JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
October 23, 2018, 04:08:00 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: VISIT OUR WEBSITE: http://jfk50thcasesolved.jimdo.com/
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

Sample Ruling: Terminology "Assassin" or "Individual"

Recent Items
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Sample Ruling: Terminology "Assassin" or "Individual"  (Read 133 times)
Forum Owner
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 212

Badges: (View All)
« on: February 14, 2011, 08:09:51 pm »

This is meant as possible grounds for/by the Defense Attorney (Mark Lane) of and for Lee Harvey Oswald for libelous suits against the Free Press in Dallas and against the Warren Commission including a cease and desist for the Free Press...... If there was a "Dream Team" (OJ Simpson) of the day for Oswald - this no doubt would be a piece of the flurry of activities initiated by them in Defense of their client for the "crime of the century".

In that Lee Harvey Oswald was suspect and in custody and then murdered in custody and without any other suspects, in turn this coupled with evidence was then deemed "case closed" as the evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald suggested a sole murderer. The terminology of "assassin" is itself prejudiced as rush to judgement of intent and seems the classic "freudian slip of the tongue" whereby the rest of the description offered was "lone assassin" and "lone nut" and then concluded as "senseless murder". On one hand the term "senseless murder by a lone disturbed individual" was suggested. However, on the other hand the term "assassin" denies that as indicating political intent. This terminology, "lone assassin", indicates he was deemed representing the U.S.S.R. in any fashion according to the introduction of his individual history of connection with the U.S.S.R. and self professed publicly "Marxist".

For Due Process in a court of law this would be leading to a conclusion inappropriately and would be struck down. "Just the Facts M'aam". The motive has nothing to do with Warrant For Arrest and does not legally serve as Probable Cause for Warrant for Arrest and Search and Seizure. The facts of the deceased, the murder weapon, the person in pocession of same, physically placed at the scene of murder, witnesses testimony of all, and so on are the ONLY legal basis for arrest - or unless actually observed by Law Officials (Police, FBI etc) committing the crime.

The introduction of "lone assassin" of the Commander in Chief (US President) implicates punishable Treason or Insurrection above a  Sedition charge under US constitutional law and can only be arrested and convicted with at least two witnesses of the act under the law. There was not even one witness identifying Lee Harvey Oswald as the gunman.

Understandably there was the sense of panic and mass hysteria to any degree by America itself.

Assassin / Defintion http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assassin
2: a person who commits murder; especially : one who murders a politically important person either for hire or from fanatical motives

Semantics ? Don't play them in a court of law successfully. If Oswald is accused as "assassin" then "personal attack" on the President does not count as motive as "assassin" indicating murder via "for hire" or for "political views and convictions" as part of that political citizenship or entity under its government as supporting its cause - which introduces Insurrection or Treason (invasion).

The Warren Commission in one conclusion defined Lee Harvey Oswald as narcisist, and by definition would be a personal attack as opposed to an actual assassin attack. In other words, as a narcisist - the murder was for the "high" of committing the act and NOTHING to do with an assassination - either for hire or political and other, such as religious persecution as a cruxifiction of any degree. To make such the charge of narcism needs be by a qualified licensed medical doctor - Phsychiatrist - based on medical and legal science as fact of law and inclusion of such as Sado-Masochist and on and on, which evidence would have to be produced as the mental state of Lee Harvey Oswald taken into custody for the crime and charged. In other words, to the contrary is not supported by Law as OBVIOUSLY an unqualified statement by other than a licensed professsional medical doctor acceptable as evidence in a court of law as witness against the defendent.

« Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 08:44:05 pm by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee » Report Spam   Logged

Social Buttons

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy