Discovery, Commission Members Deny Oswald Legal Representation - "Or, Another Smoking Gun that National Security Mode was/is Applied".
The Oswald Case: Mark Lane's Testimony To The Warren Commission
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbUV3iS1k8>
That you tube link above is the reading of transcript by Atty. Mark Lane to the Warren Commission. It is about one and a half hours. You should have a good understanding of American Constitutional Law to hear all and understand. You can listen along and understand.
I have listened to all. I have discovered just now towards the conclusion, a few things. I do not believe Mark knows he insulted the Commission Members - depending on who he was referring to as "Prosecution". However, this is as a petition at and to the Commission to dismiss the President of the American Bar Association appointed as Representative for Lee Harvey Oswald and appoint him (Atty. Mark Lane) as Representation, and of course was hired by Oswald's mother.
Mark has made a most fascinating petition and request alive to the Commission, most outstandingly with the existential evidences concerning Oswald. His attack vector was that Prosecution choosing Jury and Representation of Defendant as inequality. That is almost laughable in the Supreme Court. I am sure as most American Attorneys he has served as Public Defender. In cases whereby a Public Defender was appointed to a Defendant, Prosecution does indeed choose - with Defense - the Jurors. BUT Mark was saying it is not equality or due process that Prosecution choose Representation as well.
I believe he is referring to the Commission itself as Prosecution. Now the Commission got its power from Congress which was appointing the Commission as "Prosecution". As such, the Commission DID NOT HAVE the power to Appoint Representation for Oswald, but appointed the President of the American Bar Association anyway. THAT is the inequality Mark may have been referring to, must have been. And again, Defendant survivors did indeed afford representation - Atty. Mark Lane. I will add if unsaid then, the DISCOVERY here in research is that the Commission Members DENIED Lee Harvey Oswald Due Process of Law to Legal Representation by THEIR appointment - and the Commission can be brought up on this and a NEW Commission established with lawful COMPLIANCE to the US Congress. In other words Congress and the President are acting as Ruling Judge, dismissing Dallas and Texas jurisdictions in the cases, and the Commission Members acted inappropriately.
Now this brings in the whole ball of wax, and note if Mark is referring to "Prosecution" as the entire Presidential Commission by and with Congress in National Security Mode of Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended (or as Martial law), then he indeed is petitioning "Prosecution" itself and none of this applies (the contrary), and Mark Lane invited them to read between the lines. (Yeah he's got 'em). Prosecution is authority given to the Commission by Congress in all matters. Its root is the Presidential Commission by LBJ (President Johnson). So original legal authority is even challenged, and see why.....
You can follow along at a blog post of mine at a blog domain I own
http://christianeministry.com/ .....
ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman
Posted on July 22, 2013 by eminister
http://christianeministry.com/2013/07/22/addendum-who-was-innocent-t-martin-g-zimmerman/ JUMP TO:
HOW MAY THE US CONGRESS TAKE THIS CASE IN REVIEW AND RETRIAL?
Article IV, Section 1:
“Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”
…This is too many times misconstrued and even intentionally as misinformation and interpretation – Full Faith and Credit shall be given…. is what and by whom? Full Faith and Credit is given by the Federal Government to each State as being trusted in as the honor system, or blind faith, by promise, etc they are and will remain in compliance of putting forth into Law a republican form of government of the United States Constitution ONLY dismissing nothing, not denying and not disparaging any rights of American Citizens as citizens and residents of that State that are guaranteed all Rights as United States Citizens.
It includes State to State by State examination of public acts, records, and judicial proceedings and to compare as to the same equal justice being necessary. Judicial Proceedings can prove a more true judgment arrived in one State to Judicial Proceedings in another to be compared to – of course not infringing upon the profession and talent and income of Attorneys etc, to say how a judgment was reached lawfully. However ONLY Congress by laws may prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof. ONLY Congress has the right and overview and is Law of the Land as to how Judicial Proceedings are proved. ONLY Congress may render opinion and fact as to the EFFECT of any Judicial Proceeding in the States.
ALL THE ABOVE WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OPINIONS BY ME SHOW THE BOTTTOM LINE THAT THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS MAY TAKE FULL POCESSION OF THIS CASE TO EXAMINE AND PROVE THE CASE AS LAWFUL AND INCLUDING BY RENDERING THE EFFECT OF THIS CASE AS TO WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN ANY FEDERAL LAWS VIOLATED OR STATE LAWS OR DISTRICT. THE US SUPREME COURT MUST REFLECT THIS – THE POWER OF THE US CONGRESS – IN ANY PROCESSION.
This then includes the Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI)…” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law….”
…. This is to say then that “…which district shall have been previously ascertained by law…” shows the Federal Authority and to have oversight of Proof and to Prove the District (where this case was tried) is and was “previously ascertained by law” and is part of that FULL FAITH AND CREDIT GIVEN by the Federal Goverment (that blind faith, honor system, etc) that Florida is indeed in compliance with a state republican form of goverment of the US Constitution and this IS NOT the “double jeopardy” violation, to say the case can not be tried again or reviewed. The District in the State (county, town, etc) or State itself has NO power to stop the US Congress from this. The US Congress may show the effect of a flawed Judicial Proceeding in a State and prove any “mistrial” etc and declare it a void judgment and case be retried. Which is to say perhaps this is the route as opposed to “take it all the way to the US Supreme Court” – always assumed as the only way to get justice in cases via lawful appeal etc. The case retried then is NOT in violation of the Fifth Amendment (“..nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…”) .
Now above is the good explanation of how the United States Congress could indeed take over the Martin/Zimmerman Case. HOWEVER, in the JFK Case - Congress must needs be declaring the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus which, that's right kids, declaring National Security invoked to REMOVE jurisdiction from Dallas and State of Texas.
PRESIDENTIAL POWER TO CREATE A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION....
Article II
Section 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers;
he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and
shall commission all the officers of the United States.
(Get it ? Atty. Mark Lane was talking 'over their heads' - the Commission Members - addressing "Prosecution" meaning LBJ.)
So more smoke of the gun.... the Commission Members were 'Commissioned Officers' of the President and in National Security Mode as Writ of Habeas Corpus suspended. LBJ did not need Congressional approval, but made them as "by and with Congress" and apparently negated a Military Tribunal Trial - which effectively was in place from November 29th until December 13th. It must be the internal conspirators were waiting to be lined up against the wall and have their brains blown out because effectively LBJ was the full power of the Law of the Land for those 15 days all by himself. That ain't no coward! He took the weight of any existing conspiracy assassins as prime target with full power. "Bring it on !"
READ:
Introduction to the Records of the Warren Commission
<http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/intro.html>
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,21.msg38.html#msg38WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Article One Section 9
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
The Writ of Habeas Corpus can be invoked by a lawyer for the defendant which is basically "show me the money" or meaning 'having the body' of evidence - the Court must show the body of evidence and witnesses alleging charges. There is NO way out of that in American Courts unless the Writ of Habeas Corpus has lawfully been suspended meaning these do not have to be presented. This is a case of National Security (Martial Law declared) and more locally might be applied in various police and bureau investigations in such special circumstances BUT nevertheless with a Judge et al privately than the Open Court (Public Trial). A quickie example is some RICO Act 6 month investigation going on over drug trafficking etc etc etc. whereby in open court could compromise or endanger etc.
Now the Secret Service breaking the law in Dallas and Texas taking off with the President's body without legal autopsy by law done in Texas into Bethesda where it was illegally performed, and all the way to the new President declaring a Presidential Commission into the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy and everything between and after - isn't the invocation of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended on the flimsiest non-existent reasons?
Or as I always said, National Security being the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended or Martial Law in Effect as the only POSSIBLE cause of action for them doing what they did to say or believe they were being honest and lawful, sure evaporated fast - within hours and days - for ..."when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it".
They can't hide behind they were not acting as Judge and Jury - just an inquest into all facts and evidence and witnesses testimony because it was NOT their jurisdiction to do so. This would be like Canada taking full control of the investigation into the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan and saying they just wanted to see who was doing what. And everyone in America would say WTF - GET OUT OF HERE! (what the f^^k). That's what they tried to say in Parkland Hospital. So like when they were done, what Dallas and Texas can resume their investigation? Oh please. With all the evidence they compiled and made public and the later Freedom Of Information Act and the rest of the JFK acts on evidence being made public - they have so screwed this case with every nut and genuine professional commercial researcher and all their opposing views and screwball distorted versions implanted in the American psyche with all the evidences presented in thousands of opposing opinions that there IS NO POSSIBLE WAY that ANY JURY could convict ANY of the guilty parties "beyond the shadow of a doubt". CONGRATULATIONS PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And yet the case remains in the auspices of National Security Mode with evidences that are under the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus - no, no one may have these certain evidences - they are locked away. Listen to the end of the Tube - the words by famous TV Anchorman Walter Chronkite... (it will start there)
lbj
http://youtu.be/xd1wuXrVPjo?t=2m29s =================
AND ONE MORE SMOKING GUN THAT OUR GOVERNMENT INDEED WAS IN NATIONAL SECURITY MODE.....
WARNING ! THE ATTACHED PICTURE IS HORRIBLY BRUTALLY GRAPHIC AND THOSE AFFECTED SHOULD NOT VIEW.... IT IS A VERY GRAPHIC ARTIST RENDITION TYPE PHOTOGRAPH OF JFK ON THE AUTOPSY TABLE IN BETHESDA....
I believe that is an artist rendition and not actually a photograph if memory serves, although depicts what JFK looked like arriving on the autopsy table out of the zipped body bag after leaving Parkland with only "about one third of his brain blown out" (Parkland Doctors). Paul O'Conner was finally given Military permission to speak at the House Select Committee on Assassinations and was revealed at that time *only to date* that JFK arrived "with no brain, except less than a handful". Thus, if any real photograph it was certainly not released into record unless in National Security auspices of the WC etc. I have a degree (Data Processor) in computers of that era - the great big room filled computers and "hacking" the system then might be done by a type "tape worm" but would no doubt only retrieve text data - not graphics, pictures. So, if this was a real photograph then an insider with access had either stolen it or made a copy and put it back. This in fact is one more piece to the puzzle that upholds my research results summation that LBJ and the Govt by and with the Warren Commission were in National Security Mode and *not* involved in a criminal cover up. As the Public, we were to realize that our Government had just divulged this fact openly and by National Security permission about JFK and that his brain (what was left) had been disposed of illegally enroute from Dallas. Our Government for that one shining Camelot moment did reveal the truth to America when allowing Paul O'Conner to divulge this to the public at the hearing, which would become public. Of course the House Select Committee on Assassinations got about as much praise as the Warren Commission - wow at first, and realized it was as much BS and same off-handed Jersey hook questioning pattern without really consenting to evidence or witnesses all over again for a real trial. But as I said, it was not meant to be that National Security at the time was ready to divulge all and make arrests. During this time was all the PLO activity in the Mid East as home of the False Prophet from Bible references. He was not known yet or his powers, and did not rise until years later anyway (Bin Laden). Paul O'Conner is that *true* link to the Govt came clean to America and admitted a major conspiracy had occurred if you read between the lines. It was not clear why the investigation was still active this 15 years later and would not be until known in every Bible Study book thumping preaching fire and brimstone Minister worth his salt was teaching throughout the Nation to know what Armageddon was and is. IMO? (in my opinion). No, this is fact. If the Government were still involved in cover up as suspected, why would they allow Paul O'Conner to testify an openly admit to the world there was a conspiracy - in the least of after the fact, destrution of evidence? Did the Committee then bring charges? No. Shows *that* was not their intetntion *obviously*.
[BTW the very neat straight cut of the skull on the left side is the dead give away, pardon the pun, that this is not the real JFK. It appears as someone with a chainsaw walked up and cut the skull out. That is *not* what his skull looked like at all. But is somewhat, mostly, a fair gruesome rendition as an artist's depiction of horrible reality as a really close estimate. The brain matter on the table is another give away as it *is* testified to that the President "had less than a handful" of his brain left.]
PS EDIT.... Searched out and this was definately simply an artists's rendition.
