JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
January 23, 2018, 12:09:00 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: VISIT OUR WEBSITE: http://jfk50thcasesolved.jimdo.com/
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion)

Recent Items
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion)  (Read 5186 times)
JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Forum Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 212



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #45 on: August 30, 2014, 07:31:55 pm »

11*22*63 A Space Absurdity, Corrected   Tongue

Thanks to composer Linda Z at Facebook Group JFK ASSASSINATION RESEARCH BUREAU

SBT supporters posit one of the reasons JFK's head and body goes "back and to the left" from the head shot is "neuromuscular reaction". Since I have a medical background Steve Rxx asked me if I could support him on it. Frankly, I've never heard of it before except I connection to the assassination (turns out Belin and Ford on the WC came up with it as an explanation - apparently finding an expert or experts who were willing to testify it exists). I need proof, so I googled around and found this wonderful explanation from a Canadian neurologist, Dr Robert Zacharko, on alt.assassination.jfk in response to a inquiry to him about this theory. Brace yourself, Steve. "Neuromuscular reaction" is complete pseudoscience hogwash.

The Backward Head Snap in the Zapruder Film

MTGriffith

9/3/99

I asked Dr. Robert Zacharko, a neuroscientist at Carleton University in Canada,
about the theory that JFK's backward head snap was caused by a neuromuscular
reaction. This is really the only theory that Warren Commission supporters
have to offer as an explanation for the violent backward movement of President
Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film. I wrote to Dr. Zacharko as follows:
In frames 312-313 of the Zapruder film, we see Kennedy's head knocked
forward, but then, suddenly, beginning in frame 314, we see his head and
upper body jolted violently backward and to the left as the rightfrontal
area of his skull explodes. One theory says that this violent backward
motion was the result of a neuromuscular reaction. This reaction would
have had to occur in no more than 56 milliseconds. I have two questions
about this theory:

1. Some object to this theory on the basis that the reaction could not
have occurred so quickly. They point out that the fastest involuntary
reaction known to man is the eye blink, which takes about 40
milliseconds. They argue that this indicates that the backward head snap
would have taken longer to occur, since it involved much more mass. One
author phrases this objection as follows:

. . . it [the head] is suddenly driven forward between frames 312
and 313. Amazingly, in the very next frame, 314, it is already
moving backward, a movement it continues in succeeding frames until
the President's shoulders strike the seat cushion at Z321. . . .
The extremely small time factor combined with the relatively
large mass of the President's head would tend to rule out
such an explanation [i.e., the neuromuscular-reaction theory].
The fastest reflex reaction known to science--the startle
response--takes place over an interval of 40 to 200
milliseconds. Beginning with an eyeblink in 40 milliseconds,
the response wave moves the head forward in 83 milliseconds,
and then continues downward reaching the knees in 200 milliseconds.
The change in direction we observe [in the head snap] occurs in 56
milliseconds (1/18th/second), and involves not the negligible mass
of an eyelid but the considerable mass of a human head
moving forward with an acceleration of several g's.

What is your opinion on the speed of the alleged neuromuscular reaction?

2. One author has objected to the neuromuscular-reaction theory on the
following basis:

A "massive neuromuscular reaction," according to Messrs. Ford
and Belin, occurs when there is "massive damage inflicted to nerve
centers of the brain." The nerve centers of the brain are the
pons, the medulla, the cerebellum--all located in the rear of the
brain. According to the Warren Commission and the HSCA, the head
shot damaged the right cerebral hemisphere of Kennedy's
brain--not a nerve coordination center, not capable of causing
a "massive neuromuscular reaction."

The neuromuscular reaction that supposedly accounts for
the backward snap of Kennedy's head when struck by a
bullet from behind could happen only if a major coordinating
center of the brain is damaged. According to the x-rays and
autopsy photos that lone-gunman theorists champion as
evidence of a shot from behind, those areas of the brain
are intact.

What is your opinion of this objection to the neuromuscular-reaction
theory?

Dr. Zacharko responded as follows in an e-mail dated 8 February 1999:

If you ask any neuroscientist what a neuromuscular effect is they will
tell you that it refers to some interface of nerve and muscle for
example. In some cases a simple reflex response (e.g., knee jerk for
example). Can certain reflexes be influenced? Certainly. Do head
movements fall into such a category? No. The head movements that you are

referring to are following the laws of physics. With all due respect to
Belin and Ford I would ask what medical references or more precisely what
research references are being using to document arguments of
neuromuscular reactivity. Simply stated there are none. The pons and
medulla contain centres for respiration, cardiovascular regulation,
visceral reactivity and the like. The cerebellum is also present at this level.
Damage to these areas will interrupt respiration and heart rhythm
and affect motor coordination. Neural damage per se associated with
bullet entry will not cause exaggerated head movement of the type you see
in the Zapruder film. In fact there are no brain sites that will. This
neuromuscular reactivity argument is simply nonsense.[Note: One could
make the argument, ludicrous as it may sound, that Kennedy actually saw
the bullet approaching and jerked his head back reflexively to avoid
being hit.]

The second author does not appear to be any more informed than either
Belin or Ford. There is no such thing as a major coordinating centre.
Those arguments were largely discounted in the 1960's. The brain simply
does not act in such a fashion. It is a coordinated system. Actually
there is a system which is referred to as the extrapyramidal motor
system, which runs from the mesencephalon to the forebrain. It controls
voluntary movement. If this system was to discharge, you would effect
gross motor output. Such discharge would typically represent the invasion
of seizure like activity to motor areas. It would not be coordinated and
certainly not of the type evident in the Zapruder film.

The bottom line is that the head movements are reactions to the direction
of bullet entry. They are not the product of central nervous system
damage. It would almost seem that certain myths are maintained in the
absence of documented data. Information from half-sources of
documentation appear to blend with legitimate sources of information to
provide muddled scenarios.

Sincerely,

Dr Robert M. Zacharko
Life Sciences Research Building
Institute of Neuroscience
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

The neuromuscular-reaction theory is the principal hypothesis advanced by
lone-gunman theorists. It is untenable. Their other theory, the jet-effect
theory, is ludicrous. Even Larry Sturdivan told the HSCA that the force that
would have resulted from the right-frontal explosion would have been minimal
(and would have pushed the head leftward, not backward and to the left). In
short, lone-gunman theorists have no explanation for the marked backward head
snap.

Mike Griffith

********

Michael Griffith does a nice job on his webpage explaining how nothing could explain such a rapid motion - except the removal of frames in the Zapruder film
http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/6shots.htm
Reactions to Six Shots in the Zapruder Film
www.mtgriffith.com

The Warren Commission said only three shots were fired at President Kennedy. But there is compelling evidence in the Zapruder film alone that six shots were fired. We see reactions to shots in the following frames:
Unlike Unfollow Post Share about an hour ago

    You like this.
    Gerald Fxxx A *most* excellent contribution! Thank you. I used to say that reaction could not happen if the area nerve the pro-commission theorists said caused head movement could not have happened if it was blown to a billion pieces upon contact. I mean like if you hit with a stick, but this was an instantaneous explosion obviously seen on the Z-Film. Your contribution here has replaced my dumb-dumb words with intelligent speech! As far as a massive trial if America ever gets this case into a court room - as a Consitutional Lawyer would argue best - I believe using the argument "imperical data is then conversion as direct evidence" certainly applies here. The imperical data is the medical evidence well elaborated on here and in simple enough terms that is medical fact period, and *not* opinion. Science is fact. If argued, it is the fact argued and not a theory, but fact. So the fact established here in the parley is then imperical data for the case and means in a trial it is submitted as Direct Testimony as to the facts of the case and being - there was no nerve struck in the President's head by a weapon causing the head movement. It is compared to like a direct evidence as an authentic autopsy picture or X-Ray, or authentic bullet fragments etc as evidence presented as Direct Testimony and is the facts of the case. Opinions and theories by experts and so on are outside of the facts. From what I read, this is direct medical facts that are not argued but taught in all medical schools and practiced by their graduates. Great piece, than you!
Report Spam   Logged

JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Forum Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 212



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #46 on: October 02, 2014, 10:08:42 am »

A Final Lee Harvey Oswald Note

I must apologize I forgot about this point.

Once more and more came out to the Public about Lee Harvey Oswald, it lead to an obvious point of the trying to decide about him. There split the two views - one that he was "one of ours" (American good guy) who defected to USSR per his assignment as double agent, and two - was he actually a double agent bad guy working for the USSR. More simply, who's side was he on and working for - as it became apparent he was much more involved then being a simple "lone nut" that ran out on America and then vice versa from the USSR.

And so we go to Dallas on November 22, 1963 to the actual events immediately after the assassination up until Oswald himself was shot down in cold blood.

My thoughts are about if he was some American good guy spy working for the government as, one area, of spying on things going on between the United States and Cuba. I also turn to the many "testimonies" by Colonel F. Prouty about the U-2 Spy Plane events and how Oswald had a background in that in the military, and tying into his defection - that he did give up any information about that as part of defection, that it is required to "tell all" you know about the American Military as enemies of the USSR. With the information that came out, it was obvious in other words that Oswald was not a simple Private in the Army. The USSR was or became well aware of his Military service because he had a "loud" profile. He had a Top Secret position in the U-2 Spy Plane scenario. In those days of the Cold War - this was very loud and very spied upon and very sought out for defection from both sides - America and the USSR - trying to recruit traitors to learn military strengths secrets. It was simply routine and par for the course in those days. And so there is no doubt that the USSR was well aware of Oswald's military service background and that if he held back about the U-2 they would obviously have taken some action against him in a rejection in some manner instantly. And then was that the Soviet tactic played in sending him back to America - to make it appear to American Government that the Soviets were treating him well with employment and allowed the KGB niece's hand in marriage as to be "buttering him up" to finally tell all, and that he didn't and so he was returned to America?

But back to Dallas and as thoughts we go to he was an American good guy side again. This would make him an American "asset" as an FBI Informant or CIA or Military and so on. The key thought to focus on here is - was Oswald an American asset? And here we are just after 12:30 P.M. Dallas time Nov 22 1963. Within an hour and so and of all things an American Asset has just been arrested for killing a Police Officer and is going to be charged with assassinating the President of the United States who has just died. Now being an Asset, his whereabouts where known to them.

So picture it. Whether the FBI, CIA, etc they are hearing the news of the assassination and death and 2 plus 2 immediately goes to their Asset Oswald is employed right there at the assassination scene at Dealy Plaza, Dallas. Possibly they are thinking of others in other fashions. Obviously they would be now looking for any reports from their Assets about the assassination - anything they would know no matter how small or great.

So now get this - within those first hours their Asset is about to be charged with assassinating the President of the United States after already being charged with the murder of a Police Officer. Perhaps granting lightening reaction moves upon hearing the name Oswald, it would seem prudent then under all that is required by Law and responsibility and professionalism and expected common compliance that they would have rushed into Dallas Police Station and identify themselves and declare that they have arrested an Asset of the CIA or FBI or Military etc. The Dallas Police would have been assured it was proposterous that this Asset was involved in any manner whatsoever with the assassination of the President. At the worst, the Dallas Police and District Attorney may have argued there was far too much evidence Oswald shot an Officer and argued they were holding him on that, which again would have probably brought in their (FBI CIA etc) superiors who would have assured them the Asset Oswald in no way whatsoever was involved in shooting anyone and perhaps swear them to National Security and show them his record of service as an Asset to convince them and then order his release. The Local News would get stuck with word from the Dallas Police that in some manner the original suspect was indeed the wrong person and was released as having an airtight aliby etc.

BOTTOM LINE...... here is the point made, that if Oswald was a good-guy Asset of the American Government it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that he would have spent anymore than an hour in custody, as the Dallas Police would have been ordered by Federal Authority to release him immediately, identifying who he was and what he was doing working at the School Book Depository. Any further in time than the hour at most would have ended how it did into a complete on-scence Media Circus by the Free Press - and now that would have to be explained, and Asset compromised, that Asset Oswald was in some manner an undercover agent or informant working for the Government / Agency and was dismissed from charges and released. It is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the American Government / Agency would leave their Asset to the dogs (malicious prosecution) so that covert activities were not compromised by the Public exposure - even facing trial for the assassination of the President - at the expense of the Asset.

And what was further, it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the Oswald Rifle and any evidence found was not immediately being investigated as planted evidence and as Oswald said - making him a "patsy". The full investigation would have been just that - a now, full blown investigation into planted evidence as the murder weapon et al and by who and when and where of it all as being planted to frame their Asset. At that point, it would have been digestible by the Press and Public that an American Asset was set up for the crime and reveal that Oswald was indeed a double agent working for the American Government - a complete known and trusted Asset working under orders and admirably, and that now his undercover identity compromised and the attempted framing for the crimes left no other choice but to take Oswald into Protective Federal Custody and from public eyes and access.

If you indeed have been following my thesis here (and is in polished order in my ebook launched for publication available any minute now for download) and we go to the manner in which the true conspiracy was conducting themselves - we go to two more of their obvious plants then that fits into the entire scenario and as centerpiece as Oswald himself planted as false evidence as an apparent patsy to baffle investigation and was a kamikaze willing to die for it (foreknowledge of being shot in custody transfer). Not far fetched as Gary Powers himself (captured U-2 Pilot in USSR) had a suicide pill to take if caught. So they (real conspirators) persuade Oswald if he shot and killed the President, he would most likely get caught and have taken a suicide pill any way so why not make that work for us - plant you and evidence and then shoot you being transferred from the local Jail. Two more pieces of "plants" ......


Two more pieces of "plants" ......

As the "pristine bullet" was planted on the stretcher as well as the Oswald rifle etc., the Conpirators were as handing American Investigation their "cover story" for a full blown clandestine investigation ongoing. Here they plant Oswald and the rifle and the bullet and fragments and the pristine bullet ends up the "single bullet theory" that was handed to them - not Arlon Spector inventing that, it was that already by the planted evidence - one bullet did it. So as mocking American Investigation - they plant Oswald with giving them the ability to publicly state that Oswald was an American Asset and apparently being framed and has been taken into Federal Protection. Then they have Oswald where they want him - for full interrogation secretly and out of the sight and minds of the Public.

So get this - they also had Billy Nolan Lovelady planted (Oswald look alike outside on Depository steps at time of shooting) so that they are giving the Dallas Police their cover story as the Government / Agency comes in within the hour explaining Oswald and having him released - the Dallas Police then go public and say Oswald was a mistaken person apprehended and actually they were looking for Billy Nolan Lovelady (feasible, they are lookalikes) - and then they go public with that Lovelady had an airtight aliby as he was seen on the steps outfront during the shooting itself (Altgens photo, others).

Now get this.... then after clearing Oswald and Lovelady, the American Investigation is handed the next "plant of evidence" of the clown behind the Grassy Knoll fence that showed a Secret Service Badge at the time of the shooting to a Dallas Police Officer rushing to the scene who let him go. It is to dawn on the Dallas Police to now announce to Free Press that a full blown All Points Bulletin Manhunt is under way to find whoever identified themselves as Secret Service when there was none in service that day at that position, that the Secret Service themselves declare it was an imposter and is now wanted in the case. So these all are the plants handed American Investigation with the premise that if they had anything on the ball they would have ran the story that Oswald was indeed an Asset (as his background showed) and was taken into secret Protective Federal Custody being framed for the assassination (gun planted etc) and feasibly to the Public and Free Press if indeed they wanted to really interrogate Oswald in full privacy with chance to come clean with testifying Soviet involvement (conspirators) and clemency.

And so the real conspirators are there with their pre-judged opinion confirmed that in the crime of the century the Americans suck suck suck. They were handed Oswald on a silver platter for a real and secret National Security interrogation into his knowledge and participation in the conspiracy and completely missed "connecting the dots" because they live in complete naive delusions of grandeur of self worth and relevance and power in the world. 

Again - it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the American Government would have allowed a good-guy Asset Oswald to be charged with the assassination of the American President and stay in Dallas Police Station jail cell going on 1, 2, 3 days and be gunned down in cold blood while in custody - abandoning him against duty and honor with his would-be noted Service to the United States of America as the Asset he performed - to leave him to stand trial and completely abandoning him altogether. It is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the Government / Agency would have come in at some later date and explain to some Judge those circumstances and have the trial aborted. They would have had Oswald released into their custody IMMEDIATELY OBVIOUSLY.

THIS HAS BEEN WRITTEN THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS AN INNOCENT PATSY UNINVOLVED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY - AS IS SHOWN HERE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE HE WAS AN AMERICAN GOOD-GUY UNDERCOVER SET UP AS A PATSY BY CONSPIRATORS AND THAT INDEED HE WAS AN AMERICAN TRAITOR WHO DEFECTED TO THE USSR AND GAVE INTELLIGENCE TO THE ENEMIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION. OSWALD WAS NOT INNOCENT AND UNINVOLVED. IN THAT VIEW RECEIVE RESEARCH RESULTS AS THERE ARE THOSE THAT KEEP SPREADING THE MISINFORMATION THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT AND UNINVOLVED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT J. F. KENNEDY.

LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS A TRAITOR - PERIOD !

HE WAS NONE OF OURS (AMERICA) OR THEY WOULD HAVE CLAIMED HIM AS ASSET AND HE NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATED.

--------------------

You might say here, back up, how could employee Lovelady be a plant if he was working there since 1961. Wouldn't he be a recent employee as Oswald if he was a part of that scenario? And you come to my gut feeling from a bird's eye view as taking an over all view of all the evidence and witnesses and general history of the assassination over and over again. Even with how many times each item is pinned as pin the tail to the donkey and makes sense over all, there is still that feeling something is missing - it is not a real truth looking at it, with all the best truth telling the event as even an 90 percent accuracy or better.... there is just that feeling that there was something much more sinister involved. There was no like claim to it like the modern day terrorists will give claim that they did such and such an atrocity and why. It is too obvious Oswald was not a lone nut assassin and that was that, no matter how hard the ostriches pray to that idol. Indeed it is that much of a conspiracy but then what came of that is the question. It doesn't seem visible in that immediate and ongoing future. What this leads to is my original feeling, perhaps an alternative theory, but actual impression altogether is that the USSR duped President Kennedy and America. The USSR appears to me as having planned the whole Cuban Missile Crisis as a farce a few years before it happened, as to be the whole "we surrender" scenario that played out after taking things to the brink of nuclear engagement probable....

So the duping, the set up, goes that the USSR at plot conception mushrooms to the fake set up of the Cuban Missile Crisis well orchestrated to seem real and surrender, and to then return on November 22 1963 in Dallas and literally blow Kennedy's brains out in broad daylight putting America and the World on notice as to who was in command of them with the message this is what any next American President will get if he tries to ever come against the USSR again with surrender or else ultimatums. And it plays out. Viet Nam and illegal surrounding nation's involvements including China go unpunished with no war Declaration. For macho bravado the Warren Commission gets called a cover up instead of a put it all away and let's run away and play ostrich in Viet Nam rather than prosecute the USSR and retaliate. It moves to assassinating MLK with the screw you Eisenhower and Kennedy and your Christian Civil Rights and right to assassinating Robert Kennedy with the don't even think about it - run for President and open the JFK Assassination Case for prosecution. From there to the invasion by the USSR into Czechoslovakia with the I dare you to do something about it. On and on up to sanctioning terrorism against the U.S. and Israel and promoting oil wars with O.P.E.C. - economic wars against the United States and a thousand events in between.

This is a good look at when the Cuban Missile Crisis was born - how deployed and escalating to the point of the crisis. Good history brief:
Cuban Missile Crisis
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1736.html

There is no way either, to simply believe the Cuban anti-communist crowd killed Kennedy when everyone knows it was the high ranking officer in command of the air support that disobeyed orders causing the fiasco they site over and over again. Neither does anybody really believe that rich businessmen assassinated Kennedy to get even richer over a drummed up lasting Viet Nam A Go-Go War. Nobody believes all the bullshidt handed out from bullshidt researchers about all the bullshidt scenarios of rich men of power did it. Bullshidt. Nobody believes the American mob did it either. None of those had the far reaching hands into what is always called the national cover up. None of any of those could orchestrate that much power and control. The whole LBJ was the power behind it all is as a child's tale made up, fantasy. None of all the tales of who did it - who financed it - hold water or make sense. Presidents in the world have not been killed for these flimsy reasons. No American President has ever been assassinated, or attempt, simply for financial gain. It was much bigger and much more sinister than a fistful of dollars. Recently watching the Oswald trial movie of 1977 I believe it was, there was one line that makes the sense. It went something like Oswald is the whole centerpiece and key to the assassination. You define Oswald and you define the conspiracy.

In defining Oswald to define the conspiracy - the one major part of all this is that Oswald predates the Kennedy Administration, and so does the Gary Powers U-2 Spyplane shoot down and capture. Oswald predates all this back to the Eisenhower Administation.

Lee Harvey Oswald as a Marine radar specialist in Japan and California, Oswald had access to extensive classified information regarding radars, flight patterns, and in particular the new US height-finding radar that would have been of exceptional interest to the KGB in regard to the U-2 spy flights. Oswald told US Embassy officials in Moscow that he intended to reveal sensitive information to the Soviets. In October 1959, after a two-year stint as a radar operator, Oswald became the first Marine to defect to the Soviet Union. Gary Powers, pilot of the U-2 flight downed in May, 1960, suggested that Oswald might have betrayed to the Soviets information that they used to shoot down the U-2. This seems very believable, and it would mean that Oswald had proved himself a loyal communist and one who had provided precious information to the USSR - so the KGB would have trusted him. Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in June 1962.

My pin the tail on the donkey was that, as reported and discussed by Colonel Fletcher Prouty that there was the stronger more powerful camera in the U-2 Spyplane that photographed the missile complex in Cuba confirming to the President their existence and status and used to expose them at the U. N. was the hah- hah America wins..... we caught you with your hand in the cookie jar and you thought all we had was the Gary Powers model camera (else why else would they have them out in the open like that if they knew they would be seen plainly). But the Kennedy assassination scenario here - its reasons - show a World conquest implication. American politics have been the posture as defending the peace and not any world conquest, even with the promoting of democracy worldwide. However the much more sinister act of this duping of America and then blow them away as the opposing super power seems to have accomplished that for some time as a world conquest act, and is actually what the Communist Manifesto International promotes - world conquest.


Mind boggling Oswald Doubles......
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/TwoLHOs.html

So Lovelady plant as early as 1961 in School Book Depository in Dallas ? The USSR new Oswald very well already, not far fetched at all considering the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred in the next year and assassination in the next.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2014, 09:22:37 am by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee » Report Spam   Logged

JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Forum Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 212



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #47 on: January 14, 2015, 08:29:54 pm »

This is finally what the eBook Table Of Contents looks like....

President John F. Kennedy 50th, Case Solved

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Chapter One
Sections:
1.1 Target Audience
1.2 Medical Evidence Basics
1.3 Triangulation Head Shots
1.4 Detractors Resolve

Chapter Two
Sections:
2.1 Autopsy Controlled
2.2 JFK Assassination Ordered by One Man
2.3 The Pink Elephant Gun
2.4 Satellite Jamming Defense
2.5 The Shooters
2.6 The Missing Brain
2.7 Zapruder Film Altered

Chapter Three
Sections:
3.1 Magic Bullets
3.2 Two More Magic Bullets
3.3 11-22-63 A Space Absurdity
3.4 Magic Wounds
3.5 Magic Rifles
3.6 Magic Parade Route
3.7 Magic Witness Deaths

Chapter Four
Sections:
4.1 Qualifying Governor Connally's Wounds
4.2 Dr. Pepper
4.3 Conspiracy Extends to MLK and RFK
4.4 Jean Dixon Prophecy
4.5 JFK Medical History
4.6 The Warren Remission

Chapter Five
Sections:
5.1 National Security Begins at Autopsy
5.2 National Security At Commission Hearings
5.3 National Security Partial Declassification
5.4 Judgment
5.5 Prologue
5.5.1 Prologue Continued
5.6 Epilogue

Chapter Six
Sections:
6.1 The 50 Year Law
6.2 Sample Ruling: Sequester D. A. Henry Wade
6.3 Sample Ruling: Terminology Assassin or Individual
6.4 Sample Ruling: Autopsy Dr. Earl Rose Medical Examiner
6.5 Sample Ruling: Legality of Warren Commission

Chapter Seven
Sections:
7.1 In The Final Analysis
7.2 Sources
7.3 About The Author
Report Spam   Logged

JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Forum Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 212



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #48 on: June 12, 2015, 02:44:31 pm »

JFKCalc (Google spreadsheet of JFK witnesses and deaths and the calculations etc)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=1
SEE:
Reclaiming Science: the JFK Conspiracy: A mathematical analysis of unnatural deaths, witness testimony, altered evidence and media disinformation Paperback  October 23, 2014
by Richard Charnin (Author)
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines