JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
March 29, 2024, 04:02:15 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: VISIT OUR WEBSITE: http://jfk50thcasesolved.jimdo.com/
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

READ OUR FINISHED PROFESSIONAL EBOOK - TEXT HERE

Recent Items
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: READ OUR FINISHED PROFESSIONAL EBOOK - TEXT HERE  (Read 1417 times)
JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Forum Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 212



WWW
Badges: (View All)
Spammer 50 Posts in one day Level 5 Spammer 25 Posts in one day
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2015, 10:47:59 pm »

5.5 Prologue
Prologue

With the 50 year review - up to 2 years for me - making a diligent, sober, mature, effort of truth seeking of all things available and personal inputs added, I would like to add these notes. Being truthful and honest assuages much and virtually all the finger pointing at the U.S. Government, even at Vice President / President L.B. Johnson ! The audacity ! Being fair in any way, there was the initial complete suspicions of most and growing numbers after the release of the Warren Report. There were intelligent responses that raised questions to say the least. Going on into this vigilante lynch mob mentality ongoing of that snowballing effect of "the whole government is in on it" was more dissatisfaction with the absence of some open Public Trial in some way - where all could be publicly addressed as opposed to that seemingly private inquest by the Government not including the Public - with total outrage stemming from the "locked up for 75 years" crapola they did hand the Public. This they brought on themselves, and was the greatest part of all Public suspicion and greatest cause of all disbelief and loss of trust. The President and Congress and the Warren Commission are the ones guilty as cause of these and no one else. How was it legal ? Especially in the JFK assassination ? Why was there anything to hide by locking it up for 75 years that all living would be presumed dead then that were alive now and "involved", not "hurting" the living" as the 75 year time choice for seal !

However, years and years and more and more Researchers and more and more questions raised, and more and more public involving in study, there seems a real deficit of genuine pursuit of truth by researchers to conclusions with facts in summation. They seem more to have a tattle tale type result when simply raising more and more "new evidences" and new questions and "new facts" and so on as seemingly just piling up more and more "unanswered questions" making their mostly valid points that would have more weight in a legal trial then simply researcher comments and questions and finger pointing - as to raise Public awareness and involvement. Involvement into what, is the point. That was and is the point with researchers et al. They were appreciated originally, very early on in those days after the JFK assassination in the 1960s going into the 1970s - and even more so and a second look after the assassinations of Rev. Dr. Martin L. King and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. Along about the time of the Garrison investigation things were starting to head the other way as starting point perhaps in a large scale. Public suspicions were now agreeing with the Warren Commission members and others in Government that "official" Researchers may be simply profiteers as self serving and greedy wealth seeking individuals taking advantage of the Public by simply doing a little homework and find seeming holes and then exploit them into the whole lynch mob attitude again of "cover up" to end as forlorning the Public from action by throwing up the hands and give into it "will never be solved" attitudes - with all their continual pointing at termed "questionable" Warren Report findings or lack of therein. This is the negative effect advanced as aiding what they claimed they were against.

At some point in American History in the future it may all look like a piece of cake solved as a 90 to 99 percent probability of actual truth of what really happened taught from History books in school. I am in the new approach now after two years into this to ask if Researchers are there to help or hinder. This must be looked at and examined I feel, and necessary for the Public to come to true conclusion beyond the shadow of a doubt. Now remember, the Warren Report never claimed their findings were absolute. The clearly said they were not ruling out the possibility of conspiracy and even international involvement or others. They clearly said they could not find evidence other than the Oswald evidence in the shootings to support that outside of conjecture and suspicions and rumors et cetera, which is worthless in even simply getting Probable Cause for any Warrant for persons or evidence. Clearly it was said and known that the murder case could be opened anytime in Dallas TX (jurisdiction by law at time) with Sufficient Cause to do so. Evidence and/or witnesses must be produced we all know rationally for the murder case to be reopened - not conjecture, suspicions, theories etc.

I do not know of any Researcher killed while trying to reopen the case simply because they never did that, with the possible exception of the James Files episode. So again my point and even, I am sorry to say with Mark Lane even, the Researchers and all need a second look as the only fruit of their labors seem to have been profit and fame or profit and infamy. This unfortunately has been the responses many times and many places about them by the Government and others and those involved in the Warren Commission. Now in reality, Mark Lane has had the unique position of hired as Assistance of Counsel for Lee Harvey Oswald and has done so very well - or has he we must ask. Sure originally it was some "ACLU creep in cahoots with that dirty little commie rat as a communist sympathizer" type mentality and first impression from the American Public - like "who the hell would back Lee Oswald", believing initially he was the killer caught. But Mark Lane has had the that unique position with which would have been Public Trial and may have no doubt had in public, or behind closed doors for some aspects, most or all that was "sealed for 75 years from the Public" in Trial. This may have actually opened a real investigation rather than what did occurs - but he was denied too, or was he we must ask. Why is being answered here. But the direct question then to even Mark Lane is what in the world was he doing at the Warren Commission hearings trying to be Attorney for Lee Harvey Oswald instead of in Dallas? Being an Attorney he must have known the President's Commission was nothing more than a Congressional fact finding tour. It was not a Federal crime we were told in 1963 to kill a President. What jurisdiction would the President's Commission have to do anything about discovering conspirators? Was this the black and white actual Military Tribunal according to law invoked (a Presidential Commission of Officers) ? Then why wasn't Mark Lane serving a writ of habeas corpus as meaning "having the body of evidence" against his client Oswald? Can a civilian lawyer serve in a Military Tribunal? Wouldn't Mark Lane know that? Then what was he doing at one? Does Dallas really have jurisdiction over the murder? The questions unanswered surrounding Mark Lane's activities with the Commission. Apparently I am the only JFK Researcher confronting this, and furthermore did Atty. Mark Lane recommend to, and pursue for, the Oswald Family a "wrongful death" lawsuit against the City of Dallas and County - Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated while in their custody? Why not! ?

What's the real truth about Lee Harvey Oswald. Wasn't he squired by Naval Intelligence traitors in Louisiana to sell out the U-2 secrets? Do we really still believe Oswald was "our boy" (US) after defecting and fulfilled standard required tell-all you know about American Military but ends up married to the niece of one of the top KGB heads of the USSR just behind was Stalin who had executed over 10 million citizens? Do we really believe "our boy" would marry her, "daughter of evil" and "our boy" apple and pie Mom loving God-fearing Marine, knowing he was going to double-defect successfully and then have children with her? That's like Jesus Christ marrying Jezebel the false prophetess that orchestrated many Christians killed. Oh please! Oswald is and was a cold blooded killer and traitor to America and was just the p*i*s*s*ed off individual they set for the patsy to again play counter intelligence games against the law and interested Americans by planting him in that accord. Why p*i*s*s*ed off? I would wager President Kennedy was even aware of him inherited from the Eisenhower Administration, and played that part against himself defecting when as Colonel Prouty explained to us there were two different ability U-2 Spyplane cameras. The higher ability camera was in the one photographing in the Cuban Missile Crisis and think - why would they (Communists) have the nuclear weaponry and launches in the open in plain sight if they knew about the higher ability camera that Oswald did not know about? Wasn't this the plan of the Gary Powers "crash" with the limited ability camera found? Eisenhower foresaw the Communist troubles and arranged the Bay of Pigs Invasion to overthrow and all was inherited by President Kennedy. They got the shock of their lives that day in the U.N. Hearings along with the rest of the world. Why wasn't that introduced as motive for Oswald? That p*i*s*s*ed off at Eisenhower/Kennedy? The alternative of this was the thinking Oswald was undercover for America and for that was set up as patsy - killed your snitch! And again, a good man in America and especially in the military in those days that today would be called contrite and religious conscience and so on, a good man as some double agent would never have sexual relations with some devil worshipper or their family members, let alone have children with them. They would expect to burn in hell for fornication. He was guilty of treason. I rethink this and perhaps he was that Frame 313 head shot from the rear but with the special rifle that had the electronic firing pin set up with the other two - but his had the electronic master trigger for all three. There was the witness that reported seeing a man running out of the back door of the Book Depository Building with a rifle at the time of the shooting. Perhaps explains the "umbrella man" up and down, up and down, so Oswald could see it. But in the explanation of tangential wounds, his shot then appears as from the DalTex Building because it is more the straight on neat puncture wound entry if anything as opposed from to the right behind from an angle. He had a mission that day and it was to play decoy. I believe his mental disposition explained here accounts for that - his hatred for Eisenhower/Kennedy and even agreed perhaps to the kamikaze act with Jack Ruby - part of his mission agreed to just to stick it to America, and served "case closed".

The Public and all Researchers will have to look again at all but with a prospective from our own Government as in a National Security mode - not criminal cover up. The Youth of the 1960s are now of age as older being of the age of President Johnson and older members in Congress at the time, being in their 50s and 60s and even 70s now rather then their ripeness of young 20s and younger and even a little older in their 30s. They can now see things as perhaps they would through the eyes of their Grand Parents in 1963 as meaning the ages of the mature President and others involved in Congress and Commission and Armed Services and other. Their is more wisdom with age, if not just by the simple repetitions in the experience of life. Persons older, more mature and experienced, are going to know more and have that much more experience and benefit of trial and error and education et cetera and have greater wisdom. This applies to so much in life and it applies to those of age and position there in charge in 1963 in Government. Alternatively, those more experienced can also more easily apply sleight of hand for devious purposes. I believe what they saw is what is locked away. Obviously now, we are seeing what happened. They saw international involvement. They saw internal treason. They actually saw some "doctored evidence". It does not make sense that internally they (traitors/conspirators) would hire out to international agency but rather the other way around. It does not make sense because the conclusions given were fears of international involvement as opposed to statements of internal as what was made - "beware the military industrial complex". This was Jack Kennedy. This was America who just backed down the Soviet Union short of War and/or Nuclear war. Jack ran a tight ship and those under him. No doubt they were well aware of virtually all that Researchers and the Public have pointed to. I don't believe much was added that was presumed missed. I believe they saw everything we believe they did not or assumed was "covered up" criminally. The mode of National Security was obviously in play. Reports of everything were being made as it was for moments as a "chicken with its head cut off". All involved - the good guys - were frantically ascertaining what just happened and reporting all and you better believe it. I know they left no stone unturned and did find, in the least, suspects pointing to the conspiracy involved and resultant evidence tampering. Think of all the agents sent out clandestinely to gather information from many "pools and ponds" and even wire taps and other surveillance employed. The imminent Jack Ruby surprise of shooting Oswald in plain sight only added to more intensity upon Dallas authority.

So understandably, we hold them even criminally responsible as, technically, accessory-after-the-fact in the least by the sealing of evidence under the excuses made in today's standard, but as through it all, but particularly at the Autopsy and other critical points as such - we must in these occasions review our own Government involvement from the perspective they were not engaging criminal cover up but in the interest of, let's just say that ugly word, National Security as a cover all blanket - was their intents even innocently if you will - meaning in their minds they were acting responsibly for the Protection of the Public. That was their wisdom for the moment, for the tragedy, for all history. I say we must respect that even disagreeing. It was a Judgment Call and they made it for us. It is history. To this day they refuse adamantly to back off it - or to say to their dying days. Though much has been done ending the Cold War including President Reagan's famous revisit to the Berlin Wall, apparently our Government still feels it can not reveal secrets as would obviously threaten the American Public. Paranoid ? Probably. But remember their Generation. These were World War Two Veterans and even WWOne. They were sick of war and wanted no more! If it could be avoided, that they did. They were our fathers and grandfathers - being their first children during and after World War Two. We understood them and their feelings and their War Stories experiences. The World War II was horrible and how many millions died before (Stalin), during, and how many after (Korean War) ! Considering almost immediately after, their Viet Nam engagement, they could only have feared War with the USSR on that grand of a scale. We know who then is guilty internationally as locked up for 75 years by them. All that and yet 25 percent of conventional forces were wounded in Viet Nam - over 500,000 ! "Good money after bad" by LBJ in vein to save face in some type of positive note to end on early and pull out. Vanity, vanity, vanity.

 
« Last Edit: February 18, 2015, 12:45:59 am by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee » Report Spam   Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy