JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
February 18, 2018, 09:44:05 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: VISIT OUR WEBSITE: http://jfk50thcasesolved.jimdo.com/
 
   Home   Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  
Recent Items
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 21 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:46:00 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
5.2 National Security At Commission Hearings
Commission Members Deny Oswald Legal Representation - Or, "Another Smoking Gun that National Security Mode was Applied"

The Oswald Case: Mark Lane's Testimony To The Warren Commission
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbUV3iS1k8

That you tube link above is the reading of transcript by Atty. Mark Lane to the Warren Commission. It is about one and a half hours. You should have a good understanding of American Constitutional Law to hear all and understand. You can listen along and understand.

I have listened to all. I have discovered just now towards the conclusion, a few things. I do not believe Mark knows he insulted the Commission Members - depending on who he was referring to as "Prosecution". However, this is as a petition at and to the Commission to dismiss the President of the American Bar Association appointed as Representative for Lee Harvey Oswald and appoint him (Atty. Mark Lane) as Representation, as of course he was hired by Oswald's mother.

Mark has made a most fascinating petition and request alive to the Commission, most outstandingly with the existential evidences concerning Oswald. His attack vector was that Prosecution choosing Jury and Representation of a Defendant as inequality. That is almost laughable in the Supreme Court. I am sure as most American Attorneys he has served as Public Defender. In cases whereby a Public Defender was appointed to a Defendant, Prosecution does indeed choose - with Defense - the Jurors. But Mark was saying it is not equality or due process that Prosecution choose Representation as well.

I believe he is referring to the Commission itself as Prosecution. Now the Commission got its power from Congress which was appointing the Commission as "Prosecution". As such, the Commission did not have the power to appoint Representation for Oswald, but appointed the President of the American Bar Association anyway. That is the inequality Mark may have been referring to, must have been. And again, Defendant survivors did indeed afford representation - Atty. Mark Lane. I will add if unsaid then, the discovery here in research is that the Commission Members denied Lee Harvey Oswald Due Process of Law to Legal Representation by their appointment - and the Commission can be brought up on this and a new Commission established with lawful compliance to the US Congress. In other words Congress and the President are acting as Ruling Judge, dismissing Dallas and Texas jurisdictions in the cases, and the Commission Members acted inappropriately.

Now this brings in the whole ball of wax, and note if Mark is referring to "Prosecution" as the entire Presidential Commission by and with Congress in National Security Mode of Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended (or as Martial law), then he indeed is petitioning "Prosecution" itself and none of this applies (the contrary), and Mark Lane invited them to read between the lines. (Yeah he's got 'em). Prosecution is authority given to the Commission by Congress in all matters. Its root is the Presidential Commission by LBJ (President Johnson). So original legal authority is even challenged, and see why.....

You can follow along at a blog post of mine at a blog domain I own http://christianeministry.com/
ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman
Posted on July 22, 2013 by eminister
http://christianeministry.com/2013/07/22/addendum-who-was-innocent-t-martin-g-zimmerman/

/jump to / :
HOW MAY THE US CONGRESS TAKE THIS CASE IN REVIEW AND RETRIAL?
Article IV, Section 1:
“Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”

…This is too many times misconstrued and even intentionally as misinformation and interpretation – Full Faith and Credit shall be given…. is what and by whom? Full Faith and Credit is given by the Federal Government to each State as being trusted in as the honor system, or blind faith, by promise, etc they are and will remain in compliance of putting forth into Law a republican form of government of the United States Constitution only dismissing nothing, not denying and not disparaging any rights of American Citizens as citizens and residents of that State that are guaranteed all Rights as United States Citizens.
It includes State to State by State examination of public acts, records, and judicial proceedings and to compare as to the same equal justice being necessary. Judicial Proceedings can prove a more true judgment arrived in one State to Judicial Proceedings in another to be compared to – of course not infringing upon the profession and talent and income of Attorneys etc, to say how a judgment was reached lawfully. However only Congress by laws may prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof. Only Congress has the right and overview, and is Law of the Land as to how Judicial Proceedings are proved. Only Congress may render opinion and fact as to the effect of any Judicial Proceeding in the States. All the above comments and opinions by me show the bottom line that the United States Congress may take full possession of this case to examine and prove the case as lawful and including by rendering the Effect of this case as to whether there have been any Federal laws violated or State laws or District. The U.S. Supreme Court must reflect this - the power of the U.S. Congress - in any procession.

This then includes the Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI)…” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law….”
…. This is to say then that “…which district shall have been previously ascertained by law…” shows the Federal Authority and to have oversight of Proof and to Prove the District (where this case was tried) is and was “previously ascertained by law” and is part of that 'Full Faith and Credit' by the Federal Government (that blind faith, honor system, etc) that Florida is indeed in compliance with a state republican form of government of the US Constitution and this is not the “double jeopardy” violation, to say the case can not be tried again or reviewed. The District in the State (county, town, etc) or State itself has no power to stop the US Congress from this. The US Congress may show the effect of a flawed Judicial Proceeding in a State and prove any “mistrial” etc and declare it a void judgment and case be retried. Which is to say perhaps this is the route as opposed to “take it all the way to the US Supreme Court” – always assumed as the only way to get justice in cases via lawful appeal etc. The case retried then is not in violation of the Fifth Amendment (“..nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…”) .

Now above is the good explanation of how the United States Congress could indeed take over the Martin/Zimmerman Case. However, in the JFK Case - Congress must needs be declaring the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus which, that's right kids, declaring National Security invoked to remove jurisdiction from Dallas and State of Texas.

PRESIDENTIAL POWER TO CREATE A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION....
Article II
Section 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
(Get it ? Atty. Mark Lane was talking 'over their heads' - the Commission Members - addressing "Prosecution" meaning LBJ.)

So more smoke of the gun.... the Commission Members were 'Commissioned Officers' of the President and in National Security Mode as Writ of Habeas Corpus suspended. LBJ did not need Congressional approval, but made them as "by and with Congress" and apparently negated a Military Tribunal Trial - which effectively was in place from November 29th until December 13th. It must be the internal conspirators were waiting to be lined up against the wall and have their brains blown out because effectively LBJ was the full power of the Law of the Land for those 15 days all by himself. That ain't no coward! He took the weight of any existing conspiracy assassins as prime target with full power. "Bring it on !"

READ:
Introduction to the Records of the Warren Commission
http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/intro.html
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,21.msg38.html#msg38

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Article One Section 9
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus can be invoked by a lawyer for the defendant which is basically "show me the money" or meaning 'having the body' of evidence - the Court must show the body of evidence and witnesses alleging charges. There is NO way out of that in American Courts unless the Writ of Habeas Corpus has lawfully been suspended meaning these do not have to be presented. This is a case of National Security (Martial Law declared) and more locally might be applied in various police and bureau investigations in such special circumstances BUT nevertheless with a Judge et al privately than the Open Court (Public Trial). A quickie example is some RICO Act 6 month investigation going on over drug trafficking etc etc etc. whereby in open court could compromise or endanger etc.

Now the Secret Service breaking the law in Dallas and Texas taking off with the President's body without legal autopsy by law done in Texas into Bethesda where it was illegally performed, and all the way to the new President declaring a Presidential Commission into the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy and everything between and after - isn't the invocation of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended on the flimsiest nonexistent reasons?

Or as I always said, National Security being the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended or Martial Law in Effect as the only POSSIBLE cause of action for them doing what they did to say or believe they were being honest and lawful, sure evaporated fast - within hours and days - for ..."when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it".

They can't hide behind they were not acting as Judge and Jury - just an inquest into all facts and evidence and witnesses testimony because it was not their jurisdiction to do so. This would be like Canada taking full control of the investigation into the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan and saying they just wanted to see who was doing what. And everyone in America would say WTF - Get out of here! (what the funk). That's what they tried to say in Parkland Hospital. So like when they were done, what - Dallas and Texas can resume their investigation? Oh please. With all the evidence they compiled and made public and the later Freedom Of Information Act and the rest of the JFK acts on evidence being made public - they have so screwed this case with every nut and genuine professional commercial researcher and all their opposing views and screwball distorted versions implanted in the American psyche with all the evidences presented in thousands of opposing opinions that there is no possible way that any could convict any of the guilty parties "beyond the shadow of a doubt". Congratulations Presidential Commission on the Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy !!!

And yet the case remains in the auspices of National Security Mode with evidences that are under the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus - no, no one may have these certain evidences - they are locked away. Listen to the end of the Tube - the words by famous TV Anchorman Walter Chronkite... (it will start there)

lbj
http://youtu.be/xd1wuXrVPjo?t=2m29s

 

 22 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:45:25 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
5.1 National Security Begins at Autopsy
Orders From White House

From the Autopsy....
Lt. Colonel Pierre A. FINCK, MC, USA
Chief, Military Environmental Pathology Division &
Chief, Wound Ballistics Pathology Branch
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Washington, DC 20305

SUBJECT: Personal notes on the Assassination of President Kennedy.

TO: Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA
The Director
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Washington, DC 20305

IN FULL / SOURCE:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/finck1.htm

We find here the notes statement from Lt. Colonel Pierre A. FINCK, MC, USA the following....

"2. Before the "Warren Report" was published, in September 1964, I received Directives by telephone, from the White House, through your Office and through the Naval Medical School in Bethesda, not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report. "

Receives instructions/orders ("Directives") -- "not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report" from:
# the White House
# through your Office (Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA)
# and through the Naval Medical School in Bethesda

-----So, with all the research about who dunnnit and who was involved in all, certainly researchers must include these persons as directly ordering "cover up" as the "Directives" ordering not to say anything but what is given to and then published in the Warren Report later. I have not yet seen that concerning Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA and wondering why looking at this 'smoking gun'. Surely this means they knew in advance, that what was going to be published in the Warren Report was going to be absolutely a "censored" version of the facts, or limited version - not all. So cover up? We are looking at it, a "smoking gun".

Notice he says... "Before the "Warren Report" was published..... I received Directives.....not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report."
Now plainly it can be seen that he (Finck) has knowledge of what only is going to be given to the Warren Report that was to be published later, and they (the above issuing "Directives") knew that in advance of that as well. You might say simply the Military Officers in charge simply gave orders not to discuss and made them take an oath. That is not what Finck said.

As I said --- put on the thinking cap as being in the Government and operating in National Security Mode. Surely they would not want the guilty to know what they knew. The release of the Warren Report certainly makes them appear in part or all as also involved in a cover up. Is not that what they would want to appear as involved in a secret major sting operation? The guilty of the conspiracy might or not be scratching their heads at this, the Warren Report (autopsy photos,drawings incomplete), saying to themselves, "Well gosh darn, they dun got the autopsy room in on it too. No chance of getting caught for anything. That be one dang blaster of a payroll." .... giving them a false confidence as they would be spied on for months and months while National Security Mode investigations tried to track the entire conspiracy back to its origin with their compiling list of possible/probable conspirators within the U.S. and internationally.

As I concluded as my "solved" , I believe this document mentioned is the "smoking gun" among many that show, even prove, there was no cover up by criminal activity - but rather the United States Government was in National Security Mode measures for the obvious reasons that they knew there had been a "state sanctioned" type execution assassination of the President and was facilitated by traitors within the Government in key positions including the Secret Service, that evidence tampering indeed had occurred before reaching autopsy, and that the scope of the conspiracy within as well as extending internationally (those of the USSR) could not be immediately ascertained. It would take a major secret investigation that could not be easily put together as the "wall had ears". Slowly but surely, the beginning was with the Presidential Commission (Warren Report) as direct evidence gathering and investigation - the innocent had to wade through any found guilty and with extended investigation of any guilty found as who they were involved with and to what extent.

In the end I suppose the last sealed evidence should contain the actual list of the proven and suspected assassin conspirators. It is apparent the sources lead back to the USSR persons employing the American traitors and the Government yielding prosecution due to the Cold War could have easily escalated to the hot war of nuclear exchange. This has always been the position of the Warren Report and all involved as one of their "excuses" for keeping things sealed. This does not explain or dismiss them for not rounding up the alleged guilty per investigation of the Americans involved, and I do not believe you will find any Americans who would dismiss not arresting those of America internally who were by probable cause deemed guilty and per trial, and upon arrests bring the horrific charges horrifying America that could include a list of American Government personnel such as the Secret Service and possible FBI and CIA agency involvement and Military officers. The most horrific is announcing the President's brain had been disposed of en route to Bethesda as part of their evidence tampering. Those involved in the selling of the Atomic Secrets to the enemy were publicly hanged after trial. I think and feel if Harry Truman were President at the time, he would have had them (those traitors of America) publicly hanged after trial and convictions.
SEE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_spies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg

Conspiracy includes Affimation (Non Sworn Testimony / No Statement) as being guilty  - remaining silent and not coming forth if one knew about a conspiracy and those in it. In other words if three persons in a car go to rob a bank after discussing it, and the one says "I will wait in the car for you" and does not participate yet rides off with them to a place where the two robbers split the money and they all went their way and the third never says anything - then that person is guilty of conspiracy before and after the fact to rob the bank. The same, if there were others at the place where the robbers split up the money telling them, others, they just robbed the bank - and these others never came forward to the police to report it - these are guilty of the conspiracy after the fact as well.

They should have arrested all with probable cause of guilt and held them in a Military Trial since it was Government members and the Commander In Chief their victim. It seems quite possible they could have arranged this without any opposition from America when leaking some of the details of their involvement. Ironically and unfortunately, President Kennedy would have probably been the only one to successfully have the USSR turn over the suspected guilty for trial in America.

 

 23 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:44:47 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Chapter Five
Sections

5.1 National Security Begins at Autopsy

5.2 National Security At Commission Hearings

5.3 National Security Partial Declassification

5.4 Judgment

5.5 Prologue

5.5.1 Prologue Continued

5.6 Epilogue

 

 24 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:43:41 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.6 The Warren Remission
None Call it Treason?

The Warren Commission admits Treason and the reason before Atty. Mark Lane and the American debate audience at Beverly Hills, California - December 4, 1964. Below is the description of this two and one half hour "debate" which should be listened to entirely to comprehend the Warren Commission admission of it being a complete falsehood and their "new deal" they solicit America to engage which is much as to being a tribute nation to their enemies - or to say chicken out, coward with us and not engage the USSR to prosecute those guilty of the murder of President Kennedy, to avenge him and America in Justice, Courage, and Honor. Virtually the entire Beverly Hills audience rejected them and turned them down, disgusted by them.

Today, this is as the Red States vs. Blue States. You will see here and understand how this came to be and was actually a continuation of what they call "left of center" - Red States. These are a "Profile In Cowardice" and completely un-American to say the least. You can see how unGodly this willful treason is like Judas Iscariot did too late.

JFK ASSASSINATION DEBATE WITH MARK LANE (DECEMBER 4, 1964)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yfB9QnwtZk
DESCRIPTION:
Here is a lively debate about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The debate features well-known conspiracy theorist Mark Lane going head-to-head against three defenders of the official Warren Commission Report, including Warren Commission assistant counsel member Joseph A. Ball. This audio-only program runs for more than 2 hours and took place at Beverly Hills High School on December 4, 1964, which was just 10 weeks after the Warren Report was released to the public.
At the conclusion of the program, some of the audience members are interviewed and give their opinions about the debate they had just witnessed.

Their admission of Treason and moving Sedition to join them against the U.S. Constitution as Law of the Land. They are directly quoted verbatim (as best transcribed)...... [approx. 2:06:15 - 2 hours, six minutes, fifteen seconds into above YouTube, about 2:37:16 full]

EXCERPT / WARREN COMMISSION MEMBER.... (pronounced Wearing or Weering, Esq.)
"Now finally, the Commission said that men on the Left, neither the Soviet Union nor Cuba had anything to do with the assassination of President Kennedy. Now this statement by the Commission, a statement which the entire Commission including Mr. Dulles join - this statement saving all of us here who are Left of Center from the venom of the Rightists, this statement protects the rights of all of us. Now had this Commission been irresponsible, it might have failed to save that which - which resulted in [a marked?] intensification of a cruel [Cold?] War had the Commission not given this, clearest as it were, to many against whom the Rightest were pointing the finger, we might have had following the assassination of President Kennedy a real unleashing of terror against persons on the left. So from my point of view, the Commission instead of perpetrating a fraud upon the American People has rendered a service of major importance to the American People - particularly by protecting the Rights from hysteria and hostility, the Rights of Americans who are as I say in the Left or Left of Center. So I respectfully disagree with our distinguished Guest from New York in his statement as to the import[ance] of this Report. I think his statement that this Report is a fraud perpetrated on the American People is utterly irresponsible.

MARK LANE / EXCERPT
".....I know that it is only because of the extreme pressure of this Establishment which Mr. [Weering ?] so well emphasized in quoting H[C?]arry MacWilliams (sp.?) for I have (?) that this unusual statement was made by Mr. Weering (sp.?) I know he would not make it ordinarily and I know that it does not represent his thinking generally. We have too much respect for Mr. Weering (sp.?) and for the organization with which he is associated to believe that it represents his thinking. I know that The Day will come in America as it came in France 12 years after the conviction of Dreyfus when the whole Liberal Establishment and the rest of the Establishment said Guilty Guilty Guilty for twelve years. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Government said it. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Minister of Justice said it. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Liberals in the Parliament of France said it, anymore then when he was guilty twelve years later when the French Government had the courage and honor to reverse its position, and Oswald is not guilty now - anymore guilty then he will be when the United States Government has the Courage and the Honor to state that it was wrong. And the reasons afforded by Mr. Weering (sp.?) are sound ones. There might be an unleashing of activity against the Right, there might be an unleashing of activity against the Left. There wouldn't be [the distant ?] days in America very likely if that killing remained unsolved.
It was a terrible shock for every American Citizen, all 190 million of us. We weren't on the verge of panic or revolution, but there was great unrest - and how happy we all were when they caught him 15 minutes later his description was out and they said the first day he was a lone assassin. What a reflection. Whoever heard any Police Officer ever say the man committed the crime alone? How did they know the first day, he didn't talk to somebody two weeks before who gave him the money, was arranging to get the guns, who told him how to do it ? Lone assassin ? The first day ? That was a reflection upon the F.B.I. and the Dallas Police - not upon Lee Harvey Oswald when they used those words "lone assassin" the very first hours after the killing of the President.
Yes, those are the reasons - Mr Weering (sp.?) states them. There is no reason for anyone to speculate any longer in terms of this evening's performance - Mr. Weering (sp.?) tells us we must have a man who did it, "We must have a man, they'll be unleashed....". I tell you this, I don't believe we must have a man. First of all I don't know what the Politics of the people here are this evening, I don't think it's relevant quite frankly - I don't think it makes any difference. And I tell you this, nor are my politics relevant nor Mr. Weering's (sp.?) politics relevant or anyone else's politics. I tell you this man was condemned to death after his death, condemned as the assassin in order that the country might breath easier, in order that the country might breath easier so that there would be no unleashing of the terror that Mr. Weering (sp.?) said - then even on a practical basis that will not work. For when Justice is denied to one - be it those of us here this evening Left, Right, or Center - Justice is denied to each of us, to everyone of us. And no matter how difficult those days may be. I heard [those present accused him] when a man is retained to be an Advocate [Oswald lawyer] he makes these points. Nobody is retaining me. I closed down my Law Office. I get paid for speaking engagements it's true - and every single penny goes to the citizens committee so that they can conduct and continue an examination and investigation [endowed]. No one is here as an Advocate tonight except for this view point - I advocate and I say it and I'm not ashamed of it, I advocate that the American People are entitled to the Facts. The Chief Justice said when he was first questioning witnesses, the Chief Justice said "You may never get the facts in your lifetime" and then they issued the Warren Commission Report that tended to prove his estimate was an accurate one. Thank you."

Listening to this Commissioner speak may be the more direct impact as that type lying through the teeth old timer geezer (Geezer is a term for a man. It can carry either the connotation of age and eccentricity in the UK, or that of self-education such as craftiness or stylishness. In the US the term often refers to a cranky old man). But in looking at the text above it seems fairly straight forward - seems. But look again. It seems he is saying the Warren Report simply is true and being released, that truth helps against opposing views as being hostile and irresponsible, a hysteria, but he even goes on to say "a real unleashing of terror". But he is speaking as being from the "left" and "left of center" meaning Republican. He is accusing the "right" as the Democrats of these things. He is not saying the nation as a whole is "being protected" from some group of incensed or misguided persons in delusion. He says the Warren Report specifically is protecting Republicans and not Democrats. Strange? But you are not seeing what he is really saying and the lies you probably missed.

He begins in this excerpt (the last word from each side in the debate) to say that Oswald is guilty and that is that ("this statement"). No one internally "from the left" or internationally were involved. Now this is a direct lie because the Warren Report simply skipped over these altogether saying it never investigated them, there were no investigations into other assassins or international involvement. He says "this statement" (the Warren Report conclusions) "protects the Left and Left of Center" - "protects us (left) all". He is warning that if the Right (Democrats) pursue the truth any further there will be "a real unleashing of terror against persons on the left (admitted self preservationists - and general cronyism in this point) and is talking about war with the USSR, admitting there is involvement they know of and omitted that truth from the Report among much, much else we will see ahead in the next chapter.

Now the bait is to the rest of the audience present and the nation - "Now had this Commission been irresponsible..." and told the truth to the American Public "it might have failed to save..." all of us, those of the Left and join us now, from "that which resulted in a marked intensification of a cruel Cold War... we might have had following the assassination of President Kennedy" - "a real unleashing of terror against persons on the left" because we certainly aren't men of courage willing to commit, because the Draft Board would needs be reopened as in the World War II as a substantial war is anticipated. Therefore the nation filled with citizens of both parties would be as resuming the cold war it was to end the Nazis. This constitutes soliciting citizens of the Republican party and any "converts" of the Democrats to join in this conspiracy of surrender and non-action in defending the nation and bringing to justice those responsible of the successful attack on the President of the United States, the very same President who saved the nation against nuclear attack and defeat or surrender polices being initiated in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Republicans - left and left of center - have been historically "isolationists" when it came to war and waged political war against Franklin D. Roosevelt on these values to gain the Presidency to keep America out of what became the Second World War. In other words the Nazi attacks even in American waters sinking pleasure ships and the attack on Pearl Harbor was okay. We can handle that as long as things do not have to escalate to war. It costs too much. You have to sacrifice too much comfort. It is distressing. It costs lives of family members and loved neighbors. Just another punk-ass "Miss Know It All" (get it? solicit all, fornicate all). That's why the other half of the "Generation gap" (youth) called them old farts - full of stinky hot air. Proud cowardly mutineers - mutiny of cowardice! Have you ever heard of such a thing? Yes here.

Why the charge of Treason ?
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Does that answer your question? It did for the audience in Beverly Hills that night. Listen at the end to the "exit polls".

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official Text
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
Article. II.
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Article III.
Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Article. I.
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;

This is why songs like this were written:
Slip Kid - The Who
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4xjr9v5ehk

Beginning religious exhortation to this travesty of justice.  (This is just an introductory snippet of a full sermon I am preparing.)

As they (Warren Commission Members) stated, they knowingly charged the innocent Lee Harvey Oswald to seal the murder investigation to attempt to hide not only the truth but also from what could have escalated to the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis all over again. They freely admitted they were conservatives and were doing this as self interest for all conservatives which is basically the Republican Party in the USA. This was the "service" they said they offered America via the Warren Commission Report presented. They freely admitted they were hiding the truth with their actions of the internal coup and their Soviet connections, that they ordered the hit using insider American traitors to carry it out. This is the one part of the "unleashing" from the Right (Democrats) they said their "service" protected ALL those of the Left (Republicans).  Note originally Left was Conservative (Republican) and Right was Liberal (Democrat) - but nothing like today's usage of these terms.
 
ISAIAH Chapter 21
15 For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war.

ISAIAH Chapter 51
7 ¶Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings.
8 For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be for ever, and my salvation from generation to generation.
9 ¶Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of the Lord; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon?
10 Art thou not it which hath dried the sea, the waters of the great deep; that hath made the depths of the sea a way for the ransomed to pass over?
11 Therefore the redeemed of the Lord shall return, and come with singing unto Zion; and everlasting joy shall be upon their head: they shall obtain gladness and joy; and sorrow and mourning shall flee away.
12 I, even I, am he that comforteth you: who art thou, that thou shouldest be afraid of a man that shall die, and of the son of man which shall be made as grass;
13 And forgettest the Lord thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?

Now remember, and as a Minister I advise to take heed to God as he taught us through Jesus Christ and the Apostles through His Word the Gospel of Christ - be careful of judging and how, as it will be returned to you. The rage, against the guilty and all of there's, the rage horror and sorrows of America came to a head after the subsequent assassinations of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and Presidential Candidate and former Atty. Gen. Senator Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy after the slaying execution of President John F. Kennedy.  But we see (hearing) here in this very valuable recording of this precise moment of time by those there - we hear those of the Warren Commission very harshly telling everyone to shut up and except this "official" Commission report that Lee Harvey Oswald is the only assassin and we got him and this is "case closed" as they do not want to face anything else. Of course virtually everyone there rejected this, being courageous Americans and good Patriots and Proud, responsible decent American Citizens. You can hear that at the end with the various interview comments of the audience as an "exit poll" kind of. Not seeking Pardons I do advise we keep in our hearts the Word of God with this instruction from Him in His Word...... (concerning those in fear "left of center" ) .....

LUKE Chapter 21
25 ¶And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees;
30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.
31 So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand.
32 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.
33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.

34 ¶And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.
35 For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.
36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.

Additionally, as witness - as late as 1992.....

Disclosure of the JFK Assassination Records 4/28/92 (YouTube)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEIhXXk8c70
Length 3:17:23 (3 Hours, 17 minutes, 23 seconds)
Reference Quoted: 1:50:15 forward....
Howard Willens, Former Counsel Warren Commission
QUOTED CLIP:
"... Virtually all those records of the Warren Commission are now available for Public scrutiny. The Warren Commission in this respect, guided strongly by it's four Congressional Members, decided to publish essentially all of the evidence that the Commission relied upon in reaching its' Conclusion. I am interested in the contrast between the decision of the Warren Commission made in 1964 with the decisions made subsequently by the several Congressional Committees that investigated one or more of the subject matters that is before the Committee today. ......

.... The Members of the Commission and the Members of the Staff then and now had nothing to be embarrassed about and felt that the interest of the American Public was best served by publishing all the documentary material and testimony upon which the Commission relied in reaching its' conclusion.

It is my understanding now as a result of that publication many years ago and subsequent release by the National Archives that only a small percentage of the documents generated by the Warren Commission is not available for public examination. It has been suggested that in fact about 2 percent of those materials are not in the Public Domain. Those that have been withheld include the Autopsy photographs and X-rays, certain confidential investigative sources and informants, certain facts and procedures relating to Presidential protection, and fully investigated allegations of complicity that raised questions to privacy. ...."

And as well, later, James Johnston Former Counsel Senate Intelligence Committee
2:13:12 "As a Staff Counsel of the Senate Committee we didn't look at the events in Dallas - we didn't look for multiple assassins. "

 

 25 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:43:02 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.5 JFK Medical History
Not A Playboy

Dishonorable and otherwise scum and profiteers have continually attempted to soil the memory of our honorable President John F. Kennedy, world revered, and also the person and beloved memory of his brother the former Attorney General of the United States and Presidential Candidate Senator Robert F. Kennedy, with stories and rumors and general trash talking of adulterous sexual misconducts in office. JFK's medical conditions have even been released showing the degree of pain he was in. I, myself, have been prescribed a similar back brace due to traumatic lower back vertebrae fracture coupled with acute lumbar sprain causing two operations for fistulectomies and resultant irreparable disc injury. There was constant and continual back spasms. Only morphine injections were effective in arresting most pain, which was temporary. I can personally testify someone with these type pains and physical injuries has no normal sex life for all intents and purposes. JFK also sustained injury from his US Navy service on the famous PT-109 in the most admirable service to his country and crew. It is shown medically he could not physically possibly have been this carousing adulterous playboy they "report" accusing him all these years adding trash to the filthy minds of their readers. I have another sequel about JFK RFK and MM (Marilyn Monroe) about these things that should shock the public with the epiphany reached. But let's look at the facts. Proving the ill health President Kennedy suffered, take a good look at the facts. Playboy? They should be ashamed terribly and run and hide and never show their faces again! Filthy dreamers from the imaginations of their own filthy hearts....

Holy Bible, Book of Jude
Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

I personally had a similar back injury in the same exact place L5-S1 as a traumatic fracture of the vertebrae which later permanently damaged the disc at the same place from the fracture causing misalignment. Two and half years in bed each time. To remove the disc, they will only perform the operation if the patient would rather die or commit suicide because of the chronic (24/7) pain. You get a 50-50 chance of surviving the operations as the Gil method is performed which is four, count them, four spinal fusions are performed creating a cage around the damaged disc then removed. I also was prescribed and had to wear the same type back brace as JFK. As well there are extreme back muscle spasms in the lumbar (lower back). A simple stubbing the toe can send you into a whirlwind of pain and spasms. JFK had two of these and was at that point of wishing death at the level of pain. Like I said before, no one in this condition has anything close to a traditional sex life and yet the scum say all this trash about his constant affairs and prostitutes and on and on. That was physically impossible as seen in the release of JFK medical history....

"John F. Kennedy – A Life of Back Pain & Hidden Illness
Posted on February 23, 2011 by Paul Hagen
http://www.vacupractor.com/famous-people/john-f-kennedy-back-pain/

This post is the first in a series about famous and/or note worthy people that suffer from Back Pain. In our ongoing effort to educate America about back pain and help eliminate it, this series was inspired by a story we spotted on Hub Pages you can read here if you like: Presidents Back Pain Cured

John F. Kennedy’s medical records may shed some light on questions of the president’s character. Reviews of his records in recent years revealed that the president suffered from severe back pain and other numerous ailments, taking as many as eight medications a day to manage them. Kennedy, his aides, and his family kept this information hidden from the public in an attempt to project an image as a strong and powerful figure, in much the same way Franklin D. Roosevelt concealed the severity of his paralysis in the 1930s and 40s.

Kennedy’s back pain and other ailments clearly did not stand in the way of his political ambitions. He used his father’s connections to enlist in the Navy and keep his medical condition concealed from military physicians. While serving on Navy boats in the southwest Pacific, he slept with a plywood board under his mattress for back pain relief. During his 1960 presidential campaign, he was followed everywhere by an aide who carried a bag of “medical support.” Kennedy’s medical records remained closed for years following his death, apparently because his family worried they would tarnish his reputation as an honest political figure.

Due to his many ailments, a man of Kennedy’s health would not be able to survive today’s political climate, writes presidential biographer and New York Times political correspondent Richard Reeves. Kennedy suffered from Addison’s disease, a condition in which the adrenal glands produce insufficient hormones and which required increasing amounts of hydrocortisone and testosterone. Sickly since he was a boy, Kennedy was also frequently ill and suffered from severe fatigue and low weight. He became so ill that he was read the last rites three times in his life. Lifelong abdominal discomfort and fatigue may have been due to celiac disease, which is often associated with Addison’s.

What Was The True Source of Kennedy’s Back Pain

Though his back pain was rumored to have been caused by football injuries and war wounds, according to Reeves, however, those stories were untrue. Some reports indicate that Kennedy suffered from a degenerative disease of the lumbar spine, which caused a difference in the length of his legs, requiring him to wear a back brace and use crutches intermittently. Navy records show evidence of osteoporosis. Reporter Robert Dallek writes that steroid treatments Kennedy received for his intestinal ails as a youth may have contributed to both his Addison’s disease and his back problems. In a December 2002 article in the Atlantic Monthly, Dallek writes that in the 1930s and 40s, physicians did not realize the long-term effects of corticosteroids – specifically the suppression of normal adrenal function and the inducement of osteoporosis in the lower back. X-rays from the early 50s show compression fractures in Kennedy’s lower spine.

Kennedy Underwent High Risk Back Pain Surgery

In 1954, while Senator of Massachusetts, Kennedy underwent back surgery, which posed extreme risks due to his Addison’s disease, as his hormone treatments suppressed his immune system. According to Reeves, no one with Addison’s disease had ever previously survived traumatic surgery. But Kennedy said his back pain was so severe, he would rather die than live with the pain. His x-rays revealed that his fifth lumbar vertebra had collapsed, and he had become more dependent on his crutches. He survived the surgery, but was hospitalized for nine months afterward due to a urinary-tract infection and a transfusion reaction.

A report in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1955 indicated he would have been incapacitated without the surgery, which consisted of a lumbo sacra fusion together with a sacroiliac fusion. Doctors hoped the fusions would strengthen his lower spine, but due to a possible infection, another operation had to be performed four months later to remove the metal plate that had been inserted into Kennedy’s spine.

The President Continues to Suffer from Back Pain & Other Ailments

The surgeries brought him no back pain relief. Throughout the 50s, Kennedy continued to suffer from his back pain and other ailments, including abdominal discomfort, high fevers, dehydration, high cholesterol, and difficulty sleeping. He could not bend forward or backward at all. Turning over in bed or sitting in a chair posed extreme difficulty. Kennedy continued to hide his condition from the public and denied reports of his Addison’s disease. During his presidency, he was under the regular care of an allergist, an endocrinologist, a gastroenterologist, an orthopedist, a urologist, and an internist/pharmacologist. He received back injections to make less reliant on his crutches, but his medical advisors feared they may be doing more harm than good and that he would eventually end up in a wheelchair.

Regular exercise therapy with an orthopedic surgeon began to ease his back spasms and increase his mobility, but it is unknown how his health issues would have progressed had he lived longer. Kennedy was killed in 1963 by Lee Harvey Oswald. Some believe that his chronic back problems ultimately contributed to his death:  Kennedy was wearing his back brace when he was shot. The first bullet struck him in the neck, and his back brace held him upright and kept him in the path of Oswald’s second, fatal bullet to the head.

John F. Kennedy Deception or Exceptional Character?

Though some have criticized Kennedy for deceiving the public in order to advance his political career, Dallek notes that Kennedy refused to complain about his ailments and exhibited an extraordinary strength of will, enduring unspeakable pain and yet refusing to let his physical ailments interfere with his political duties.

References:
PBS.org: John F. Kennedy
“In J.F.K.  File, Hidden Illness, Pain and Pills;” The New York Times
The Health and Medical History of President John Kennedy; Dr. Zebra
“The Medical Ordeals of JFK;” The Atlantic Monthly, December 2002 "

 

 26 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:42:24 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.4 Jean Dixon Prophecy
MacArthur's Park Melting in the Rain

Those alive back then may clearly remember at least two incidents of premonitions or dreams or visions or prophecy about the assassination. Rev. Billy Graham had a premonition and tried but failed to warn President Kennedy not to go to Dallas. Jean Dixon is the other. Anybody remember Jean Dixon? Jean Dixon predicted the JFK assassination and name "Oswald".
Jean Dixon who became a household name, this is very interesting to read. I have retrieved here a link showing the actual newspaper story. See the actual vision so to speak she describes... chilling....
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1346&dat=19800427&id=j44sAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JPsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6306,4205796

I am seeing one report quoted ..."In a side chapel is where Jean Dixon, the famous seer, had a vision in 1956 of a young, tall man standing in a White House doorway with "1960" over his head. She knew he was a Democrat and that he wouldn't live out his term. She told of this vision on a radio show that year."

And the famous "Mac Arthur's Park" song that came out "melting in the rain". It may have been based on the Jean Dixon "vision" she discussed - seeing (something like) the White House and JFK face and 1960 and from top melting down all over all. Being a PA native, I have lived in California 10 years and been to MacArthur Park many times. It is like a smaller Central Park just west of Central City. Very nice. 'Mac Arthur's Park' played and played on radio music channels across the nation. It especially took heart after the death of RFK - like the Kennedys "recipe" of a good nation for all - "and I'll never have that recipe again". They were quite unique leaders in American history and will never be forgotten, and as well, their blood stained those same pages.

(((PLAY MacArthur Park: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NE-5ICw-QqM

You hate to speak out if this happened to you (seeing something so to speak) because you may get immediately tagged as an Area 51 Looney or nut job or etc etc etc. It is in the common Bible Studies that it is taught we test these things to see if true, and if even from the Lord. Some of these verses....

Deuteronomy 13:1
1 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

Jeremiah 23:28
28 The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the Lord.
29 Is not my word like as a fire? saith the Lord; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?
30 Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.
31 Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues, and say, He saith.
32 Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the Lord.
 
Joel 2:28
28 And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:
29 And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.
31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come.
32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the Lord hath said, and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call.

I John 4:1
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.
6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

 The Gifts of God through His Holy Spirit.....

I Corinthians 12
1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.
2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led.
3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.
5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.
7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;
10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:
11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.
12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.
13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
14 For the body is not one member, but many.
 

Note that after the death, resurrection and ascension of the Messiah Jesus Christ to Heaven, and before that, it was told to the 12 Apostles (now minus one, Judas Iscariot dead) the mystery of God that now all will be baptized in the Holy Spirit of God. You may remember John baptizing Jesus and the Holy Spirit in the figure of a dove rested upon him. Christ foretold that after he was arisen he would send them the Comforter - the Holy Ghost (Holy Spirit) and to wait for it. As was written "signs shall follow them". In the Purposes of God, these many signs and miracles were done after Christ among the Apostles and was the fulfillment of the words of Jesus spoken to them. This was reassurance and reaffirming The Word in them, making them confident and strong in witness. It convinced others. The charge left to them was to spread The Gospel to all nations beginning at Jerusalem. These as well preserved the Word of God as the Gospel as the New Testament scriptures added to the Old Testament - which was preserved and preached from and taught to this day. Beyond this time is not that calling or cause or operation of God so to continue except by the Grace of God - where and when He will. There have been many false and, as well, deluded persons that have gone about claiming these "gifts" in many ways and places and times - and we all know too well in modern times. These are not the operation of God and not by the power of His Spirit. His Intents were clear and Christ Jesus spoke them. Adding here shortly an instruction, and also read the Book of Acts in the New Testament (Authorized King James Holy Bible - exact approved English translation of the common faith) where these actual events were unfolding and recorded.

Mark 16
1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.
2 And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.
3 And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre?
4 And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.
5 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.
6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.
7 But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.
8 And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid.
9 ¶Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.
10 And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.
11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.
12 ¶After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.
13 And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.
14 ¶Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.
15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. 
16  He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. 
17  And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; 
18  They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover. 
19 ¶So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.
20 And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.

 

 27 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:41:45 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.3 Conspiracy Extends To MLK RFK
The Conspiracy Continues to Martyrdom of MLK and RFK

This will show and help understand the MLK and RFK assassinations are an extension and have religious ties - evil religious ties.

In observing all previously posted about the JFK assassination and religious Studies posted as reference and truth, we find this extends into the subsequent MLK and RFK assassinations. "You know a tree by it's fruit" applies. This means the technique employed by he (head of 6th kingdom) who ordered the assassination of JFK as a somewhat 'counter intelligence' type of operation as planting of evidence and blame theme, and patsy cover story, etc. Here in the RFK assassination, Sirhan Sirhan is the new patsy and cover story. Naturally they understood any investigation, of course as there would be, would reveal Thane Eugene Cesar would be assumed the actual assassin - the "rent a cop" moving directly behind RFK at the time, and armed. Virtually all evidence did point directly at him as the actual assassin of RFK.

SEE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

Thane Eugene Cesar was openly in interview as a white racist by comments and despised RFK policy etc. and Democratic Party.
Title: RFK Assassination: Multiple Shooters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llo0WMJ94eo

And here we are again.... the patsy - set up as shooter is Sirhan Sirhan that was not the real assassin. He is reported preliminarily as a Jordanian and Palestinian and as well Iran was mentioned in others. Mid East ties in other words as "cover story" for "motive, cause" and is out for the public in the similar furor of the JFK and Oswald events. The "cover story" goes worldwide to hush up the true assassin, plot, and cause - as happened with Lee Harvey Oswald.

So religiously as the same technique as the JFK assassination, the 6th King in power (Book Of Revelation, Holy Bible) ordering the RFK assassination (and MLK) puts the blame finger as a counter intelligence type maneuver used in JFK assassination - again pointing to the 7th King (American) as the one ordering the assassination, the investigation no doubt finding the apparent white racist of those lines of theories and rumors flying around the JFK assassination as the actual assassin. The original theories and/or suspicions with JFK's murder where towards the Cuban involvements and American personnel and Communist-hating old south Republicans etc. - those lines. Specifically then, Thane Eugene Cesar was a perfect candidate it appears to be found as assassin (but in "national security" type hidden investigation again) - only this time intentionally - as was never the mode or intention in the JFK assassination, to discover the actual real shooter(s) because the actual multiple assassins and conspiracy where being concealed by the Oswald cover story as the "lone assassin nut" - no conspiracy. And of course the cover story there was along the lines Oswald was an American traitor with Communist loyalty in some fashion - but not forgetting that the 6th King (Red Communism, underground world head) was planting that the American 7th King planted him to put blame on the USSR and Red Communism as the 7th king hope to not get caught... "counter intelligence" technique employed in all things.

(For the MLK tie in See the Dr. Pepper mentioned previously and explanation ! )

The presumption in America and world is hoped by the 6th King (Underground head of Red Communism - see Bible Studies posted) to be that the 7th King has taken power in America by the JFK, MLK, and RFK assassinations - all but eliminating the competition (Christian and humane and economic leadership powers) through assassination and public fear in America, and worldwide, by these assassinations and other murders such as JFK witnesses etc.. Now, all rumors and anything going public in some manner as leaks along the lines there were multiple shooters is supposed to be nothing but more crazy Kennedy theories again and dismissed worldwide as America is hitting the roof in public hysteria and panic and wild rumor. In short, if you are not getting it, the entire wedge driven into the American heart causing panic and rumor and public hysteria over these multiple assassinations again and again - as desired by the 6th king intentionally - is having America believe or suspect there is an "internal coup detat" going on - and the "7th king did it" scenario as the notable '"counter intelligence planting technique" blame game for the actual real American National Security investigation occurring - to baffle their minds in fear, uncertainty, and doubt to escape actual prosecution.

Title: sirhan sirhan Are The comments correct was there a second shooter ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZpLxcplJuI

About at 16:30 (mins/secs), his explanation of his sudden reversal in feelings and now contempt for RFK and explanation of his position after RFK supported the 50 jets aid to Israel - which Sirhan believed would be used against his people and homeland called Palestine for basically, assumed (by him), what would he seemed to term probable war atrocities, or simply slaughter of Palestinians. He claims, previously RFK was as a hero and world champion to him for his leadership for the "underdogs" - economic and otherwise - to be remedied in some fashion. In any irony, he is prestating approximately the entire causes of modern day extinct Bin Laden of the extremist terrorism type activity - here what would be a political assassination of a world leader to be according to popularity and projected vote. Of course, there was the PLO in those days and that did commit acts of terrorism such as the Munich Massacre at the World Olympics. What is very, very, very notable in the Holy Bible (Authorized King James Holy Bible - Christian Bible) is that Palestine has been extinct for thousands of years and there is no such thing. This has been posted with full detailed history and explanation in this Bible Study posted....

Study: Who are the Palestinians ?
http://churchphilaforums.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,31.0.html

In short, diligent search in the Scriptures reveal they are the modern day Philistines actually. Is this that verse Sirhan refers to pre-emptively to Bin Laden in the extremist vein of victory showing a Palestinian inclusion ? .....

Isaiah 11:14
King James Version (KJV)
14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west; .....(America)

The betrayal Sirhan mentioned he felt of RFK ? Or is this the actual part of the cover story - reading between the lines - that these (JFK, MLK, RFK) and who they represent as the American majority and all Christianity in America as now finally being defeated to fulfill a world dominion scenario by the 6th Red Communist underground king in that no one will have the guts to ever run for President or Congress to initiate retaliation and prosecution without total fear of "die trying" ? Heard of David and Goliath right ? Don't forget the other counter intelligence game he played as always blaming the Mid East "false prophet" - the " lamb with two horns " (two princes) - leaving their calling card on the assassinations - all posted previously. More of the attempt to baffle real good-guy American Investigation to escape prosecution. And bingo! Perhaps as younger, you have just understood hopefully the entire 1960's Revolution by the American Youth etc. "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf" to coin a phrase. We were not intimidated and did perceive an evil, evil, evil power that was to be met and succeeded. Granted, there simply was not enough knowledge, knowledge of God, to secure victory and fell short to another day. You can do a micro sum up of this in two songs of the era with the Dylan / Hendrix song "All Along the Watch Tower" and the term "barefoot servants too (sultans)". "Song of Solomon 7:1 How beautiful are thy feet with shoes,.." (This refers to the Ten Kingdoms and what that meant. Barefoot - "no kingdom yet" but "one hour with the beast" - without shoes, poor, unable.

RFK - Final Journey (movie footage)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4vJxi9Kis
Robert Kennedy Funeral Train Pics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSpJfVlfQrE
Robert F Kennedy's emotional final journey to Washington from New York by Train.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mems0eRzgOk

I was there in Philadelphia Suburbs with my father and others and it was packed up and down the train stations all along the route, I think it was Folcroft Station (maybe Glenolden by name). I will never forget it and Hands Across America (Reagan times) reminded me of that. I remember vividly everyone watching and waiting and suddenly the train comes along. But it was just an engine and caboose and everyone did the gasp, and we were all mentioning they sent out a lead engine probably sweeping for bombs along the route because Ted Kennedy was on board. Finally it came. Could see the flag draped casket. We all saw Ted standing on the back platform of the car looking at everyone. I will never forget it and today there is now the you tube videos showing it. That night stopped America cold when Bobby was on the floor. Pure insanity.. how how how. why why why. no no no.

Bobby Kennedy: America's first assassination conspiracy theorist
May 13, 2007
BY DAVID TALBOT
http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=deceptions/assassinations/jfk/rfk-accused-cia-of-jfk-murder.txt

 

 28 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:41:00 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.2 Dr. Pepper
The Chicken Snack

The "Dr. Pepper" soda and "chicken...bag"

One more religion / assassination connected aspect of the "sniper's layer" at the Book Depository where Oswald was supposed to have fired from....

Briefly, very close to the window where Oswald was to be accused as shooting from, there was found what appeared to be an almost finished lunch bag and soda pop bottle. The bag was said to have chicken bones and the soda was a Dr. Pepper. Now in the Holy Bible (Authorized King James Holy Bible © in the Public Domain USA) there are several references to the "King of Babylon" with several meanings and times applied by God. Two are to Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon. He is the major topic in the Book of Daniel, Old Testament. After dealings with God, he sums up ....

Book of Daniel, Chapter 4
34 And at the end of the days I Nebuchadnezzar lifted up mine eyes unto heaven, and mine understanding returned unto me, and I blessed the most High, and I praised and honoured him that liveth for ever, whose dominion is an everlasting dominion, and his kingdom is from generation to generation:
35 And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?
36 At the same time my reason returned unto me; and for the glory of my kingdom, mine honour and brightness returned unto me; and my counsellors and my lords sought unto me; and I was established in my kingdom, and excellent majesty was added unto me.
37 Now I Nebuchadnezzar praise and extol and honour the King of heaven, all whose works are truth, and his ways judgment: and those that walk in pride he is able to abase.

However, and you will have to read our Bible Studies, God also refers to him as Elisha who is to come just before the "Second Coming" who will "restore all things" and is who is to "rule all nations with a rod of iron" (Book of Revelation) - the last King of Israel. Read God's prophecy about these end times....

EZEKIEL Chapter 29
 18 Son of man, Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon [Elijah/Elias/Esias] caused his army to serve a great service against Tyrus [satan / beast 666]: every head was made bald, and every shoulder was peeled: yet had he no wages, nor his army, for Tyrus, for the service that he had served against it:
19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will give the land of Egypt unto Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon; and he shall take her multitude, and take her spoil, and take her prey; and it shall be the wages for his army.
20 I have given him the land of Egypt for his labour wherewith he served against it, because they wrought for me, saith the Lord God.
21 ¶In that day will I cause the horn [Elijah] of the house of Israel to bud forth, and I will give thee the opening of the mouth in the midst of them; and they shall know that I am the Lord. [mouth - Lawgiver as Moses was called and is Elisha in the last days - end times. Horn means a king].

Never mind a-hole historians and pay attention to the Word of God. When did He say ? .... In that day ... what day ? the End days. Prophecy interpreted. That is the time reference (Now) and Egypt refers to both Reborn Africans (worldwide) as well as the conquering of ancient Egyptian type referencing Pharaoh which was godless and opposed to God and is well elaborated on at the times of Moses - the "plagues of Egypt" as the releasing of the Jews from the slavery of Egypt. Pharaoh was remembered for his infamous words "this (Egypt) river is my own." In these end times it more simply means those that have not been baptized and reborn yet. Now Elisha has many crowns and titles already and the entire World will know him soon obviously. Remember that in Revelation there are the 7 kingdoms - five are fallen. The 6th is Red Communism, now fallen. The 7th has obviously been America. And shown is the Beast666 (eighth) "who is of the seven (6th)". So it has been shown the 6th king (head of the world as underground king of Red Communism) ordered JFK dead.

Now the 7th kingdom is referred as well as - Babylon.....
BOOK of  REVELATION Chapter 17
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great **** that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Now above, is the 7th kingdom that defeated the 6th (Red Communism, tear down the wall, flag). This is who all the terrorism (false prophet Bin Laden) was / is against (residue, remainder). Note that God fortells of the 7 mountains/kingdoms and heads (kings) in Revelations which is the last 2,000 years of history after Jesus Christ's ascension to Heaven, as Babylon itself is a defined kingdom that assayed to rule the world until each of these burned out and rose again elsewhere as it is written "five are fallen, one is [6th], and one [7th] is not yet come". Rome was the first that destroyed Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and eventually came to its end. The Bible and Book of Revelations is a 2,000 year old game played by the best through history to attempt world dominion for sake of wealth and lust, and has been done the seven times - eight. Remember what you read? ....

16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the ****, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
(911 Attack, their centerpiece).

So what are we talking? Who is Dr. Pepper? Today, thank God, many insulting defaming phrases are forgotten. One more time I will recall these in this alarming discovery and what it really meant. The chicken bag like watermelon phrase-ology is to the bad old N-word meaning a N-picnic. Get it? Dr.Pepper is referring to the honorable Reverend Dr. Martin L. King - get it, Dr. Pepper? Above is the connection as to why he was assassinated by the same 6th king (Red Communism underground head) who ordered the Kennedy assassinations. Now I say that because of the size of this conspiracy and by who and who was target. The payroll was very large as well as those involved. Everything practiced over and over. Everything orchestrated so that nothing could go wrong. There is not one little thing you overlook at Dealy Plaza that day because of all these things. It is somewhat of coming upon a large fire out and examination begins to see where it started and how. Every little ditty, and I found a good handful, was set by the conspirators for reason. there was nothing coincidental that day is how it gets looked at. Everything was for a purpose, and a purpose for everything. Obviously that also included the evidence planting and on and on.

Now, here is the rest of the story. In America, Afro-Americans had suffered too much to say in one sentence - yet are now flourishing in all the aftermath of the Civil War and Civil Rights Movement, all the years  - the great efforts to Equality finally with still small fires of discontent. So we go back to those times - the Early 1960s - where there was racial oppression (virtually all in the South) and chronic unemployment nationwide. In short - poverty was in many places. Remember how the Beast666 comes in ?

Revelation Chapter 13
16 And he causeth all [non-Christians], both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

The Beast666 and False Prophet (Bin Laden) were recruiting against the **** Babylon among the poor who are not baptized and reborn - in the know. In the times of Blessed Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Black America was like most of America - as religious, church going and that notably obviously in the marches. It scratches the head thinking of Malcolm X with his preachings about drugs in the black ghetto and "whitey" was doing it to subvert and enslave poor Black America to their own profiteering. His references in the Holy Bible are indeed talking about this "**** of Babylon" or back then called the Secret Societies and generally all white. So the 6th king who becomes the 8th (beast666) assassinates the designate head of the black Christian America Civil Rights Leader - "Dr. Pepper", Reverend Dr. Martin L. King.

This "calling card" on November 22, 1963 in Dallas can not be ignored. He had it "planted" as advertisement. There was enough a-do about it as was in the "sniper nest" and was reportedly moved around causing extra dialogue in the Warren Commission testimonies to stick out. Bottom line, this could be a coincidence or not. One thing is clear and should be clear, when looking at the JFK assassination with a magnifying glass and then a super one - virtually nothing that day was a coincidence. All that happened was quite intentional and virtually all rehearsed in advance.

Above references to the Kennedy and King slayings and the attempted destruction of the fabric of America as it was in the days, as predominantly a religious nation and people in all the various ways, destroying this were the actions and hope of the Beast666 and Satan who gave him his seat and authority yet being the 6th king/kingdom at the time. The JFK assassination is the very beginning - the apostasy, the fall - and is foretold here.....

Book of Thessalonians Chapter 2: 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

They began with the assassinations of these heads of integrity and leadership of America in the Government and Church in the hope all would begin to turn away as forlorn and hopeless and indulge the vices etc. - to turn as many away from God as they could as is their lust - to destroy Christianity. The lust of all the followers of the Devil Satan are the same....

I Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

)))PLAY )))
Robert F. Kennedy's Martin Luther King Jr. Assassination Speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrx_u3825g
U2 - Pride (In The Name Of Love) [MLK Song]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHcP4MWABGY&feature=related

The Two "Martin Luther King Day" earthquakes.....

1994 Northridge earthquake
(Dr. Martin L. King Day January 17, 1994)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Northridge_earthquake
(I was in that one personally, my God it rocked a long time and almost threw me physically out of bed - so violent)

Great Hanshin earthquake (Kobe Japan Earthquake)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Hanshin_earthquake
(A year to the day - January 17, 1995)

 

 29 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:40:24 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
4.1 Qualifying Governor Connally's Wounds
Bullets and Fragments

In this my Thesis (solved) you have read here that the first wound to JFK was by a high powered rifle entering below the neck on the President from behind. Some questions must have risen. I will here qualify Governor Connally's wounds as not from the same bullet.

Remember what was written here that the bullet entering from rear below the neck of JFK then passing through struck the vertebrae, nicking it shown in X-Rays, and then ricocheted upward - exiting the front about the Adam's Apple. There was the fresh dent on the chrome dash of the Presidential Limo that was about the size of a bullet as this striking it. There was also the windshield debacle of actually a through and through bullet hole against it was "just cracked". The bullet exiting JFK's throat could have been either of these, or simply ricocheted out of the car altogether.

And so the questions arise. Then I am then saying that the Governor was hit by another shot other than the one striking the President from behind below the neck. It is really difficult looking at the Zapruder Film to not say that both these men were simultaneously hit by the same bullet. They both appear reacting at the same instant. However, this does not rule out that two bullets were fired simultaneously at both men by two different assassins.

It has been shown here that the American Government did "declassify" to the American Public and World in the House Select Committee Hearings that President Kennedy arrived into the Autopsy Room "with no brain". It is documented the President was in a different casket (then the one left from Dallas) brought into the room at Bethesda with both caskets in a paper trail and no one accessed the President at Bethesda. What was revealed to all via the testimony now allowed by Paul O'Conner (Military Autopsy worker), as he and the others were sworn to secrecy by the Military at the autopsy time - was that indeed the President was in that different casket and a body bag (which he was not placed in at Dallas) and was unzipped and O'Conner helped place the President onto the table and said there was "a gasp" as the President "had no brain" except "less than a handful" of serrated matter inside at the bottom of the blown open skull. Of course Parkland Doctors all testified that only about one third of the President's brain had been blown away, out. What was "declassified" was that the only persons with access and to do this (dispose of the President's brain) were those of the Secret Service and at the only time alone with the casket in Air Force One at the time of the swearing in of V.P. Johnson as the President now of the United States.

Since it was shown here that Oswald's gun could not possibly have been the murder weapon and according to all medical testimony, then also it is known that those of the Secret Service had planted fragments of bullets from Oswald's rifle - shot and collected elsewhere on a previous date. This includes in conspiracy the infamous "pristine bullet" planted on the gurney at Parkland Hospital.

And so also, we see the Secret Service were "sweeping" the Presidential Limo at Parkland and elsewhere - obviously then to gather and dispose of damning evidence of more than one assassin, being then by definition as part of the conspiracy. There was all the Parade Route oddities and lack of security, and the slowing down almost to a stop right precisely at the spot where the head wounds occurred which are also obviously conspiratorial. 

Revision Add-in: A post script here about the Presidential limo slowing to almost stopping the instants before the fatal head wounds. It is evident now why the first shot hitting the President about the lower neck upper back area was fired. This gave the excuses for the Secret Service Driver to be looking over his shoulder hearing shots with his testimony that he then hit the brakes instead of gas by mistake. Right. This occurred so suspiciously to all right in the exact "kill zone" when thereafter the fatal head shots were fired. 

To qualify Governor Connally's wounds in answering questions arisen in my thesis here, we go to the medical descriptions of the entry wound of the Governor. This is a several part examination of existing documented evidence and testimony.

Here is one source showing photos of the "recovered" bullets, fragments from the Presidential Limo and the 'pristine' (meaning almost with no damage) bullet from the gurney at Parkland....
http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/fragments/fragphotos.html
...and here....
http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Rifle_Bullets/index.html


And so with your research about the Gov. Connally wounds as I did, a good source is here....
http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm

....we find that the entrance wound of the Governor was described as much a puncture wound - meaning a straight on shot, the bullet entering with a slight elliptical shape as to be from a slight tangent or "tangential". The entry wound in the top rear of the President's head was a puncture wound - virtually round clean straight in. This alludes to the bullet hitting the Governor was from a slight angle. Those of course of the SBT (single bullet theory) camp will say that naturally, as the Governor said he was turning when he got hit.

This also means that a separate bullet could have been fired from a more severe angle than the supposed Oswald bullet hitting the President's head. That would cause the entry wound described in the Governor - slight tangential entry. Note that the entry wound to the rear of the President's head (top center, about size of a pencil hole) has been described as and looks like a puncture wound - straight in cleanly and not tangential - which of course means not from an angle such as from behind and to the right as the Book Depository Building, but rather straight on as from the DalTex Building.

There is more though, and importantly so. A lot of the bullets, cartridges, in these type weapons as Oswald's have a very pointed tip sharply. The ammunition for the Carcano Rifle (like Oswald's) is much more round in pronounced manner. This Carcano ammo, not even in the FBI test repository at time, having the rounded tip makes it much less able to yaw or tumble after leaving whatever it hit - here reported as JFK in the Warren Commission. It stays almost virtually straight to then hit a second target which became Governor Connally also reported by the warren Commission.

Most other bullets as this tend to hit sideways into the second victim, after tumbling or yaw from leaving the first. SEE....  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaw_(rotation)

Now in support of the Warren Commission, or rather not, it was actually not in there that the Carcano ammo could have indeed caused the slight tangential puncture entry wound of the Governor's back and as opposed to all other type ammo not as the Carcano rounded tip ammo - which is reportedly not known to yaw much or tumble after leaving a first victim. Ironically, the Warren Commission not doing their homework, lost a best chance to support their SBT (single bullet theory). This may have cinched their theory's credibility in the eyes of many more.

And so what we have here is that Governor Connally was hit from a slight angle - more so then the bullet that first entered the President's head (not tangential) in the top rear and from the rear. There is one research offering a shot was fired from the other end of the Book Depository Building and a lower floor I believe it was. That, as example, would be more of an angle obviously than straight on from the rear.

In review of the Secret Service, or rather the FBI, bullet fragments they said were found about the rear seat area (Mrs. Connally) - this would coincide with the angle shot from the Book Depository (Oswald sniper nest) as fragments from the head shot entering the rear of the President's head and exiting as fragments and landed there. Problem: The entry wound of the President's head towards the top and center (not the lower blow out wound of lower right side) was not tangential - but plainly seen as a traditional puncture wound fired straight on and not from an angle. Reconcile that! It would be from the Daltex Building if anywhere (straight on puncture wound), and not the Book Depository Building that would have caused then a somewhat tangential entry wound.

SCREENSHOT PICTURE.....
http://www.jfklancer.com/docs.maps/limoexam.gif

+Revision Add: (Also SEE 1.3 Triangulation Head Shots, and, 2.4 Satellite Jamming Defense, also, 4.1 Qualifying Governor Connally's Wounds.)
Now can be explained the two "walkie talkie" guys photographed in the "kill zone" at Dealey Plaza the moments of the shots. We have the entry wounds on the rear of the President - two. One is the straight on puncture entry wound on the rear of the President's head about the top middle, and the other at the lower, below the neck area, which is also a straight on puncture entry wound - both shots from behind and straight on and not from the Dallas Book Depository Building to the side, both non-tangetial wounds. And we have the Govenor's entry wound from the rear striking him in the back which is tangential - from a side angle and not straight on as from the Dal tex Building area. There are several instances of researchers showing it is believed Governor Conally was shot with a seperate bullet from a side angle and not wounded with the "pritine bullet", which the Warren Report claimed did it - a single bullet striking Kennedy in the neck area and passing through to then strike the Governor, the infamous "magic bullet theory. NOW GO TO Chapter One and Two discussing the "electronic firing pins" used by the assassins and also the documented information about the two "walkie talkie guys" present at the assassination on sight. I am adding here the mystery solved about these two "walkie talkie guys" as the trigger men for the assassination. Review how the electronic firing pins of the assassins rifles were set for wireless firing control. And we have here the two - TWO - sets of these assassins. ONE is the two rifles set to fire almost simultaneously from the rear causing the neck and back wounds of the President and Governor repectively. The second set, three rifles, set to fire at the President's head. TWO firing teams with TWO wireless portable walkie talkies as the triggers, trigger men, of the wireless enabled electronic firing pin rifles. THESE were the actual spotters on sight with their green light given (perhaps "Umbrella Man" - Go!) that fired the assassins rifles in their pre-planned fashion for purposes explained.


The greatest mystery I find here as knowing a different shot hit the Governor, is the whole planted evidence scenario. Remember that I have written and reminded that the Oswald Evidence of the gun and three spent shells have been already planted to find to frame Oswald. It has to be that all evidence found means only three shots could have been fired - and from Oswald's rifle only. This includes the pristine bullet found on the gurney at Parkland. If anything else shows up - it shows a conspiracy and may even reveal the evidence tampering that did go on. Busted. Obviously the assassination conspiracy "hit" was revealed as Oswald only did it and with three bullets only - period. They put all their money on that as the outcome of investigation obviously by all the found planted evidence. Even with all their planning, we find, they were sloppy and did weird risky unexplained things as if somewhat deranged rather than cold blooded calculated murderers - even being in category of a "state sanctioned hit" as is said today.

The strangest thing is the "pristine bullet" found on the gurney at Parkland Hospital. If they knew they were shooting JFK first in the back (and was shown here why and reason of that wound - not a mistake or sloppy gunmanship) - they also knew they were shooting the Governor also with a separate bullet. With the straight on puncture wound of the back at the neck area of JFK - they must have assumed (and even practiced on victims or reproductions) the exiting bullet would have struck the Governor as well. This means the second shooter actually causing the wounds with a separate shot would have left two entry wounds in the Governor's back - one tangential from the actual side shot and the other presumed as a tumbler or yaw entry from passing through the first victim (JFK). Again note the Carcano ammo. The bullet hitting JFK in the back/neck area did nick the vertebrae (discovered in X-Ray) ricocheting and exited the throat - but did not hit Connally. It ricocheted upwards and out and explains the angles involved. I have posted this here and has not been found elsewhere, to my knowledge, by other researchers who seem to have missed the valuable info about the vertebrae injury of JFK being struck by the bullet.

So why plant the pristine bullet? We are talking here a shot at least 90 yards away having to basically hit a silver dollar with all accuracy (JFK's back/neck shot). It did hit but a little to the left which then entered and ricocheted off the vertebrae and out. This is part of the weird stuff. Why take a shot like that with the obvious outcome being in many scenarios of violent reactions that would have called off the head shots ? Deranged people.

Now if you haven't gotten to the 'smokin gun' question here, it is this. How could those involved have possibly predicted the JFK back/neck shot would ricochet off his vertebrae and angle upward even out of the car and not hit Connally? Why and how then did they plant the pristine bullet as if they knew this would occur and took the next shot hitting Gov. Connally as if it was the JFK back shot that hit Connally?

They set up the single bullet theory - not Arlon Spector. It was like a script handed to American Government and Law investigating - Oswald, the rifle, the three spent shells, and the single bullet. Remember, I don't believe they had any type laser targeting then for rifles - but even so at 90 plus yards away pinpointing a vertebrae nick while the Limo was moving at speed during this sequence shots and after slowed down for the head shots is not possible except by luck in many, many shots and one hitting target - the vertebrae to cause ricocheting.

Look at it.... single bullet Carcano ammo (doesn't yaw much), tangential wound to Connally. It's crazy like they were Satan himself which knew more than saved him. But we know that was impossible. As they say God's hand is in everything. Here they must have gone a bit crazy wondering what happened to the exiting bullet that struck JFK in the back/neck area. Remember that the evidence of Oswald rifle fragments are being planted in the Limo too. Simple. Visually sweep the Limo after, beginning at Parkland, and even with a Geiger counter. Everything found swooped up to be thrown out and then plant the Oswald rifle fragments. Then wash it down to be sure nothing else is found in some profound excuse of decency for the President. And so the reality. They were prepared to explain the two entry wounds into Governor Connally's back - and P.S. - how could they have possibly known the bullet hitting the Governor would finally exit as a graze wound of the thigh (SBT) ?

Too bad for them - Governor Connally had turned sideways and then fell into his wife's lap before the head shot so that they could not say one entry wound into Connally's back was fragments from the JFK head shots - which was probably the planned outcome.

Again we go back to the Carcano rifle picked which raised the questions why Oswald did this. He could have easily purchased a rifle back then anywhere and not have it traced to him, but seemingly chose the order method that would and with the fake name. Did the conspirators do their homework and knew this about the Carcano ammunition that does not tumble or yaw much after hitting a first victim and into the second? Does this explain these obvious stick out like a sore thumb tactics in Oswald ordering the Carcano rifle? Fits. Fits for the SBT (single bullet theory) and we are back to square one - why and how did they set that up as it was? How could they know the outcome of the shots in advance as they did occur ? The only explanation is they expected two entry wounds into Governor Connally and ready to have evidence support that in their prearranged Oswald did it in three shots (evidence already planted).

All said and done, the Doctors said the found fragments/bullet on the floor of the Limo would be the expected evidence and not the pristine bullet for Governor Connally's wounds. As well, all tolled, the fragments found (planted) weighed far too much to be from the "pristine bullet" planted at Parkland.

Take a look......
1963 SECRET SERVICE FILM (JFK ASSASSINATION RECONSTRUCTION)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcqYcdIce6E

You can see the angles here that do not match the JFK head wound from the rear that was as a puncture wound straight on (apparently from Daltex Bldg.) - no tangential entrance. Ironically, the slightly elliptical puncture entry tangential wound in Gov. Connally's back reveals the JFK rear head wound entry was not from the Book Depository. This is more gleaned from the medical evidence and not mentioned by other researchers I have seen. And so they "snitched" on themselves. Perhaps the first "amateur" state sanctioned hit in modern history. Again, there is no such thing as the perfect crime in America.

And so the bottom line here in qualifying Gov. John Connally's wounds is shown as the actual multiple assassin attack became flawed immediately after the first wounding of the President which was also the simultaneous wounding of the Governor by a different gunman and bullet. In other words, there were two different gunman who simultaneously fired - one at the President and one at the Governor. They had obviously been prepared to have these wounds explained and obviously involved the mysterious pristine bullet found on the gurney at parkland Hospital.

What went immediately wrong, was the bullet that hit the President in the lower neck area (upper back) striking through, ricocheted off of the President's vertebrae and exited upward out his throat area around the Adam's apple. This is what forced the President's arms up in reaction, as seemingly clutching towards his throat as choking as seen on the Zapruder film and reported/testified by witnesses.

This unexpected injury to JFK in the shooting shows Gov. Connally was hit simultaneously by a second gunman. The one shot of the three the Warren Commission reports that "missed everything" may indeed be a shot intended as firing over the targets and missing everything - expressly as a missed shot that in turn was intended to be a cover story second shot that then fitted hitting the Governor causing back wounding. Witnesses easily sloughed off as hearing echoes, but the medical evidence was the crux of the matter.

If you look at the Zapruder film you notice it seems both men were hit simultaneously by that shot that struck the President in the lower neck/upper back area. But in viewing the aftermath of that strike, we see JFK throwing his arms up as seemingly choking and then after that the Governor has attempted turning around to see him. Now this is about the time of the reported second shot according to the warren Commission that simply missed everything - and obviously it would have had to, because look at the men now to try and shoot the Governor. We have JFK's arms up and clutching towards his throat - his elbows and arms up high and now in the way of another shot to hit the Governor. As well, the Governor has turned and is also falling into his wife's lap backwards, sideways in the car. There is now no clear shot from the buildings behind to hit Connally in the back. This proves the bullets that hit the President in the lower neck area and the Governor in the back were indeed fired simultaneously even though Governor Connally swears he was hit by the "second shot heard". All the reenactments and all the years they have never shown the shot with JFK's arms up and in the way of it with the Gov. turning and then falling - though they have shown the trees in the way of an Oswald first shot, showing when it was possible to fire. Let's see Gov. Connally's "second shot hit" him. If possible, then medically it would seem to have shown a more tangential entry wound as the target was moving sideways as opposed to the shooter shooting from a sideways position.

I hope this has served to qualify Governor John Connally's wounds that occurred and when - answering as well questions that may have arose about my "solved" thesis on the JFK Assassination and concerning the lower neck/upper back wounding of JFK which then did not continue on into the Governor.

 

 30 
 on: February 17, 2015, 10:39:40 pm 
Started by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee - Last post by JFK-50-Year-Jubilee
Chapter Four
Sections

4.1 Qualifying Governor Connally's Wounds

4.2 Dr. Pepper

4.3 Conspiracy Extends to MLK and RFK

4.4 Jean Dixon Prophecy

4.5 JFK Medical History

4.6 The Warren Remission

 

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines