JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings

Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion) .......

EDIT / WINTER 2015 --- WE ARE MAKING OUR EBOOK FINISHED ORGANIZED FORMAL VERSION OF OUR NOTES HERE FREE TO OUR FORUM MEMBERS AND VISITORS !

TITLE: 'President John F. Kennedy 50th, Case Solved'

WE HAVE USED THE FREE EBOOK CREATOR - MOBIPOCKET.COM EBOOK CREATOR AND FREE READER (GENUINE FREEWARE - NO ADS ETC) TO CREATE OUR EBOOK IN PROFESSIONAL MANNER FOR THE DESKTOP PC (NETBOOK, NOTEBOOK, LAPTOP).

MOBIPOCKET.COM ALSO OFFERS MOBILE VERSION FREE READERS FOR PALM OS, WINDOWS POCKET PC / SMARTPHONE, SYMBIAN OS, BLACKBERRY, - DEDICATED DEVICES AS CYBOOK, iLIAD, PEPPER PAD.

DOWNLOAD YOUR CHOICE OF FREE READER TO VIEW/READ OUR EBOOK HERE:
http://www.mobipocket.com/en/DownloadSoft/default.asp
http://www.mobipocket.com/en/DownloadSoft/default.asp?Language=EN

THEN DOWNLOAD OUR EBOOK HERE:
https://jumpshare.com/v/TVajCawpe607RgtQY3Cb

CLICK TO OPEN IT AUTOMATICALLY IN THE MOBI POCKET READER AND USE THIS PASSWORD:
nigibvil5w

ALTERNATIVELY YOU CAN READ THE EBOOK POSTED HERE AT THE FORUM HERE:
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,323.0.html

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


((( # SPECIAL EDIT..... MY OPINION OF THE WARREN COMMISSION FINAL REPORT.......
* IMAGINE Jane Curtain and Dan Aykroyd of Saturday Night Live of the day in their parody of Point / Counter Point... Jane quoting Chronkite on the TV with the Warren Commission Report Special to America when it was released...... AND THEN DAN..... quote / unquote....

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80nW6AOhTs>

http://youtu.be/k80nW6AOhTs

"Jane you ignorant sludtt! If there was a hole any larger than the one between your ears and legs it would be reserved only for the Devil himself in Hell. From every Magellan hopeful and telescope owner enthusiest and lucky child finding a toy refractor as a prize in a Cracker Jack box would assume to have discovered the eleventh planet "Turdsville" seeing the mountain of shidtt delivered to this city today in the worst indiscretion, alarm and shame since discovering a Cuban cigar is not one you smoke, but one that smokes you.
Indeed this is perhaps the worst sequel written as "An even funnier thing happened to me on my way to Cuba..." since the written Adolph Hitler version of the Holy Bible... Mein Kampf "...


I AM BEGINNING HERE MY FULL SCRATCH NOTES AS TO MY FINAL CONCLUSIONS AND AS MY "CASE SOLVED" FOR THE 50 YEAR CELEBRATION.

LET ME PREMISE THIS THAT MY "SOLVED" IS BASED ALMOST ENTIRELY OF ALL THE GREAT EFFORTS, REPORTS, AND TESTIMONIES AND INTERVIEWS  BY THE PARKLAND HOSPITAL DALLAS AND BY ALL THE GREAT RESEARCHERS EFFORTS AND BY THE AMERICAN CITIZENS, US ALL - AND PERSONAL RESEARCH OF DIRECT EVIDENCES MADE PUBLIC.

***SPECIAL EDIT NOTE AUGUST 01, 2012..... I HAVE EDITED ALL POSTINGS HERE AND CLEANED UP AND ANY REVISION NECESSARY TO VIRTUALLY COMPLETED EXCEPT FOR THE SUSPECTS LIST INCLUDING ALL THOSE AMERICAN WITNESSES KILLED BY THEM.

EDIT: THIS FORUM IS IN A PUBLIC TYPE POSTING AND I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT POSTED HERE IS BASED ACTUALLY ON AND COMBINED AS A BIBLE STUDY I HAVE DONE CALLED....

JFK Assassination Solved, by God
http://echurchofphiladelphia.org/2013/08/jfk-assassination-solved-by-god-introduction/
AND HERE:
http://churchphilaforums.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,174.0.html
(back up site)

AND THE POINT IS HERE THAT THE PUBLIC VERSION HERE CALLED "Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion)" I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THIS IS ENTIRELY BASED ON KNOWLEDGE AND INSTRUCTION FROM GOD AS BEING A PERSON OF FAITH AND I TAKE NO CREDIT FOR "SOLVED" BUT THAT THIS WAS SOLVED BY GOD 2,000 YEARS AGO BEFORE IT EVER HAPPENED - FOUND IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION IN THE KING JAMES AUTHORIZED VERSION HOLY BIBLE (only, as the only approved direct translation into the English language from the Hebrew as copyrighted in the Public Domain USA).

SO TO CORRECT / NOT ADMINISTRATOR SOLVED - BUT JFK ASSASSINATION SOLVED BY GOD ! (Give all the credit to God....)
=============|


I will begin here with an introductory premise in lieu of an informal write up --- just to get things rolling. These are scratch notes and I will go back and then formally make the conclusionary report as my "Case Solved".

Don't forget I am from Philadelphia PA USA which is home of Cold Case solvings.

==============SPECIAL EDIT / OCTOBER 18 2013.... CONCERNING THE WOUNDS IN THE NEXT POST, READ THIS BRIEF ARTICLE ABOUT THEM BY ONE OF THE ATTENDING PHYSICIANS OF PARKLAND HOSPITAL DALLAS....

Surgeon in ER insists 2 gunmen shot JFK
Doctor first to see Kennedy's wound
October 18, 2013 12:04 am
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-city/surgeon-in-er-insists-2-gunmen-shot-jfk-708042/

By Michael A. Fuoco / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

BRIEF SNIPS QUOTED:

A surgeon who half a century ago was among the doctors who tried to save President John F. Kennedy's life said Thursday that the Warren Commission got it wrong in determining a lone gunman assassinated JFK in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963.

Speaking via teleconference to a Duquesne University symposium marking the 50th anniversary of the assassination, Robert N. McClelland said he was the first doctor in Parkland Hospital's Trauma Room One to notice the massive wound in the back of Kennedy's skull and that a trauma of that size had to be an exit wound.

"The whole right side of his skull was gone. I could look inside his skull cavity. Obviously, it was a mortal wound," he told a spellbound audience of legal, medical, forensic and investigative experts and the public who packed the university's Power Ballroom.

Dr. McClelland, now 83 and professor emeritus at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, said that because it was an exit wound, it logically followed that it had been fired from in front of the president's limousine. And, in turn, that meant a second gunman was involved in the assassination, contradicting the Warren Commission's finding that there was but one assassin.

But Dr. McClelland was resolute. "Having seen what I saw" in the emergency room and then viewing the Zapruder film of the assassination, he said, he believes JFK "was initially hit from a bullet fired from the sixth floor that went through his back and out through his neck. The next injury was caused by somebody behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll firing a shot that blew out the right side of his head."

(Statements confirm what I have about wounds as you will see)

I will begin from all first-hand Medical Testimony that described at least THREE ENTRY WOUNDS of the President's head.

# FIRST ENTRY Wound was the carbine type hole about the size of a pencil hole - in the top rear of the skull, about above the massive hole towards the right - above this and more centered. This entry wound was like about the size of pencil or slightly larger it would make as stuck into a watermelon, cantalope, etc. The exit wound of this entry wound was obliterated by the virtual simultaneous second exploding tip shot - virtually completely.
 
SCREEN SHOT 1st HEADWOUND: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/JFK_posterior_head_wound.jpg

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/JFK_posterior_head_wound.jpg)

# SECOND ENTRY Wound from the front and right side approximately above the forehead obliterating the exit wound damage from the first shot. The entry wound damage of this second shot is consistent with an exploding upon contact type projectile round - see 'scalp/cap flanges fingers' skull flaps medical evidences of the frontal wounds. Reported as only possible via an exploding tipped projectile round.

SCREEN SHOT 2ND HEADWOUND: http://www.abload.de/img/autopsycolorsideqndlv.jpg
ALSO: https://2718f7c0-a-86436885-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/patspeer.com/www2/chapter16b%3Adigginginthedirt/tangentialwoundscomparison.jpg?attachauth=ANoY7cp170shXk1vzKAebhAG4UYNqkThc7KqhgXmMwk4lA8HpUnAKatMFkhcwxFXIztvBbo61ADSXAQ-Cl7x5gvLzaDjvmYWzXXIMY4hOFPsqijtFzNeqq0w939gIEyEWj1C4gdSF1WNUfIgU3vgLGeMlz1DMCTpdTcddyqxiDi0hduZGMkMSqsVH2Gnbfe6ZV6S5u_Zx2nWj6DaW0-GfegIoEWvVJEvDoYHynDmrWCw6Sg01ZiI9niOcuQ0n5AVZOUxkY9dNIuzkkEGJ-mTDurRiQbFS3GBjg%3D%3D&attredirects=0

(http://www.abload.de/img/autopsycolorsideqndlv.jpg)

# THIRD ENTRY Wound was declared as a high power carbine type shot from the front as approximately entering above the forehead that created the exit wound lower rear of head described as about the size of a baseball exit wound - the rear blow out wound / massive hole. The reported and testified exit wound here defined the type rifle that caused it - as a carbine type as the described "Oswald Rifle". This rear "blow out" wound has been discovered as occurring AFTER the front right side exploding tipped round hit by great efforts by great researchers, thus defines a THIRD rifle and was in front as most probability as down from the overpass area where witnesses and Police ran to also.

SCREENSHOT 3RD HEADWOUND: http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=ByPE-oAqyK6KXM&tbnid=FbyIlJICWENWaM:&ved=0CAgQjRw4Pw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmcadams.posc.mu.edu%2Fhead.htm&ei=g-f3U-3JHJX-yQTD1YDQBw&psig=AFQjCNHEv-q82pesrtP_VWjztlHudAdJJA&ust=1408841987574702
AT WEBSITE: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm

(http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/medical/mcdrawing.GIF)

PLEASE PLAY THIS VIDEO..... CONCERNING THE THIRD FINAL SHO TO JFK's HEAD
WATCH ALL 8 MINUTES.....
Bob Harris The final shots - addendum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYaoBB1rwkc
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYaoBB1rwkc>
AND OBSERVE MY COMMENTS....
Hello Bob. I believe you have an end of a mystery concerning the path of the third bullet hitting JFK's head from the front causing the "rear blow out wound" described by Doctors as about the size of a tight clenched fist about the below-center-right side of the back of JFK's head. IMO there were three rounds that hit JFk's head almost simultaneously, almost. First hits from rear causing neat entry wound about size of a pencil punctering not tangetial apparently, head juts forward Z312/313. Almost simultaneoulsy a second round as exploding tip hits from front and right (Knoll area), massive blood. The third round you have captured here in your vid shows the third round coming from front to back from overpass area, and then the pinkish wound part and missing hair appears with the blow out exit wound in the rear of JFK's head. I believe this then is that mystery as this is very much like a "gutter wound" and described well with pictuers at PatSpeer.Com Chapter 16b Digging in the Dirt. The normal type gutter wound is a shot that creases the skull as like a grazing wound but deeper. The third shot then to JFK's head as a gutter shot in some vein is not creasing skull, but brain matter (pinkish part appears) and then exits the rear of the head causing the exit wound described by Doctors and commonly called the "rear blow out wound" in forums - about the size of a clenched fist hole on the back of JFK'S head - somewhat to the right and some what down from center.
SOURCE:  Chapter 16b: Digging in the Dirt
http://www.patspeer.com/chapter16b%3Adigginginthedirt
http://www.patspeer.com/_/rsrc/1381480516642/chapter16b%3Adigginginthedirt/Gutterwoundfixed.jpg

(http://www.patspeer.com/_/rsrc/1381480516642/chapter16b%3Adigginginthedirt/Gutterwoundfixed.jpg)


*** What seems entirely established by the great efforts of top Researchers with excellent ware is that President Kennedy was hit first from the rear at FRAME 313 of the two rounds and one exploding projectile. With the great excellent ware able to super slow and super blow up without very much distortion or loss at all - indeed shows the President's head just jutting forward from the first impact of a rear shot impact entry wound, as then almost simultaneously then jolting backwards violently from severe impact from about the side and front directions - violently forcing the President backwards and to the left. As to the sequence order of the second two shots from the front - they are practically simultaneous BUT definately AFTER the first rear shot. 

THE MEDICAL TESTIMONY BY THE ATTENDING PHYSICIANS DIRECTLY OF PROFESSION TESTIFIES THAT THREE SHOTS OCCURRED..... THE FIRST VIA HIGH POWER CARBINE FROM THE REAR - THE SECOND WAS THE EXPLODING TIPPED PROJECTILE ROUND CAUSING THE "FLANGED" FINGER LIKE SCALP/CAP BLOWOUT/BLOWBACK REACTIVE DAMAGES AND MASSIVE BRAIN DAMAGE - THE THIRD BEING VIA HIGH POWER CARBINE FROM THE FRONT CAUSING THE REAR BLOWOUT EXIT WOUND.

THE SECOND SHOT OBLITERATED THE EXIT WOUND OF THE FIRST SHOT VIRTUALLY SIMULTANEOUSLY. THE ENTRY WOUND OF THE THIRD SHOT FROM THE FRONT CAUSING THE REAR "BLOW OUT" EXIT WOUND EVIDENCE WAS LOST VIA THE "MISSING BRAIN" OF THE DEAD PRESIDENT ARRIVING TO BETHESDA FOR THE AUTOPSY. ENTERING THIRD INTO THE ALREADY DAMAGE FROM THE SECOND EXPLODING SHOT SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER - IT ENTERED THIS DAMAGE AS MAKING ANY ENTRY WOUND BUT IN THE OBLITERATION OF THE DAMAGES ALREADY.

THESE OCCURRED A SPLIT PARTIAL SECOND APART - ALMOST SIMULTANEOUSLY AND IN THEIR PREARRANGED SPECIFIC ORDER, ALMOST - IN THE OBVIOUS EXACT ORDER AS THE REAR CARBINE WOUND FIRST AND THEN THE SECOND EXPLOSIVE TIP CARBINE PROJECTILE ROUND FROM THE FRONT AND SIDE SECOND AND THEN THE CARBINE SHOT FROM THE FRONT THIRDLY.

THERE IS OBVIOUSLY NO OTHER POSSIBLE ORDER OF SHOTS AS THE DIRECT MEDICAL OBSERVATION AS THE ATTENDING DOCTORS HAS BEEN TESTIFIED TO AND REPORTED ON IN INTERVIEWS AND SWORN COURT TESTIMONY.

THESE ARE THE ATTENDING DOCTORS DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WOUNDS TO THE HEAD THAT PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY SUFFERED.

NOW REMEMBER THAT THE WARREN REPORT WILL NOT REPORT THESE AND ACTUALLY SAID THEY WERE MISTAKEN ALONG WITH MRS.JACKIE KENNEDY AND IS BASED UPON THE AFORE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSPIRATORS THAT THE AUTOPSY WILL BE "CONTROLLED" BY JACKIE AND ROBERT KENNEDY AS WAS SUGGESTED TO THEM TO KEEP THE PRESIDENT'S HEALTH RECORD FROM THE PUBLIC AND TO "LOCK UP" THE EVIDENCE IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES - THE EXACT PLAN THE CONPSIRATORS WERE BANKING ON, JACKIE AND BOBBY BEING UNKNOWINGLY DUPED INTO THIS "SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE" AND UNDER LAWFUL NATIONAL ARCHIVES LAWS...... DISCUSSED FURTHER DOWN OR GO HERE --- http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100autopsy.html


----HOW ? LUCK ? ANSWER NEXT.....

When considering all the evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald was expressly set as the "fall guy" for the JFK assassination, and as conspiracy proved revealing the partial role of Oswald, their version of truth has to be that the head wounds of President Kennedy HAD TO BE FROM THE REAR or obviously more than one shooter would have been revealed. Follow this through.

They had Oswald's rifle and three shells in the building, or considering the Mauser rifle testimony and/or reports - Oswald's rifle was in the least 'waiting in the wings' to be presented as the murder weapon. Various cameras were being confiscated immediately after the shooting. Others developed were returned damaged. The "money" went on the Zapruder Film and additional testimony of head movement as reaction to the rear shot much later (rear shot hit brain nerve that forced the head forward then backward). [I personally believe Zapruder was a plant as part of the conspiracy. ]

If the THREE SHOTS went amiss as out of order in EXACT TIME they hit the head, the entire "contract hit" was fatally erred and would obviously reveal a conspiracy as more than one assassin. 

How could they "time it perfect " ? The "triangulation hit" ?

A visual sign like "Umbrella Man" - No, you can't aim through a scope and look at him at the same time for such the EXACT precise timing of the three shots.

Maybe a radio device and ear plug and a beep audio signal ? No, the reaction time could vary greater and greater above one person, and here three at least, to this stimulus signal by hundredths to tenths to even half to a full second later of pulling the trigger upon ANY audio signal to fire - or yelling "now !" - by more than one shooter which there plainly were according to the Attending Physicians at Parkland Hospital and the President's body itself.

It needed an ELECTRONIC FIRING PIN as opposed to the traditional physical firing pin. The gun hammer ignites the powder. This can also be done by an electric current of the right amount of amperage to ignite the powder.

We now have ELECTRONIC FIRING PINS in three weapons. These can be set to any timing for firing to the thousandeths of a second apart and any amount of guns and in any order 1,2,3. BUT - THIS CAN BE DONE WIRELESSLY BY ONE PERSON.... all the shooters have to do is AIM THE WEAPON AND THE WIRELESS TRIGGER MAN HITS THE BUTTON - causing the firing order of the three weapons 1,2,3 as a hundredth of a second apart in order 1,2,3 - a hundredth of a second apart as example of the exact timing it was.

Electronic firing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_firing
"....Electronic firing refers to the use of an electric current to fire a cartridge, instead of a percussion cap.

In modern firearm designs, a firing pin and percussion cap are used to ignite the propellant in the cartridge and propels the bullet forward. Because the firing pin must travel a short distance, this creates a short delay between the user pulling the trigger and the weapon firing, which generally decreases accuracy.

In an electronic-fired firearm however, an electric current is used instead to ignite the propellant, which fires the cartridge as soon as the trigger is pulled.

Electrically primed small arms cartridges retain the primer which functions in the same way as a conventional primer. Rather than being struck by a firing pin, or equivalent mechanical means, a small electrical current serves to detonate the primer which provides the thermal impulse necessary to ignite the propellant which then deflagrates, producing pressure. ...."

Now there is the one "radio walkie talkie guy" on the scene on the sidewalk area about after the first JFK wounds to the throat area. This radio as a two way radio could be a minimum one quarter watt radio broadcast which would broadcast a signal a quarter of a mile or more.

A wireless broadcast, a second or less, dead carrier (broadcast button on and no voice) would broadcast a wireless signal. If we take the two positions of the School Book and Dal Tex Buildings and then all the way down the picket fence to the overpass - we are looking at about well over a hundred yards. It is measured from "Oswald's layer" to the head wound as about 90 yards. You can throw in another 30 yards about to the Dal Tex Building and another 50 yards about to the fence down at the over pass area.

So, the two furthest shooting positions apart are about 150 yards approxiamately. THIS is then the BROADCAST SIGNAL range/distance neccesssary revealing the wattage necesary to reach them. A common four watt citizens band radio walkie talkie broadcast signal will go several miles - up to even ten miles or more on line of sight without obstructions (buildings, trees, etc. ). The smaller one quarter watt two way radios obviously can broadcast a signal up to a mile away, same conditions - line of sight.

Now the electronic firing pin in the three rifles being modified to recieve and amplify a wireless signal induction voltage to the neccessary amperage to ignite the powder of the rounds - these can be set to ANY time delay desired such as one thousandeth or one hundredth of a second electronically - AND for each rifle, to say they were set to shoot one hundredth of a second apart in sucession as example of the actual time factor which can be precisely determined.

And 'shotzie" there you are. Each of the three rounds were set to fire in SUCCESSION of each other - whatever the exact as one hundredth of a second apart as example. ALL THE SHOOTERS HAD TO DO WAS AIM THE RIFLES - THE REST WAS DONE BY ONE ELECTRONIC TRIGGER MAN FIRING ALL THREE RIFLES PRACTICALLY INSTANTLY APART - NO MISSES, AS TIME SENSITIVE.


The FIRST SHOT OBVIOUSLY HAD TO BE FROM THE REAR as obviously Oswald was already set up as the shooter of ALL three shots. It seems such the overkill or even the degree of paranoa by the conspirators that horribly they set up three rifles to kill the President. So violent and so the murderers they were guarenteed the "hit" in this manner. It is probable as opposed to speculative that the exploding projectile second shot was used obviously (in looking back retrospectively) because of the massive brain damage it could do upon impact. This allowed further destroying of the area to destroy bullet fragments and evidence. They needed Oswald rifle evidences and none else. If you will remember or research - the Attending Physicians at Parkland Hospital said there was only about "one third" of the brain blown away. That's not what was reported in the Autopsy. It was virtually all gone. Lastly, to the Public and even Warren Commission Members, the second exploding round damage to the front of the head appeared as what would be explained as an "exit wound" of the alleged fatal shot by L. H. Oswald. The average citizen having no practical knowledge of gun wounds - well everything seemed plausible. Any private citizen of any degree dispelling any of these lies could simply be made out as some self serving liar trying some new profitable book story - and did occur during the Garrison Investigation fom New Orleans, publically destroying personnas.

OBVIOUSLY Oswald or anyone did not have the time to remove the WIRELESS electronic firing pin panel insertion 'jury rig' that would be about the size of a cigarette pack but smaller - and replace all with the original hardware of the alleged murder weapon, plant it and run like hell without getting caught. Neither was the alleged Mauser 7.65 Rifle reported or seen with such the jury rig wirless receiver attached to the rifle. So, right. This moves to the Oswald rifle "ballistics confirmed" fragments found and that if Oswald's rifle was already planted in the Book Depository - then the fragments were planted as well as the "pristine bullet" found on the stretcher because OBVIOUSLY Oswald's rifle could NOT have been the murder weapon due to the MEDICAL TESTIMONY of the Attending Physicians in Parkland Hospital Dallas because it did NOT have the Wireless Electronic Firing Pin "jury rig" attached to it and is ruled out as the medical testimony revealed three electronic firing pin coordinated fire weapons. 

(((The arguement that three rifles could have simulataneously fired by luck or plan at the same time and all hit as they did is lost in probability and odds as impossible and non existant with the preponderance of medical and miltary security evidence to the contrary and considering the nature of the homicide here and by who - as assassination of the President of the United States by, in the least, three shooters paid to do so with escape arrangements obviously as well and complete cover stories etc.
OTHERWISE you would also have to explain and produce three "lone nuts" as Oswald to fit the "coincidence" that just all happened to pick the exact same very spot in the Parade Route and also at Dallas and also the same date being November 22, 1963. The odds, again, of this are virtually non existant. BUT, having Oswald's incriminating "evidences" in place [rifle, bullet fragments, etc] then it is neccessary to produce two other "lone nut assassins" and the evidences of that which goes into fringe lunacy I am sure.... dog bites lol.... in other words, Oswald's tale was told, prearranged, to the world as some Communist sympathizer in some manner - but as well likely emotionally disturbed, or even some traitor of some sort as being a "double defector" from two nations etc blah blah blah as the profile story of the "caught" assassin.
NOW you would need two other completely INDEPENDENT other "nut lone assassin" profile stories as to the Who, What, Where, When - they decided to shoot President JFK in the head in the Parade Route in Dallas on Nov 22 1963 to fit the whole theory that possibly three "lone nut assassins" happened to all show up in Dallas on the Parade Route in and about the same exact area and all at virtually the exact second decided to shoot at the exact precise spot ---- ALL completely independent of each other NOT knowing each other at all so that NO conspiracy was/is possible, as the theory is based on the random chance three independent "lone assassin nuts" may have coincidentally shot at the exact same second randomly - to the contrary notwithstanding. The contrary of that is there were three in conspiracy and all shot at the exact same instant.

The preponderance of evidence CLEARLY showing the Conspiracy from evidence tampering etc as well as excellent testimony/report and visual evidence of Parade Route Security tampering etc. CLEARLY rules out ANY theory that there were several people as Oswald present simultaneously shooting being at least three head shots and at least one shot to the President's lower neck area. Additionally, the illegal gruesome act of the disposal of the President's brain matter en route reveals the foreknowledge of the explosive round projectile presumably with mercury evidence being removed as best possible by this most ugly criminal act thinkable as opposed to the idea that Oswald was being set up originally and two other happened to fire at the same time. There would be no need to dispose of evidence mentioned as Oswald's would be in place and any else found simply destroyed or later identified with other plants and real ones removed. This reveals their paranoa over getting caught by mercury evidence by an exploding tip round. It also reveals they had to frame Oswald and kill him for their version of case solved. In short, according to this theory of three shooters not knowing each other all showed up and fired at the same exact time - then the Secret Service [only ones in pocession of JFK's body en route] and evidence "clean up crews" would have to have been NOTIFIED like "I don't know how to tell you this but like one or two other shooters fired simultaneously and we've got extra evidence to clean up to avoid a conspiracy probe" . In other words - WHERE AND WHO reported to the Secret Service et al that "someone shot a mercury round exploding tip at the same time, believe it or not - and we gotta clean up!"
WHOever possibly had THAT experience on site to make THAT assessment being obviously critical to the cover up going on, indeed, by the Oswald teams being independent and without knowledge of the two other "lone assassin nuts" shooting.... They would HAVE to be on the ground within the "kill zone" to ever be able to call up "mercury tipped exploding round fired/hit the President simultaneously - act accordingly in clean up of all things".
No, again, the preponderance of evidence coupled with the nature of the assassination and by who of the President of the United States at such the time as just winding down, literally, from nuclear World War Three if the USSR had not backed down at the Cuban Missle Crisis places all "maybe it was a coincidence that three "lone assassin nuts" happened to ironically fire at the same exact second at the President's head hitting him fatally" is completely virtually non-existant. )))

And also, it is obvious the Electric Trigger Man wireless radio and all WIRELESS RECEIEVER ELECTRIC FIRING PINS were set at a frequency that was NOT used by all the surrounding broadcasts as Police Radio, AM Radio Stations, HAM Radio, CB Radio, etc. - as ANY ONE using their broadcast frequency would have OBVIOUSLY fired the weapons prematurely - as obviously disasterously for them.

As a sort of footnote is observing in a formal "retrial" if you will, that obviously all witnessing to the "three shots" will be legaly impinged upon regarding as well the precluding testimony and evidence of this coerced and manipulated and ignored testimonies to the contrary whereby witnesses reported being told to "shut up" and "three shots is all you heard" and "you / they were mistaken" etc. This then includes same treatment as to the Oswald rifle evidences.

Impinged Evidence and Testimony as meaning these will be isolated, set aside as corrupted and tainted.

Note that in electronics, and I have a Certificate in Home Electronics and Equipment Repair, that there is what is called Band Pass and Band Block filters. You can set up any to receive any frequency you wish - blocking out all others.

Now we all know there is the extrememly tiny broadcast voltage signal in the air for Radio and TV - and now Satellite and Wi-Fi - and this tiny almost minute voltage signal is then amplified into the TV picture or like even to the loudest radio channel playing rattling all the china off the shelf at up to 250 Watts or even more. In automobiles the amplification is not supplied by plugging it into the house electric plug. It is from the 12 volt car battery which also gets amplified into up to 30 Amps or more (lots of juice). From a simple car battery and amplification of that voltage - it cranks the 20,000 volts running through spark plugs giving the electric spark neccessary to ignite the gasoline.
Any tiny voltage can be amplified into the greatest amperage and voltage you wish. The point is that a simple two way radio signal of tiny voltage - like even less than the current through a small flashlight bulb - can be amplified all the way up to the 40,000 volts into the picture tube that used to run in the age old Black and White Televisions , so that if it took up to say 2 or even 30 Amps (electric current, juice) to electronically set off the rifle/pistol rounds - it is that easy with a handful of electronic components and in this instance assembled in a very small electronic board attached to the rifle/pistol (Remington Fireball). The electronic board would be the size of a pack of cigarettes or even way less in 1963 as opposed to stamp size chips today.

Just as introduction, basically 1963 was void of many, many, many taken-for-granted practical inventions and lifestyle today. Color TV was not even invented yet ! There were no personal computers - and possibly not even dreamed of yet. No cell phones or smart phones. No Satellite TV or internet - and of course no internet at all or even dreamed of yet probably. The Presidential Assassination on November 22 1963 is sometimes referred to as the first "media circus" in America - and as giving birth to the modern Live News casts on location.

Because the assassination was obviously the "crime of the century" - and especially upon knowledge of the death of the President, all newscasts were broadcasting all tidbits blow by blow, minute by minute, of all the events unfolding. There was the initial witnesses pointing to a man seen in the 6th Floor window of the Schoolbook Depository and the Police rushing in there. And rapidly, events unfolded to the broadcast for a possible suspect and the finding of the apparent murder weapon and finding the suspect after minutes before of a local Dallas Police Officer gunned down in the streets involved in a possible arrest or questioning - whether related yet unknown. There were some processed movie clips being shown - and the famous Abe Zapruder being interviewed and the suggestion to get his home film processed as fast as possible.

So we all know the history - as literally with in a handful of hours that some 'lone assassin" with a Communist background was arrested who worked in the Schoolbook Depository and was found to be the owner of the rifle found on the 6th Floor where he was working which included the three spent cartridges on the floor beside the window a man was seen in with a rifle - and as well was charged with the Police Officer homicide. And then the bizarre occurence of the suspect murdered in the Police Building live on Television during the funeral of President J. F. Kennedy while he (Oswald) was in transport and by some supposed 'mafia' figure.

SINCE IT IS KNOWN A CONSPIRACY OCCURRED, THE MOST IMPORTANT EVENT OF THAT ASPECT HERE IS COMMITTMENT.....
The overall Conspiracy has engaged very early on to COMMITTMENT. They committed to the murder weapon and the murderer and most importantly that the fatal shot occurred from the 6th Floor of the Depository Building - BEHIND the President. ALL the evidence now going on IMMEDIATELY after the fatal shot (s ) have to agree with the SHOT FROM BEHIND FROM THE 6TH FLOOR and that Lee Harvey Oswald fired the shots - ONLY 3 - with the murder weapon found and spent shells beside it, 3.

As to who knew what that was involved in the conpiracy can be arrived at with the intense conclusion of the case, all told. What immediately occurring after the assassination and pronounced death of the President was one of the first evidence tamperings by the ILLEGAL seizure of the dead president's body at Parkland Hospital to PREVENT a legal Autopsy under Texas Law and Juirsdiction. THIS was quite neccessary as we find that part of the over all Conspiracy as persuading the Kennedy Family present - Widow Mrs. Kennedy and brother U.S. Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy - to the hope of offering the limited findings to archives that "locked up" the evidence for that time period (see the Gift Law and either 25 or 50 years in Archives) - limited as also the knowing and suggesting towards the Kennedy Family to NOT allow some procedures of the Autopsy because of the "health secrets' of the President.

SEE NEXT..... THE AUTOPSY "DIRECTED" BY THE KENNEDY FAMILY.....

WE CAN SEE HERE THE DOINGS OF THE AUTOPSY THAT WERE IN REALITY OCCURRING STEP BY STEP BY THE PERMISSION OF THE KENNEDY FAMILY PRESENT BEING MRS. J. F. KENNEDY (JACKIE) AND BROTHER U.S. ATTY. GEN. ROBERT F. KENNEDY....

http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100autopsy.html
(SEE SYNOPSIS BELOW / DIRECT EVIDENCE TESTIMONY)

Now upon verifying all these - it gives a VERY GREAT dismissal of many, many instances of reference to the "autopsy was contolled by conpsirators". That is really important as putting together the over all view of the Parts of the Conpiracy and those of suspicion or report or fact.

Let's start with one person "ordered the hit".....

We have the later screwball lack of security of the Parade Route circumstance under complete suspicion and slight bewilderment. We have the "insider" Col. Prouty giving us the information missing on the actual intelligent factual read out about the normal Presidential Security doings for these Public Events and like events. I myself signed the Petition that was going around in the mid-1970s to reopen the case on the basis of the Military being stopped from performing their normal procedures for the Dallas Presidential Parade Route.

Much the Public was being "turned on to" was from the basically first original publication that shot accross the Nation like wildfire that everyone was reading or being told about that was the book 'Six Seconds In Dallas'. The Parade Route beginnings of "conspiracy theories" also was being the great puzzle as the story went that the Parade Route knowledge was not legally released until just two weeks before the actual event Nov. 22 1963. How did Oswald the assassin know to be on the Parade Route in the "kill zone" at least one month before, getting employment there - and two weeks before the Parade Route could have possibly have been known by anyone in Dallas including Authorities ? It is found it is leaked and there was the "persuading" of the entire trip to President Kennedy and all involved for the trip - the parade route itself of this being a trivial detail to him/them in the overall actual decision to go to Dallas and the politicking involved and the Public appearances.

So the HIT......

Presuming one person ordered the murder, they needed to be THAT inside of the U.S. Government itself. We have the presumed several parts of that.
# The Military part involving Parade Route Security and all logistics of that. A major preeminent part of this is the Secret Service had the legal authority for any call up for additional protections and there was the "stand down order" to the 113th for Parade Route security.
# The personnel such as assassins and contacts and meetings and persuassions and all involved of putting the hit together would lean towards C.I.A. type tactics - these professionally trained in these type orders.
# Evidence tamperings and plants and all involved suggest the F.B.I. as being professionally trained in this area as well as investigations.

So one person ordering the hit would apparently logically begin at the top - the military. This would also coordinate all things such as arrangements and who among persons through CIA abilities and then FBI as far as all evidence securing ALL EVIDENCE TO POINT TO THE COMMITTMENT - the "lone assassin" with Communist background shooting from the REAR - 3 shots ONLY - that indeed was in place virtually within the hour.

As you may be already percieve, my conclusions are based almost entirely on the witnessing of Col. Prouty. BUT there is a religious aspect I don't believe has ever been considered and is why I point all to "one person ordered the hit". There are/were two underground kings involved at the time. These both would/will have total rulership over the ENTIRE worldwide organized crime. A "Godfather" would simply be a "corner boy" to either and both of these kings. These are defined as the 6th and 7th Kingdoms with world dominion found in the Book Of Revelation of the Authorized King James Holy Bible and IN DETAIL HERE.....
eChurchOfPhiladelphia.Org eChurch Forums
http://churchphilaforums.freesmfhosting.com/index.php
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristianEministry/
http://echurchofphiladelphia.org/
http://christianeministry.com/

The 6th King is the head of "Red Communism" which attempted world dominion and was strategically put down by President John Fitzgerald Kennedy at the Cuban Missle Crisis. The 7th King is who defeats the 6th King (US - only available super power ability to do such) BUT the 6th King ("of the seven") becomes the 8th King who we all have heard about as called the Beast and 666 and the Devil's Champion and all the like who will rule 70 years including the years as underground ruler of Russia as the 6th and 8th King (underground - murder, bribery, assassination, paid votes, etc. - illegal activities to control) .

Now we have the Allies defeating Hitler's Germany and world dominion attempt via false prophecy (dirt mountain - earthy) - as they are crying at defeat "Fall on Us - it is the Wrath of the Lamb [Jesus Christ second Coming] upon us"..... so that this "Mountain thrown into the sea" [defeat of their king of the mountain Adolph Hitler] shows two things. One, ironically is the event of false prophecy by Hitler [kill all Jews and God will not return] which later rests in the actual False Prophet under the Beast 666. Hitler uniquely was able to deceive the 7 kingdoms that will sit on the 7 mountains [underground kings and dominions in succession since the death of Jesus Christ to the End of Time] by practically indecipherable Scriptures interpretation and teaching [master race, eugenics, etc] which the 7 Kings are the witchcraft that rules. Two, is that though this is beyond the Prophecy revealed about the 7 kingdoms but included, it is understood that Christianity destroyed the evil and again at the Cuban Missle Crisis so that the obvious as saying JFK was operating at the instructions of the 7th King of the devil is not implied at all.

I think now you may understand my Premise that indeed "One Person Ordered The Hit" - and this is now the Religious Mystery included and introduced as to whether the obvious being the 6th King of Red Communism [undergound rulers of Communism worldwide] ordering JFK dead for the two reasons of reciprocity for the public embarressment of the Cuban Missle Crisis and the destruction of the World Peace Plan that the Honorable President John F. Kennedy introduced and continually attended from day one at the Innaugural Speech - OR whether the 7th Kingdom (US) ordering the assassination as preventing that very Peace Plan who "shall continue a short space ...." [14 years give or take]. WHY is this the ACTUAL TRUTH ? ......

Authorized King James Holy Bible
New Testament
Book Of Revelation
Chapter 17 Verse 18
"And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. " .
C.18 V. 24 "And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth".

GOD SAID IT - I BELIEVE IT .... is a common saying of those of Faith.

THE IMPORTANCE..... is that all Christianity is taught, instructed, and believes BEYOND the shadow of a doubt that President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was martyred by the king of this evil City engaging antichrist world dominion. This ONLY means that ONE PERSON - the one king ordered his "execution".

Looking over the Autopsy revealation that actually the Kennedy family was "controlling" this - it takes away a lot of a conpiracy as far as having to control those present and evidences as well - as quite easily simply maneavering them into restricting the autopsy hiding JFK health history and sealing up the actual evidence into the National Archives for them. So, the point is the "size of the conspiracy" is really shrunken here by these events of the Kennedys themselves.
Like the implication "could Organized Crime control the parade route and Wash. DC and the Secret Service and the Officers and the autopsy ? No, it is much bigger. " ---- in other words it is that lighter of all that were in on it or controlled by it - the assassination conspiracy.

WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THAT ? .......

The importance is it would OBVIOUSLY be the 7th King (USA Undergound) who ordered the assassination of JFK if THAT MUCH of the American Gov't was being controlled or "on the payroll" and they all would have to have been THAT EVIL obviously to agree to it. It is simply that UNBELIEVABLE that the USSR Underground governement controlled THAT MUCH of America.
HOWEVER - if it is just the handful of persons making arrangements (here dismissing for instance any outside control of the autopsy via conpirators thus the Medical Officers are not included as suspects ) - THEN these fewer could certainly have been approached from international sources as those of the undergorund Soviet Russia (USSR). This is along the same lines that US Organized Crime could not have reached that far into the American Gov't. and so the other side of the coin - neither could have the USSR.

In shorter terms, the actual conspiracy then to assassinate President Kennedy simply involved the ordered 'contract hit' by this head of "Red Communism" (Jackie Kennedy - "They killed him..." ) and those handful, only a handful, of traitors of the USA in those necessary strategic places to carry it out. The real conspiracy is then much smaller than imagined in size of persons, as some wild theories simply snowballed to almost the entire USA Governement was "in on it" - being that absurd. However, let us not forget here that President Kennedy and the USSR President et al were negotiating and seeing the day very imminent in the very near future to achieve, finally, Nuclear Disarmament. Now we look to President LBJ addressing the US Congress saying to "let's pass all these laws to honor President Kennedy" - which were a lot of the civil things and more. BUT, now President, Pres. L.B. Johnson NEVER moved to continue the Nuclear Disarmament hopes of President J. F. Kennedy - but rather ushered the USA into the Viet Nam War with Communism into the millions of troops rotated throughout.

However, when we get rid of all the Public Panic and fire of wild eyed conspiracy theories and vain misinformed beliefs that prevailed for all these years - it finally is melted down to the small handful of Government Insiders that indeed could and did pull this off who could have been hired by either side - American or Russian "evil empires" members and rulers. 

========ADDING HERE DIRECT TRANSCRIPT \ AUTOPSY ORDERS.... ====

SYNOPSIS:

[After the Warren Commission Report and now Committee, you see the pattern of the back handed interrogation methods and receiving answers that are apparently for a different question and the left handed questioning and so on. Further is jumbled with he said\she said etc. This Synopsis should direct the crux of the matter and results of questioning to simply ask a question and get an answer... DRAWN FROM THE FULL TEXT BELOW... ]

(29)  The committee conducted a review of all documentary evidence and contacted almost all persons still alive who had attended the autopsy. The Department of the Navy agreed to rescind the orders of silence issued to the autopsy personnel.

(31)  The evidence indicates that while the pathologists were given authority to perform a complete autopsy, the autopsy was not complete according to established medicolegal standards.

(83)  This evidence indicates that:
1. Commander Humes had full authority to perform a complete autopsy, and indeed, that Admiral Galloway told him to do so;
2. Commander Humes, not  anyone else, made any  decision that resulted in a  deviation from a complete  forensic autopsy; and
3. The remarks of others to expedite the autopsy were probably the reason for the decision to perform a less than complete autopsy.

(The "Others"....  (49)  The belief that Dr. Humes had authority for only a partial autopsy derived from several factors. Special Agent O'Neill told the committee that he recalled that Mrs. Kennedy had
given permission for a partial autopsy and that Dr. Burkley, the President's physician, reiterated her remarks in the autopsy room. (36) He believed there was no question that Dr. Burkley was
conveying the wishes of the Kennedy family regarding a full-versus-partial autopsy.(37) Special Agent Sibert told the committee that he, too, had the impression the Kennedy family was somehow transmitting step-by-step clearances to the pathologists. (38)

(50)  John Stringer, the medical photographer, likewise recalled some discussion at the beginning of the autopsy concerning the scope of the autopsy. He said he believed Dr. Burkley played a central role in the discussions and seemed to be acting on behalf of the Kennedy family.(39) He specifically
recalled Dr. Burkley indicating to the doctors that they should not conduct a full autopsy,
saying, "* * * (you) shouldn't do a complete one if (you) don't have to."(40)

(51)  Adm. David Osborne (then captain) stated that at the beginning of the autopsy there was tremendous pressure to perform a "quick post" and to leave the hospital.
(41)
Following arrival at the Naval Medical Center and preparation of the President's body for inspection and autopsy, to be performed by Dr. Humes, chief pathologist and commander, U.S. Navy, Admiral Burkley, the President's personal physician advised that Mrs. Kennedy had granted permission for a limited autopsy and he questioned any feasibility for a complete autopsy to obtain the bullet which had entered the President's back. 
# At this point, it will be noted Dr. Humes, as the physician conducting the autopsy, stated it was his opinion that the bullet was still in the President's body and could only be extracted through a complete autopsy, which he proposed to do.
# Special Agent Roy Kellerman, Secret Service, in conference with Special Agents Sibert and O'Neill, from  an investigative and protective standpoint, advised Admiral Burkley that it was felt the bullet should be located.
# At this point, Adm. C.B. Galloway, Commanding Officer of the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., told Commander Humes to perform a complete autopsy.

==EDIT=> "Federal Agent" interferes with autopsy....???
(57)  Stringer also stated that a Federal agent took a camera from Riebe and exposed the film. (52) This apparently occurred because the agent felt Stringer was the only person authorized to photograph the body and that Riebe was only to assist Stringer and not take photographs on his own initiative. 

==EDIT=>
Q. It should have been asked - who is in charge?
A. "Adm. C.B. Galloway, Commanding Officer of the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. "
Q. What were his orders?
A. "to perform a complete autopsy."
Q. Were his orders followed?
A. (31)  The evidence indicates that while the pathologists were given authority to perform a complete autopsy, the autopsy was not complete according to established medicolegal standards.

Q. What is the defense statement/position against Court Martial?
A.  (76)  Although Dr. Humes had authority to perform a complete autopsy, the committee still had to resolve the issue of the actual scope of the autopsy. Specifically, Dr. Humes may have decided on his own initiative to limit the autopsy in certain respects or, despite the initial grant of authority, some factors may possibly have surfaced during the course of the autopsy which may have impinged on the independent decisionmaking of Dr. Humes.
 (77)  Dr. Pierre Finck, one of the pathologists, asserted in a sworn statement to the committee that he believed the autopsy was incomplete. Because of the restrictions I suggested or said I felt it was not complete, but Dr. Humes then said that the autopsy had accomplished the purposes as stated-the  number of wounds, the direction of the projectiles and the cause of death so I was actually satisfied. (98)
Dr. Finck later stated that restrictions from the family (were) the reason for limiting our actions.
(99) Specifically, Dr. Finck contends that someone ordered them (the pathologists) not to dissect the missile track that began in the upper back and progressed forward into the neck region. When questioned about the source of this order, Dr. Finck stated:

     I cannot say that it was this army general, I can't
     recall that precisely. I remember the prosecutors and
     Admiral Galloway. As far as saying now so and so told
     me that or didn't tell me that, it is extremely
     difficult. There was an army general in that room and I
     cannot readily pinpoint the origin of those
     instructions to comply with those family wishes. (100)

     (78)  The committee determined that it was Dr. Humes and not
any army general or other person who made the decision not to
dissect the back entry wound. The following exchange between one
of the medical consultants for the committee and Dr. Humes
supports this conclusion:

     Dr. BADEN. Now, for example, not exploring the wound from
     the back to the neck, that was not done. I mean, cutting it
     open completely. That wasn't done specifically; was that
     because somebody said, "Don't do it"?

     Dr. HUMES. Now wait a minute, that wound was excised.
     Dr. BADEN. The back wound?
     Dr. HUMES. Yes, sir. The back of the neck, and there are
     microscopic slides of that wound.                       
     Dr. BADEN. I see. The skin was taken out. And then was --
     Dr. HUMES. It was probed.
     Dr. BADEN. Was it opened up?
     Dr. HUMES. It was not laid open.
     Dr. BADEN. Now that was your decision as opposed to somebody
     else's decision?
     Dr. HUMES. Yes. It was mine. (101)

     (79)  The committee also investigated the possibility that the Kennedy family may have unduly influenced the pathologists once the autopsy began, possibly by transmitting messages by
telephone into the autopsy room.  Brig. Gen. Godfrey McHugh, then an Air Force military  aide to the President, informed the committee that Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and Kenneth O'Donnell, a presidential aide, frequently telephoned him during the autopsy from the 17th floor suite. 
(102) McHugh said that on occasions, Kennedy and O'Donnell asked only to speak with
him.(103) They inquired about the results, why the autopsy was consuming so much time, and the need for speed and efficiency, while still performing the required examinations.
(104)  McHugh said he forwarded this information to the pathologists, never stating or implying that the doctors should limit the autopsy in any manner, but merely reminding them to work as efficiently and quickly as possible.(105)
(80) While General McHugh or others may not have stated or implied that the doctors should limit the autopsy, their remarks no doubt caused consternation, although they may  not have substantively affected the autopsy. The following passage explains this view:

  (81)  Dr. HUMES. There were no questions but we were being urged to expedite this examination as quickly as possible, that members of the President's family were in the building, that they refused to leave the premises until the President's body was ready to be moved; and similar remarks of the vein which we made every effort to put aside and approach the investigation in as scientific a manner as we could. But did it harass us and cause difficulty--of course it did, how could it not!
  Dr. BOSWELL. I don't think it interfered with the manner in which we did the autopsy.
          Dr. HUMES. I don't either. (106)

     (82)  Dr. Boswell further stated that there were no constraints. (107) Dr. Ebersole, the radiologist, likewise informed the committee that "to the best of my knowledge there were absolutely no restrictions and it was Dr. Humes' decision as to the extent of the autopsy."(108) Stringer, one of the medical photographers, also could not recall anyone issuing any orders. (109) He stated specifically that while McHugh manifested a great deal of emotion, he did not issue any orders. (110)

     (83)  This evidence indicates that:

     1. Commander Humes had full authority to perform a complete
     autopsy, and indeed, that Admiral Galloway told him to do
     so;
     2. Commander Humes, not anyone else, made any decision that
     resulted in a deviation from a complete forensic autopsy;
     and
     3. The remarks of others to expedite the autopsy were
     probably the reason for the decision to perform a less than
     complete autopsy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is from Volume 7 of the HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
ASSASSINATIONS:


                 SECTION II.--PERFORMANCE OF AUTOPSY

     PART I. INTRODUCTION

     (27)  Throughout the last 15 years, many critics have
questioned the competency and validity of the autopsy of
President Kennedy. The efforts of the U.S. Department of the Navy
and other Government sources to insure privacy with respect to
the autopsy procedures and other events that took place at
Bethesda Naval Hospital have contributed in part to much of the
uncertainty and skepticism. Included in these efforts was an
order of silence issued to the participants in the autopsy. (1)

     (28)  Because of this skepticism and in accordance with its
mandate to conduct a full and complete investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the death of President Kennedy, the
committee decided to investigate the performance of the autopsy.
The focus was to be on the following issues:

     1.  The possibility that someone ordered or
          otherwise strongly suggested that the autopsy
          doctors perform a limited or incomplete
          autopsy;

     2.  The question of the competency and validity of
          the autopsy; and

     3.  The documentation of the events that occurred,
          how they occurred, and when they occurred.

     (29)  The committee conducted a review of all documentary
evidence and contacted almost all persons still alive who had
attended the autopsy. The Department of the Navy agreed to
rescind the orders of silence issued to the autopsy personnel.

     (30)  The following material relates the issues and
corresponding facts chronologically (part II) and then presents
the conclusions of the committee.

     (31)  The evidence indicates that while the pathologists
were given authority to perform a complete autopsy, the autopsy
was not complete according to established medicolegal standards.
     
     PART II. FACTS AND ISSUES

     Background

     (32) At 1:30 p.m., eastern standard time (e.s.t.), on
November 22, 1963, President Kennedy and Governor Connally were
shot while riding in a Presidential motorcade, through the
streets of Dallas, Tex. The driver of the Presidential limousine,
Secret Service Agent William Grier, immediately drove the
limousine at high speed to Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas,
Tex. arriving at approximately 1:35 p.m., e.s.t.(2) Having been
alerted to the emergency by radio, Parkland Hospital personnel
quickly escorted the wounded President and Governor into the
emergency treatment facilities.

     (33)  Drs. Malcolm Perry and Charles J. Carrico were two of
the first doctors to attend the President. In addition to a
massive head wound, both observed a small, circular wound
situated in the region of the neck below the adam's apple, which
they subsequently characterized as an entry wound. (3) To combat
the President's failure to breathe, Dr. Perry decided to perform
a tracheotomy.(4) In doing so, he cut through the small, circular
neck wound, making it difficult to identify the missile wound.

     (34)  With respect to the head wound, Dr. Robert McClelland,
another the doctors who attended the President, said in his
testimony before the Warren Commission, that the right posterior
section of the skull had been blasted. (6) Dr. Kemp Clark, who
also assisted with the President, similarly described the wound
as being in the back of the President's head--in the right
posterior part. (7)                         

     (35)  The Parkland doctors soon realized their efforts to
save President Kennedy were fruitless. Dr. Clark pronounced him
dead at 2 p.m., e.s.t.( 8 )

     (36)  The total time that the doctors had observed or
treated the President was approximately 20 minutes.  They had
been concerned only with administering emergency treatment. Their
primary concern was to restore the breathing and stop the
bleeding. None examined the President's back--and so did not
discover any wound there. Further, none observed any wound to the
head other than the one massive wound. Nor was their job to
measure precisely the location of the wounds or to examine the
body for all possible wounds. When the President died, the
Parkland doctors' functions also ended. (9)

     (37)  Drs. Robert Shaw, Charles Gregory, and George Shires
treated the wounds of Governor Connally. (10) In their medical
reports, they described wounds to his chest, wrist, and thigh.

     (38)  Soon after Dr. Kemp Clark of Parkland Hospital,
Dallas, Tex., pronounced the President dead, the Secret Service
and other personnel proceeded to transport the body from Texas to
Washington, D.C.  While in flight, Mrs. Kennedy chose Bethesda
Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Md., as the site for the autopsy,
since the President had served in the Navy. (11)

     (39)  The Secret Service and the Navy Department made
arrangements for the performance of the autopsy. (12) The surgeon
general the Navy and the commanding officer of the Naval Medical
School advised Comdr. James J. Humes, the director of
laboratories of the National Medical School, (13) Naval Medical
Center, Bethesda, Md., that the Secret Service was transporting
the body of the President to Bethesda and that he was to
ascertain the cause of death. (14)

     (40)  The FBI authorities contacted their Baltimore field
office and advised that arrangements should be made for Bureau
agents to proceed to Andrews Air Force Base, Camp Springs, Md.,
to meet Air Force One and to handle any matters that would fall
within FBI jurisdiction.(15) Consequently, Special Agents Francis
X. O'Neill, Jr., and James W. Sibert proceeded to Andrews Air
Force Base. Their specific instructions were to accompany the
body at all times, ride in the motorcade to Bethesda Naval
Hospital, witness the autopsy, preserve the chain of custody of
any evidentiary material, and transport any bullets that might be
recovered to the FBI Laboratory.

     (41)  On arrival at Andrews Air Force Base, a motorcade
transported the body of the President to the Bethesda Naval
Hospital, (17) with Special Agents Sibert and O'Neill traveling
in the third car. (18) At Bethesda, the ambulance first stopped
at the main entrance; Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy and Attorney
General Robert F. Kennedy got out (19) and joined other members
of the Kennedy family on the 17th floor of the hospital to await
the conclusion of the autopsy. (20) The ambulance then proceeded
to the rear of the building, arriving at approximately 7:35
p.m.(21). Personnel carried the body into the hospital. (22)

     (42) Dr. Humes chose J. Thornton Boswell, M.D., chief of
pathology at Bethesda, (23) and Pierre A. Finck, M.D., chief of
the military environmental pathology division and chief of the
wound ballistics pathology branch at the Armed Forces Institute
of Pathology at Walter Reed Medical Center, (241) to assist him
in performing the autopsy. During the autopsy, Special Agents
Sibert and O'Neill recorded the names of what they believed were
all the persons in attendance at any time.  (25) In a report they
submitted subsequent the autopsy, they included: (26)

     1. Adm. Calvin B. Galloway, commanding officer of the U.N.
          [sic] National Naval Medical Center;
     2. Adm. George C. Burkley, White House physician to the
          President;
     3. Comdr. James J. Humes, director of the laboratories of
          the National Medical School, Naval Medical Center,
          Bethesda, Md.;
     4. Capt. James H. Stover, Jr., commanding officer of the
          Naval Medical School;
     5. John Thomas Stringer, Jr., medical photographer;
     6. James H. Ebersole, assistant chief radiologist at the
          Bethesda Naval Medical Center;
     7. Floyd Albert Riebe, medical photographer;
     8. J. Thornton Boswell, chief of pathology at Bethesda;
     9. Jan Gail Rudnicki, laboratory technologist, assisting Dr.
          Boswell;
     10. Pierre A. Finck, M.D., chief of the military
          environmental pathology division and chief of the wound
          ballistics pathology branch at Walter Reed Medical
          Center; (27)
     11. Paul K. O'Conner, laboratory technologist;
     12. Jerrol F. Custer, X-ray technician;
     13. James Curtis Jenkins, laboratory technologist;
     14. Edward F. Reed, X-ray technician;
     15. James E. Metzler, hospital corpsman third-class;
     16. Capt. David Osborne, chief of surgery;
     17. Brig. Gen. Godfrey McHugh, Air Force aide to the
          President; 
     18. Lt. Comdr. Gregory H. Cross, resident in surgery;
     19. Gen. Philip C. Wehle, commanding officer of the U.S.
          Military District, Washington, D.C.;
     20. Chester H. Boyers, chief petty officer in charge of the
          pathology division;
     21. Dr. George Bakeman, U.S. Navy (the committee could not
          locate this person);
     22. Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman;
     23. Secret Service Agent William Greer; and
     24. Secret Service Agent John J. O'Leary. (28)

     (43)  Through its own investigation, the committee
determined that the following persons also attended the autopsy:
     
     1.  Richard A. Lipsey, personal aide to General Wehle;(29)
          and
     2.  Samuel Bird,(30) in 1963, a lieutenant stationed at the
          ceremonial duties office, Fort Myers, Va., 3d Infantry
          Division.

     (44)  Additionally, Sibert and O'Neill reported that,
following the autopsy, four persons from Gawler's Funeral Home in
Washington, D.C., entered the autopsy room to prepare the
President's body for burial. They were:

     1.  John Van Haeson;
     2.  Edwin Stroble;
     3.  Thomas Robinson; and
     4.  Mr. Hagen.(31)

     (45)  These persons, together with Sibert and O'Neill, were
the only ones present at any time in the autopsy room with the
body of the President.

     (46)  In their report, Sibert and O'Neill noted that the
body of the President was removed from the casket in which it
arrived and placed on the autopsy table.(32) They said that a
sheet covered the entire body; an additional wrapping, saturated
in blood, surrounded the head. (33)

     (47)  Dr. Humes had testified previously to the Warren
Commission that the body was received in a casket, was wrapped in
a sheet, and was unclothed.(34) James Jenkins, a student
laboratory technician, whose normal duties included admitting a
body to the morgue and conducting an initial examination,
likewise stated that the body of the President was unclothed and
that it may have been wrapped in a sheet. (35)

     (48)  A major issue in the initial stages of the autopsy was
whether Dr. Humes had authority to perform a full or partial
autopsy.

     (49)  The belief that Dr. Humes had authority for only a
partial autopsy derived from several factors. Special Agent
O'Neill told the committee that he recalled that Mrs. Kennedy had
given permission for a partial autopsy and that Dr. Burkley, the
President's physician, reiterated her remarks in the autopsy
room. (36) He believed there was no question that Dr. Burkley was
conveying the wishes of the Kennedy family regarding a
full-versus-partial autopsy.(37) Special Agent Sibert told the
committee that he, too, had the impression the Kennedy family was
somehow transmitting step-by-step clearances to the pathologists.
(38)

     (50)  John Stringer, the medical photographer, likewise
recalled some discussion at the beginning of the autopsy
concerning the scope of the autopsy. He said he believed Dr.
Burkley played a central role in the discussions and seemed to be
acting on behalf of the Kennedy family.(39) He specifically
recalled Dr. Burkley indicating to the doctors that they should
not conduct a full autopsy, saying, "* * * (you) shouldn't do a
complete one if (you) don't have to."(40)

     (51)  Adm. David Osborne (then captain) stated that at the
beginning of the autopsy there was tremendous pressure to perform
a "quick post" and to leave the hospital. (41)

     (52)  The evidence supports the above recollections. They
reflect the general nature of the initial stages of the autopsy:
somewhat confused at the beginning with discussions concerning
the extent and nature of the autopsy to be performed. The
evidence also indicates, however, that these observations do not
reflect the total picture and that Dr. Humes ultimately received
permission to perform a complete autopsy. The following
memorandum is a primary source:

     DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1963.
            SAC, Baltimore.

     From: SA's James W. Sibert and Francis X. O'Neill, Jr.

     Subject: Assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

          Following arrival at the Naval Medical Center and
     preparation of the President's body for inspection and
     autopsy, to be performed by Dr. Humes, chief
     pathologist and commander, U.S. Navy, Admiral Burkley,
     the President's personal physician advised that Mrs.
     Kennedy had granted permission for a limited autopsy
     and he questioned any feasibility for a complete
     autopsy to obtain the bullet which had entered the
     President's back.

          At this point, it will be noted Dr. Humes, as the
     physician conducting the autopsy, stated it was his
     opinion that the bullet was still in the President's
     body and could only be extracted through a complete
     autopsy, which he proposed to do.

          Special Agent Roy Kellerman, Secret Service, in
     conference with Special Agents Sibert and O'Neill, from
     an investigative and protective standpoint, advised
     Admiral Burkley that it was felt the bullet should be
     located.

          At this point, Adm. C.B. Galloway, Commanding
     Officer of the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda,
     Md., told Commander Humes to perform a complete
     autopsy.

     (53)  Special Agent O'Neill corroborated the information in
this memorandum in an affidavit and in his interview with the
committee.(42) In addition, Admiral Osborne (the Captain) stated
in a committee interview that Dr. Humes was successful in
resisting pressure to perform an incomplete autopsy and that no
one issued any orders limiting it. (43) Admiral Galloway also
stated that no one transmitted any orders to limit the autopsy in
any manner and that this memorandum was consistent with his
recollections.

     (54)  For these reasons, it may be concluded that Dr. Humes
possessed authority to perform a complete autopsy.

     (55)  During the initial stages of the autopsy, when the
discussion over a full-versus-partial autopsy occurred, the
pathologists conducted an examination of the exterior of the body
and took photographs and X-rays before making any incisions. (45)
This is when the pathologists observed that a tracheostomy had
been performed on the President.(46)

     (56)  Stringer(47) and Riebe(48) took the autopsy
photographs under the direction of Dr. Humes. Stringer told the
committee that his equipment included a 4- by 5-inch graphic view
camera that had standard lens and used film holders which
contained one segment of film on each side.(49) He also stated
that as he photographed the body, he would give the film to a
Secret Service agent standing adjacent to him who later signed a
receipt to Captain Stover to obtain formal custody of the
film.(50)  Such a receipt--from Capt. J. H. Stover, Jr.,
commanding officer of the U.S. Naval Medical School to Roy H.
Kellerman, assistant special agent in charge, U.S. Secret
Service--does exist. (51)

     (57)  Stringer also stated that a Federal agent took a
camera from Riebe and exposed the film. (52) This apparently
occurred because the agent felt Stringer was the only person
authorized to photograph the body and that Riebe was only to
assist Stringer and not take photographs on his own initiative.

     (58)  Special Agents Sibert and O'Neill confirmed that the
pathologists had X-rays taken before and after making
incisions.(53) Dr. Ebersole, the acting chief of the radiology
department that evening, stated in a deposition to the committee
that prior to commencing the autopsy he took several X-rays of
the skull, chest and trunk of the body. (54) He stated that he
used portable X-ray equipment (55) and did not take X-rays of the
hands and feet.(56) Dr. Ebersole further told the committee that
he hand carried these films in their cassettes to the fourth
floor of the hospital, where a darkroom technician developed them
and then returned them to him. Ebersole then hand carried them
back to the autopsy room. (57)

     (59)  After completion of the autopsy, before releasing the
X-rays, Dr. Ebersole received a receipt from Roy H. Kellerman
acknowledging possession of them.

     (60)  Sibert and O'Neill observed that, on the basis of the
preliminary X-rays, the pathologists concluded that:

     * * * no complete bullet of any size could be located in the
     brain area and likewise no bullet could be located in the
     back or any other area of the body as determined by total
     body X-rays. (59)

     (61)  At approximately 8:15 p.m., e.s.t, Dr. Humes made the
first incision. (60) In his Warren Commission testimony, he
stated that he used a routine incision:

     Which is a Y-shaped incision from the shoulders over the
     lower portion of the breastbone and over to the opposite
     shoulder and reflected the skin and tissues from the
     interior portion of the chest. (61)

     (62)  Dr. Humes then began examining the missile wounds.
Sibert and O'Neill noted that he located the track of a missile
that appeared to enter the rear of the head and progress forward.
(62) The X-rays of the skull revealed numerous minute fragments
widely distributed throughout the skull, as well as two larger
fragments. The pathologists commented that this indicated the
missile had fragmented on passing through the skull. (63)

     (63)  Dr. Humes located the entrance of the missile track in
the head as approximately 2.5 centimeters laterally to the right
and slightly above the external occipital protuberance. (64)

     (64)  In the autopsy report, Dr. Humes described the exit
as:

     A large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right
     involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat
     into the temporal and occipital regions. (65)

He further stated that:

     n this region there is an actual absence of scalp and
     bone producing a defect which measures approximately 13
     centimeters in greatest diameter. (66).

     (65)  Sibert and O'Neill observed that Dr. Humes removed two
fragments from the right side of the skull; one 7 by 2
millimeters in size, the other 1 by 3 millimeters.(67) Special
Agents Sibert and O'Neill signed a receipt for custody of these
fragments and immediately following the autopsy transported them
to Special Agent Kurt Frazier at the FBI Laboratory. (68)

     (66)  The receipt for the fragments has been a continuing
source of controversy. It states that Bureau agents received a
"missile," (69) as opposed to two fragments.  Chester H. Boyers,
the corpsman who typed the receipt,(70) submitted an affidavit to
the committee which stated that the receipt was for two fragments
that Dr. Humes removed from the skull, despite the receipt's
caption of "a missile." (71) Boyers emphasized that he gave
Sibert and O'Neill only missile fragments.

     In affidavits and committee interviews, Sibert and O'Neill
also stated that Dr. Humes had retrieved two fragments and that
they received these fragments and not a missile. (73)

     (67)  The evidence indicates that the receipt was in error
and that Boyers transferred only fragments to Sibert and O'Neill.

     (68)  Sibert and O'Neill next observed in their report that
Dr. Humes examined a wound situated below the shoulders and 2
inches to the right of the middle line of the spinal column.(74)
In the autopsy report, Dr. Humes characterized this wound as an
entrance wound and located it 14 centimeters from the tip of the
right acromion process and 14 centimeters below the tip of the
right mastoid process. (75) Dr. Humes probed this wound with his
finger and concluded that the missile had only traveled a short
distance because he could feel the end track with his finger.(76)
During the autopsy, Dr. Humes stated that he and his colleagues
opened the chest cavity and carefully examined the lining of the
chest cavity and both lungs.(77) Admiral Galloway told the
committee that the pathologists examined the brain and all of the
internal organs and structures. These included the liver, heart,
lungs, spleen, kidneys, and adrenal glands.(78) The autopsy
protocol and supplemental report state that the doctors examined
the chest cavity, lungs, heart, abdominal cavity, skeletal
system, liver, spleen, kidneys, and brain, but did not list the
adrenal glands.(79)

     (69)  In regard to the examination of the chest cavity, Dr.
Humes told the Warren Commission and the committee that he
specifically remembered the photographers taking Kodachrome
photographs of the interior of the President's chest. (80)
Stringer, one of the photographers, stated that he also thought
he had taken some interior photographs of the President's chest.
(81) Dr. Burkley, however, told the committee that no one took
any photographs of the interior of the chest. (82) There is no
evidence that such photographs exist.

     (70)  By this point in the autopsy, the pathologists had
closely examined the body and had still not located any missile,
particularly the one which entered the back. They could not
explain why they could not find any bullets.(83) They then began
speculating about bullets which fragment. Special Agent Sibert
decided to call Special Agent Charles L. Killion at the firearms
section of the FBI laboratory to inquire about fragmenting
bullets.(84) On receiving this call, Killion informed Sibert that
Secret Service Agent Richard Johnson had forwarded to the
laboratory a bullet which reportedly had been found  on a
stretcher in the emergency room of Parkland Memorial Hospital in
Dallas, Tex. (85) Killion described the bullet as a
6.5-millimeter rifle missile with a copper-alloy full jacket.
(86)

     (71)  Sibert and O'Neill stated in their report that during
the autopsy Dr. Humes, concluded on the basis of this information
and knowing that the Parkland doctors had performed cardiac
massage that they may have forced the bullet out of the
President's back. (87) This theory would account for a missile
track with no bullet.

     (72)  During the latter stages of the autopsy, authorities
sent from Dallas three separate fragments of skull bone (88)
found in the Presidential limousine. There is no evidence to show
who sent these fragments to Bethesda. The pathologists concluded
they were from the skull. Dr. Humes directed the X-raying of
these fragments(89) and observed that one of the fragments
contained minute metallic fragments along a line which
corresponded with the large defect in the skull of the
President.(90) This particular bone fragment alone exhibited
beveling of the outer table which Pierre Finck said indicated
that a missile exited at that point.(91) Both Dr. Humes and Dr.
Burkley informed the committee that these fragments were placed
back in the skull of the President. (92)

     (73)  By the termination of the autopsy at approximately 11
p.m.,(93) the pathologist had formulated the following general
conclusions:

     1. One missile entered in the rear of the skull of the
     President and exited in the front of the skull; and

     2. One missile entered the back of the President and was
     apparently dislodged during cardiac massage at Parkland
     Hospital.

     (74)  Admiral Galloway corroborated these statements before
the committee, saying that an assassin or assassins shot the
President from behind with two shots. (95)

     (75)  After completing the autopsy, Dr. Humes remained to
assist the morticians in preparing the President's body. (96)
Secret Service Agent Kellerman said that after the morticians had
prepared the body, the Secret Service agents and the Kennedy
family left the hospital at 3:56 a.m. and went to the White
House. (97)

Additional issues arising from
the performance of the autopsy


     (76)  Although Dr. Humes had authority to perform a complete
autopsy, the committee still had to resolve the issue of the
actual scope of the autopsy. Specifically, Dr. Humes may have
decided on his own initiative to limit the autopsy in certain
respects or, despite the initial grant of authority, some factors
may possibly have surfaced during the course of the autopsy which
may have impinged on the independent decisionmaking of Dr. Humes.

     (77)  Dr. Pierre Finck, one of the pathologists, asserted in
a sworn statement to the committee that he believed the autopsy
was incomplete. 

     Because of the restrictions I suggested or said I felt
     it was not complete, but Dr. Humes then said that the
     autopsy had accomplished the purposes as stated-the
     number of wounds, the direction of the projectiles and
     the cause of death  so I was actually satisfied. (98)

Dr. Finck later stated that restrictions from the family (were)
the reason for limiting our actions. (99) Specifically, Dr. Finck
contends that someone ordered them (the pathologists) not to
dissect the missile track that began in the upper back and
progressed forward into the neck region. When questioned about
the source of this order, Dr. Finck stated:

     I cannot say that it was this army general, I can't
     recall that precisely. I remember the prosecutors and
     Admiral Galloway. As far as saying now so and so told
     me that or didn't tell me that, it is extremely
     difficult. There was an army general in that room and I
     cannot readily pinpoint the origin of those
     instructions to comply with those family wishes. (100)

     (78)  The committee determined that it was Dr. Humes and not
any army general or other person who made the decision not to
dissect the back entry wound. The following exchange between one
of the medical consultants for the committee and Dr. Humes
supports this conclusion:

     Dr. BADEN. Now, for example, not exploring the wound from
     the back to the neck, that was not done. I mean, cutting it
     open completely. That wasn't done specifically; was that
     because somebody said, "Don't do it"?

     Dr. HUMES. Now wait a minute, that wound was excised.

     Dr. BADEN. The back wound?

     Dr. HUMES. Yes, sir. The back of the neck, and there are
     microscopic slides of that wound.                       

     Dr. BADEN. I see. The skin was taken out. And then was --

     Dr. HUMES. It was probed.

     Dr. BADEN. Was it opened up?

     Dr. HUMES. It was not laid open.

     Dr. BADEN. Now that was your decision as opposed to somebody
     else's decision?

     Dr. HUMES. Yes. It was mine. (101)

     (79)  The committee also investigated the possibility that
the Kennedy family may have unduly influenced the pathologists
once the autopsy began, possibly by transmitting messages by
telephone into the autopsy room.  Brig. Gen. Godfrey McHugh, then
an Air Force military  aide to the President, informed the
committee that Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and Kenneth
O'Donnell, a presidential aide, frequently telephoned him during
the autopsy from the 17th floor suite. (102) McHugh said that on
occasions, Kennedy and O'Donnell asked only to speak with
him.(103) They inquired about the results, why the autopsy was
consuming so much time, and the need for speed and efficiency,
while still performing the required examinations. (104)  McHugh
said he forwarded this information to the pathologists, never
stating or implying that the doctors should limit the autopsy in
any manner, but merely reminding them to work as efficiently and
quickly as possible.(105)
       
     (80) While General McHugh  or others may not have stated or
implied that the doctors should limit the autopsy, their remarks
no doubt caused consternation, although they may  not have
substantively affected the autopsy. The following passage
explains this view:

     (81)  Dr. HUMES. There were no questions but we were being
          urged to expedite this examination as quickly as
          possible, that members of the President's family were
          in the building, that they refused to leave the
          premises until the President's body was ready to be
          moved; and similar remarks of the vein which we made
          every effort to put aside and approach the
          investigation in as scientific a manner as we could.
          But did it harass us and cause difficulty--of course it
          did, how could it not!

          Dr. BOSWELL. I don't think it interfered with the
               manner in which we did the autopsy.

          Dr. HUMES. I don't either. (106)

     (82)  Dr. Boswell further stated that there were no
constraints. (107) Dr. Ebersole, the radiologist, likewise
informed the committee that "to the best of my knowledge there
were absolutely no restrictions and it was Dr. Humes' decision as
to the extent of the autopsy."(108) Stringer, one of the medical
photographers, also could not recall anyone issuing any orders.
(109) He stated specifically that while McHugh manifested a great
deal of emotion, he did not issue any orders. (110)

     (83)  This evidence indicates that:

     1. Commander Humes had full authority to perform a complete
     autopsy, and indeed, that Admiral Galloway told him to do
     so;

     2. Commander Humes, not anyone else, made any decision that
     resulted in a deviation from a complete forensic autopsy;
     and

     3. The remarks of others to expedite the autopsy were
     probably the reason for the decision to perform a less than
     complete autopsy.

     (84)  In a committee telephone interview with Admiral
Osborne, another issue arose. He stated that he thought he
recalled seeing an intact slug roll out from the clothing of
President Kennedy and onto the autopsy table when personnel
opened the casket and removed the clothing from the body of the
President. (111)

     (85)  The committee reviewed thoroughly all documents and
recontacted those persons who moved the body of the President
from the casket onto the autopsy table and then prepared the body
for examination. Paul K. O'Connor, who along with James Jenkins,
had the duty of preparing the body for the autopsy, said the body
had arrived at about 8 p.m. and was wrapped in a body bag, the
head in a sheet. (112) O'Connor said he assisted in unwrapping
the sheet(113) and could not recall any foreign object,
specifically a missile, being discovered during the autopsy or
while unwrapping the sheets. (114)

     (86)  Jenkins likewise said he could not recall any foreign
objects being discovered or discussed and specifically could not
recall any missile or fragments of a missile falling out onto the
autopsy table or floor. (115)

     (87)  Throughout the committee's investigation, no one had
ever mentioned the discovery of a missile in Bethesda Naval
Hospital. The only bullet recovered was the one discovered at
Parkland Memorial Hospital.

     (88)  Following this investigation, the committee
recontacted Admiral Osborne and informed him that the body of the
President had not arrived in any clothes, but was wrapped in
sheets,(116) and that no one else recalled anything about the
discovery of a missile.(117)  Admiral Osborne then said that he
could not be sure he actually did see a missile and that it was
possible the FBI and Secret Service only spoke about the
discovery of a missile. He did say he was positive only one
bullet was ever recovered, whether it was discovered at Bethesda
Hospital or Parkland Hospital. (118)

     Post-autopsy events

     (89)  On Saturday morning, November 23, Dr. Humes informed
the committee that he fulfilled a religious commitment and then
met with the other two autopsy pathologists in the late morning
(119) to discuss the preparation of the autopsy report. Dr. Humes
said he then called Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas to speak
with the doctors who had administered emergency treatment to
President Kennedy.(120) Dr. Perry, one of the first physicians to
see and treat the President, told the committee that Dr. Humes
called him twice, separated by about a 30-minute interval. (121)
During the first call, Dr. Perry told Dr. Humes that due to the
President's failure to breathe, he had determined a tracheostomy
was necessary, then or never, and therefore made a transverse
incision straight through the bullet wound in the anterior aspect
of the neck at approximately the second or third tracheal ring.
(122) The second call involved a discussion of chest incisions
made on the President at Parkland. (123)

     (90)  As a result of these telephone calls, Dr. Humes
concluded that the missile which had entered the upper back had
traversed the body and exited in the anterior portion of the
neck,(124) although he had not observed the remains of any such
hole during his examination of the body.

     (91)  Following the telephone calls with Dr. Perry, Dr.
Humes went home and rested until late that afternoon and then
proceeded to write the autopsy protocol (autopsy report).(125) He
told the committee that after writing the report he destroyed the
original notes because they were stained with the blood of the
President and he felt it would be "inappropriate to retain [them]
to turn in to anyone in that condition" (126)

     (92)  In preparing the autopsy protocol, Dr. Humes did not
have access to the autopsy photographs or X-rays. (127) (This was
also the case with respect to his Warren Commission testimony.)

     (93)  After completion of the autopsy protocol(128). Dr.
Humes hand-carried the document to the Office of the White House
Physician at approximately 6 p.m. that evening.(129) The general
conclusions were that:

     1. One missile entered in the rear of the skull of the
     President and exited in the front of the skull; and

     2. One missile entered the back of the President and exited
     in the front of the neck. (130)

     (94)  The pathologists completed a supplementary report
approximately weeks later and delivered it to the White House
Physician on December 6, 1963. (

Now a next part of all this will be my video work soon completed to add. I am making a video to upload to my YouTube Channel
HERE:
<http://www.youtube.com/jfk50yearjubilee>

This will show a crowd and Police response to the apparent shot or simultaneous shots from the upper Grassy Knoll area. This - from the Orville Nix film which when you look around beyond seeing the importance of this additional home movie to the Zapruder film of the fatal head shot - you will notice easily what I did.

Suddenly at the moment of the JFK fatal head wound (s ) shot (s ) a girl in the foreground on the Plaza grassy area (opposite side - across street from Grassy Knoll) jumps shockingly as you would at an unexpected very loud and close thunderclap boom from a thunderstorm, and sways as normally instinctively to fall to the ground - reacting to the apparent very loud gun shot or simultaneous gun shots.

As well, the two Dallas Motorcycle Police flanking the right side of the Presidential Limosuine, slightly to the rear, simultaneously are reacting to obviously a very loud shot or simultaneus shots immediately to their right, looking right towards the Grassy Knoll as if even seeing an assassin or suspecting same - right from the Grassy Knoll area and virtually slam their brakes on to dismount and give chase - apparently not even aware of the actual fatal woundings of the President. Obviously this was a very LOUD shot (exploding tipped projectile round) like a larger buffalo hunting rifle towards a 50 calibre as opposed to the military 30 calibre carbine rifle Oswald was supposed to have used. These are twice the size round (bullet used) and then gun powder used to fire them and thus twice as loud - OBVIOUSLY very loud as the Dallas Motorcycle Police are wearing motorcycle HELMITS and operating the then American standard very loud Harley Davidson motorcycles and at slow speed which is even louder then cruize speed.

NOTE HERE IN THE ORVILLE NIX FILM - AT ABOUT EXACTLY WHEN THE FATAL HEAD WOUND OCCURS, BOTH THE RIGHT FLANK DALLAS MOTORCYCLE POLICE LOOKING TO THE RIGHT SLAM ON THEIR BRAKES (AND THEN RUN TOWARDS THE GRASSY KNOLL) AND THE WOMAN IN THE FOREGROUND ALMOST DIVES TO THE GROUND AS LIKE HEARING A THUNDERCLAP HITTING IN FRONT OF HER ...... WATCH SEVERAL TIMES - NOTICE TO THE LEFT THE PRESIDENT AND ABOUT THE TIME OF THE HIT AND THEN COMPARE TO THE RIGHT THE MOTORCYCLE POLICE AND WOMAN IN THE FOREGROUND..... ALL THREE OF THOSE ARE FACING DEAD ON TO THE WHITE RETAINING WALL ON THE GRASSY KNOLL ("BLACK DOG MAN" ASSASSIN PERCHED) WHERE THE EXPLODING TIPPED ROUND CAME FROM - LOUD LOUD LOUD BOOM.

<http://youtu.be/_Oh8B8jRGMg>

SLOW:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLERm5sKGSY>

Now you can get a sneek peek here with this amazing high speed clear blow up and indeed shows someone firing their weapon from the white retaining wall running away immediately after the shot - the "Black Dog Guy" ......

JFK Black Dog Shooter on Knoll Rare Footage
<http://youtu.be/sVC-hFdmUAg>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVC-hFdmUAg>

A loud sound as that would be kind of like an "M 80" firecracker which is very, very, very dangerous and very, very, very loud - as I believe they are rated as a quarter stick of dynamite. These are about the sound or slightly louder when exploding of like a buffalo hunting rifle or 50 calibre round from the old USA Civil War Era cap and ball rifles. These are very large rifles as compared to normal rifles and use ammunition almost twice the size and are twice as loud naturally. This much louder sound can easily explain the Dallas Police reactions here, which as well for all mentioned even reacting to the regular carbine rifle possibly as all were within approxiamately 100 foot it seems of an actual shot or explosion.

The importance here is that this very loud explosion sound could as well indeed be the "exploding tip" round fired at the President's head, being much louder as a larger ammunition used kind of as a tiny RPG granade launcher military rifle round (exploding tipped projectile exploding upon contact) - which has been medically identified by the Parkland Hospital Doctors as one of the two front entrance wounds identified as cause of the massive head and brain damage with the tell tale flanged splayed fingers of scalp/cap tissue which specifically occurs via an exploding tipped type ammunition upon contact instantly.

Another film clip - a most seen clip - as the original aftermath of the shots where the press movie photographer is filming the father and child fallen to the ground right near the curb where the JFK head wounds occurred, and then the man and woman further up to the top of the Grassy Knoll. Watch the man as the woman falls to the ground but he then runs up to the wall and looks over as if he were trying to see a gunman as he OBVIOUSLY heard the same thing as the girl across the street instinctively beginning to fall to the ground like a lightening strike and boom and the two Dallas Motorcycle Police reacting to the loud boom.

These three reactions on film as they occurred proved to me beyond the shadow of a doubt - and independent of all else by themselves - that indeed in the very least there was a large explosive sound at the exact time the president was killed, and it came from the Grassy Knoll area behind the wall or fence or both. With all the fears and confusion and criminal activity immediately after this of people afraid to talk or being told to shut up - the film indeed shows in the very least the professional, expert, and trained reactions by the Dallas Police Officers to an explosive sound either as gunshot or shots or explosive detonation. This is indisputable evidence "caught on tape" as it is minimumly by two, two, professionally trained Officers of the Law who's testimony in these cases is accepted as fact, and facts of the case, as unquestionable eyewitness evidence - of course observing due process in trial cross examination naturally.

Most importantly in this special optically enhanced high speed movie here as well, and indeed most importantly, is the two front wounds ocurring AFTER the rear shot has occurred to President Kennedy's head, and caught on film here and shown. In other high speed high resolution blow ups we see the rear shot hitting JFK - nudging the head forward BEFORE the reactions backward. This was the first head wound as a carbine type round leaving that size entry wound in the rear of JFK's head - roughly the entry hole the size of a pencil. Here in this film we see the exit wound occurring just UNDER the rear entry wound area on the back of the President's head - the rear 'blow out' exit wound described by Parkland Attending Physicians as about the size of a baseball down towards the bottom of the head. This was consistent as an exit wound from a carbine type round - which they indeed reported of course also occurred as an exit wound on the rear of the President's head. (They described as testimony and interview an entry AND an exit wound, two different wounds from two different directions, on the rear of the President's head.) SECOND HERE is shown the SECOND shot from the FRONT hitting the President's head causing the massive damage to JFK's brain. So the Orville Nix film captures the two front shots which the Zapruder film did also which is credited for showing the rear shot occurring first and then the two front shots.

SOME REFERENCES TO THE REAR BLOW OUT WOUND ON THE BACK OF HEAD OF PRES JFK...... (below)

NOTE THE IMPORTANCE IS MANY TIMES IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED IF THE "BADGE MAN" FOR INSTANCE WAS THE ASSASSIN THAT THE EXIT WOUND DEBRIS WOULD HAVE STRUCK, EVEN KILLED,  JACKIE KENNEDY ACCORDINGLY TO LINE OF SIGHT. BUT THEY REFER TO A CARBINE STYLE RIFLE LIKE THE REPORTED OSWALD RIFLE.
OKAY SHERLOCK - AN EXPLODING PROJECTILE ROUND DOES NOT HAVE AN EXIT WOUND PER SE. IT WOULD BE LIKE DUCK TAPING AN M-80 FIRECRACKER TO THE FOREHEAD. ONLY THE FRONT WOULD BE BLOWN AWAY - NOT THE REAR OF THE HEAD. IN LIKE MANNER THIS IS ROUGHLY THE WOUNDING BY THE EXPLODING TIPPED ROUND THAT HIT PRESIDENT KENNEDY FROM THE FRONT AND RIGHT SIDE APPARENTLY BY THE "BLACK DOG MAN" ASSASSIN.
NOTE A MUZZLE FLASH IS SEEN BY "BLACK DOG MAN" (BEHIND CEMENT WALL ON GRASSY KNOLL) AT THE EXACT INSTANT AND AS WELL APPARENTLY BY THE "BADGE MAN" ABOVE THAT BEHIND THE PICKET FENCE ON THE GRASSY KNOLL. IT SEEMS APPARENT THE BADGE MAN WAS AN ADDITIONAL ATTEMPT AS A DECOY BLANK ROUND FIRED TO HIDE THE "BLACK DOG MAN" ASSASSIN FOR THE VARIOUS OBVIOUS REASONS OF CONFUSING CAMERAS THAT POSSIBLY RECORDED THE MUZZLE FLASHES AND WITNESSES HEARING OR SEEING THE SHOTS. A BLANK ROUND BY THE "BADGE MAN" AS INDEED IF HE FIRED A CARBINE TYPE ROUND IT WOULD HAVE INDEED ALSO INJURED FIRST LADY JACKIE KENNEDY IN THE DIRECT LINE OF FIRE WHICH OBVIOUSLY DID NOT OCCUR AND THEREFORE BADGE MAN HAD TO HAVE FIRED A BLANK ROUND.
REFERENCES (REAR BLOW OUT WOUND).....
# Right rear blowout
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?topic=2323.40;wap2
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/harper.htm
http://thedriverkilledkenendy.blogspot.com/2010/11/right-rear-blowout.html

<http://youtu.be/IXglIRrg3Kg>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXglIRrg3Kg>

<http://youtu.be/IVfIh-8nXyQ>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVfIh-8nXyQ>

<http://youtu.be/rYaoBB1rwkc>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYaoBB1rwkc>

THE PERHAPS PUZZLEMENT AND PERHAPS MYSTERY OF THE THIRD CARBINE SHOT FROM THE FRONT - WAY DOWN FROM THE OVERPASS AREA (WHICH PARTIAL CROWDS RAN TO) LEAVING THE REAR BLOW OUT EXIT WOUND THE "SIZE OF A BASEBALL OR FIST CLENCHED" IS SOLVED AS OCCURRING INSTANTANEOUSLY AFTER THE SECOND EXPLODING ROUND FROM THE FRONT AND RIGHT BY "BLACK DOG MAN" WHICH VIOLENTLY JERKED THE PRESIDENT TO HIS LEFT AND BACKWARD. TO DISGUISE THE EXPLODING ROUND AS COMING FROM THE FRONT AND RIGHT WHICH CAUSED THE PRESIDENT TO VIOLENTLY JERK TO HIS LEFT AND BACKWARD - THIS INSTANTANEOUS SHOT "PINNED" THIS MOVEMENT BY IMPACT FORCING A FRONT TO REAR MOVEMENT  - STOPPING THE MOVEMENT OF THE PRESIDENT TO HIS LEFT VIRTUALLY DEAD IN ITS TRACKS. REMEMBER THEY LATER CLAIMED A NERVE INSIDE THE BRAIN WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ODD MOVEMENT DECLARING OSWALD AS THE ONLY SHOOTER.

THESE SECOND AND THIRD SHOTS ON TOP OF EACH OTHER PRODUCED THE, FIRST SIDEWAYS MOVEMENT, AND THEN BACKWARDS MOVEMENT OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY - OCCURRING INSTANTLY AFTER THE FIRST SHOT FROM THE REAR - THE CARBINE ROUND LEAVING THE PENCIL SIZED ENTRY WOUND AT THE TOP OF THE BACK OF THE HEAD ABOVE THE REAR BLOW OUT EXIT WOUND FROM THE CARBINE TYPE ROUND AS THIRD SHOT FROM THE FRONT - ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED BY WIRELESS SET ELECTRONIC FIRING PINS.

Of note is Mrs. Kennedy crawling out on the rear of the Presidential Limosuine recovering a partial part of the President's head, literally, from the third frontal shot that exited the rear of the head as a described carbine rifle round exit wound type - that partial piece was cupped by Mrs. Kennedy, the Secret Service officer observing jumping onto the limo, in her state of shock and given to the Parkland Doctors at arrival. This one piece of evidence may have revealed bullet fragments from this third shot wound ( the "rear blow out" ) obviously from a different rifle and direction then the President Johnson commissioned Warren Report final declaration released to the Public stated.

The bottom line is that the Parkland Doctors all reported correctly and exactly what occurred from their professional observations and descriptions of the three head wounds which indeed occurred. These were in the distinct order reported obviously as FIRST an entry wound in rear by a carbine type round, SECOND - an exploding upon contact type projectile frontal wound that resulted in the obliteration of the exit wound of the first shot and the entry wound of the THIRD shot - a carbine round type from front with rear exit wound the "size of a baseball" or "rear blow out" wound as an exit wound on the rear head. 

In other words the Parkland Doctors had the very, very, very grim duty to report that President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was not shot, or assassinated - he was EXECUTED. Executed in a military style "state sanctioned" type hit execution. NO DOUBT - THAT - is what was reported to Vice President Johnson who was to be sworn in as the succeeding President by Law.

*****SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT IDENTITY OF "BADGE MAN" GRASSY KNOLL......
.....In watching and examining the several YouTubes showing the Research of the "Badge Man" (the apparent man in a Dallas Police Uniform or copy of one pointing rifle right at President from behind the fence, top oif Grassy Knoll area) it struck me almost immediately that the almost visible face, facial features, as even extrapulated fill in looked very very very much like an Actor that I remember from TV back in the 1960s going into the 1970s. I could not remember his name until now I finally looked him up and here he is. Compare loosely and see if he looks eerily similar to the Badge Man or mock up enhanced facial fetured Badge Man. Obviously this could help in discovering his identity by one more time exhuming pictorial evidence of the day to see if he is anywhere in photos or movie clips ......

The Actor -- 
Stuart Whitman
Google Images Search
http://www.google.com/search?q=Stuart+Whitman&hl=en&client=iceweasel-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&prmd=imvnso&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=nV6fT_jmJYXc0QHi1JSEAg&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CG8Q_AUoAQ&biw=1022&bih=

Stuart, God Bless You - this may help in lieu of a police drawing and thank you !

NOTES.....

WHY THE OVERKILL ?

Revelation Chapter 20
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

So what is reported and testified to in various ways and how it happened are three gunmen targeting the President's head with electronic firing pins in their rifles wirelessly controlled to fire upon signal - and almost simultaneously. But why ? Paranoa one might miss ? It becomes obvious as very very very graphic was the desired effect.

One simple shot, as the Warren Report offered by Oswald, was not too dramatic graphically since Zapruder was right on the scene either coveniently or coincidentally by chance. Neither could that one shot have done all the damage to the President's head as reported and testified to in various ways and times and primarily by the Parkland Hospital Doctors in Dallas.

In other words, the three shots including the explode-upon-contact round made the normal graphics dramatisized greatly to two, three, four, five times the normal damage and graphic sight of it all. This becomes the reason for the over kill of at least 2 carbine rounds and an exploding tipped projectile.

To wit, the rear exit wound was "about the size of a tight closed fist or small baseball". (Not actually verbateum testimony but close) . So, if the Warren Report were truth - then we would have seen - by all released - the pencil sized hole in the upper rear of the President's head and about a baseball sized exit wound in the front. There you are. This is obviosly NOT what has been seen by all the world.
Remember, the baseball size hole in the rear of the President's head was described as a common exit wound of a high powered rifle such as the carbine and anything close to that reportedly Oswald's and found in Dallas.
Embaressingly enough, too, if shown - they would have to come up with THE NEW SECOND SINGLE BULLET THEORY THAT SHOWED THE CARBINE SIZE SMALL ENTRY WOUND IN THE REAR OF THE HEAD GOING OUT AND THEN TURNING 180 DEGREES TO COME BACK IN THE FRONT TO MAKE THE EXIT WOUND THE SIZE OF A BASEBALL OUT OF THE REAR OF THE HEAD..... PERHAPS IT EXITED AND BOUNCED OFF THE WINDSHIELD AND HIT PRESIDENT KENNEDY IN THE FRONT SIMULATANEOUSLY. THEY COULDN'T CLAIM THE DENT ON THE WINDSHIELD TRIM BECAUSE THEY ALREADY LIED AND SAID IT HAPPENED BEFORE NOV 22.
No wonder the Warren report NEVER reported on the TWO WOUNDS IN THE REAR OF THE PRESIDENT'S HEAD ! ! !

Suddenly things actually appear as the baseball sized exit wound being an entry wound of some gigantic "pink elephant gun" (joke) or some fantastically large safari hunt rifle leaving the massive exit wound seen of the President's head. But ACTUALLY THERE WAS A BIG GAME HUNTER THAT MADE A POLICE REPORT AS ALMOST MOCKING EVERYONE...... G. G. SLACK..... (GG is the two first characters of the license plate of the JFK limo ! )

SEE POLICE REPORT OF "GG" http://www.jfk-online.com/slack.html

VOLUNTARY STATEMENT. Not Under Arrest Form No. 86
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS

Before me, the undersigned authority, on this the 22nd day of November A.D. 1963 personally appeared Garland Glenwill Slack, Address: 4130 Deely [sp?] St., Dallas, Age 59, Phone No. EV 1 2950

Deposes and says:

Today, I was standing on Houston Street, just below the window to Sheriff Decker's office waiting for the parade. I was standing there when the President's car passed and just after they rounded the corner from Houston onto Elm Street, I heard a report and I knew at once it was a high-powered rifle shot. I am a [cross-out] big game hunter and am familiar with the sound of hi [sic] powered rifles and I knew when I heard the retort [sic] that the shot had hit something. Within a [cross-out] few seconds I heard another retort [sic] and knew it also had hit something and all I could see was the highly colored hat that Mrs. Kennedy had on. I couldn't see anything else. I was so sick that I went back to my office but after thinking it over, I came back as a citizen to offer my statement if it could help in any way. During the time I was standing there I did look up into the building where the Texas Book Depository is and saw some people, maybe 12 or 14, hanging out of windows, but I didn't see anyone with a gun.

When the sound of this shot came, it sounded to me like this shot came from away back or from within a building. I have heard this same sort of sound when a shot has come from within a cave, as I have been on many big game hunts.

                                                                                /s/ G. G. Slack

Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the 22nd day of Nov A. D. 1963

                                                                                /s/ Rosemary Allen

                                                                                Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas

UNFREAKINGLY UNBELIEVABLE ! COINCIDENCE ? I THINK NOT ! ! !

The appearence and graphics most particularly and solely of the Zapruder film show a most horrifying literally "blew his brains out" image in thw world's minds and hearts. This is the apparent reason for this overkill - a most dramatic visual display of President John F. Kennedy vividly and literally having his brains blown out in broad daylight right in front of the world. To make that point here - we all remember the suspected traitor being executed by the Viet Nam general in broad daylight on camera by raising a handgun close to his temple and pulling the trigger. It was the larger than trickle, slim stream of blood flowing as he fell to the ground. This is what was drastically dramatisized in the President John F. Kennedy "execution" . SEE THE YOU TUBE..... graphic !

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGrsw6m9UOY>

<http://youtu.be/BGrsw6m9UOY>

Aside from the evidence value of that as to some sado masochistic personality characteristic of the one (s ) who paid for this execution or decided on it - the rest is then the obvious desired reaction of the world --- completely horrified. We enter mental health and can understand those guilty are deficient to chose such which occurred intentionally. It is as they are trying to convince themselves as well in other words that they are to now be that feared by the world which honors only their target. 

RELIGIOUS REFERENCES
Deuteronomy
7:10 And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face.
23:21 ¶When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee.

Proverbs
4 He becometh poor that dealeth with a slack hand: but the hand of the diligent maketh rich.

Habakkuk
1 The burden which Habakkuk the prophet did see. 
2 O LORD, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save! 
3 Why dost thou shew me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? for spoiling and violence are before me: and there are that raise up strife and contention. 
4 Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.

Zephaniah
16 In that day it shall be said to Jerusalem, Fear thou not: and to Zion, Let not thine hands be slack.

II Peter
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 

EDIT: Found this live clip of "G.G. Slack"
CBS News - The Warren Report - JFK Assassination
Garland Slack Interview:
<http://youtu.be/zVDXdep7Ehg?t=47m51s>

MORE NOTES.....

Uninterestingly enough, and I did not know this until now, isn't it quite the coinicidence that Republican President Richard M. Nixon "hired" Gov. John Connally of Texas to be the United States Secretary Of Treasury. ....

John Connally
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connally#Secretary_of_the_Treasury

"....In 1971, Republican President Nixon appointed the then Democrat Connally as Treasury Secretary. Before agreeing to take the appointment, however, Connally told Nixon that the president must find a position in the administration for George H.W. Bush, the Republican who had been defeated in November 1970 in a hard-fought U.S. Senate race against Democrat Lloyd M. Bentsen. Connally told Nixon that his taking the treasury post would embarrass Bush, who had "labored in the vineyards" for Nixon's election as president, while Connally had supported Humphrey. Ben Barnes, then the lieutenant governor and originally a Connally ally, claims in his autobiography that Connally's insistence saved Bush's political career because the then former U.S. representative and twice-defeated Senate candidate relied on appointed offices to build a resume by which to seek the presidency in 1980 and again in 1988. Nixon hence named Bush as ambassador to the United Nations in order to secure Connally's services at treasury. Barnes also said that he doubted George W. Bush could have become president in 2001 had Bush's father not first been given the string of federal appointments during the 1970s to strengthen the family's political viability. "

AS IF THAT IS NOT BAD ENOUGH..... HE AND NIXON TOOK AMERICA OFF THE GOLD STANDARD DESTROYING OUR MONITERY SYSTEM ILLEGALLY AND AFTER ADVOCATING FULL PRICE GOUGING VIA INFLATIONARY PRACTICES WHICH PRSIDENT KENNEDY STOPPED WITH PRICE CONTROLS. REMEMBER YOUR HISTORY. PRESIDENT NIXON WAS THE FIRST TO REVERSE AND DESTROY THE ENSUING KENNEDY PROSPERITY FOR AMERICA AND THE WORLD THROUGH THESE LAWFUL REGULATIONS AGAINST PIRACY AND ECONOMIC OPPRESSION AND NIXON BEGAN THE SNOWBALL AVALANCHE OF "DEREGULATION" OF ALL.

"....On taking the treasury post, Connally famously told a delegation of Europeans worried about exchange rate fluctuations that the American dollar "is our currency, but your problem." Secretary Connally defended a $50 billion increase in the debt ceiling and a $35 to $40 billion budget deficit as an essential "fiscal stimulus" at a time when five million Americans were unemployed. He unveiled Nixon's program of raising the price of gold and formally devaluing the dollar—finally leaving the old gold standard entirely, a process begun in 1934 by Franklin D. Roosevelt. Prices continued to increase during 1971 ...."

NOW WE GO BACK TO THE ABOVE WERE WIKIPEDIA CLAIMS DEMOCRAT ROOSEVELT ....
".... finally leaving the old gold standard entirely, a process begun in 1934 by Franklin D. Roosevelt ...."
THIS IS NOT TRUE OBVIOUSLY AS IT IS ENTIRELY AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN STATED AND REPORTED AND IN ALL NEWS THAT PRESIDENT NIXON TOOK AMERICA OFF THE GOLD STANDARD --- NOT ANY OTHER PRESIDENT OBVIOUSLY. PRESIDENT NIXON DID IT.
WE CAN READ ALONG IN HISTORY ABOUT WHAT ROOSEVELT ACTUALY DID.....

Franklin D. Roosevelt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt

First New Deal, 1933–1934
".....Executive Order 6102 made all privately held gold of American citizens was to be sold to the U.S. Treasury and the price raised from $20 to $35 per ounce.[78] Exceptions were made for jewelers, coin collectors and a few others. The goal was to counter the deflation which was paralyzing the economy. ...."

WHAT ROOSEVELT DID WAS INGENUIOUS AND YES I HAVE AN ECONOMICS DEGREE..... FOR THE SEVERAL REASONS GOLD WAS TAKEN INTO "CUSTODY". ENEMIES OF AMERICA COULD ACQUIRE GOLD FOR THEIR WAR SUPPORT. THIS BRIEFLY WAS OCCURRING IND3EED BY FRANCE IN THE 1970'S COINCIDENTALLY BECAUSE ALL AMERICAN MONEY ABOVE ONE DOLLAR BILLS HAD WRITTEN ON IT "PAY TO THE BEARER ON DEMAND IN GOLD" AND FRANCE INDEED WAS HORDING AMERICAN GOLD IN CURRENCY EXCHANGE ALTHOUGH WAR WAS NOT CAUSE BUT PROFIT. THIS EPISODE CAUSED ALL AMERICAN MONEY TO NO LONGER HAVE WRIITEN ON IT "PAY TO THE BEARER ON DEMAND IN GOLD" AND "SILVER CERTIFICATES" ...THIS HAPPENED IN MY LIFETIME AND I REMEMBER OUR MONEY.

ROOSEVELT PURCHASED AMERICAN CURRENCY AT PROFIT WHICH CREATED M-1 MONEY SUPPLY LIQUIDITY OR "SPENDING MONEY" FOR EVERYONE. HIS POLOCIES AND ACTIONS FOREVER HAVE BEEN THE FOUNDATION THAT AMERICAN ECONOMICS ARE BASED ON AS STARTING FROM COMPLETE BANKRUPTCY TO COMPLETE AND FULL EMPLOYMENT AND ALL DEFINTIONS IN BETWEEN. THERE IS SIMPLY NO ARGUEMENT CONCIEVABLE AS IT IS PART OF OUR HISTORY. HE PUT THE GREAT DEPRESSION BACK TO WORK FULL TIME.

WAS THERE SATELLITE SIGNAL JAMMING TECHNOLOGY TO JAM "WIRELESS ELECTRONIC FIRING PIN EQUIPPED WEAPONS" FREQUENCIES AND WHERE THESE BLOCKED OR TURNED OFF FOR THE ASSASSINATION ?

One more possibility concerning the wireless controlled electronic firing pin weapons of the three weapons involves the "umbrella man" and also the mentioned man with apparently a two way radio or walkie talkie type communication device.

The radio man may indeed have been the actual wireless device that wirelessly fired the three weapons as explained above in this post thread. So in effect, this would actually be the person who killed President John F. Kennedy.

The idea here to kick around with much research starts with the Russian "Sputnik" orbiting satellite. SEE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_1
... Think of the James Bond movie "Golden Eye". Is this the second half of the 'Space Race' beginning aside from simple spy satellites ? As there is now satellite television and internet - of the beginnings of the 'Space Race' there may have been attempts to electronically jam nuclear warhead triggers and launch sites operations from the orbitting satellites. Of course, additionally, attempts at jamming communications in a war scenario. Was there additionally the jamming of wirelessly controlled weapons that could be fired, even remotely, to protect leaders and military and government officials ? Is this why modern terrorists might choose legal assigned frequencies such as cellular phones or other devices to remotely fire WMDs ?

Now, with satellite TV dish receivers - in bad cloudy days the reception starts to fail and may suffer outages up to hours as in thick rain or snow clouds events overhead. However, they sell an add-on that is a sort of cover that fits over the dish that boosts signal for recption at these times.

The "Umbrella Man" signaling activity may be a first type stealth technology coated over the umbrella that blocks or scatters a satellite jamming signal because it is up above the "radio man" during the assassination timing. Of course there are variations on the theme here obviously. The "umbrella man" signaling may be the signal to actually jam any American and/or Soviet jamming activity to the remote source waiting to throw a switch or even inside the actual satellite control room - indicating the procession has entered the 'kill zone" . It may have been quite possible that either or both the USA and the USSR may have had any of this type of jamming abilities and were indeed employed at all times the American President was outside in the open. The jamming ability technology may have indeed been to stop wireless activation of electronic firing of weapons. Perhaps this was a signal (umbrella man) to "throw the switch" and turn it off for those few fatal seconds. Again, any variation on the theme and is probably less than an official "conspiracy theory" at this point - but food for thought. TAKE A LOOK....

<http://youtu.be/NB-TLTWAh6s>

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NB-TLTWAh6s>

MORE:
<http://youtu.be/7RUlYJxWE7s>

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RUlYJxWE7s>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella_Man_(JFK_assassination)

The "other" radio man......
JIM HICKS

Jim Hicks
Radio specialist from Dallas. Was radio communications coordinator in Dealey Plaza. Placed in mental hospital run by the military.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ToA/ToAchp5.html

QUOTED: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4886
pg. 48: 12:32pm: "Jim Hicks, an eyewitness in Dealey Plaza, walks toward the knoll as the motorcade's press bus speeds by on its way to Parkland hospital. Photographs of Hicks, taken from the rear, show something in his back pocket resembling a radio with an antenna. (Hicks will later tell New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison that he was the radio coordinator for the assassination team. Shortly after admitting this to Garrison, Hicks is beaten up, kidnapped, and taken to an Air Force mental institution in Oklahoma, where he will be incarcerated until 1988. A few days after his release, Hicks will be murdered in Oklahoma.) It will later be suggested that Jim Hicks is possibly the man photographed in the Cuban and Soviet Embassies in Mexico by the CIA. He is identified incorrectly as Oswald in those photographs."

QUOTED: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4886
pg. 48: 12:32pm: "Jim Hicks, an eyewitness in Dealey Plaza, walks toward the knoll as the motorcade's press bus speeds by on its way to Parkland hospital. Photographs of Hicks, taken from the rear, show something in his back pocket resembling a radio with an antenna. (Hicks will later tell New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison that he was the radio coordinator for the assassination team. Shortly after admitting this to Garrison, Hicks is beaten up, kidnapped, and taken to an Air Force mental institution in Oklahoma, where he will be incarcerated until 1988. A few days after his release, Hicks will be murdered in Oklahoma.) It will later be suggested that Jim Hicks is possibly the man photographed in the Cuban and Soviet Embassies in Mexico by the CIA. He is identified incorrectly as Oswald in those photographs."

PICTURES
http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=set_linear_mode&forum=3&page=6&topic_id=88923&prev_page=show_mesg

WAS JIM HICKS "THE REAL OSWALD" IN MEXICO - MEANING THE REAL ASSASSIN AS THE WIRELESS ELECTRONIC FIRING PINS WALKIE TALKIE GUY ? IN OTHER WORDS - DEPRESSING THE TALK BUTTON SENT THE SIGNAL TO THE WIRELESS CONTROLLED ELECTRONIC FIRING PINS TO SHOOT IN THEIR PRECISE ORDER 1,2,3.... THE ELECTRONICS RECEIVING THE SIGNAL SET TO FIRE RIFLE #1 -THEN INSTANT DELAY (BUILT INTO ELECTRONICS JURY RIG) AND RIFLE #2 FIRES THEN RIFLE #3.

TO DATE....

So for the record to date - and this is like the "Clue" game like Col. Mustard did it in the Living room with a pipe - I am pointing to (and from religious knowledge) that the man identified as the Beast666 in the Holy Bible (Authorized King James Version) is the person responsible for the "hit" as the mastermind who paid for it. In 1963 he was identified as the underground "king" of Communist Nations worldwide that was called "Red Communism" (Sixth King/Head/Mountain) . This was a reciprocity vendetta killing against the person of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy for the embarrassment caused by him at the "Cuban Missle Crisis" to this underground leader - as much as it was the assassination was the blocking of the President Kennedy Administration and all it stood for as far as World Peace.

It was knocking on the door of the devil himself, which world peace would be his ending and rulership, and he struck back with the assassination  and great fear caused by the violence of President Kennedy's "execution" in broad daylight and ensuing cover up activities (many discovered, witnesses killed) in the exact manner it occurred for all its theatrics that were so painful to live through to this day.

Obviously as well, after the terrible assassination, international crime would now flourish as Law and Order would not prevail ever so closer into every dark corner worldwide with the "Super Powers" now working closer and closer to a civilized world free of the scourge of war and crime in general. This in effect (world peace achieved) would have put Satan and the Beast666 out of business as is known would not occur at that time "Elisha must come first".

In religious aspect, respect, and effect, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was Elisha (Elias) in the same manner as John was spoken of by Jesus.....

MATTHEW Chapter 11
4 Jesus answered and said unto them, Go and shew John again those things which ye do hear and see:   
5  The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them.   
6  And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me.   
7 ¶And as they departed, Jesus began to say unto the multitudes concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken with the wind?   
8  But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold, they that wear soft clothing are in kings' houses.   
9  But what went ye out for to see? A prophet? yea, I say unto you, and more than a prophet.   
10  For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.   
11  Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.   
12  And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.   
13  For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.   
14  And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.   
15  He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. 

HIS REWARD
Jesus spoke....
MATTHEW Chapter 10
40 ¶ He that receiveth you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.   
41  He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward.   
42  And whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his reward.


It was written about the crucifixion of Jesus Christ approxiamately 500 years earlier as told to the prophet Isaiah to write in the Holy Bible....
Book Of Isaiah
Chapter 27
7 Hath he smitten him, as he smote those that smote him? or is he slain according to the slaughter of them that are slain by him?
[Hath he, God, smitten him, Jesus Christ, as he, God, smote those that smote him, Jesus Christ? or is he, Jesus Christ, slain according to the slaughter of them that are slain by him, God? In other words there was no justice or righteousness at all in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and here neither in the slaying of President JFK. This discusses the ugly gruesome most disgusting indignity to such the Honorable. In other words when God punishes - does He do it in the manner as murderers do ? No ! It applies to our beloved slain President John Fitzgerald Kennedy as well ! ] 

I believe David Ferrie fired the carbine shot from front (3rd shot) all the way down the fence on the Grassy Knoll near the overpass - which may be identified in pictures or movies of that area, and the USSR assassin fired the exploding tip round (2nd shot) from the wall of the Grassy Knoll who may have been the "KGB Agent" described by Frank Sturgis (YouTube below) and he is shown as Black Dog Man caught on film shooting. Most likely the "Badge Man" as I believe shot a blank round causing the smoke, to decoy away from the explosive tipped round shooter as mentioned above, and the muzzle flashes shown on film with great efforts, as an exiting by a carbine round from JFK's head would have also killed Jackie. Also remember witnesses at the Grassy Knoll area at the time of the fatal head wound described two shots "right on top of each other like bang - bang" - the second "bang" most likely that third simultaneous shot from the overpass area, the first being the exploding tipped round. Witnesses described this also as very loud - which would have been the explosive tipped round having more gun powder and louder than a carbine type weapon and round. Testimony by witnesses did say they saw "smoke" from behind the picket fence of the Grassy Knoll. I believe this is a further intended decoy away from the actual assassin behind the cement retaining wall firing the exploding tipped round - being who he was and preeminence as to escape. In other words if there was, for them tragically, the need of a "fall guy" at the Grassy Knoll - then it would have been the "Badge Man". 

(For all intents and purposes, I believe the first round (bullet) shooter and the wireless trigger man should be the assassins charged with the murder via the first rear carbine size shot that was indeed the first of the almost simultaneous three shots that struck President Kennedy's head. [That exit wound in the front was obliterated by the explosive tip round that after struck the front. ] The rear shot of the three has been shown in the Zapruder Film with great efforts as indeed the first of the three almost simultaneous shots to strike President Kennedy's head. This equals as one holding and aiming a rifle and another pulling the trigger. Of course in their buffoonery they would probably have argued that neither of them could be charged for the murder because either of them did not aim and shoot. The first aiming the gun would argue he did not shoot it and claim not guilty. The actual wireless trigger man would argue he did not know who or what the gun was aiming at even though his wireless device made it shoot and plead not guilty.

The other two, the shooter of the exploding tipped round which stuck the head from the front right side and the carbine size round striking from the front leaving the 'baseball size' exit wound in the rear of the head - in that order by the wireless delay as almost simultaneous hits - may have argued 'you can not kill a dead man' meaning he was instantly dead from the first head wound shot of the three.
But to amend this, in reality it was all three shooters and the trigger man, as the death was not actually within hundredths or thousandths of a second or instantly by any one of the three shots striking the President's head almost simultaneously. The President was still alive for up to several instants or seconds beyond the timing of the second and third almost simultaneous shots. Was the President DOA ? Yes - though arguably during emergency resuscitation there were recorded I believe one or two breaths and one to three heartbeats at Parkland Hospital by the attending Physicians. This can be arguably "artificial". )

THE THREE SHOOTERS VIRTUALLY SIMULTANEOUS PER CONSPIRATORIAL PURPOSE AS EXPLAINED IN THIS THREAD ......

Frank Sturgis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Sturgis names the second shooter as a "KGB Agent" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xax_NbArKT4>


FIRST SHOOTER - ACCORDING TO RESEARCH EITHER FROM DALTEX OR SCHOOLBOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDINGS....
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97pPNG03ikc>

ADDITIONAL SHOOTERS ? ONE WITH APPARENT SILENCER - FIRE CRACKER SOUNDS ?
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-KOpdISioM>


SHOOTER NUMBER TWO REVEALED AT GRASSY KNOLL FENCE - "BADGE MAN" - apparently fired a dummy round
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSQdnAcCbXI>

SHOOTER NUMBER THREE REVEALED GRASSY KNOLL WALL- THE EXPLODING TIPPED ROUND...
<http://youtu.be/sVC-hFdmUAg>

SHOOTER NUMBER FOUR DOWN AT OVERPASS?
POSSIBLY THE THIRD SHOOTER.....
TITLE: The Rifleman on the Bridge Holds His Rifle by its Sling JFK assassination
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYxiIpbPk34>

BELOW ARE TWO SNAPSHOTS FROM THE BLACK DOG MAN (ONE WITH RED CIRCLED IMAGE) - FROM THE OPTICALLY ENHANCED YOUTUBE THE BLOW UP SNAPSHOT OF THAT REVEALING MAYBE FOR THE FIRST TIME THE FACE OF THE KILLER ASSASSIN  KNOWN AS BLACK DOG MAN ......

---- START BY STARING AT JUST A LITTLE TO THE LEFT OF CENTER TO FOCUS ON THE END OF THE RIFLE BARREL POINTING AT JFK..... YOU WILL THEN SEE APPARENTLY ON THE RIGHT A SEEMINGLY BLACK OVERCOAT OR RAINCOAT PULLED UP HALF WAY OVER THE LEFT SIDE OF THE HEAD WHICH IS FACING THE CAMERA MEANING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SNAPSHOT..... IDENTIFYING THIS YOU WILL SEE THE FACE APPEARING WITH GLASSES OR SUNGLASSES WHICH IS STARING RIGHT DOWN THE SITES OF THE RIFLE JUST ABOVE THE END OF THE BARREL. ....TAKES A FEW MINUTES TO MAKE HIM AND THE RIFLE OUT. HE IS WEARING A MILITARY HAT AS A POLICE OFFICER HAT OR OTHER MILITARY HAT. IT IS BELIEVED THIS IS THE "KGB AGENT" MENTIONED.....
---- THIS IS THE SECOND VIRTUAL SIMULTANEOUS TIMED SYNCHRONIZED WIRELESS CONTROLLED ELECTRONIC FIRING PIN SHOT OF THE THREE HITTING THE PRESIDENT'S HEAD - THE "EXPLODING TIPPED" PROJECTILE ROUND. ALL THE ASSASSIN HAD TO DO WAS AIM THE RIFLE. THE WIRELESS SIGNAL FIRING THE THREE WEAPONS WITH PRESET SYNCHRONIZED FIRING TIME PRESET WAS THE "TRIGGER MAN".
NOTE ALSO APPARENTLY THE RIFLE IS BEING PROPPED ON HIS LEFT HAND - HIS LEFT ARM STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN AND HAND BENDING SIDEWAYS OPEN (FOUR FINGERS) ALL RIGHT BELOW THE RIFLE.
--- YOU CAN EVEN SEE APPARENTLY HE IS WEARING A WRIST WATCH ON THE ARM PROPPING THE RIFLE AIMING AND THE LONG SHIRT SLEEVE IS WHITE OR LIGHT COLORED. AS WELL THERE IS APPARENTLY A BADGE ON HIS MILITARY CAP..... SEEMS THESE ASSASSINS THAT DAY REVEALED WHERE ALL WEARING DALLAS POLICE COPY UNIFORMS OR ACTUAL ONES STOLEN OR PASSED ONTO THEM. MAKES SENSE AS RUNNING AWAY - WITNESSES WOULD GUESS THEY WERE CHASING ASSASSINS RATHER THAN ACTUALLY BEING THEM AND RUNNING LIKE HELL OUT OF DALLAS.

THE GRUESOME PART..... "MISSING BRAIN" ....

Direct evidence shows Parkland Hospital Doctors, witnesses - ALL testify to about one third of President Kennedy's brain had been blown away altogether, missing.

However, upon arrival at US Navy Bethesda Hospital - and in a different casket - direct evidence and testimony reveals that there was 'less than a handful' of President Kennedy's brain present and every one there 'gasped' when they saw it (official Autopsy proceedings).

This means the certain of the Secret Service where the ONLY ones in control of the body in the casket from the Parkland Hospital to the Presidential jet to Bethesda Naval Hospital. These ONLY had disposed of the "missing brain" . Most likely during the swearing in of the Vice President Johson into the presidency was when the gruesome illegal actions took place of the disposal and most likely flushed in the jet bathroom toilet and then flushed in flight, probably - or any variation on the theme. THIS was about the ONLY time when no one else was with or looking at the casket aboard the jet. It was virtually the only time those certain of the Secret Service was/were alone with the dead President in the casket without anyone else present.

The strange timing of the entire event of the oath of office performed to swear in VP Johnson may have been, and probably was, prearranged - to stage any destruction of evidence hastily and even when the Oswald rifle bullet fragments and "surgical alteration" took place - wedging the Oswald rifle fragments into the skull bone, and some of the skull had the appearence of surgical alteration - jagged cut away around wounds.

This was ONLY done no doubt to destroy evidence of the residue from the exploding tipped round (mercury?) - the second almost simultaneous of the three shots hitting President Kennedy's head, the exploding tipped round - along with, most likely, a metal detector to remove bullet fragments and subsequently implant fragments to implicate Lee Harvey oswald who was the 'patsy' designate from day one before the assassanation ever occurred.

HERE IS THE CLIP BY THE OFFICIAL AUTOPSY - "THERE WAS NO BRAIN" ....
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDYNMlXD59o>

AS WELL THIS REVEALS THAT ALTHOUGH PRESIDENT KENNEDY WAS PLACED IN A DONATED BRONZE CASKET IN DALLAS - AT THE AUTOPSY HE ARRIVED IN A 'PINKISH' "SHIPPING CASKET" AND GRAY BODY BAG WHEREAS IT IS REPORTED AND TESTIFIED HE LEFT WITH SHEETS AROUND HEAD AND IN THE EXPENSIVE BRONZE CASKET FROM DALLAS. IT WOULD REASON ACCORDING TO EVENTS THAT THE CASKET-TO-BODY BAG CHANGE WAS TO THROW OFF SUSPICION AND PLACE THE "MISSING BRAIN" CRIME BY BETHESDA PERSONEL AS FRAIMING THEM WITH THE HOLE HOPED ASSUMPTION THAT EVERYONE PUZZLED WOULD ASSUME THINGS MYSTERIOUS WERE PROBABLY "NATIONAL SECURITY" TYPE THINGS GOING ON BEGINNING WITH THE "STEALING OF THE BODY" FROM DALLAS - ILLEGAL UNTIL AUTOPSY PERFORMED IN DALLAS - AND ON TO THE "CASKET SWITCH IS WHEN THEY MUST HAVE REMOVED THE BRAIN FOR EVIDENCE TOP SECRET". AND ON AND ON.

SMOKING GUN? YOU BETCHHA.... READ THIS:
The Casket Switch From the Records
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-happened-to-jfks-body-cover-up-on.html

Further, the evidence public reveals the presidential limosuine was hosed down in Dallas and later the windshield was removed and other changes.

Of note, all considered from evidence and interviews, apparently former US Atty. Gen. Senator Robert F. Kennedy (JFK's brother) retrieved the "canister" with the remains of JFK's brains ("less than a handful") from the National Archives and buried them with JFK when the casket was reinterred. This was the other flash rumour and news "the President's brain is missing".

THE PRESIDENTIAL LIMOSUINE EVIDENCE COVER UP.....
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtFoPCKVp-8> 

THE PARADE ROUTE "STAND DOWN" AND LACK OF NORMAL PROTECTION "STAND DOWN ORDERS".....

PROTECTION STAND ORDERS AND NORMAL PROTECTION ABSENT - COLNEL PROUTY
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpbHW7o0X00>

EN ROUTE - SECRET SERVICE "STAND DOWN" ORDERS FROM PROTECTING LIMOSUINE
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8>

Review the research and clips showing the "Secret Service Stand Down" which was not only highly unusual but completely outside of the Presidential Protection Procedures - as explained professionally by Col. Prouty.

HERE - TOWARDS THE MIDDLE OF THIS CLIP SHOWS A USUAL PROTECTION BY THE SECRET SERVICE WITH PRESIDENT KENNEDY IN PREVIOUS PARADES TYPE ACTIVITIES - SHOWING SOME USUAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES BY THE SECRET SERVICE AND REVEALS WHAT WAS OBVIOUSLY MISSING AT DALLAS THAT DARK DAY (If I find more I will post them for obvious comparisons).....
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxRt5gAvS9w>

It may have dawned on you that with the Medical reports and testimony by the Attending Physicians in Dallas 'treating' President John F. Kennedy declaring three virtually simultaneous deadly head wounds via coordinated wireless fired electronic weapons - THAT IT WAS IMPOSSSIBLE THAT THE "OSWALD RIFLE" COULD HAVE BEEN USED AS THE MURDER WEAPON - IT DID NOT HAVE THE WIRELESS RECEIVER AND ELECTRONIC FIRING PIN MODIFICATIONS TO IT.

There was no attached device to the weapon of the wireless receiver or the electronic firing pin shown or reported or photographed. THAT MEANS ALL THE "OSWALD RIFLE FRAGMENTS " WERE IMPLANTS BY THE ONLY ONES ABLE TO - THOSE OF THE SECRET SERVICE.

The alternative would involve a real dog chase the tail.

# There was apparent reliable testimony that the "Oswald Rifle" was actually a German made Mauser and NOT what was shown to the world.

# If the "Oswald Rifle" were indeed used as the first as the rear shot - this involves further treasoners of Dallas Police that would have had to "break down the electronic evidence" from the rifle before it was entered and booked and shown. Possibly even in the Evidence Room or wherever it may have been specially held before further involvement such as ballistics tests etc. -

THE OFFICERS FIND A MAUSER RIFLE - NOT THE OSWALD ITALIAN RIFLE.....
<http://youtu.be/4XNHtUDEDAI>

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XNHtUDEDAI>


Was this why the Mauser Rifle was shown ? - To give time to remove the modifications from the "Oswald Rifle" ? And further - Dallas Police would have had to be able to smuggle the "Oswald Rifle" out of the building to remove the modifications first.

If that (the Mauser Rifle) was ALREADY PREPARED to be shown as it was AND FIRED as being one of the three actual murder weapons, Then the reported "Mauser Rifle" would have had to shown the wireless receiver and electronic firing devices modifications that were not reported - but rather a normal looking Mauser Rifle which looks a lot like the reported "murder weapon" -the Oswald Rifle.
 
# The "Pristine Bullet" would have to have been fired earlier before "planting" it as evidence. This means they (conspirators) indeed had pocession of the "Oswald Rifle" before the assassination, and fired it at least twice to retreive the "pristine bullet" and other fragments reportedly identified as from the "Oswald Rifle".

Things are much simpler as they appeared. The Oswald rifle and spent cartridges on the floor were indeed planted. Since there was ONLY one rear entry wound to the President's head (rear, about size of pencil hole - the other two rounds hitting from the side and front) then the trajectory lined up shows where the ACTUAL wireless controlled electronic firing pin rigged rifle was positioned and it, and the assassin, where positioned.

Further, since it was a wireless controlled electronic firing pin 3 rifles/assassins shooting gallery - this could explain the earlier mentioned G. G. Slack actual involvement as to his very, very, very strange statement of "help" to Police insisting to make the statement that he heard the first shot as sounding like it was fired back inside "like from inside a cave" to throw off thoughts of wireless involvement - by duping to believe this wireless signal would not reach inside as to, for example, coming from the one DalTex Building broken window "perch" as someone back inside a ways with a rifle.

SOME FOOT NOTES.....

Z FILM ALTERED....
As far as the Zapruder Film being "doctored" - changed in any manner, there is an erie coincidence in the Holy Bible to be considered. That is that Frame 313 (head shots) being the desired "fixed frame" for presentation adds credence to those of the Researchers great efforts that point to beginning frames are indeed missing - and even a reported eye witness who saw the original saying a lot of the beginning was removed. (Claims in the orginal the Presidential Limo was seen almost running over the curb/sidewalk in the turn from Houston to Elm. As well that the Limo indeed came to a complete stop at the "kill zone" spot until after the shots, etc. ) So most likely the film - frame by frame was cut off from the beginning until they played it back and Frame 313 exactly was the head shot. This indeed may account for the missing frames in the beginning of the film.

READ:
Book Of Habakkuk Chapter 3
3:13 Thou wentest forth for the salvation of thy people, even for salvation with thine anointed; thou woundedst the head out of the house of the wicked, by discovering the foundation unto the neck. Selah.

Coincidence ? 313 - Head Wounds, neck wounds ?

No. It was doctored to point to this. It is a "confession" if you will. This reveals religious persecution beyond murder and assassination. If you will remember the one clip I added that conatined the "Opal Bust" which was a sort of microdot implant photo in the photo which I now recognize as the mask faces on the Three Stooges introductions - the smiling face and pouting face. Here it was the smiling face mask.

What does that mean ? It points to who in the Bible ? The three stooges - False Prophet and two princes. Blaming it all on them as being guilty as false prophets telling lies - the accusation "...thou woundedst the head out of the house of the wicked..." - as in other words "America is the Great Satan".

SPECIAL NOTE here was that ironically the off beat remark went through America after these assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK - Kennedy, King, Kennedy - that notice there names all end in capital "K" so that altogether they are "KKK" . Hmmmm. their calling card? This was sentiment.

But we see in the Scriptures (Holy Bible) the 6th Kingdom (Red Communism) had a king over them....
Revelation Chapter 9, verse 11
11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

The angel is the Devil - Satan - who is the false accuser of the brethern.....
Revelation Chapter 12
10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren [Satan] is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. 
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.

Did you notice the reversal ? 9-11 ? Reportedly the attack by the one who is believed to be the False Prophet himself here at Revelation 9:11 points to the Beast did it ? Coincidence ? No, an 'insider' and why the date 9-11 most likely to point to this all.

COMMENTS - THE OTHER TWO MAGIC BRAIN BULLETS...

There is a verse in the Scriptures (Holy Bible, Authorized King James) ....

Book of Matthew, Chapter 23
Verse 24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

...that makes my point and not to accept as belittling. Again, I was 10 years old Nov 22 1963 and all the researchers of the day were like older brothers or Uncle ages to me that I later heard about and read through the years on up to now - the internet and researchers online.

From the beginning, each point of the assassination and Warren Report discovered seemed so trivial but was earth shattering - each in themselves - showing either grave incompetence or worst, cover up and conspiracy.  Each point discovered, all, are making up a foundation and then castle of true evidence of what truly happened - opposite of what the Public has been told, the lone Lee Harvey Oswald Story.

However, and taking that into account and especially the early on public investigations, the two areas I find all these years later were so obvious and seemingly IMPOSSIBLE for the researchers to have missed and never commented on.

These are firstly the Parkland Hospital Doctors and their testimonies and reports. OBVIOUSLY they described THREE shots hit the President in the head virtually simultaneously. The obvious first shot, being the carbine pencil sized hole at the top of the back of the President's head, is still slightly vague to me where this has been commented on by the Doctors and medical personnel. However, the other two shots that hit were WELL mentioned and described - one being the massive hit/wound in the front of the head all the world saw from the magazine color photos taken from the Zapruder film and published ( I believe it was Life magazine shortly after the dust settled) . The other was the description of the exit wound about the size of a baseball out of the BACK of the President's head, below the pencil sized carbine entry hole - above by seemingly a couple inches.

So the one point was that no one seemed to ever say that Parkland Hospital reported that President Kennedy suffered THREE shots virtually simultaneously to the head being his cause of death.

(Speaking of the 'brain missing' at Bethesda - "about less than a handful left" [Paul O'Conner] - if that was all that was present in Parkland Hospital, then I find it impossible respected Doctors there would have bothered with resuscitation. Of course they reported about only one third was blown away - completely gone. )

But the other new point is that the frontal massive wound is on the RIGHT SIDE of the President's head. This is supposed to be the exit wound from Oswald's rifle. This constitutes the NEW MAGIC BRAIN BULLET that no one seems to ever mention. This is so simple it is VERY pathetic it has never been said. If, as reported, Oswald shot Kennedy from behind, then the skipped over massive hole in the rear, but mentioned entry hole somewhere back there, was coming from the REAR AND RIGHT AND ABOVE President Kennedy. 

So here we have the SECOND MAGIC BULLET !
If Oswald shot from above, and right of, and behind - then that bullet that hit President Kennedy from behind is SUDENNLY TAKING A RIGHT TURN OUT OF THE President's head to the RIGHT INSTEAD OF LEFT. The reported Oswald shots were from above, and from right to left in striking ANYONE in this criss cross angle from behind. Don't you think then that the Oswald EXIT WOUND WOULD BE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF KENNEDY'S HEAD AND NOT THE RIGHT???

NOPE - THE SECOND MAGIC BULLET - THE MAGIC BRAIN BULLET - INSTEAD OF EXITING THE LEFT FOREHEAD BEING REPORTEDLY SHOT FROM ABOVE AND RIGHT MAGICALLY EXITS THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE FOREHEAD. PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE ACCORDING TO PHYSICS I AM SURE.

Now they (the cover up) already tried to explain that the head movement backwards was from a nerve/muscle reaction natural movement from being struck from behind by the Oswald 'magic brain bullet'. LOL Gee Whiz, the only thing wrong with that "theory" is that President Kennedy was mising the top third of his brain and head on the right side where ANY of those skeletal-muscle nerves would have been present to react in such described manner. In other words, that entire area was instantaneously missing as by explosion - as opposed to a normal type scenario of rear entry striking these areas to possibly conduct such irregular movement as their "theory" suggested. Simply, there was not the normal type through and through they were describing present as OBVIOUSLY this exit wound was several times LARGER than ANY EXIT WOUND that any type CARBINE ROUND would cause - defining the EXPLOSIVE TIP ROUND reported by Parkland Doctors causing the "finger like" flange blow back of the scalp ONLY caused by an EXPLOSIVE TIPPED ROUND. These are the Professional and Expert Opinions, the reported FACTS, by those who "treated" President John F. Kennedy shortly after 12:30PM November 22, 1963. 

I do not believe it was ever reported that the Oswald rifle was "rifled" - which is a type of groove cut into the inside of the gun barrel all the way up as a like spiralling out winding out groove. This, called a rifled barrel, sets the bullet spinning in a circular motion on its way out of the barrel for more precision and longer range. It also adds speed as the bullet in this spinning manner is cutting the atmosphere in its smallest air resistance possible and is why they are cone shaped for least air resistance as well - adding as much pinpointing accuracy as possible.

This also would greatly reduce any wobbling type motion of the head of the bullet traveling, the nose cone so to speak, which also makes a "cleaner" entry wound as opposed to a bullet in the extreme wobbling hitting sideways after wobbling that far out as to like a "tumbling bullet" which would greatly lose speed and distance in the extreme. That entry wound would be large and mis-shapen as opposed to what was observed as the pencil sized carbine type hole in the rear of President Kennedy's head - a clean entry which would have only occurred by close proximity rather than a long long far away shot that inevitibly would have began to wobble/tumble. This too hints to the closeness of the assassin(s ) or combined as using "rifled barrels" for the two carbine shots - one from the rear and one from the front. Of course note the scope of the assassination and that anything amateur has been ruled out by all sane people. Therefore, rifled barrels were absolutely employed, as there is no other choice for such a chosen precision hoped for as a "clean hit" (did it, and got away with it) .

NOTE that the famous/infamous M-16 Rifle introduced in the Viet Nam Conflict was more an artillery weapon as opposed to a standard issue rifle. It fired longer and more accurate than ANY rifle in the world such as the opposing AK-47. In theory the M-16 supplied army could kill all charging forces before they ever came into range to do the opposite - and is why I have always said it should be classified as an artillery piece which is what artillery does.

Nevertheless, at some point a type of anti-rifling of the barrel of the M-16 was intentionally made causing the round to severely wobble and tumble at close range even. It was turned into a "Saturday Night Special" (noted as a cheap piece of crap that could not shoot straight, or far) as kind of making it like the old World War Two Thompson machine gun and SEVERELY DIMINSHED the ability of the rifle design. The point was that when this tumbler round hit - it would richochet all over the place inside the body causing many wounds instead of just the one, intentionally. This cut the chances of survival to quite minimal for any enemy hit, as well considering triage military medical treament in the field - patch 'em up and send 'em back in - too many wounds were skipped over and even left to bleed to death. Understand that Communist North Viet Nam and China were cheating cheating cheating. China in conspiracy with them were pouring communist troops into the Viet Nam War. America could wait for them to 'fess up in a UN Council while literally hundreds of thousands may have been killed - or step up the bombing and introduce "Mr. Saturday Night Special".

Unbelievably, North Viet Nam President Ho Chi Minh actually sued the United States because of the damage intentionally by the M-16 "tumbler" round for "Cruel and Unusual Punishment" from our own United States Constitution. Absurd perhaps.

REFERENCE
Rifling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Barrel rifling was invented in Augsburg, Germany at the end of the fifteenth century. In 1520 August Kotter, an armourer of Nuremberg, Germany improved upon ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling 

THE THIRD MAGIC BULLET

The 3rd MAGIC BULLET is the one from the Grassy Knoll area behind the retaining wall as the Black Dog Man ...... AGAIN this bullet would have to take a SEVERE left turn as entering the temple area of the President's head BUT it exited out the right rear of the President's head called the 'REAR BLOW OUT " exit wound ALL the Parkland Attending Physicians and others testified to seeing on the back of the President's head.

In other words the line of fire from the Grassy Knoll exit wound should have been out the back LEFT side instead of the exit wound that existed as on the RIGHT rear side. THIS proves it was not a high powered carbine type round/bullet (as the reported Oswald rifle type) BUT rather the EXPLODING TIPPED ROUND which has NO EXIT WOUND as it explodes upon impact. THIS proves as well the actual "rear blow out" exit wound testified to was from the THIRD round/bullet from the front creating its exit wound in the rear of the President's head "about the size of a clenched fist or baseball".

Another ditty....

Ask yourself "Why did they (conspirators) even have a "pristine bullet" in the first place, prepared with a slight nick, and ready to "plant" on the stretcher? " .

We are following out from ALL input to date that indeed President John F. Kennedy was victim of a major conspiracy and their resultant assassination of him.

The 'pristine bullet' reveals that the first wound to President Kennedy's back/throat was no mistake. It was QUITE INTENTIONAL and not at all the result of a lousy shot "with Maggies Drawers".... (Bob Dylan "I ain't gonna work at Maggie's Farm no more..." ) - quite intentional as they already had the 'pristine bullet' ready to plant just as they already had the three empty shells to plant and the Oswald rifle. We know according to the Parkland Doctors that there is NO WAY the Oswald rifle was used in this assassination, simply because the wounds could ONLY have occurred with special equipped electronic firing pin wirelessly fired rifles in timed coordination - at least one of which contained the deadly exploding tipped round.

There is speculation that Gov. Connally was shot from the side of the car rather than the back. As well, Parkland Doctors treating Gov. Connally stated at a Press Conference after preliminary treatment that a bullet remained lodged in the Govenor's leg. Everyone knows the flesh is swolen and closes in on wounds and the 'pristine bullet' was indeed planted as false evidence impeading a murder investigation and again ACCORDING TO PARKLAND DOCTORS. This is to say, according to the Parkland Hospital Doctor's Professional Opinions and Statements and Reports - the "pristine bullet" WAS PLANTED FALSE EVIDENCE.

Now remember, there was originally confusion caused as to Lee Harvey Oswald was an either expert or lousy shot. The "pristine bullet" intentionally planted as false evidence was in perhaps as well in one scenario attempting to validate the Oswald-is-a-lousy-shot side of the aisle. Then add the "one shot completely missed" statements. Obviously, again, the conspirators intentionally planted the "pristine bullet" to quite intentionally have shown the back/neck shot that hit President Kennedy broadcasted in some manner. So now set up is - since Oswald was a lousy shot with a lousy rifle - is why it took multiple gunfire shots for Oswald to kill JFK - and sets up cover for the intended multiple shots that did occur that dark day, Nov. 22, 1963. 

All in all, the "pristine bullet" pointed to the religious connection intended in the conspiracy, as that bullet supposedly that caused the back/neck injuries to President Kennedy - taking us to the verse as mentioned above....

Book Of Habakkuk Chapter 3 Verse 13 ----- "313"
Thou wentest forth for the salvation of thy people, even for salvation with thine anointed; thou woundedst the head out of the house of the wicked, by discovering the foundation unto the neck. Selah...

NOW that verse is referring to the Majesty of God - but the evil reading it in evil as meaning Satan and the Beast666 (who was the 6th King and 8th) went out killing for their "salvation" which is the riches of this world - "the root of evil is the love of money" .....

I Timothy Chapter 6
10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

....The infamous Frame 313 of the Zapruder Film which was the instant on film of the President Kennedy head wounding took us right to this track revealing many things. Obviously and utmost was the "proclamation" by the 'head of the contract' (the USSR underground leader - 6th Kingdom who then became the 8th, the Beast666). Obviously to all Christians, Bible Students everywhere, this "proclamation" as cause of the assassination is immediately understood that this person is completely mocking Christianity (the false accuser of the brethern accusing them night and day before the Lord) as posing as spirit of antichrist and that this meaning there was no validity whatsoever in this striking-from-the-shadows murder as saying he was God turning The Word upside down as witchcraft ALTOGETHER meaning the murderer (contract head) quoted 313 which actually says God wounded heads of evil throughout as to now say that he (contract head) was wounding the Christian-guilty-of-sin heads for their disobedience to God - claiming to be God.

Don't forget that for real this bastard in making his getaway was hinting towards those of the 7th Kingdom (USA) were the ones who did this and trying to blame it on and frame the Red Communist Head for it. The bastard hoped internal strife and paranoa would take over. This is a main cause for raising Lee Harvey Oswald. Kind of the counter intelligence moves of first planting stories or evidence to implicate the 7th king (USA) as the assassins, and then making it look like these are trying to make it look like the 6th/8th (Red Communism / Beast) King did it. A double reverse. Counter intelligence view. Reveals much of the true assassin contractor - underground king of Red Communism - tactics !

He could have even tried the "wars and rumours of wars" game of this was Protestant verses Catholic in killing the Gentile Catcholic Head as President. This type religious war later did start up in the UK. No, he wanted credit to him. No, it meant as Christianity was persecuted in the USSR and all the mass murders etc, this has now come to the largest existing predominantly Christian nation - the USA starting with their leader - the President of the United States, being as well openly a confessed God fearing Jesus belieiving Catholic Christian. This was the fall..... "The Apostasy" ....

Book of Thessalonian Chapter 2
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

NOW we can open the doors to the top Criminologists of the nation and world. We see here EASILY now the make up of this one person identified today as the last 8th King the Beast666 who was then the 6th King as the underground leader worlwide of what was commonly called Red Communism.

We do not have this underground "leader" going public claiming responsibility and even consequential demands to be met or else scenario. Quite the opposite. A coward striking from the dark and fearing reprisal. It is not one taking the helm of world leadership as in the honor of days past of battle. Not as an act of justice openly to benefit the world.

A coward striking from the dark and fearing reprisal..... here in this enormous conspiracy is this little do-ditty writing of 313 like written inside a fortune cookie. This is as saying "catch me, catch me, I dare you to catch me" - revealing the psychologial mind at the time of the murder. A taunting murder. A daunting murder. Not in power or purpose, but as cutting a model's face in spite and jealousy - wishing they were a respected and respectable world leader. And Cain slew Able.

It reveals the murderer as the head of the contract feared the Law and Justice. By his little "313 Catch Me, Catch Me" act of writing this accross the film for the Law and Public to see - it shows his reverence if you will or to say he is acknowledging the Law and Justice are larger than him. He is as saying "Catch Me, Catch Me" to the one or many as greater than himself and obviously admitting his crime to them who he admits are just and right.

He was admitting his horrendous crime, one of the most horrific and terrible of all time - not just the century. He was admitting he like ran up and knocked over the wedding cake and table and threw stuff on the bride and groom - for all intents ruining the occasion.

His "313 Catch Me, Catch Me" was as the dagger to the heart introducing in cold heartless thrust the announcement of the beginning of tribulations as the False Accuser of Chritianity - spirit of antichrist - that from the greatest to the least they will have to pass his fire to see Eternity in Christian America. Of course what is written of him reveals even more.....

Book of Revelation Chapter 13
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

..... revealing he was a notable terrible braggart. He was defined as a leopard but brags with his mouth to be bigger than himself as a lion - bragging to be as the king of the jungle. Bragging to be. Bragging. His mouth bigger than his stomach, taking on more than he could handle or deserved. A leopard speaking with a lion's mouth - bragger. Mouth bigger than his stomach - to devour much flesh (in iniquity) never achieved..... read;

JOB Chapter 5
12 He [God] disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise.

Revelation 13:5
And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

Ezekiel 14:9
And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand upon him, and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel.

Job 12:16
With him [God] is strength and wisdom: the deceived and the deceiver are his.


MORE..... FRAME 313
Book of Revelation Chapter 13
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

Playing with some "frames" from the Holy Bible, in the above verse 13:3 we see 313 as this very bastard named by God as the murderer. THIS IS WHY HE DID WHAT HE DID TO PRESIDENT KENNEDY. He as well mocked him as "let's see you do it - heal from your head wound" - or "Where is your God?" .....

MICAH Chapter 7
10 Then she that is mine enemy shall see it, and shame shall cover her which said unto me, Where is the Lord thy God? mine eyes shall behold her: now shall she be trodden down as the mire of the streets.
11 In the day that thy walls are to be built, in that day shall the decree be far removed.

JOEL Chapter 2
17 Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God?
 
BUT READ AND UNDERSTAND..... recompense me? .....

Book Of Joel
Chapter 3
  1 For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem,
  2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.
  3 And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, that they might drink.
  4 Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre [beast], and Zidon [witch], and all the coasts of Palestine [false prophet]? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head;
  5 Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things:
  6 The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Grecians, that ye might remove them far from their border.
  7 Behold, I will raise them out of the place whither ye have sold them, and will return your recompence upon your own head:
  8 And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the LORD hath spoken it.

  9 ¶Proclaim ye this among the Gentiles; Prepare war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near; let them come up:
  10 Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears: let the weak say, I am strong.
  11 Assemble yourselves, and come, all ye heathen, and gather yourselves together round about: thither cause thy mighty ones to come down, O Lord.
  12 Let the heathen be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about.
 313 Put ye in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe: come, get you down; for the press is full, the fats overflow; for their wickedness is great.
  14 Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision.

AND we find this "leopard with a lion's mouth" was nothing but hot air....

NOTE (to the fearing)
Isaiah Chapter 51
13 And forgettest the Lord thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?

(Perhaps nursing his head wound! )

THE FIRST AND LAST MYSTERY - THE BACK/NECK WOUNDS.....

As mentioned above - the religious implications intended - the "real" mystery of this entire tragic affair is actually the back/neck wounds to the President - the three head wounds and how and why occurred and from where has been established.

THIS is that "smoking gun" area, if you will, that CLEARLY defines the Obstruction Of Justice that DID occur ending as the Presidential Commission Warren Report presented to him - President Lyndon Baines Johnson . CLEARLY in ANY Court of Law the obstruction of justice occurring is the presentation in finality containing falsified evidence, and the whole path of it and who and to who which defines the "Cover Up" and clearly meaning accessory after the fact in the technicality of the law. It gets said, "Ignorance of the Law is no excuse", and so ultimately President Johnson and Congress have to had accept the blame as being under their lawful hand whether they claim ignorance of the falsified evidence entered or not. Technically they have to had to accept Accessory to Murder After the Fact in the very least by presenting/receiving the false report of the evidence as the final "inquest" of "all" evidence in the "murder investigation". The Commission was given FULL legal powers so that there can be NO EXCUSE to the results presented - which were quite "fudged", incomplete, and inept as the worst Travesty of Justice in American history if not the world.

The "oddities" of the back/neck wounds of President Kennedy in the extreme are a reported actual three shots to this area. Two in the rear, and one in the front. The oddities are that all are reported as entry wounds and none of those showing or reporting or testifying any exit wounds from them. This means at worst there were three and lesser two, but at least one bullet lodged in the President's neck/back area. If simply the throat wound was an entry wound and only wound to these areas with no exit wound, as reported by Parkland Hospital - then obviously where is the bullet ? Worst, if there was also an entry wound in the back at this area with no exit wound - then where are the TWO bullets ?

LET'S REFRESH THE MEMORY HERE IN A VERY GOOD YOU TUBE.....

JFK-ASSASSINATED by the U.S. Government
[about 32 minutes into this film forward shows most of the neck/back wounds controversies]
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH2x1hZpb0k> 

Let's go here with the simpler report of the two wounds - one in the back and one in the front neck. Both apparently are being reported as entry wounds, and in the very least - the front neck wound is testified to as an entry wound by Parkland Hospital.

So where are the exit wounds ? NONE are reported, testified to. THAT means AT LEAST ONE bullet had to be lodged in the President's body according to the Parkland Hospital. The reported second entry wound on the back ALSO had to be from a bullet lodged in the President's body. So, in the least, there had to be at least one bullet lodged in the President and in the extreme - three. Again, there are no reports OR testimony of ANY exit wounds.

THIS IS THE ONLY AREA I QUESTION PARKLAND HOSPITAL DOCTORS ABOUT.....

The Doctor (s ) testified/reported that there was the entry wound to the front about at the adam's apple. They did not say from a hand gun at close range, but apparently as a carbine rifle style wound from distance.

I would have to beyond all reasonable doubt conclude that as completely wrong. If a rifle shot, and in the scheme of things being a military round from a carbine, struck the area of the Adam's Apple from the front - the EXIT wound would be after the, in effect of, severing the President's head as shattering the vertebrae and cutting the spinal cord at the neck leaving about only muscle and other tissue left - no vertabrae bones or spinal cord to the brain.

Simply look to Gov. Connally and what the one bullet did - shattering rib and wrist bones and remainder lodging in the thigh. This is a same similar damage that would have occurred to the President's neck bones and all.

If that were true, why would the Doctors attempt resuscitation ? If there is no spinal cord nerves to the President's brain ? To what effect ? These are like a zillion optical fibers in the spinal cord carrying commands from the brain and also veins and arteries for blood and oxygen to and from. If these were blown away by a rifle round there would be nothing to resuscitate ! It would be the equivalent of someone beheaded. There is no treatment possible OBVIOUSLY. It is not possible to reattach the head and revive a person, yet anyway.

The only way I could accept the Doctor's testimony as an entry wound here is that it is quite conceivable, and according to their excellent reputation and competence, is that they may have hoped by sight - first observation impression - that it was an entry wound from a side angle and began to feel around a little for neck bone (vertebrae). If they felt "mush" then they concluded the vertebrae and spinal cord were indeed destroyed as no hope for resuscitation procedures. If this occurred, they indeed then did feel vertebrae and assumed the spinal cord was somewhat if not totally intact and THEN proceeded to resuscitation procedures. Again, otherwise what was the point? Common sense prevails.

If they felt "mush" (no vertebrae bone) they would most likely have pronounced him DOA - dead on arrival. They did not. Their response to all present would have been "he is dead, there is no spinal cord connected to the brain - no treatment possible" or in some similar fashion. They did not. 

In other words and as well, the Doctors were not performing an autopsy or forensics of wounds - entry and exit. They were performing immediate necessary emergency treatment of the wounded President. They saw the neck wound in front and were not moving the body around as adding trauma to the already grievously multiply wounded President - searching for exit wounds was redundant to the immediate assessment of possible resuscitation procedures which they then immediately did apply. Their concern and concentration was certainly not with exit wounds but rather perhaps the hope at a glance that the neck wound in front was from the side seems valid to proceed as I would assume - and indeed they went onto the tracheal tube procedure for oxygen to the President. And HERE CERTAINLY defines there was NO BULLET lodged in the President's neck at the front wound here or they would have CERTAINLY noticed and reported it and would as well probably have blocked the tracheal procedure - the tracheotomy they performed on top of the wound which was testified/reported by them as done SOLELY as to not make a fresh incision for a tracheotomy procedure to the President's already extreme traumatic condition - it would have unnecessarily added more trauma to the shocked body.
(I would assume that an injection of morphine and then make a new incision for a tracheotomy procedure was OBVIOUSLY ruled out because of the massive blood loss and the only two heartbeats audible were from the resuscitation procedures. In other words that in itself would cause death if resuscitation procedures could have been successful in any fashion. In other words I believe the Doctors about the tracheotomy procedure applied and do not believe AT ALL that they were involved in ANY conspiracy WHATSOEVER as to "changing wounds". )


FORWARD AND CONCLUSION

It would be insanity and paranoid to think or believe the Secret Service in some manner like stabbed the President's back and neck with like a screw driver or something - to inflict the wounds, or make extra ones, to in some manner be in conspiracy as setting up the "magic bullet" theory that prevailed as the worst lie in a murder case history - regarding to whom occurred and by those investigating involved as well ! President Kennedy was cradled in First Lady Jackie's lap after the head wound all the way to Parkland Hospital - and BEFORE the Secret Service Agent jumped onto the vehicle from the rear after the shots. It seems inconceivable to think the Secret Service, or anyone, had an opportunity to do something as this from the moment the President was removed from the Limosine and taken into the Attending Physicians considering all the prying eyes on the scene.

So here we are.... the President had apparently two entry wounds about the neck area and lower - the front neck wound and the back below the neck wound - both appearing strangely as entry wounds and NO BULLETS found or reported lodged in the President. During the autopsy, it is insane and paranoid to think or believe that someone or persons "carved" into the dead President to dig out lodged bullets in these areas - PERHAPS.

It is also ABSURD to think that two different shooters, front and rear, BOTH hit these areas causing the visible wounds and BOTH bullets were somehow lucky enough not to have caused ANY damage BUT to lodge in the President's body as kind of like sticking a pencil in a bowel of jello. That is beyond probabilities calculated for anyone so disposed to. Again, they were not reported as close up hits/shots - they were from distance. This removes some lucky probability of two shooters to have done this. It is simply impossible.

What would have stopped the bullets from exiting the body? They would both have to have been of such a low powder load in the bullet cartridge as to preclude they would only travel at most about an inch into the body, and lucky enough not to hit bone or solid. THAT low of a powder load would as well preclude they HAD to be fired at anywhere near POINT BLANK RANGE. They did not OBVIOUSLY.

SO WHAT DID HAPPEN....

There is apparently only one explanation and is my conclusion according to things visible and testified to and reported. If you will remember or dig, there was the x-ray report that one of the President's vertebrae was nicked. This was about at the area of the wounds of the neck/back area.

REFERENCE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy
"According to the Warren Commission[24] and the House Select Committee on Assassinations,[25] as President Kennedy waved to the crowds on his right with his right arm upraised on the side of the limo, a shot entered his upper back, penetrated his neck, slightly damaged a spinal vertebra and the top of his right lung, exited his throat nearly centerline just beneath his larynx, then nicked the left side of his suit tie knot. He then raised his elbows and clenched his fists in front of his face and neck, then leaned forward and towards his left. "

It is my opinion that indeed President Kennedy was shot from behind, entering just below the neck area and was of the scheme that day of a military high power carbine rifle. This round passed into the body in the rear, hitting the disc and nicking the top of the vertebrae and then ricocheted upwards - coming out of the President's neck in front and passed onto striking the "chrome dash" at the top of the windshield of the President's Limosine on the inside of the vehicle.

You will remember how badly they tried to lie about this and were caught. They claimed it happened from previous auto maintenance performed by a clumsy worker. Photographs on November 21st 1963 revealed it was INTACT!

Bullet holes in the limousine and extra bullets in Dealey Plaza
(About at 3 minutes into this YouTube shows the picture of the Limosine chrome dash was INTACT Nov 21, 1963 in San Antnio TX - submitted document says it occurred 11/01/61 !)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtFoPCKVp-8>

It seems unlikely this would not have left a larger exit wound, as Doctors said the front throat wound appeared as an entry wound. THIS may be the ONLY time the Warren Commission people were RIGHT when they said to them "You must be mistaken". I think this is the ONLY PLAUSIBLE explanation of these wounds.

Again, to revert to the secret service was stabbing the body to make wounds - well OBVIOUSLY President Kennedy WAS SHOT in the throat area as seen on the many photos and films that day. We have to account for this. I think I may have.

Ironically, the "pristine bullet" probably looked VERY MUCH like the bullet that did this, having the slight nick on it, exiting the President before striking the chrome dash. This may account for such the clean exit wound on the President's throat - especially considering no doubt it was fired through a rifled barrel.

A bottom line here is as well, that my conclusion might also explain the "fudging" of this evidence from the autopsy to the commission which apparently is then attempting to hide the other shooter's position - another shooter other than their reported Lee Oswald. In other words it was impossible Oswald lined up with this shot considering entry wound in rear and the throat wound the exit wound - and the "moving of the wounds" as intentional false testimony then hides that the position of the actual shooter had to be from a much lower trajectory as street level or not much higher. However in my conclusion it is not that the wounds were from a straight pass through shot - but rather entered and deflected by the vertebrae ricocheted upward. 

Additionally and obviously they had to hide this shot because it blew everything..... Oswald would not be the only assassin and becomes conspiracy if there were more than one. So the "magic bullet theory" takes on this new dimension by my conclusion. I believe it has been proved according to Zapruder Film frames examination that this shot was followed quickly by the next that hit Gov. Connally. These two shots could NOT have been fired by Oswald's rifle because it was a minimum of something like 2.3 seconds after a shot to move the bolt action and then fire again (and not even taking into consideration of about another second to aim before shooting) .

I would consider that, actually lining up the two wounds, the exit wound seems a tad towards an extreme upward angle - and noting the President was sitting upright when hit here. It would seem that if hit from Oswald's reported position that there would have been more centrifugal speed - high from a sixth floor and downward. I would assume the angle of the deflection would be much lower where it exited from just from the speed and extra force added to the round - causing a more straighter line path of entry wound to exit wound. 
A lower position from street level or not much higher (2nd floor or lower) would seem to more account for the sharper upward exiting angle as without the added centrifugal speed and force pushing causing a more straighter path - wound to wound. Shooting from the lower position would be a slower round hitting, naturally, and therefore more subject or prone to a more extreme deflection path if hitting anything - here just barely nicking the vertebrae. 

In other words it would be like two cars - one nicking a pole or like a trash can full of sand at 100 MPH and the other at 200 MPH to make the point. The one hitting at 100 MPH would be more prone to body damage and even causing some swerve. The 200 MPH car would more push the pole or can off rather than absorb the hit and take a lesser of a nick in body damage.

So to add to my conclusion, the neck/back wound was NOT by Lee Harvey Oswald or anyone else on the 6th Floor of the TSBD. That leaves the only other cover from the rear for an assassin as the DalTex Building on Houston - either from 2nd or 1st floor or the outside fire escape from between the two floors...... SEE :

Administrator Research Contributions (OPAL BUST)
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,12.0.html

YOU TUBE
JFKshooters2_Altgens.wmv
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-KOpdISioM>

MY CHANNEL
<http://www.youtube.com/user/JFK50YearJubilee>

A LAST POINT - TIME OF DEATH.....

One additional point here is there was no exit wound on the neck if indeed their reported "entry wound" on the throat occurred from a side shot and exited the throat area just hitting flesh and possibly muscle tissue - no bones. In real world then - the Doctors reportedly observing and also testifying the throat wound in front was an entry wound, then they indeed would apparently assume the neck vertebrae (s) had been shattered and spinal column severed causing instantaneous death. This goes back to a shadow on Parkland Hospital as to going through the "dog show" of the "play" of attempting resuscitation on a DOA Dead On Arrival. Why ? To make Mrs. Kennedy feel a little better like they tried but lost him ? Ridiculous. Not wanting any liability and do everything available as treatment ? Isn't that desecration of a corpse ? It certainly is by the law. EVERYONE now knows President John Fitzgerald Kennedy arrived DOA because of the MASSIVE head wounds. There is NO other truth. DON"T hand us the Catholic crap whereas we have separation of Church/State laws which President Kennedy him self preached - whereas religious rite now is acceptable as to intervening and suddenly making it okay to commit PERJURY AND FALSE SWEARING OF STATE AND FEDERAL DOCUMENTS OF DEATH CERTIFICATE AS TO TIME EXPIRED doctors! Unfortunately they have to be charged with this as setting 1:00 as time of death after Catholic Rite.

IT HAS TO BE ASKED....

# Doctors, have you EVER in all your life in all the history of the world ever witnessed or heard of or reported that ANYONE with about "one third of their brain blown away" had ANY chance whatsoever of living or revived by resuscitation or where ever other than DOA ? No.

# Where the Doctors themselves ordered by the Secret Service to go along with the "dog show" of the Catholic rite to buy time ? Where they told to wait the time (about a half an hour) for the Priest as being lied to that this would help National Security in some fashion that the killer (s) did not know if they were successful or the world as including American Enemies, or in any scenario as to helping law officials catch the villain (s) having them think they could surrender because they only wounded rather than killed ?

# Did the Secret Service order everyone to keep quiet and tell no one yet the President is dead because they needed an half hour to get DEFCON 2 (nuclear war) in place if the Communists did this (of course we know the Secret service was in on it, so meaning was the Secret Service lying to everyone with plausible explanations but why.)

# Why was the extra half hour before announcing death necessary ? OBVIOUSLY everyone knew this was DOA. I mean Mrs. Kennedy herself said "I have his brains in my hand". People are dead with "missing brains". Common sense, and here scientific fact prevail. The President was DOA at approximately 12:30 PM PERIOD. Instantaneous death. Fatal gun shot wounds to the head.

# IS THIS WHY THE FRAME OR TWO AT THE TIME OF THE THROAT SHOT WAS DELETED FROM THE ZAPRUDER FILM - TO HIDE THE DIRECTION OF THE PRESIDENT'S HEAD TO HIDE TRAJECTORY OF THE EXIT TO THE CHROME DASHBOARD EMBEDDED BULLET ?

NOTE: The "half hour" delay time for Announcement of Death according to the scheme of things in this conspiracy no doubt tied into the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald, as the police report went out with description and then the police shooting and then the capture of him. This apparently was why the Secret Service had to "buy a half hour" - the arrest to occur almost within the hour and all the newspapers world wide lighting up with "Lone nut assassin defector caught" , which off the top "relieved" all efforts to continue to search further for any one else. "We got him".

SPECIAL EDIT: ..... .....

In case you thought to have picked apart my "Solved" thesis by the "yaw" entry wound into Gov. Connally's back proves the SBT (single bullet theory) and "pristine bullet" found on the stretcher were the truth instead of my research showing the bullet striking JFK in the upper back exited the throat after richocheting off of and nicking the vertebrae (shown in autopsy X-Rays) - LET US LOOK AT THE LIE!

SEE: Yaw (rotation) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaw_%28rotation%29>

Now with your familiarty with the JFK Assassination go ahead and view this PBS Nova special which is pro Single Bullet Theory. It is almst quite compelling to have you believe in it. A good presentation with great effort.

PBS NOVA - Cold Case JFK (S41E07, Nov. 13 2013)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4VLmPxFyk8>

What can be gleaned from this is that it rules out that the "Badge Man" fired a high powered carbine type round from behind the picket fence on the Grassy Knoll. This is true from my research, however not ignoring that this actual shot always mentioned was actually an exploding tipped round fired from behind the white wall in front and to the side of that spot.

Now the greatest point in their support of the SBT (single bullet theory) is the great efforts showing the "yaw" of a bullet passing from back/neck of the President and into the Governor that would conclude the SBT was correct, as the entrance wound into Gov. Connally was shaped as this they claim - a sideways bullet as opposed to the straight in bullet wound like the size of a pencil stuck in a mellon as example, which is what the one up high rear head wound entry wound of the President did appear as. 

THE TRUTH is that the entry wound into the Govenor's back was the size of like a pencil stuck into a mellon which was surgically altered by the Parkland Doctors for medical reasons - the same as the President's throat wound was surgically altered for medical reasons (to perform a Tracheotomy) - which then enlarged the wound. Now obviously this Medical Testimony by the treating Physicians shows as fact there was not the SBT - but rather a seperate shot that did not hit the President first, or anyone - the entry wound examined and defined as a normal entry wound.

LET US READ THIS: (And do note the treating Doctor describes as a slight "tangent" causing a slightly eliptical entry hole - which means a shot from side more so then straight on).

Trajectory of a Lie
By Milicent Cranor
http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm
(QUOTED IN PART...)

Part III.  Big Lie About a Small Wound in Connally's Back

Background
There is no evidence, hard or soft, that supports the single bullet theory (SBT). Its defenders have spent a lot of time proving that it could have happened that way, which is not the same as proving that it did, a distinction they don't make. But the can't even prove it hypothetically because the sniper's nest and the various wounds of Kennedy and Connally do not line up. In addition, witnesses say the men reacted at two different times to two different bullets, and the Zapruder film seems to prove them right. To solve the problems of geometry and timing, promoters of the SBT have resorted to the use of junk science and chicanery. (See especially the crudely fraudulent computerized animation of the Zapruder film by Dale Myers: www.abclies.com/dale.html) But even these tricks do nothing more than give the appearance of proving the theory as opposed to proving the reality. There is still no evidence whatsoever for the SBT. But since when has that been a problem? Evidence can always be manufactured, especially when it involves the written word.

One example of manufactured evidence is the lie about Connally’s back wound.  Why do supporters of the SBT say the wound was 3 centimeters long, when, in fact, it was only half as long?  Why was the 1.5 centimeter wound a problem?   Defenders of the theory say that if the Carcano bullet had struck sideways (as opposed to nose-on),  it would have created a wound the same size as its length (3 centimeters), and such a long wound would be proof the bullet had been tumbling.   If it had been tumbling, this, presumably, would be proof it had struck something else on its way to Connally’s back.   The something else in this case:  John F. Kennedy.

Problem:  Connally’s back wound was only as long as the wound in the back of Kennedy’s head:  1.5 centimeters.  No one has suggested Kennedy was hit in the head with a tumbling bullet.

Adaptation of a drawing demonstrating the hypothetical tumbling bullet.  From John Lattimer’s book, Kennedy and Lincoln.  Medical and Ballistic Comparisons of Their Assassinations, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980, page 268.

The drawing above demonstrates the alleged behavior of the single bullet.   The drawing was designed (though not executed) by John Lattimer, a urologist who has published several infomercials in medical journals promoting the lone assassin theory.  What is wrong with this picture, aside from the fact that the men are too far apart?    Experts assure me the Carcano bullet is much too stable to behave like this.   Perforating a neck could divert the bullet, but not make it tumble to this extent in so short a time and in so short a space.     (There is more on Lattimer below.)

The wound in Connally’s back did not indicate a sideways hit any more than the wound in the back of Kennedy’s head.  The latter was 1.5 x 0.6 centimeters, and the former, 1.5 x 0.8 centimeters, as documented on at least four occasions by the governor’s thoracic surgeon, Dr. Robert Shaw.  (4WCH104, 107; 6WCH85, 86).   The holes in the back of Connally’s shirt and jacket were as small as his back wound. (5WCH64) (See TABLE below.)  The damage inside Connally’s chest also disproves a sideways hit.  According to Shaw, the bullet created a "small tunneling wound" (7HSCA149) and he noted, "the neat way in which it stripped the rib out without doing much damage to the muscles that lay on either side of it."  (4WCH116)   Shaw felt that the shape of the bullet was explained either by a “slight tumbling,” or by it striking at a tangent. (6WCH95)   It had to have been a tangential hit since the bullet  “followed the line of declination of the fifth rib” (4WCH105), i.e., its path slanted downward.

Connally’s back wound became 3 centimeters when it was surgically enlarged.   Shaw explained that in order to clean and debride (cut away devitalized tissue) the wound, he had to enlarge it to twice its size.  (6WCH88)

Despite all this testimony, two doctors — John Lattimer and Michael Baden — found ways to make the magic bullet wound change its size to fit the magic bullet theory.  And “investigative journalists,” like Gerald Posner, Gus Russo and Dale Myers, who are as incompetent as they are unethical, have spread the lie further.   

John Lattimer Exploits a Coincidence

Bullets and wounds are a bit like keys and locks, and that would make John Lattimer an amateur locksmith.   Since a tumbling bullet did not fit into Connally’s back wound, Lattimer changed the lock.   

Some 30 years ago, Lattimer apparently noticed an interesting coincidence:  the size of the wound – after it was enlarged – was the same length as a Carcano bullet, 3 centimeters.   Lattimer then published an article in which he claimed the wound had in fact been three centimeters long originally, i.e., without enlargement (Medical Times 1974; 102 November:33-56; Kennedy and Lincoln, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980).    As proof, he published the report on Connally's operation which only mentioned the post-enlargement size.  Lattimer also chose to publish an uncorrected diagram that portrayed the back wound as it was after surgical enlargement (CE 679, 17WCH336) when instead, he could have published the corrected diagram that showed its original size, 1.5cm.   (Gregory Exhibit No.1, 20WCH32).   See Exhibit A (Lattimer's rendition of CE 679) and Exhibit B (corrected drawing).   In each case, Lattimer selected documents out of context to create the false impression of a tumbling bullet entering sideways.  The uncorrected diagram appears in his book surrounded by testimony taken out of context to reinforce the false impression.  Below, I have reproduced these passages, and have placed a rectangle around the parts Lattimer selected to display.

Snippet 1 (6WCH86).  Above the uncorrected diagram, Lattimer placed selected statements that suggest Dr. Shaw has been asked to draw the large wound that you see on Connally, and he omits testimony that indicates the wound was too large:
    

Mr. Specter.  Is the size and dimension of the hole accurate on scale, or would you care to make any adjustment or modification in that characterization by picture?

Dr. Shaw.  As the wound entry is marked on this figure, I would say that the scale is larger than the actual wound or the actual depicting of the wound should be.  As I described it, it was approximately  a centimeter and a half in length.  [Emphasis added.]

Mr. Specter.  Would you draw, Dr. Shaw, right above the shoulder as best you can recollect, what that wound of entry appeared at the time you first observed it?  Would you put your initials right beside that? 

(The witness, Dr. Shaw, complied with the request of Counsel Specter.)

Snippet 2 (6WCH95).  Below the diagram, appears a passage that omits reference to Shaw's opinion that the elongated wound may have been caused by the angle of entry, and not by tumbling.
    

Mr. Specter.  As to the wound on the back of Governor Connally, was there any indication that the bullet was tumbling prior to the time it struck him?

Dr. Shaw.  I would only have to say that I'm not a ballistics expert, but the wound on his chest was not a single puncture wound, it was long enough so that there might have been some tumbling.

Mr. Specter.  You mean the wound on his back?

Dr. Shaw.  The wound on his back – yes, it was long enough so that there might have been some tumbling.  In other words, it was not a spherical puncture wound.

Mr. Specter.  So, it might have had some tumbling involved, or it might not have?

Dr. Shaw.  Yes; I don't know whether the clothes would have occasioned this or not.

Mr. Specter.  My question would be that perhaps some tumbling might have been involved as a result of decrease in velocity as the bullet passed through President Kennedy, whether there was any indication from the surface of the wound which would indicate tumbling.

Dr. Shaw.  The wound entrance was an elliptical wound.  In other words, it had a long diameter and a short diameter.  It didn't have the appearance of a wound caused by a high velocity bullet that had not struck anything else; in other words, a puncture wound.
          Now, you have to also take into consideration, however, whether the bullet enters at a right angle or at a tangent.  If it enters at a tangent there will be some length to the wound of entrance.   [Emphasis added.]

[Again, it should be noted that the entrance wound in Kennedy's head was said to have been the exact same length – 15mm.]

Snippet 3 (6WCH87).   Again Lattimer provides selected testimony that shows Dr. Shaw agreeing on the size of a wound in the diagram – only he omits statements above and below his selection that indicate the subject of the discussion was the exit wound.
    

Mr. Specter.  Would you at this time, right above the right shoulder there, draw the apearance of the point of exit as nearly as you can recollect it on Governor Connally?

Dr. Shaw.  This is right.

Mr. Specter.  You say the hole which appears on Governor Connally is just about the size that it would have been on his body?

Dr. Shaw.  Yes; it is drawn in good scale.

Mr. Specter.  In good scale to the body?

Dr. Shaw.  Yes.

Mr. specter.  Would you draw it on another portion of the paper here in terms of its absolute size?

Dr. Shaw.  Five cm. it would be – about like that – do you want me to mark that?

Mr. Specter.  Put your initials right in the center of that circle.

Dr. Shaw.  I'll just put "wound of exit."

Lattimer did report that a correction had been made, but lied about its nature.  A few pages earlier, he wrote,  “His careful diagram of the wound of entry (which he revised and initialed) showed it to be elongated in its vertical (not horizontal) axis and to be at least 3 cm in length.”(Kennedy and Lincoln, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980)     "At least" three centimeters long?    At least?

Michael Baden Stretches the Lie Further

Dr. Michael Baden who headed the HSCA medical panel, knew the true size of the wound and how it had been enlarged.  He had also personally examined the scar on Connally’s back.  This is how he described it to the panel:
    “On removing his shirt, it was readily apparent that at the site of gunshot perforation of the upper right back there is now a 1 1/8 -inch long horizontal pale well healed...”  (7HSCA 143-144; 240)

In a book Baden wrote for the public, he doubled the size of the scar:
    

"According to Connally's medical records, the bullet struck him nose first in the back and left a vertical scar.  I thought the records were wrong.  If it was the same magic bullet, it would have gone in sideways -- with the length, not the point, first.  After leaving Kennedy, it would have lost its power and became a tumbling bullet, and tumbling bullets rotate.  When they finally strike, they strike edgewise.  I needed to examine Connally...

“He removed his shirt.  There it was -- a two-inch long sideways entrance scar in his back.  He had not been shot by a second shooter but by the same flattened bullet that went through Kennedy." (Unnatural Death: Confessions of a Medical Examiner, Random House 1989, p.20)   See Exhibit C .

Apparently Baden realized that if the original wound had been three centimeters (1.2 inches), then, after its surgical enlargement, the scar would have been even bigger.   It was a calculated lie.   This is only one of several examples of Michael Baden’s deceptions.

Gerald Posner, Gus Russo, and Dale Myers  Perpetuate the Lie

Two of these “investigative reporters,” Posner and Russo, never quoted primary sources on the wound, choosing instead to accept the fraudulent claims of Lattimer and Baden. (Gerald Posner. Case Closed.  Random House, pp 336, 479; Gus Russo.  Live by the Sword: The Secret War Against Castro and the Death of JFK.  Bancroft Press, 1998, p.297).

The third “investigative reporter,” Dale Myers, mimicked Lattimer’s technique of taking testimony out of context.  On his website, he wrote:   “According to Dr. Robert Shaw's operative record, the entrance wound in JBC's body was ‘just lateral to the right [shoulder blade] close [to] the [armpit] yet has passed through the latysmus [latissimus] dorsi muscle...the wound of entrance was approximately [1.2 inches] in its longest diameter.’ (7HSCA142)”  But Myers omitted what followed immediately after the quote above:  “The rear entrance wound was NOT [emphasis mine]  3 centimeters [1.2 inches] (in diameter) as indicated in one of the operative notes. It was a puncture-type wound, as if a bullet had struck the body at slight declination [i.e., not at a right angle]. The wound was actually approximately 1.5 centimeters in diameter. The ragged edges of the wound were surgically cut away, effectively enlarging it to approximately 3 centimeters.”   (7HSCA143)

Conclusion

A lie from one of John Lattimer's pseudoscientific articles has persisted to this day. The lie, which concerns the wound in John Connally's back and how it relates to the single bullet theory, is remarkable in that it is so easy to disprove. Yet, it has been perpetuated by a number of unethical authors, the most significant of whom is Michael Baden. This man was Head of the Medical Panel, House Select Committee on Assassinations, the second largest investigation into the medical evidence in this case. We are grateful to these people for unwittingly demonstrating a fatal flaw in the case against Lee Harvey Oswald—and for providing such accessible proof of conspiracy to cover up the truth. 

TABLE. Connally’s Back Wound – the Hole Story.....
FULL: http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm

MORAL OF THE STORY....

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE "PERFECT CRIME" IN AMERICA. lol

EDIT..... WE WILL NEVER FORGET ! The slain - of courage, fearful, innocents, the martyred.
WE MUST ATTAIN THE CLOSURE AS CASE SOLVED AND OWE THIS AS AMERICANS AND WORLD CITIZENS TO PRESIDENT JACK KENNEDY AND ALL THE WITNESSES WHO WERE SILENCED ON EARTH.....

EDIT.... Let us not be naive here. Below shows two views, and must be sifted by known experts. I point to hard evidence by the Attending Physicians at Parkland Hospital treating President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. These are professionals and expert testimony - expert because aside of their fine reputations and experience, there observations are truth as best truth is known to medical science which is fact in any court. There has never been any doubt of what the Doctors reported and testified to. They testified to at least one wound in the throat and three to the head. Four wounds constituting CONSPIRACY. There obviously would be NO reason for them to lie and make that up as that would be absurd and contrary to the Warren Commission Report. It is what happened and there are many, many, many other witnesses that day that describe the same. Responsible HONEST Americans ! Let NO view slander these fine Citizens. (The view here is "coincidences" are bunk)

Considering the facts from Parkland Hospital by the Attending Physicians - conspiracy defined as three different angles of gunshots to the head - considering these FACTS by HONEST Doctors, if there are any errors as to "suspicious deaths" of persons "possibly connected as conspiracy witnesses" - let us sanely and rationally and of good courage and sound mind err on the side of "probably, yes - was slain as connected to the case as far as possible / probable / definate witness of a conspiracy to kill JFK.

I mean to the opposite view - grow up, how many cop / detective TV shows have Americans seen and for all these years with so many true stories [Highway Patrol, Dragnet, etc] showing how criminal murderers have so brutally tried to hide their crimes from 10 bucks in a cash register to attempting entire estates ! The JFK Assassination is NOT LOCAL CRIME. It was the slaying of the Commander in Chief, the President of the United States. Give the crime and victim its due RESPECT.

OBVIOUSLY there were great efforts and massive logistics to complete the assassination with no trial - the intention from the beginning, not to get caught under any circumstances and at ANY cost. We are not defining a simple murder of some person of least value we might place as far as finance and accomplishments - we are defining what today is described as a "state sanctioned assassination". DO NOT BE NAIVE and quickly and sharply call everyone (the great majority) in America nuts because they believe President Kennedy was victim of this and the Warren Commission was the worst fairy tale ever told. Again, THIS IS the expert opinion of MANY EXPERTS including MEDICAL FACTS and of the so many educated Americans and all Americans able to intelligently comprehend what has taken place - and the remainder, if any, believing by having faith in the same.

NOTE that many say "why didn't they come forth and tell what they know? "..... These must be too young and were not alive through the Times. Some did come forward and were "mysteriously" told to "shut up .... you only heard three shots .... you are mistaken..." etc. Those taking pictures and movies had them taken away - some promised return but were returned damaged. Others were directly assaulted as the American taking pictures of the Grassy Knoll a little in front of the area of the "Badge Man" suspected assassin. JFK has been noted in history as the only time the world was at DEFCON 2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEFCON in Nuclear exchange as the beginning of World War Three itself no doubt at the Cuban Missle Crisis. The WORLD itself was peeing its pants. Now this - the assassination of JFK not very long after things calmed down. Americans were very, very, very scared - yet those many in Dallas did come forward and were "saying what they knew". Rapidly in the manner of minutes and hours and days and months and year after year, with each event unfolding, there was always a complete sinister cloud hanging over the murder of President Kennedy. America not too long ago came out of the World War Two Era when in national solidarity lived by the creed, "Loose lips sink ships" - from the actuality or suspicion of enemy spies in the nation and to keep their mouths during casual talk or public discussion - shut such as in military support type employment and so on. Were they conspiracy NUTS ? ? ?

Quite the contrary. Many and most of the witnesses and probable slain for "knowing something" were of that age and mindset. The very report that it was a "lone nut assassin with Communist connections/background, actually a defector" captured as the probable assassin and "we have our man" only fueled almost immediately that the Soviet Union was involved. The rest were all the News Reports previous to the Dallas Trip by the President of many warnings of other "nuts" who might try something. And then Jack Ruby and the "Mafia" crime syndicate suddenly enters the reality of those Citizens who were witnesses and/or who might have "known something". WHO THE HELL WERE THEY SUPPOSED TO COME FORWARD AND TELL ? ? ? The fear was for many they would be killed if they came forward. This was recorded on Dallas radio, published in other media. The best they could settle for was someday close will be safe enough to come forward and then the Warren Commission was suddenly released which turned into almost immediately the next level that the US Government itself in part is INVOLVED IN A COVER UP ! WHO WERE THEY TO COME FORWARD TO AND TELL ? ? ? Dallas Police were mistrusted as well at the time and locality on November 22, 1963 and forward. Again, NO NEED to sit there BRUTALLY ATTACKING these fine honest Good Americans calling Americans "conspiracy nuts". ! ! ! Please shut up and not muddy the waters and slander Good Americans as such. Jack thanks you !

Jim Marrs' List
WEBSITE - FULL http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/deaths.htm


Marrs List of "Mystery Deaths"

Note: information in the first four columns is from Marrs, the "Comment" is by the author of this web page.
* = Marrs considers death "particularly suspicious"

Date   Name   Marrs: Connection with case   Marrs: Cause of death   Comment

11/63   Karyn Kupcinet   TV host's daughter who was overheard telling of JFK's death prior to 11/22/63   Murdered   No corroboration for Penn Jones' implausible "foreknowledge" claim. 

12/63   Jack Zangretti   Expressed foreknowledge of Ruby shooting Oswald   Gunshot Victim   Actually "Zangetty." Unsourced claim by Penn Jones with no corroboration. Supposedly, member of Sinatra family was to be kidnapped. 

2/64   Eddy Benavides   Lookalike brother to Tippit shooting witness, Domingo Benavides   Gunshot to head   Innocent bystander killed in bar brawl. Death was actually in February, 1965. 

2/64   Betty MacDonald*   Former Ruby employee who alibied Warren Reynolds shooting suspect.   Suicide by hanging in Dallas Jail   Was in fact a suicide. 

3/64   Bill Chesher   Thought to have information linking Oswald and Ruby   Heart attack   No evidence he could link Ruby and Oswald. HSCA found death nonsinister 

3/64   Hank Killam*   Husband of Ruby employee, knew Oswald acquaintance   Throat cut   HSCA found death non-suspicious. 

4/64   Bill Hunter*   Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63   Accidental shooting by policeman   Death judged non-suspicious by HSCA. Accidently shot by cop. 

5/64   Gary Underhill*   CIA agent who claimed Agency was involved   Gunshot in head ruled suicide   Was not a CIA agent. Death was indeed a suicide. 

5/64   Hugh Ward*   Private investigator working with Guy Banister and David Ferrie   Plane crash in Mexico   No evidence of connection to case. 

5/64   DeLesseps Morrison*   New Orleans    Passenger in Ward's plane   Was mayor of New Orleans. Otherwise, unconnected to case. 

8/64   Teresa Norton*   Ruby employee   Fatally shot   Same person as Karen Carlin. Marrs listed her twice, and further she is not known to be dead. 

6/64   Guy Banister*   x-FBI agent in New Orleans connected to Ferrie, CIA, Carlos Marcello & Oswald   Heart attack   No evidence death was from foul play. 

9/64   Jim Koethe*   Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63   Blow to neck   Judged non-suspicious by HSCA. Police suspected fight with gay lover. 

9/64   C.D. Jackson   "Life" magazine senior Vice President who bought Zapruder Film and locked it away   Unknown   No other connection to the case. Actually died of a heart attack. 

10/64   Mary Pinchot   JFK "special" friend whose diary was taken by CIA chief James Angleton after her death   Murdered   Killed in mugging. Her diary had account of affair with JFK, nothing about assassination. 

1/65   Paul Mandel   "Life" writer who told of JFK turning to rear when shot in throat   Cancer   No other connection to the case -- did indeed die of cancer 

3/65   Tom Howard*   Ruby's first lawyer, was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63   Heart attack   Had history of heart disease and was heavy drinker. HSCA found death non-sinister. 

5/65   Maurice Gatlin*   Pilot for Guy Banister   Fatal fall   No connection with assassination. 

8/65   Mona B. Saenz*   Texas Employment clerk who interviewed Oswald   Hit by Dallas bus   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" her. 

?/65   David Goldstein   Dallasite who helped FBI trace Oswald's pistol   Natural causes   Every gunshop owner in Dallas, including Goldstein, provided affidavit saying he did not sell Oswald pistol. No other connection. 

9/65   Rose Cheramie*   Knew of assassination in advance, told of riding to Dallas with Cubans   Hit/run victim   Prostitute and drug addict, doubtful her statements that Kennedy was going to be killed indicated "foreknowledge." 

11/65   Dorothy Kilgallen*   Columnist who had private interview with Ruby, pledged to "break" JFK case   Drug overdose   HSCA investigated her death, found nothing sinister. 

11/65   Mrs. Earl Smith*   Close friend to Dorothy Kilgallen, died two days after columnist, may have kept Kilgallen's notes   Cause unknown   A fellow Journal-American columnist, she died after three-month illness. No evidence of any knowledge about the case. 

12/65   William Whaley*   Cab driver who reportedly drove Oswald to Oak Cliff (The only Dallas taxi driver to die on duty)   Motor collision   83 year-old man in oncoming car crashed into Whaley on viaduct, killing himself and Whaley. 

1966   Judge Joe Brown   Presided over Ruby's trial   Heart attack   Had history of heart attacks. 

1966   Karen "Little Lynn" Carlin*   Ruby employee who last talked with Ruby before Oswald shooting   Gunshot victim   Same person as Teresa Norton (see above). No reliable evidence of her death. 

1/66   Earlene Roberts   Oswald's landlady   Heart attack   Had a history of heart disease. 

2/66   Albert Bogard*   Car salesman who said Oswald test drove new car   Suicide   Investigation of local authorities and testimony of relatives makes it clear it was indeed suicide. 

6/66   Capt. Frank Martin   Dallas policeman who witnessed Oswald slaying, told Warren Commission "there's a lot to be said but probably be better if I don't say it"   Sudden cancer   Immediately explained what it would be better not to say: that the Dallas police had performed poorly in allowing Oswald to be killed. 

8/66   Lee Bowers Jr.*   Witnessed men behind picket fence on Grassy Knoll   Motor accident   Investigated by HSCA, and researcher David Perry. No evidence of murder. 

9/66   Marilyn "Delila" Walle*   Ruby dancer   Shot by husband after 1 month of marriage   Shot in domestic squabble. 

10/66   Lt. William Pitzer*   JFK autopsy photographer who described his duty as "horrifying experience"   Gunshot ruled suicide   Evidence contradicts alleged claim to have photographed autopsy. No evidence of murder. 

11/66   Jimmy Levens   Fort Worth nightclub owner who hired Ruby employees   Natural causes   Casual acquaintance of Ruby's. HSCA judged death non-suspicious. 

11/66   James Worrell Jr.*   Saw man flee rear of Texas School Book Depository   Motor accident   Told Warren Commission of seeing a shooter in Sniper's Nest. Died in motorcycle accident. 

1966   Clarence Oliver   Dist. Atty. Investigator who worked Ruby case   Unknown   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him. 

12/66   Hank Suydam   Life magazine official in charge of JFK stories   Heart attack   No other connection to the case.

1967   Leonard Pullin   Civilian Navy employee who helped film "Last Two Days" about assassination   One-car crash   Film actually dealt with Texas trip, and had no information about assassination.

1/67   Jack Ruby*   Oswald's slayer   Lung cancer (he told family he was injected with cancer cells)   Inducing cancer by injecting cancer cells is medical nonsense. Ruby's mental condition had badly deteriorated.

2/67   Harold Russell*   Saw escape of Tippit killer   Killed by cop in bar brawl   Actually died of heart failure several hours after bar brawl.

2/67   David Ferrie*   Acquaintance of Oswald, Garrison suspect and employee of Guy Banister   Blow to neck (ruled accidental)   Died of Berry aneurysm, natural causes.

2/67   Eladio Del Valle*   Anti-Castro Cuban associate of David Ferrie being sought by Garrison   Gunshot wound, ax wound to head   Was involved in drug running, various criminal activities. No "axe wound."

3/67   Dr. Mary Sherman*   Ferrie associate working on cancer research   Died in fire (possibly shot)   No evidence of Ferrie association, died in 1964, and was not shot, but rather stabbed. Otherwise, Marrs is correct.

1/68   A. D. Bowie   Asst. Dallas District Attorney prosecuting Ruby   Cancer   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

4/68   Hiram Ingram   Dallas Deputy Sheriff, close friend to Roger Craig   Sudden cancer   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

5/68   Dr. Nicholas Chetta   New Orleans coroner who ruled on death of Ferrie   Heart attack   No evidence he knew anything sinister. HSCA found nothing suspicious about death.

8/68   Philip Geraci*   Friend of Perry Russo, told of Oswald/Shaw conversation   Electrocution   Note Marrs' syntax. It was Russo, and not Geraci who told of story of "Oswald/Shaw conversation."

1/69   Henry Delaune*   Brother-in-law to coroner Chetta   Murdered   If Chetta's death wasn't suspicious, how was that of his brother-in-law supposed to be?

1/69   E.R. Walthers*   Dallas Deputy Sheriff who was involved in Depository search, claimed to have found .45-cal. slug   Shot by felon   Made no claim of finding slug, in fact explicitly denied it. Killed trying to arrest violent suspect.

1969   Charles Mentesana   Filmed rifle other than Mannlicher-Carcano being taken from Depository   Heart attack   Film actually shows Dallas Police shotgun, and survives to this day. Had no other knowledge of the assassination.

4/69   Mary Bledsoe   Neighbor to Oswald, also knew David Ferrie   Natural causes   Key witness supporting Warren Commission case. Died at age 72.

4/69   John Crawford*   Close friend to both Ruby and Wesley Frazier, who gave ride to Oswald on 11/22/63   Crash of private plane   No evidence of foul play.

7/69   Rev. Clyde Johnson*   Scheduled to testify about Clay Shaw/Oswald connection   Fatally shot   Was shot after end of trial, so unreliable prosecution decided not to use him. HSCA judged death non-sinister.

1970   George McGann*   Underworld figure connected to Ruby friends, wife, Beverly, took film in Dealey Plaza   Murdered   Beverly's claim to have been in Dealey Plaza has severe credibility problems. No other connection with the case.

1/70   Darrell W. Garner   Arrested for shooting Warren Reynolds, released after alibi from Betty MacDonald   Drug overdose   No evidence of any connection to the assassination.

8/70   Bill Decker   Dallas Sheriff who saw bullet hit street in front of JFK   Natural causes   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

8/70   Abraham Zapruder   Took famous film of JFK assassination   Natural causes   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

12/70   Salvatore Granello*   Mobster linked to both Hoffa,Trafficante, and Castro assassination plots   Murdered   Unfortunately, no link to Kennedy assassination plot.

1971   James Plumeri*   Mobster tied to mob-CIA assassination plots   Murdered   Mobster getting murdered is not that unusual. Plumeri had no connection with the case.

3/71   Clayton Fowler   Ruby's chief defense attorney   Unknown   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

4/71   Gen. Charles Cabell*   CIA deputy director connected to anti-Castro Cubans   Collapsed and died after physical at Fort Myers   Circumstances not sinister, no connection with assassination.

1972   Hale Boggs*   House Majority Leader, member of Warren Commission who began to publicly express doubts about findings   Disappeared on Alaskan plane flight   Having doubts about findings is not the same as having information "dangerous" to a conspiracy.

5/72   J. Edgar Hoover*   FBI director who pushed "lone assassin" theory in JFK assassination   Heart attack (no autopsy)   Died at age 77. Wasn't he running the coverup? Who killed him?

9/73   Thomas E. Davis*   Gunrunner connected to both Ruby and CIA   Electrocuted trying to steal wire   No connection to assassination.

2/74   J.A. Milteer*   Miami right-winger who predicted JFK's death and capture of scapegoat   Heater explosion   Milteer's crackpot statements are far from a "prediction" of JFK's death.

1974   Dave Yaras*   Close friend to both Hoffa and Jack Ruby   Murdered   Childhood friend of Ruby's, had no contact with him in 1963.

7/74   Earl Warren   Chief Justice who reluctantly chaired Warren Commission   Heart failure   Died at age 82. Insisted to the end that Oswald was the lone assassin.

8/74   Clay Shaw*   Prime suspect in Garrison case, reportedly a CIA contact with Ferrie and E. Howard Hunt   Possible cancer   Garrison's flimsy case against Shaw collapsed in 1969. Shaw died of cancer.

1974   Earle Cabell   Mayor of Dallas on 11/22/63, whose brother, Gen. Charles Cabell was fired from CIA by JFK   Natural causes   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

6/75   Sam Giancana*   Chicago Mafia boss slated to tell about CIA-mob death plots to Senate Committee   Murdered   HSCA found no evidence his death was assassination related.

7/75   Clyde Tolson   J. Edgar Hoover's assistant and roommate   Natural causes   Died of heart disease at age 71.

1975   Allen Sweatt   Dallas Deputy Sheriff involved in investigation   Natural causes   One of scores of deputies involved in investigation.

12/75   Gen. Earle Wheeler   Contact between JFK and CIA   Unknown   Died of heart failure at age 67 — no connection with case.

1976   Ralph Paul   Ruby's business partner connected with crime figures   Heart attack   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

4/76   James Chaney   Dallas motorcycle officer riding to JFK's right rear who said JFK "struck in the face" with bullet   Heart attack   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

4/76   Dr. Charles Gregory   Governor John Connally's physician   Heart attack   His testimony refuted the idea that there was "too much lead" in Connally to have come from CE 399.

6/76   William Harvey*   CIA coordinator for CIA-mob assassination plans against Castro   Complications from heart surgery   No connection with Kennedy assassination.

7/76   John Roselli*   Mobster who testified to Senate Committee and was to appear again   Stabbed and stuffed in metal drum   HSCA found no evidence his murder was related to JFK assassination.

1/77   William Pawley*   Former Brazilian Ambassador connected to Anti-Castro Cubans, crime figures   Gunshot ruled suicide   No connection with assassination

3/77   George DeMohrenschildt*   Close friend to both Oswald and Bouvier family (Jackie Kennedy's parents), CIA contract agent   Gunshot wound ruled suicide   Was not "CIA contract agent." Had history of mental illness and previous suicide attempts. Death thoroughly investigated by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office.

3/77   Carlos Prio Soccaras*   Former Cuban President, money man for anti-Castro Cubans   Gunshot wound ruled suicide   No connection to case.

3/77   Paul Raigorodsky   Business friend of George DeMohrenschildt and wealthy oilmen   Natural causes   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

5/77   Lou Staples*   Dallas radio Talk Show host who told friends he would break assassination case   Gunshot to head, ruled suicide   Was living in Oklahoma when he killed himself. Apparently unable to "break the case."

6/77   Louis Nichols   Former No. 3 man in FBI, worked on JFK investigation   Heart attack   No evidence of foul play.

8/77   Alan Belmont   FBI official who testified to Warren Commission   "Long illness"   No evidence of foul play.

8/77   James Cadigan   FBI document expert who testified to Warren Commission   Fall in home   No evidence of any foul play.

8/77   Joseph C. Ayres*   Chief steward on JFK's Air Force One   Shooting accident   Being Chief Steward doubtless allowed him to garner much sinister information.

8/77   Francis G. Powers*   U-2 pilot downed over Russia in 1960   Helicopter crash (He reportedly ran out of fuel)   Speculated Oswald may have given the Soviets information that allowed them to shoot him down. Had no evidence.

9/77   Kenneth O'Donnell   JFK's closest aide   Natural causes   Died of aneurysm and liver complications.

10/77   Donald Kaylor   FBI fingerprint chemist   Heart attack   One of hundreds of FBI employees with marginal connection to assassination.

10/77   J.M. English   Former head of FBI Forensic Sciences Laboratory   Heart attack   No evidence of foul play.

11/77   William Sullivan*   Former No. 3 man in FBI, headed Division 5, counter- espionage and domestic intelligence   Hunting accident   Investigation by New Hampshire authorities showed no indication of foul play.

1978   C.L. "Lummie" Lewis   Dallas Deputy Sheriff who arrested Mafia man Braden in Dealey Plaza   Natural causes   Are we supposed to assume that Braden blurted out details of plot to cop arresting him?

9/78   Garland Slack   Man who said Oswald fired at his target at rifle range   Unknown   Died of heart disease — no connection with the case beyond "Oswald sighting" discussed in Warren Commission Report.

1/79   Billy Lovelady   Depository employee said to be the man in the doorway in AP photograph   Complications from heart attack   Unclear what sinister information he might have revealed.

6/80   Jesse Curry   Dallas Police Chief at time of assassination   Heart attack   Unclear why there would be any need to "silence" him almost 17 years after assassination.

6/80   Dr. John Holbrook   Psychiatrist who testified Ruby was not insane   Heart attack but pills, notes found   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

1/81   Marguerite Oswald   Mother of accused assassin   Cancer   Always loudly insisted her son was innocent. Unclear what information she had that she had not already revealed.

10/81   Frank Watts   Chief felony prosecutor for Dallas D.A.   Natural causes   Died of cancer at age 83.

1/82   Peter Gregory   Original translator for Marina Oswald and Secret Service   Natural causes   Circumstances not suspicious — no evidence of any reason to "silence" him.

5/82   Dr. James Weston   Pathologist allowed to see JFK autopsy material for HSCA   Died while jogging, ruled natural causes   Insisted that Kennedy was hit by two shots from behind.

8/82   Will H. Griffin   FBI agent who reportedly said Oswald was "definitely" an FBI informant   Cancer   HSCA investigation found he had said no such thing.

10/82   W. Marvin Gheesling   FBI official who helped supervise JFK investigation   "Long illness"   Circumstances not suspicious — had only minor role in investigation.

3/84   Roy Kellerman   Secret Service agent in charge of JFK limousine   Unknown    Died of heart failure at age 69.

When the House Select Committee on Assassinations wished to study the "mysterious deaths" associated with the assassination, they asked the Congressional Research Service — a division of the Library of Congress — to investigate a list of such deaths from published sources. The resulting CRS report is merely preliminary, but it shows the appalling number of factual errors in the conspiracy books pushing the notion, and the utterly non-mysterious nature of most of the deaths. Click on the name below to see the relevant section of the CRS report.

    Introduction to Report
    Edward/Eddie Benavides
    Albert Guy Bogard
    Hale Boggs
    Lee Bowers, Jr.
    Bill Chesher
    Nicholas J. Chetta, M.D.
    David Goldstein
    Thomas Hale (Tom) Howard
    William (Bill) Hunter
    Clyde Johnson
    Dorothy Kilgallen

   

    Thomas Henry (Hank) Killam
    Jim Koethe
    Levens (first name unknown)
    Nancy Jane Mooney (also known as Betty McDonald)
    Teresa Norton
    Earlene Roberts
    Harold Russell
    Marilyn April Walle, a.k.a. Marilyn Moon, Marilyn Magyar, Delilah
    William W. Whaley
    James R. Worrell

A Person Not on the List
Roger Craig told a variety of "interesting" stories about the assassination, most of which clearly indicated a conspiracy. So it might seem quite logical that a conspiracy would want to silence him. And indeed Craig's death at age 39 in 1975 by suicide (conspiracy books usually put quotes around "suicide") might seem suspicious. But do the details of his death actually seem suspicious? Let's Just Think About This, OK?

Excerpted from "The Case of the Grassy Knoll: The Romance of Conspiracy" by John Kaplan; printed in The Historian As Detective, Winks, editor; originally published as "The Assassins" in Stanford Law Review (May 1967).

    [Regarding the "mysterious" deaths of "witnesses" to the assassination], even the most cursory examination of the stories shows how essentially foolish they are. A good many of the deaths hardly seem mysterious in that they were caused by auto accidents, heart attacks, and other phenomena that afflict our entire population. Moreover, before we could tell whether the number of these deaths is in any way unusual, we would have to know the number of equally "mysterious" deaths that occurred to people completely unconnected with the WR. But even apart from any statistical refutation, the theory that a set of conspirators is now devoted to wiping out a host of unimportant witnesses is almost too silly to be put forth. There is not the slightest indication that any of the "victims" have had anything to tell that they had not already told, and indeed the deaths seem concentrated among those who bore only the most peripheral relation to the assassination. When one stops to consider that almost each one of the "mysterious" deaths requires the recruitment of at least one and often several new conspirators, it would seem that, like the pyramid club, the conspiracy would be getting bigger and bigger rather than smaller. One would think that in light of what had happened to those who knew too much it would get very difficult to recruit new members into the conspiracy. Most important, however, it is hard to say why the supposed killers are taking whatever chances these murders entail when it is so obvious that, whoever the conspirators are, they have already gotten off scot-free.

MORE

Convenient Deaths
1963 - 1976
http://www.jfk-assassination.de/articles/deaths.php

1963 - 1976
Many witnesses died in the thirteen year period following the assassination - mostly of unnatural causes. Many rumours crawl around about the high death rate during these years. They are supported by the mostly suspicious circumstances the victims died under. For a unknown shooter or even shooters, all these deaths have one thing in common: they are very convenient to those assassins since these witnesses took their knowledge with them into the grave. But see yourself and decide whether these deaths are purely coincidently:

Asterisks mark death that seemed to happen under suspicious circumstances.

Date    Name    Connection with case    Cause of death
11/63    Karyn Kupicinet    Tv host's daughter who was overheard telling of JFK's death prior to 11/22/63    Murdered

12/63    Jack Zangretti    Expressed foreknowledge of Ruby shooting Oswald    Gunshot Victim

2/64    Eddy Benavides    Lookalike brother to Tippit shooting witness, Domingo Benavides    Gunshot to head

2/64    Betty MacDonald*    Former Ruby employee who alibied Warren Reynolds shooting suspect.    Suicide by hanging in Dallas Jail

3/64    Bill Chesher    Thought to have information linking Oswald and Ruby    Heart attack

3/64    Hank Killam*    Husband of Ruby employee, knew Oswald acquaintance    Throat cut

4/64    Bill Hunter*    Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63    Accidental shooting by policeman

5/64    Gary Underhill*    CIA agent who claimed Agency was involved    Gunshot in head ruled suicide

5/64    Hugh Ward*    Private investigator working with Guy Banister and David Ferrie    Plane crash in Mexico

5/64    DeLesseps Morrison*    New Orleans Mayor    Passenger in Ward's plane

8/64    Teresa Norton*    Ruby employee    Fatally shot

6/64    Guy Banister*    x-FBI agent in New Orleans connected to Ferrie, CIA, Carlos Marcello & Oswald    Heart attack

9/64    Jim Koethe*    Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63    Blow to neck

9/64    C.D. Jackson    "Life" magazine senior Vicepresident who bought Zapruderfilm and locked it away    Unknown

10/64    Mary Pinchot    JFK "special" friend whose diary was taken by CIA chief James Angleton after her death    Murdered

1/65    Paul Mandal    "Life" writer who told of JFK turning to rear when shot in throat    Cancer

3/65    Tom Howard*    Ruby's first lawyer, was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63    Heart attack

5/65    Maurice Gatlin*    Pilot for Guy Banister    Fatal fall

8/65    Mona B. Saenz*    Texas Employment clerk who interviewed Oswald    Hit by Dallas bus

?/65    David Goldstein    Dallasite who helped FBI trace Oswald's pistol    Natural causes

9/65    Rose Cheramie*    Knew of assassination in advance, told of riding to Dallas with Cubans    Hit/run victim

11/65    Dorothy Kilgallen*    Columnist who had private interview with Ruby, pledged to "break" JFK case    Drug overdose

11/65    Mrs. Earl Smith*    Close friend to Dorothy Kilgallen, died two daysafter columnist, may have kept Kilgallen's notes    Cause unknown

12/65    William Whaley*    Cab driver who reportedly drove Oswald to Oak Cliff (The only Dallas taxi driver to die on duty)    Motor collision

1966    Judge Joe Brown    Presided over Ruby's trial    Heart attack

1966    Karen "Little Lynn" Carlin*    Ruby employee who last talked with Ruby before Oswald shooting    Gunshot victim

1/66    Earlene Roberts    Oswald's landlady    Heart attack

2/66    Albert Bogard*    Car salesman who said Oswald test drove new car    Suicide

6/66    Capt. Frank Martin    Dallas policeman who witnessed Oswald slaying, told Warren Commission "there's a lot to be said but probably be better if I don't say it"    Sudden cancer

8/66    Lee Bowers Jr.*    Witnessed men behind picket fence on Grassy Knoll    Motor accident

9/66    Marilyn "Delila Walle*    Ruby dancer    Shot by husband after 1 month of marriage

10/66    Lt. William Pitzer*    JFK autopsy photographer who described his duty as "horrifying experience"    Gunshot rule suicided

11/66    Jimmy Levens    Fort Worth nightclub owner who hired Ruby employees    Natural causes

11/66    James Worrell Jr.*    Saw man flee rear of Texas School Book Depository    Motor accident

1966    Clarence Oliver    Dist. Atty. Investigator who worked Ruby case    Unknown

12/66    Hank Suydam    Life magazine official in charge of JFK stories    Heart attack

1967    Leonard Pullin    Civilian Navy employee who helped film "Last Two Days" about assassination    One-car crash

1/67    Jack Ruby*    Oswald's slayer    Lung cancer (he told family he was injected with cancer cells)

2/67    Harold Russell*    Saw escape of Tippit killer    killed by cop in bar brawl

2/67    David Ferrie*    Acquaintance of Oswald, Garrison suspect and employee of Guy Banister    Blow to neck (ruled accidental)

2/67    Eladio Del Valle*    Anti-Castro Cuban associate of David Ferrie being sought by Garrison    Gunshot wound, a wound to head

3/67    Dr. Mary Sherman*    Ferrie associate working on cancer research    Died in fire (possibly shot)

1/68    A. D. Bowie    Asst. Dallas District Attorney prosecuting Ruby    Cancer

4/68    Hiram Ingram    Dallas Deputy Sheriff, close friend to Roger Craig    Sudden cancer

5/68    Dr. Nicholas Chetta    New Orleans coroner who on death of Ferrie    Heart attack

8/68    Philip Geraci*    Friend of Perry Russo, told of Oswald/Shaw conversation    Electrocution

1/69    Henry Delaune*    Brother-in-law to coroner Chetta    Murdered

1/69    E.R. Walthers*    Dallas Deputy Sheriff who was involved in Depository search, claimed to have found .45-cal. slug    Shot by felon

1969    Charles Mentesana    Filmed rifle other than Mannlicher-Carcano being taken from Depository    Heart attack

4/69    Mary Bledsoe    Neighbor to Oswald, also knew David Ferrie    Natural causes

4/69    John Crawford*    Close friend to both Ruby and Wesley Frazier, who gave ride to Oswald on 11/22/63    Crash of private plane

7/69    Rev. Clyde Johnson*    Scheduled to testify about Clay Shaw/Oswald connection    Fatally shot

1970    George McGann*    Underworld figure connected to Ruby friends, wife, Beverly, took film in Dealey Plaza    Murdered

1/70    Darrell W. Garner    Arrested for shooting Warren Reynolds, released after alibi from Betty MacDonald    Drug overdose

8/70    Bill Decker    Dallas Sheriff who saw bullet hit street in front of JFK    Natural causes

8/70    Abraham Zapruder    Took famous film of JFK assassination    Natural causes

12/70    Salvatore Granello*    Mobster linked to both Hoffa,Trafficante, and Castro assassination plots    Murdered

1971    James Plumeri*    Mobster tied to mob-CIA assassination plots    Murdered

3/71    Clayton Fowler    Ruby's chief defense attorney    Uknown

4/71    Gen. Charles Cabell*    CIA deputy director connected to anti-Castro Cubans    Collapsed and died afterphysical at Fort Myers

1972    Hale Boggs*    House Majority Leader, member of Warren Commission who began to publicly express doubts about findings    Disappeared on Alaskan plane flight

5/72    J. Edgar Hoover*    FBI director who pushed "lone assassin" theory in JFK assassination    Heart attack (no autopsy)

9/73    Thomas E. Davis*    Gunrunner connected to both Ruby and CIA    Electrocuted trying to steal wire

2/74    J.A. Milteer*    Miami right-winger who predicted JFK's death and capture of scapegoat    Heater explosion

1974    Dave Yaras*    Close friend to both Hoffa and Jack Ruby    Murdered

7/74    Earl Warren    Chief Justice who reluctantly chaired Warren Commission    Heart failure

8/74    Clay Shaw*    Prime suspect in Garrison case, reportedly a CIA contact with Ferrie and E. Howard Hunt    Possible cancer

1974    Earle Cabell    Mayor of Dallas on 11/22/63, whose brother, Gen. Charles Cabell was fired from CIA by JFK    Natural causes

6/75    Sam Giancana*    Chicago Mafia boss slated to tell about CIA-mob death plots to Senate Committee    Murdered

7/75    Clyde Tolson    J. Edgar Hoover's assistant and roommate    Natural causes

1975    Allen Sweatt    Dallas Deputy Sheriff involved in investigation    Natural causes

12/75    Gen. Earle Wheeler    Contact between JFK and CIA    Unknown

1976    Ralph Paul    Ruby's business partner connected with crime figures    Heart attack

4/76    James Chaney    Dallas motorcycle officer riding to JFK's right rear who said JFK "struck in the face" with bullet    Heart attack

4/76    Dr. Charles Gregory    Governor John Connally's physician    Heart attack

6/76    William Harvey*    CIA coordinator for CIA-mob assassination plans against Castro    Complications from heart surgery

7/76    John Roselli*    Mobster who testified to Senate Committee and was to appear again    Stabbed and stuffed in metal drum

The HSCA Investigation
Just when the House Select Committee on Assassinations was investigating the JFK assassination, more suspicious deaths were coming up:

Date    Name    Connection with case    Cause of Death

1/77    William Pawley*    Former Brazilian Ambassador connected to Anti-Castro Cubans, crime figures    Gunshot ruled suicide

3/77    George DeMohrenschildt*    Close friend to both Oswald and Bouvier family (Jackie Kennedy's parents), CIA contract agent    Gunshot wound ruled suicide

3/77    Carlos Prio Soccaras*    Former Cuban President, money man for anti-Castro Cubans    Gunshot wound ruled suicide

3/77    Paul Raigorodsky    Business friend of George DeMohrenschildt and wealthy oilmen    Natural causes

5/77    Lou Staples*    Dallas radio Talk Show host who told friends he would break assassination case    Gunshot to head,ruled suicide

6/77    Louis Nichols    Former No. 3 man in FBI, worked on JFK investigation    Heart attack

8/77    Alan Belmont    FBI official who testified to Warren Commission    "Long illness"

8/77    James Cadigan    FBI document expert who testified to Warren Commission    Fall in home

8/77    Joseph C. Ayres*    Chief steward on JFK's Air Force One    Shooting accident

8/77    Francis G. Powers*    U-2 pilot downed over Russia in 1960    Helicopter crash (He reportedly ran out of fuel)

9/77    Kenneth O'Donnell    JFK's closest aide    Natural causes

10/77    Donald Kaylor    FBI fingerprint chemist    Heart attack

10/77    J.M. English    Former head of FBI Forensic Sciences Laboratory    Heart attack

11/77    William Sullivan*    Former No. 3 man in FBI, headed Division 5, counter- espionage and domestic intelligence    Hunting accident

1978    C.L. "Lummie" Lewis    Dallas Deputy Sheriff who arrested Mafia man Braden in Dealey Plaza    Natural causes

9/78    Garland Slack    Man who said Oswald fired at his target at rifle range    Unknown

1/79    Billy Lovelady    Depository employee said to be the man in the doorway in AP photograph    Complications from heart attack

6/80    Jesse Curry    Dallas Police Chief at time of assassination    Heart attack

6/80    Dr. John Holbrook    Psychiatrist who testified Ruby was not insane    Heart attack but pills, notes found

1/81    Marguerite Oswald    Mother of accused assassin    Cancer

10/81    Frank Watts    Chief felony prosecutor for Dallas D.A.    Natural causes

1/82    Peter Gregory    Original translator for Marina Oswald and Secret Service    Natural causes

5/82    Dr. James Weston    Pathologist allowed to see JFK autopsy material for HSCA    Died while jogging, ruled natural causes

8/82    Will H. Griffin    FBI agent who reportedly said Oswald was "definitely" an FBI informant    Cancer

10/82    W. Marvin Gheesling    FBI official who helped supervise JFK investigation    "Long illness"

3/84    Roy Kellerman    Secret Service agent in charge of JFK limousine    Unknown

Following names are the recently known deaths, almost all died of natural causes:

Date    Name    Connection with case    Cause of Death

10/92    Jim Garrison    Former District Attorney of New Orleans, only one who sued in the JFK assassination case    Natural causes

?/94    Perry Russo    witness who told he had seen Shaw, Oswald and Ferrie talking about the killing of JFK    Unknown

01/95    Rose Kennedy    Mother of John F. Kennedy    natural causes

01/95    L.C. Graves    wrested Ruby's revolver away from him after shooting Oswald    natural causes

2/95    Irving L. Goldberg    Judge who advised L. B. Johnson on transition of power    natural causes

3/95    Philip L. Willis    Dealey Plaza Witness, photographer    Leukemia

5/95    Evelyn Norton Lincoln    JFK's personal secretary    natural causes

5/95    Phil L. Barleson    Defender of Ruby    Heart attack

11/95    Richard Case Nagell    CIA agent who claimed he uncovered a "large operation" aimed at killing JFK    heart disease

12/95    James W. Altgens    Dealey Plaza Witness, press photographer    natural causes

1/96    Ralph W. Yarborough    Dealey Plaza witness, rode in motorcade    natural causes

7/96    Melvin Belli    Lawyer of Jack Ruby    Suffering stroke and pneumonia

8/96    Charles Brehm    Dealey Plaza Witness    Unknown

9/96    McGeorge Bundy    Top aide to JFK and LBJ    Heart attack

10/96    Rufus Youngblood    Agent who shielded LBJ during the JFK murder    Cancer

10/96    Larry Ray Harris    Researcher    Car accident

10/96    Lawrence Brantley    Sold Jack Ruby the gun used to kill Oswald    Complications from surgery

The "Dr. Pepper" soda and "chicken...bag"

One more religion / assassination connected aspect of the "sniper's layer" at the Book Depository where Oswald was supposed to have fired from....

Briefly, very close to the window where Oswald was to be accused as shooting from, there was found what appeared to be an almost finished lunch bag and soda pop bottle. The bag was said to have chicken bones and the soda was a Dr. Pepper.

Now in the Holy Bible (Authorized King James Holy Bible © in the Public Domain USA) there are several references to the "King of Babylon" with several meanings and times applied by God. Two are to Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon. He is the major topic in the Book of Daniel, Old Testament. After dealings with God, he sums up ....

Book of Daniel, Chapter 4 
34 And at the end of the days I Nebuchadnezzar lifted up mine eyes unto heaven, and mine understanding returned unto me, and I blessed the most High, and I praised and honoured him that liveth for ever, whose dominion is an everlasting dominion, and his kingdom is from generation to generation: 
35 And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou? 
36 At the same time my reason returned unto me; and for the glory of my kingdom, mine honour and brightness returned unto me; and my counsellors and my lords sought unto me; and I was established in my kingdom, and excellent majesty was added unto me. 
37 Now I Nebuchadnezzar praise and extol and honour the King of heaven, all whose works are truth, and his ways judgment: and those that walk in pride he is able to abase.

However, and you will have to read our Bible Studies, God also refers to him as Elisha who is to come just before the "Second Coming" who will "restore all things" and is who is to "rule all nations with a rod of iron" (Book of Revelation) - the last King of Israel. READ God's prophecy about these end times....

BOOK OF EZEKIEL Chapter 29 
 18 Son of man, Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon caused his army to serve a great service against Tyrus [satan / beast 666]: every head was made bald, and every shoulder was peeled: yet had he no wages, nor his army, for Tyrus, for the service that he had served against it: 
19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will give the land of Egypt unto Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon; and he shall take her multitude, and take her spoil, and take her prey; and it shall be the wages for his army.
20 I have given him the land of Egypt for his labour wherewith he served against it, because they wrought for me, saith the Lord God.
21 ¶In that day will I cause the horn of the house of Israel to bud forth, and I will give thee the opening of the mouth in the midst of them; and they shall know that I am the Lord. [mouth - Lawgiver as Moses was called and is Elisha in the last days - end times. Horn means a king].

Nevermind a-hole historians and pay attention to the Word of God. When did He say ? .... In that day ... what day ? the End days. Prophecy interpreted. That is the time reference (NOW) and Egypt refers to both Reborn Africans (worldwide) as well as the conquering of ancient Egyptian type referencing Pharoah which was Godless and opposed to God and is well elaborated on at the times of Moses - the "plagues of Egypt" as the releasing of the Jews from the slavery of Egypt. Pharoah was remembered for his infamous words "this (Egypt) river is my own." In these end times it more simply means those that have not been baptized and reborn yet.

Now Elisha has many crowns and titles already and the entire World will know him soon obviously. Remember that in Revelation there are the 7 kingdoms - five are fallen. The 6th is Red Communism, now fallen. The 7th has obviously been America. And shown is the Beast666 "who is of the seven (6th)". So it has been shown the 6th king (head of the world as underground king of Red Communism) ordered JFK dead.

Now the 7th kingdom is referred as well as - Babylon.....
BOOK of  REVELATION Chapter 17
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great w*h*o*r*e that sitteth upon many waters: 
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Now above, is the 7th kingdom that defeated the 6th (Red Communism). THIS is who all the terrorism (false prophet Bin Laden) was / is against (residue, remainder). Note that God fortells of the 7 mountains/kingdoms and heads (kings) in Revelations which is the last 2,000 years of history after Jesus Christ's ascension to Heaven as Babylon itself as defined kingdom that assayed to rule the world until each of these burned out and rose again elsewhere as it is written "five are fallen, one is [6th], and one [7th] is not yet come". Remember what you read? ....

16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the w*h*o*r*e, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. 
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. 
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
(911 Attack their centerpiece).

SO WHAT ARE WE TALKING - WHO IS DR. PEPPER ? 

Today, thank God, many insulting defaming phrases are forgotten. One more time I will recall these in this alarming discovery and WHAT IT REALLY MEANT..... the chicken bag like watermelon phrase-ology is to the bad old N-word as N-picnic. Get it. DR. PEPPER IS REFERRING TO REVEREND DR. MARTIN L. KING --- GET IT DR. PEPPER ?

.... ABOVE is the connection as to WHY he was assassinated by the same 6th king (Red Communism underground head) who ordered the Kennedy assassinations.

NOw... here is the rest of the story.....

In America, Black America has suffered too much to say in one sentence yet are now flourishing in all the aftermath of the war and Civil Rights Movement, all the years  - the great efforts to Equality finally. So we go back to those times - the Early 1960s - where there was racial oppression (virtually all in the South) and chronic unemployment nationwide. In short - poor.....

Remember how the Beast666 comes in ?
BOOK OF REVELATION Chapter 13
16 And he causeth all [non-Christians], both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. 

The Beast666 and False Prophet (Bin Laden) were RECRUITING against the W*H*O*R*E* Babylon among the poor who are not baptized and reborn - in the know. In the times of Blessed Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Black America was like most of America as religious, church going and that notably obviously in the marches. It scratches the head thinking of Malcolm X with his preachings about drugs in the black ghetto and "whitey" was doing it to subvert and enslave poor Black America to their own profiteerings. His references in the Holy Bible are indeed talking about this "w*h*o*r*e* of Babylon or back then called the Secret Societies and generally all white.

SO THE 6TH KING WHO BECOMES THE BEAST666 ASSASSINATES THE HEAD OF THE BLACK CHRISTIAN AMERICA CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER - "DR. PEPPER" - REVEREND DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING !

This "calling card" on November 22, 1963 in Dallas can not be ignored. He had it "planted" as advertisement. There was enough a-do about it as was in the "sniper nest" and was reportedly moved around causing extra dialouge in the Warren Commission testimonies to stick out.

BOTTOM LINE.....
This could be a coincidence or not. One thing is clear and should be clear, when looking at the JFK assassination with a magnifying glass and then a super one - virtually nothing that day was a coinicidence. ALL that happened was quite intentional and virtually ALL rehearsed in advance.

ABOVE.....
references to the Kennedy and King slayings and all the destruction of the fabric of America as it was in the days as predominantly a religious nation and people in all the various ways were the actions and hope of the Beast666 and Satan who gave him his seat and authority. The JFK assassination is the very beginning - the apostasy, the fall - and is foretold here.....
BOOK OF THESSALONIANS Chapter 2
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

They began with the assassinations of these heads of America in the Government and Church in the hope all would begin to turn away as forlorn and hopeless and indulge the vices etc. - to turn as many away from God as they could as is their lust - to destroy Christianity.

)))PLAY )))


Robert F. Kennedy's Martin Luther King Jr. Assassination Speech
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrx_u3825g> 

U2 - Pride (In The Name Of Love)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHcP4MWABGY&feature=related>

FINALLY - THE WARREN COMMISSION ADMITS TREASON AND THE REASON BEFORE MARK LANE AND BEVERLY HILLS AMERICAN GATHERING.....
BELOW IS THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS TWO AND ONE HALF HOUR "DEBATE" WHICH SHOULD BE LISTENED TO ENTIRELY TO COMPREHEND THE WARREN COMMISSION ADMISSION OF IT BEING A COMPLETE FALSEHOOD AND THEIR "NEW DEAL" THEY SOLICIT AMERICA TO ENGAGE WHICH IS MUCH AS TO BE A "SERVANT TO TRIBUTE" - OR TO SAY TO BE A COWARD WITH US AND NOT ENGAGE THE USSR TO PROSECUTE THOSE GUILTY OF THE MURDER OF PRESIDENT JFK, TO AVENGE HIM AND AMERICA IN COURAGE AND HONOR. --- VIRTUALLY THE ENTIRE BEVERLY HILLS AUDIENCE TURNED THEM DOWN !   

TODAY THIS IS THE RED STATES VS BLUE STATES..... YOU WILL SEE HERE AND UNDERSTAND HOW THIS CAME TO BE AND WAS ACTUALLY A CONTINUATION THEN OF WHAT THEY CALL "LEFT OF CENTER" = RED STATES. THESE ARE A "PROFILE IN COWARDICE" AND COMPLETELY UN-AMERICAN TO SAY THE LEAST.

BELOW WILL BE THE US CONSTITUTION LAW AGAINST THIS AND FINALLY AS A MINISTER OF GOD - THEIR ADDRESS FROM GOD FOR THIS !

-----------

JFK ASSASSINATION DEBATE WITH MARK LANE (DECEMBER 4, 1964)   
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yfB9QnwtZk>

DESCRIPTION:
Here is a lively debate about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The debate features well-known conspiracy theorist Mark Lane going head-to-head against three defenders of the official Warren Commission Report, including Warren Commission assistant counsel member Joseph A. Ball.

This audio-only program runs for more than 2 hours and took place at Beverly Hills High School on December 4, 1964, which was just 10 weeks after the Warren Report was released to the public.

I totally disagree with virtually everything Mark Lane has to say about his beliefs in a conspiracy to kill JFK, and I vehemently disagree with Lane's comment about the Warren Commission Report being a "fraud from the first page to the last page", but I will say that I thoroughly enjoyed listening to this 1964 debate. Mr. Lane can, indeed, put on a good show. And he does here.

At the conclusion of the program, some of the audience members are interviewed and give their opinions about the debate they had just witnessed.

PROGRAM SOURCE:
Ray Marcus, Len Osanic, and Black Op Radio.

MORE PROGRAMS WITH MARK LANE:
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/12/mark-lane-interviews.html

RELATED LINKS:
http://Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com
http://Kennedy-Videos.blogspot.com

--------------

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official Text
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

Article. II. 
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article III. 
Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Article. I. 
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;

-----------
THEIR ADMISSION OF TREASON AND MOVING SEDITION TO JOIN THEM AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND QUOTED VERBATIM (as best transcribed)......

[approx. 2:06:15 - 2 hours, six minutes, fifteen seconds into above YouTube, about 2:37:16 full]

EXCERPT / WARREN COMMISSION MEMBER.... (pronounced Wearing or Weering, Esq.) 
"Now finally, the Commission said that men on the Left neither the Soviet Union nor Cuba had anything to do with the assassination of President Kennedy. Now this statement by the Commission, a statement which the entire Commission including Mr. Dulles join - this statement saving all of us here who are Left of Center from the venom of the Rightests, this statement protects the rights of all of us. Now had this Commission been irresponsible, it might have failed to save that which - which resulted in ( a marked?) intensification of a cruel (Cold?) War had the Commission not given this, clearest as it were, to many against whom the Rightest were pointing the finger we might have had following the assassination of President Kennedy a real unleashing of terror against persons on the left. So from my point of view, the Commission instead of perpetrating a fraud upon the American People has rendered a service of major importance to the American People - particularly by protecting the Rights from hysteria and hostility, the Rights of Americans who are as I say in the Left or Left of Center. So I respectfully disagree with our distinguished Guest from New York in his statement as to the import (ance) of this Report. I think his statement that this Report is a fraud perpetrated on the American People is utterly irresponsible.

MARK LANE
".....I know that it is only because of the extreme pressure of this Establishment which Mr. (Weering ?) so well emphasized in quoting H(C?)arry MacWilliams (sp.?) for I have (?) that this unusual statement was made by Mr. Weering (sp.?) I know he would not make it ordinarily and I know that it does not represent his thinking generally. We have too much respect for Mr. Weering (sp.?) and for the orginization with which he is associated to believe that it represents his thinking. I know that The Day will come in America as it came in France 12 years after the conviction of Dreyfus when the whole Liberal Establishment and the rest of the Establishment said Guilty Guilty Guilty for twelve years. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Government said it. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Minister of Justice said it. Dreyfus was not guilty when the Liberals in the Parliamnet of France said it anymore then when he was guilty twelve years later when the French Government had the courage and honor to reverse its posistion, and Oswald is not guilty now - anymore guilty then he will be when the United States Government has the Courage and the Honor to state that it was wrong. And the reasons afforded by Mr. Weering (sp.?) are sound ones. There might be an unleashing of activity against the Right, there might be an unleashing of activity against the Left. There wouldn't be (the distant ? ) days in America very likely if that killing remained unsolved. It was a terrible shock for every American Citizen, all 190 million of us. We weren't on the verge of panic or revolution, but there was great unrest - and how happy we all were when they caught him 15 minutes later his description was out and they said the first day he was a lone assassin. What a reflection. Whoever heard any Police Officer ever say the man commintted the crime alone. How did they know the first day he didn't talk to somebody two weeks before who gave him the money, was arranging to get the guns, who told him how to do it ? Lone assassin ? The first day ? That was a reflection upon the F.B.I. and the Dallas Police - not upon Lee Harvey Oswald when they used those words "lone assassin" the very first hours after the killing of the President. Yes, those are the reasons - Mr Weering (sp.?) states them. There is no reason for anyone to speculate any longer in terms of this evening's performance - Mr. Weering (sp.?) tells us we must have a man who did it, "We must have a man, they'll be unleashed....". I tell you this, I don't believe we must have a man. First of all I don't know what the Polictics of the people here are this evening, I don't think it's relevant quite frankly - I don't think it makes any difference. And I tell you this, nor are my politics relevant nor Mr. Weering's (sp.?) politics relevant or anyone else's politics. I tell you this man was condemned to death after his death, condemned as the assassin in order that the country might breath easier, in order that the country might breath easier so that there would be no unleashing of the terror that Mr. Weering (sp.?) said - then even on a practical basis that will not work. For when Justice is denied to one - be it those of us here this evening Left, Right, or Center - Justice is denied to each of us, to everyone of us. And no matter how difficult those days may be. I heard [those present accused him] when a man is retained to be an Advocate [Oswald lawyer] he makes these points. Nobody is retaining me. I closed down my Law Office. I get paid for speaking engagements it's true - and every single penny goes to the citizens committee so that they can conduct and continue an examination and investigation (endowed). No one is here as an Advocate tonight except for this view point - I advocate and I say it and I'm not ashamed of it, I advocate that the American People are entitled to the Facts. The Chief Justice said when he was first questioning witnesses, the Chief Justice said "You may never get the facts in your lifetime" and then they issued the Warren Commission Report that tended to prove his estimate was an accurate one. Thank you.

--------------

BEGINNING OF RELIGIOUS EXHORTATION TO THIS TRAVESTY....... This is just an introductory snippet of a full sermon I am preparing.....

As they (Warren Commission Members) stated, they knowingly charged the innocent Lee Harvey Oswald to seal the murder investigation to attempt to hide not only the truth but also from what could have escalated to the height of the Cuban Missle Crisis all over again. They freely admitted they were conservatives and were doing this as self interest for all conservatives which is basically the Republican Party in the USA. This was the "service" they said they offered America via the Warren Commission Report presented. They freely admitted they were hiding the truth with their actions of the internal coup and their Soviet connections, that they ordered the hit using insider American traitors to carry it out. This is the one part of the "unleashing" from the Right (Democrats) they said their "service" protected ALL those of the Left (Republicans).  NOTE originally Left was Conservative (Republican) and Right was Liberal (Democrat) - but nothing like today's usage.   
 
ISAIAH Chapter 21
15 For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war. 

ISAIAH Chapter 51
7 ¶Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings.
8 For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be for ever, and my salvation from generation to generation. 
9 ¶Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of the Lord; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon? 
10 Art thou not it which hath dried the sea, the waters of the great deep; that hath made the depths of the sea a way for the ransomed to pass over? 
11 Therefore the redeemed of the Lord shall return, and come with singing unto Zion; and everlasting joy shall be upon their head: they shall obtain gladness and joy; and sorrow and mourning shall flee away. 
12 I, even I, am he that comforteth you: who art thou, that thou shouldest be afraid of a man that shall die, and of the son of man which shall be made as grass; 
13 And forgettest the Lord thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor? 

NOW REMEMBER, and as a Minister I advise to take heed to God as he taught us through Jesus Christ and the Apostles through His Word the Gospel of Christ - be careful of judging and how, as it will be returned to you. The rage, against the guilty and all of there's, the rage horror and sorrows of America came to a head after the subsequesnt assassinations of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and Presidential Candidate and former Atty. Gen. Senator Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy after the slaying execution of President John F. Kennedy.  But we see (hearing) here in this very valuable recording of this precise moment of time by those there - we hear those of the Warren Commission very harshly telling everyone to shut up and except this "official" Commssion report that Lee Harvey Oswald is the only assassin and we got him and this is "case closed" as they do not want to face anything else. Of course virtually everyone there rejected this, being courageous Americans and good Patriots and Proud. You can hear that at the end with the various interview comments of the audience as an "exit poll" kind of. Not seeking Pardons I do ADVISE we keep in our hearts the Word of God with THIS instruction from Him in His Word...... (concerning those in fear "left of center" ) .....

LUKE Chapter 21
25 ¶And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; 
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. 
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 
28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. 
29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; 
30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand. 
31 So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand. 
32 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled. 
33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. 

34 ¶And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.  
35 For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth. 
36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man. 
37 And in the day time he was teaching in the temple; and at night he went out, and abode in the mount that is called the mount of Olives. 
38 And all the people came early in the morning to him in the temple, for to hear him.

*****ADDITIONALLY, AS WITNESS

AS LATE AS 1992....

Disclosure of the JFK Assassination Records 4/28/92 (YouTube)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEIhXXk8c70>
Length 3:17:23 (3 Hours, 17 minutes, 23 seconds) 
Reference Quoted: 1:50:15 forward....
Howard Willens, Former Counsel Warren Commission
QUOTED CLIP:
"... Virtually all those records of the Warren Commission are now available for Public scrutiny. The Warren Commission in this respect, guided strongly by it's four Congressional Members, decided to publish essentially all of the evidence that the Commission relied upon in reaching its' Conclusion. I am interested in the contrast between the decision of the Warren Commission made in 1964 with the decisions made subsequently by the several Congressional Committees that investigated one or more of the subject matters that is before the Committee today. ......

.... The Members of the Commission and the Members of the Staff then and now had nothing to be embarressed about and felt that the interest of the American Public was best served by publishing all the documentary material and testimony upon which the Commission relied in reaching its' conclusion.

It is my understanding now as a result of that publication many years ago and subsequent release by the National Archives that only a small percentage of the documents generated by the Warren Commission is not available for public examination. It has been suggested that in fact about 2 percent of those materials are not in the Public Domain. Those that have been withheld include the Autopsy photographs and X-rays, certain confidential investigative sources and informants, certain facts and procedures relating to Presidential protection, and fully investigated allegations of complicity that raised questions to privacy. ...."


And as well, later, James Johnston Former Counsel Senate Intelligence Committee
2:13:12 "As a Staff Counsel of the Senate Committee we didn't look at the events in Dallas - we didn't look for multiple assassins. " 

JUDGEMENT

It is my conclusive Judgement short of comprehensive inquest, in review of the Warren Report and public posted and recorded histories of those with witnesses and facts and subsequent government publications and hearings and new facts and as may be attributed to new technologies and research not available in 1963 by the independent public and others - that the Government itself gave full witness and report available of their actions for their published findings.

The Warren Report commissioned by and with the United States Government admittedly withheld evidences and actions, concluding international conspiracy and assassination by those of guilt internationally and with those within the United States that facilatated the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. To take action it was presumed by them would involve what easily escalated into War and even World War Three. This was their admitted reason for non-action against the guilty and suspects. Fear of loss of life limb and property in the scourges of war and of those times may have even escalated to a Nuclear Winter with the loss of Earth itself perceived in their ignorance of faith and its' hope and victory offered.

As judged, it is the responsibility of the American Public and Government to diligently separate in America those that may have purposely withheld evidence and action for the sake of the preservation of America in their opinion from those that were sprinkled within and without that mixed in with intent of the obstruction of justice called a conspiratorial cover-up of the truth to remain unpunished as the "bargain of the devil".

One look at the Book of Revelation in the Authorized King James Holy Bible as the only commissioned English Translation mixed with many prophecies throughout shows the horrors of ignorance available with virtually absolute destruction and death only perceived in ignorance of Faith. This ignorance demands the complete participation of those of Faith being its' leaders to teach the full truth in entirety, that if known in those times precludes the immediate apprehension and Pubclic Trial of the guilty. As a Minister of God I have so published those truths and teachings and interpretations dispelling the ignorances of those times that can only be possible in our times - the Present Truth - and this by the Hand of God.

In reviewing the Warren Report of by and with the United States Government as Commissioned - their very own subsequent Public words and explanations and actual contents - we must agree and find them NOT GUILTY of CONSPIRATORIAL COVER UP OF THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY. Their implications to this day of all concerned point to the guilty as part of a murderous underground governmental association as mentioned as those evil figures and persons found in the Book of Revelations in the Authorized King James Holy Bible known as the Scriptures and Word of God and Gospel of Jesus Christ the Messiah. In short, the Guilty of the conspiracy and act of the Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy is today now publicly known as the Beast 666 in his former capacity as the Underground evil ruler of what was called "Red Communism" as defined from the Holy Bible as head of this previous authority as head and is indicated as the "person of agency" mentioned by President Reagan (below) and apparently by Frank Sturgis as indicating a wealthy USSR Citizen contracted as by the KGB (deceitfully now known). The Victory over these was not known or perceived until was achieved in recent history and is why I advocate a FULL PUBLIC HEARING AND TRIAL for the 50th Anniversary of this "mystery of history" - the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. All that remains of their number is a small residue worldwide and are pursued and slain as we speak engaged in war against the same.  

Former President Eisenhower mentions briefly about National Security
Eisenhower Speaks About Murder of JFK (1963)
<http://youtu.be/KyGzVQGgdqw>

The United States of America has always been a nation of Faith as predominantly Christian, founded in the name of Christianity with all our shortcomings including those dark times and dark deeds - and is the responsibility of our current day Citizens and Leaders to forgive or condemn those of fear and ignorance and judge those guilty of conspiracy and treason with the true abilities and true wisdom and true words and true faith and true faithful judgement from Above.

We can decide to forgive those of fear in those times as those parts involved of our Government as cause of their inaction - but we can never add to those who actually judge our President and Government as a whole as involved in the conspiracy and administrating the subsequent cover up as being guilty. This would be the same as condemning our first President George Washington and Government for the actions of the insider Traitor - Benedict Arnold. In our Nation by Law the innocent are not held guilty for the actions of those committing the crimes. It has been explained why any "cover up" was NOT accessory after the fact or complicity according to even existing and previous ongoing National Security. It is understood those of internal conspiracy are the guilty but does NOT imply in this Judgement suggested that the ENTIRE Presidency and Government of the United States are guilty of the act, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice as a cover up. Early on the panic and grieving public much simply smeared the whole government in this manner by their grief from the loss of the Beloved President but later expanded almost to or including the point of paranoia. Let us sit down in Judgment and Reason and Wisdom together !

Perhaps the truth is the Courage of the Warren Commission was in preserving to another day, "fight fight run away and live to fight another day", to another day when all considered would give the best yield of Salvation of the World was the Greater Harvest rather then simple slaughter by revenge destroying the Unborn without chance of the same Grace and Prosperity from God afforded America from the beginning. Perhaps they can be considered as a Chapter in 'Profiles In Courage' ? NOT IN OUR BOOK ! The youth of America at the time that the world heard called the 60's Generation (1960s) entirely rejected this having love and respect for the fallen President and their Nation. Their action of reply (Johnson and Nixon Administrations) was to send millions of draftees into Viet Nam leaving over 500,000 wounded and over 55,000 dead at the hand of two Presidents, Johnson and Nixon, and worst actually withdraw in defeat at those losses "saving face" ? Who's ? Ours ? There's (The Presidents) ? It seems more some appeasement to Communism apologizing for even dreaming of investigating them for the assassination of President Kennedy. The insider view of the 1960s Generation and many and finally most adults was that if you are going to fight Communism you don't "shoot your foot in Viet Nam" - you begin in Moscow ! This WAS the stance and action by President Kennedy who "got it right". 

But what does God and His Law say about COWARDS in uniform ? Let us read together God's Laws.....
DEUTERONOMY Chapter 20
5 ¶And the officers shall speak unto the people, saying, What man is there that hath built a new house, and hath not dedicated it? let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it.
6 And what man is he that hath planted a vineyard, and hath not yet eaten of it? let him also go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man eat of it.
7 And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her.
8 And the officers shall speak further unto the people, and they shall say, What man is there that is fearful and fainthearted? let him go and return unto his house, lest his brethren's heart faint as well as his heart.
HE IS TO BE RELIEVED OF COMMAND ! ! ! SENT HOME AND WHAT HIDE WITH WOMAN ? READ ON......
 
WHAT ? HAVE YOU NEVER HEARD THE FAMOUS STORY IN ISRAEL AS THE SONG OF DEBORAH ? THE COWARD OF BATTLE - SISERA ?

JUDGES Chapter 4

1 And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of the Lord, when Ehud was dead.
2 And the Lord sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan, that reigned in Hazor; the captain of whose host was Sisera, which dwelt in Harosheth of the Gentiles.  3 And the children of Israel cried unto the Lord: for he had nine hundred chariots of iron; and twenty years he mightily oppressed the children of Israel. 
4 ¶And Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth, she judged Israel at that time.
5 And she dwelt under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Beth–el in mount Ephraim: and the children of Israel came up to her for judgment.
6 And she sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam out of Kedesh–naphtali, and said unto him, Hath not the Lord God of Israel commanded, saying, Go and draw toward mount Tabor, and take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of Zebulun?
7 And I will draw unto thee to the river Kishon Sisera, the captain of Jabin's army, with his chariots and his multitude; and I will deliver him into thine hand. 
8 And Barak said unto her, If thou wilt go with me, then I will go: but if thou wilt not go with me, then I will not go.
9 And she said, I will surely go with thee: notwithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honour; for the Lord shall sell Sisera into the hand of a woman. And Deborah arose, and went with Barak to Kedesh.

10 ¶And Barak called Zebulun and Naphtali to Kedesh; and he went up with ten thousand men at his feet: and Deborah went up with him.
11 Now Heber the Kenite, which was of the children of Hobab the father in law of Moses, had severed himself from the Kenites, and pitched his tent unto the plain of Zaanaim, which is by Kedesh.
12 And they shewed Sisera that Barak the son of Abinoam was gone up to mount Tabor.
13 And Sisera gathered together all his chariots, even nine hundred chariots of iron, and all the people that were with him, from Harosheth of the Gentiles unto the river of Kishon.
14 And Deborah said unto Barak, Up; for this is the day in which the Lord hath delivered Sisera into thine hand: is not the Lord gone out before thee? So Barak went down from mount Tabor, and ten thousand men after him.
15 And the Lord discomfited Sisera, and all his chariots, and all his host, with the edge of the sword before Barak; so that Sisera lighted down off his chariot, and fled away on his feet.
16 But Barak pursued after the chariots, and after the host, unto Harosheth of the Gentiles: and all the host of Sisera fell upon the edge of the sword; and there was not a man left.
17 Howbeit Sisera fled away on his feet to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite: for there was peace between Jabin the king of Hazor and the house of Heber the Kenite.

18 ¶And Jael went out to meet Sisera, and said unto him, Turn in, my lord, turn in to me; fear not. And when he had turned in unto her into the tent, she covered him with a mantle.
19 And he said unto her, Give me, I pray thee, a little water to drink; for I am thirsty. And she opened a bottle of milk, and gave him drink, and covered him. 
20 Again he said unto her, Stand in the door of the tent, and it shall be, when any man doth come and enquire of thee, and say, Is there any man here? that thou shalt say, No.
21 Then Jael Heber's wife took a nail of the tent, and took an hammer in her hand, and went softly unto him, and smote the nail into his temples, and fastened it into the ground: for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died.
22 And, behold, as Barak pursued Sisera, Jael came out to meet him, and said unto him, Come, and I will shew thee the man whom thou seekest. And when he came into her tent, behold, Sisera lay dead, and the nail was in his temples.
23 So God subdued on that day Jabin the king of Canaan before the children of Israel.
24 And the hand of the children of Israel prospered, and prevailed against Jabin the king of Canaan, until they had destroyed Jabin king of Canaan.

Chapter 5
1 Then sang Deborah and Barak the son of Abinoam on that day, saying,
2 Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel, when the people willingly offered themselves.
3 Hear, O ye kings; give ear, O ye princes; I, even I, will sing unto the Lord; I will sing praise to the Lord God of Israel.
4 Lord, when thou wentest out of Seir, when thou marchedst out of the field of Edom, the earth trembled, and the heavens dropped, the clouds also dropped water.
5 The mountains melted from before the Lord, even that Sinai from before the Lord God of Israel.
6 In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoccupied, and the travellers walked through byways.
7 The inhabitants of the villages ceased, they ceased in Israel, until that I Deborah arose, that I arose a mother in Israel.
8 They chose new gods; then was war in the gates: was there a shield or spear seen among forty thousand in Israel?
9 My heart is toward the governors of Israel, that offered themselves willingly among the people. Bless ye the Lord.
10 Speak, ye that ride on white asses, ye that sit in judgment, and walk by the way.
11 They that are delivered from the noise of archers in the places of drawing water, there shall they rehearse the righteous acts of the Lord, even the righteous acts toward the inhabitants of his villages in Israel: then shall the people of the Lord go down to the gates.
12 Awake, awake, Deborah: awake, awake, utter a song: arise, Barak, and lead thy captivity captive, thou son of Abinoam.
13 Then he made him that remaineth have dominion over the nobles among the people: the Lord made me have dominion over the mighty.
14 Out of Ephraim was there a root of them against Amalek; after thee, Benjamin, among thy people; out of Machir came down governors, and out of Zebulun they that handle the pen of the writer.
15 And the princes of Issachar were with Deborah; even Issachar, and also Barak: he was sent on foot into the valley. For the divisions of Reuben there were great thoughts of heart.
16 Why abodest thou among the sheepfolds, to hear the bleatings of the flocks? For the divisions of Reuben there were great searchings of heart. 
17 Gilead abode beyond Jordan: and why did Dan remain in ships? Asher continued on the sea shore, and abode in his breaches.
18 Zebulun and Naphtali were a people that jeoparded their lives unto the death in the high places of the field.
19 The kings came and fought, then fought the kings of Canaan in Taanach by the waters of Megiddo; they took no gain of money.
20 They fought from heaven; the stars in their courses fought against Sisera.
21 The river of Kishon swept them away, that ancient river, the river Kishon. O my soul, thou hast trodden down strength.
22 Then were the horsehoofs broken by the means of the pransings, the pransings of their mighty ones.
23 Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the Lord, curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof; because they came not to the help of the Lord, to the help of the Lord against the mighty.
24 Blessed above women shall Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite be, blessed shall she be above women in the tent.
25 He asked water, and she gave him milk; she brought forth butter in a lordly dish.
26 She put her hand to the nail, and her right hand to the workmen's hammer; and with the hammer she smote Sisera, she smote off his head, when she had pierced and stricken through his temples.
27 At her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down: at her feet he bowed, he fell: where he bowed, there he fell down dead.
28 The mother of Sisera looked out at a window, and cried through the lattice, Why is his chariot so long in coming? why tarry the wheels of his chariots? 
29 Her wise ladies answered her, yea, she returned answer to herself,
30 Have they not sped? have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two; to Sisera a prey of divers colours, a prey of divers colours of needlework, of divers colours of needlework on both sides, meet for the necks of them that take the spoil?
31 So let all thine enemies perish, O Lord: but let them that love him be as the sun when he goeth forth in his might. And the land had rest forty years.



NOTICE: Those of Faith and Wisdom as myself and all are not naive. We do indeed implicate those of that underground murderous governments associations - the traitors of America directly involved in conspiracy and actions in this assassination - indeed were the birth at point of conception and implement and are hope and foundation of those within opposed to America and Faith that arose as a kingdom within commonly known as 7th Kingdom as the W*H*O*R*E of Babylon. These are they attempting Dominion at the cost of this entire history and its people. They have only flourished against the panicked majority public believing rather in conspiracy and Nation - only flourished in evil abusing the official findings of the U.S. Government, turning the secluded findings and opinions as protection of the public and adding National Security causes - turning them to their favor by advancing all disinformation and misinformation attempting to keep complete mistrust by the American Public in their Government and attempting to strike fear against all those of Courage who would continue and those who would engage Public Service by subsequent assassinations of MLK and RFK.

Note.... At best this Judgement can only be viewed as "hind sight is always 20-20" - and is only as a draft or brief in lieu of full Sermon and comprehensive inclusive text.

AS APPERTAINS....

FROM THE SCRIPTURES .....
BOOK OF ACTS - CHAPTER 17
22 ¶Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.
23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.
24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: 


IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT MY OPINION AND JUDGEMNENT AND FAITH AND RELIGIOUS REPORT - I ASK YOU TO THEN ACCEPT THE COUNSEL AND CHALLENGE FROM ONE OF OUR MOST FAMOUS LEADERS, PRESIDENT RONALD WILSON REAGAN UNDERSCORING AND UNDERLINING ALL THESE HERE  ----- PLAY/LISTEN/OBSERVE/ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE

Ronald Reagan on JFK assassination conspiracy theory
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYxvLf8P3Hk>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P_k2qGadFU>

PRESIDENT REAGAN IS ALLUDING TO A USSR CITIZEN OF WEALTH DECEPTIVELY ON SURFACE POSED AS A KGB (AGENCY HIT) CONTRACT AGENT SUCH AS AN EQUIVALENT AS THE CLAY SHAW IN USA AS A CIA CONTRACT AGENT....

Frank Sturgis
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xax_NbArKT4>

Welcome to National Security.

Prolouge - Epilouge  

With the 50 year review - up to 2 years for me - making a dilligent, sober, mature, effort of truth seeking of all things available and peronal inputs added, I would like to add these notes. Being truthful and honest assuages much and virtually all the finger pointing at the U.S. Government, even at Vice President / President L.B. Johnson ! The audacity ! Being fair in any way, there was the initial complete suspicions of most and growing numbers after the release of the Warren Report.

There were intelligent responses that raised questions to say the least. Going on into this vigilante lynch mob mentality ongoing of that snowballing effect of "the whole governmnet is in on it" was more dissatisfaction with the absense of some open Public Trial in some way - where all could be publicly addressed as opposed to that seemingly private inquest by the Governmnet not including the Public - with total outrage stemming from the "locked up for 75 years" crapola they did hand the Public. This they brought on themselves, and was the greatest part of all Public suspicion and greatest cause of all disbelief and loss of trust. The President and Congress and the Warren Commission are the ones guilty as cause of these and no one else. How was it legal ? Especially in the JFK assassination ? Why was there ANYTHING to hide by locking it up for 75 years that all living would be presumed dead then that were alive now and "involved", not "hurting" the living" as the 75 year time choice for seal ! 

However, years and years and more and more Researchers and more and more questions raised, and more and more public involving in study, there seems a REAL deficit of genuine pursuit of truth by researchers to conclusions with facts in summation. They seem more to have a tattle tale type result when simply raising more and more "new evidences" and new questions and "new facts" and so on - as seemingly just piling up more and more "unanswered questions", making their mostly valid points that would have more weight in a legal trial then simply researcher comments and questions and finger pointing as to raise Public awareness and involvement. Involvement into what, is the point.

That was and is the point with researchers et al. They were appreciated originally, very early on in those days after the JFK assassination in the 1960s going into the 1970s - and even more so and a second look after the assassinations of Rev. Dr. Martin L. King and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. Along about the time of the Garrison investigation things were starting to head the other way as starting point perhaps in a large scale. Public suspicions were now agreeing with the Warren Commission members and others in Government that "official" Researchers may be simply profiteers as self serving and greedy wealth seeking individuals taking advantage of the Public by simply doing a little homework and find seeming wholes and then exploit them into the whole lynch mob attitude again of "cover up" to end as forlorning the Public from action by throwing up the hands and give into it "will never be solved" attitudes with all their continual pointing at termed "questionable" Warren Report findings or lack of therein. This is the negative effect advanced as aiding what they claimed they were against.

At some point in American History in the future it may all look like a piece of cake solved as a 90 to 99 percent probability of actual truth of what really happened taught from History books in school. I am in the new approach now after two years into this to ask if Researchers are there to help or hinder. This must be looked at and examined I feel and necessary for the Public to come to true conclusion beyond the shadow of a doubt. Now remember, the warren Report never claimed their findings were absolute. The CLEARLY said they were not ruling out the possibility of conspiracy and even international involvement or others. They CLEARLY said they could not find EVIDENCE OTHER THAN the Oswald Evidence in the shootings to support that outside of conjecture and suspicions and rumours etc. which is worthless in evensimply getting Probable Cause for any Warrant for persons or evidence. CLEARLY it was said and known that the murder case could be opened ANYTIME in Dallas TX (jurisdiction by law at time) with Sufficient Cause to do so. EVIDENCE and/or WITNESSES must be produced we all know rationally for the murder case to be re-opened - NOT conjecture, suspicions, theories etc.

I do not know of ANY Researcher killed while trying to re-open the case simply because they NEVER did that with the possible exception of the James Files episode. So again my point and even, I am sorry to say with Mark Lane even, the Researchers and all need a second look as the only fruit of their labors seem to have been profit and fame or profit and infamy. This unfortunately has been the responses many times and many places about them by the Government and others and those involved in the Warren Commission. Now in reality, Mark Lane has had the unique posistion of hired as Assistance of Counsel for Lee Harvey Oswald and has done so very well. Sure originally it was some "ACLU creep in cahoots with that dirty little commie rat as a communist sympathizer" type mentality and first impression from the American Public - like who the hell would back Lee Oswald, believing initially he was the killer caught ? But Mark Lane has had the that unique posistion with which WOULD have been Public Trial and may have no doubt had in public, or behind closed doors for some aspects, most or ALL that was "sealed for 75 years from the Public" in Trial. THIS may have actually opened a real investigation rather than what did occurr - but he was denied too. Why is being answered here.

The Public and all Researchers will have to look again at all but with a prospective from our own Government as in a National Security mode. The Youth of the 1960s are now of age as older being of the age of President Johnson and older members in Congress at the time, being in their 50s and 60s and even 70s now rather then their ripeness of young 20s and younger and even a little older in their 30s. They can now see things as perhaps they would through the eyes of their Grand Parents in 1963 as meaning the ages of the mature President and others involved in Congress and Commission and Armed Services and other. Their is more wisdom with age, simply if not just by experience of life. Persons older, more mature and experienced, are going to know more and have that much more experience and benefit of trial and error and education etc. and have greater wisdom. This applies to so much in life and it applies to those of age and posistion there in charge in 1963 in Government. Alternatively, those more expereienced can also more easily apply sleight of hand for devious purposes.

I believe what they saw is what is locked away. Obviously now, we are seeing what happened. They saw international involvement. They saw internal treason. They may have perceived or actually saw some "doctored evidence". It does not make sense that internally they would hire out to international agency but rather the other way around. This was Jack Kennedy. This was America who just backed down the Soviet Union short of War and/or Nuclear war. Jack ran a tight ship and those under him. No doubt they were well aware of virtually all that Researchers and the Public have pointed to. I don't believe much was added that was presumed missed. I believe they saw everything we believe they did not or assumed was "covered up" criminally. The mode of National Security was obviously in play. Reports of everything were being made as it was for moments as a "chicken with its head cut off". All involved - the good guys - were frantically ascertaining what just happened and reporting all and you better believe it. I know they left no stone unturned and did find in the least suspects pointing to the conspiracy involved and resultant evidence tampering. The imminent Jack Ruby surprise of shooting Oswald in plain sight only added to more intensity upon Dallas authority.

So understandbly, we hold them even criminally responsible as technically accessory-after-the-fact in the least by the sealing of evidence under the excuses made in today's standard, but as through it all, but particularly at the Autopsy and other critical points as such - we must in these occasions re-view our own Government involvement from the perspective they were NOT engaging criminal cover up but in the interest of let's just say that ugly word National Security as a cover all blanket was THEIR INTENTS even innocently if you will - meaning in their minds they were acting responsibly for Protection of the Public. That was THEIR WISDOM for the moment, for the tradgedy, for all history. I say we MUST respect that even disagreeing. It was a JUDGMENT CALL and they made it for us. It is history. To this day they refuse adamantly to back off it - or to say to their dying days. Though much has been done ending the Cold War including President Reagan's famous re-visit to the Berlin Wall, apparently our Governmnet still feels it can not reveal secrets as would obviously threaten the American Public. Paranoid ? Probably. But remember THEIR GENERATION. These were World War Two Veterans and even One. They were SICK OF WAR and wanted NO MORE ! If it could be avoided, that they did. They were our fathers and grandfathers - being their first children during and after World War Two. We understood them and their feelings and their War Stories experiences. The World War was horrible and how many millions died before (Stalin), during, and how many after (Korean War) ! Considering almost immediately after, their Viet Nam engagement, they could only have feared War with the USSR on that grand of a scale. We know who then is guilty internationally as locked up for 75 years by them.

Whether you want to accept it or not - they chose the 75 year figure specifically on this wise..... the youngest entry to U.S. Government is 25 years old for the House of Representatives of Congress, 30 for Senate and 35 for Presidency.
You add 25 to the 75 year "seal" and you get 100 years old HERE --->

SECRET REVEALED ....
ISAIAH Chapter 65
18 But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.
19 And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.
20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

AND ....
LUKE Chapter 16
8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.

Virtually all of the American Government, meaning the Presidency and Congress and Supreme Court, are and historically Persons of Faith.
WHAT WAS IMPLIED IS WHEN AMERICA IS OLD ENOUGH - WHEN YOU ARE AS OLD AS THE EVIL BEING A HUNDRED YEARS OLD, A FULL GROWN IN KNOWLEDGE - AND MATURE ENOUGH AND WISE ENOUGH IN THE WORD AS CHRISTIANS TO PROSECUTE THEY WILL AND NOT BEFORE THEN WILL THEY BE ALLOWED ! YOU WILL HAVE TO BE OF AGE IN THE PROMISED AGE OF VICTORY TO DEFEAT THEM, PERIOD, AND NOT UNTIL THEN. REMEMBER IN THE OLIVER STONE MOVIE WITH GARRISON ACTOR SAYING "YOUR GOVERNMNET WON'T ALLOW YOU TO SEE THE EVIDENCE BECAUSE THEY SAY YOU ARE NOT OLD ENOUGH...." (almost verbatim). Sound familiar ?

REVEALED....
So we now know that our Government as much as it has been critisized and suspected and even cursed have indeed already SOLVED THE CASE. THEY WERE THAT GOOD IN THEIR INVESTIGATION. THEY INVESTIGATED AND HAVE NAMED WHO IS NOW CALLED THE BEAST666 WHO WAS AT THAT TIME THE 6TH KING AS HEAD OF RED COMMUNISM (EXPLAINED IN MY POSTED BIBLE STUDIES) - THE EIGHTH (BEAST666) WHO IS OF THE SEVEN - THE 6TH AS THE SOLE PERSON WHO ORDERED AND FINANCED THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY AND WAS ON THE GRASSY KNOLL AS THE "BLACK DOG MAN" WHO FIRED THE EXPLODING TIPPED ROUND AS SECOND SHOT OF THE SIMULTANEOUS THREE SHOTS STRIKING THE PRESIDENT'S HEAD AND POSED AS A KGB CONTRACTED AGENT BEING A NOBLEMAN.

HERE IS HIS PICTURE JUST BEFORE FIRING THAT SHOT.....
SCREENSHOTS
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=18;image
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=165.0;attach=20;image
SOURCE
MY FORUM
JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion)
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,165.0.html

I believe President Johnson went on with "Containment Policy" of Communist Expansion into South Viet Nam with the view as "if we defeated Communism in South Viet Nam we have beaten them in Moscow" (USSR Capital).

Fingers gave pointed at President Johnson as the head of the contract. Fingers have pointed at the CIA. Fingers have pointed at the "Military Industrial Complex". Fingers have pointed at those of our Government involved against Fidel Castro, Communist head of Cuba. Fingers have pointed at more more more including the Presidents Bush and on and on to Oil Billionares and so on. All those of our Government they pointed fingers at are those who have been there under Presidents Truman and Eisenhower and Kennedy and well trained and trusted. It is disgusting they have behaved in this manner and unfounded liblous accusations of many inciting the public apparently as profiteers just for a buck as was originally their descriptions by our Government and I was one of their followers many years ago as believeing they stumbled onto truths but all too naive as being too young and not doing my own homework but relying on theirs. A simple look at obvious evidence reveals how full of it they were. All they do is fill books and now the internet with nothing but pointing at unknowns giving to speculation and invite any conjecture other than the simple amount of culprits involved and where EXACTLY. They take the public into the void outer space in the mind if you allow them to. It invites scrutiny as to whether they intend this as being "communist symathizers" against America as was called back then, trying to poisen as many minds as they can to keep them from pursuing the truth. John Lennon of the Beatles gave a name ' "Mind Guerillas" playing "Mind Games". That is the concise point, making anyone their mark for a buck. Profiteers ! Disgusting against such a one who was Martyred and those after Him ! There are that handful who are deemed as genuinely involved and trying to educate the public (ironically as was requested ! ) to someday bring to a head some final Public Trial fair and open with all holds barred. They are deeemed sincerely interested in Closure as solving this once and for all. They know who they are and so do we. Beyond them as "Official Researchers" there have been a handful more who have contributed. History will show these have been "America's Heroes" in the JFK Case Solved. God Bless them and their works. The night is far spent and let us all live in their examples of walking in the light of day - the truth.

We kept looking and have found the Good Man of the House. God Bless Them !

THE GUILTY
There are the few areas we see the guilty and his traitors in America.....

# The few of the Dallas PD
# Oswald and Ruby
# The one or few involved in the Zabruder Film manipulation
# Those of the Secret Service involved in Parade Route Security and theft and handling of the body of President JFK
# The Autopsy I virtually entirely write off to our own Government and National Security Policy in review and retrospect as receiving the Pesident's body with virtually his entire brain matter missing when leaving Parkland Hospital with only about one third blown away.
(Investigation had to reveal Secret Service involvement in tracing this back to Parkland - all who saw and handled. This left only those of the Secret Service only during the swearing in of President Johnson. This obviously was to destroy and plant evidence they knew would be damning. I believe the entire affair of sending "doctored" pictures and drawings to the Warren Commission was QUITE INTENTIONAL by our U.S. Government as National Security Policy. No doubt the Warren Commission Members ONLY were sworn to Secrecy concerning this and why what had to be hid. This would stop investigation further into matters and that hand into the investigation across the board shows by them anywhere as simply nudging and butting others off the trail in the certain areas. I am sure this spread to other key investigators and possibly into certain subpeonas and probably ones the Public is not allowed to know about as there can NOT be any doubt that our immediate Governement was well aware that JFK was not murdered or assassinated byt rather was EXECUTED as what we call today a state-sanctioned hit. THIS is what they were secretly operating on in investigation in National Security mode with all concerned. THIS is the hand "hiding" things in investigation anywhere it appears. )

REMEMBER THEIR EXACT WORDS (shown above in context - previous post)
"....It is my understanding now as a result of that publication many years ago and subsequent release by the National Archives that only a small percentage of the documents generated by the Warren Commission is not available for public examination. It has been suggested that in fact about 2 percent of those materials are not in the Public Domain. Those that have been withheld include the Autopsy photographs and X-rays, certain confidential investigative sources and informants, certain facts and procedures relating to Presidential protection, and fully investigated allegations of complicity that raised questions to privacy. ...."

P.S. Actually I think Mark Lane should be made United States Attorney General ! That good.

The point I hope is received that I never heard mentioned is the honest point here, and you will give our Government due respect and honor, is as they say in street talk or ruff speech --- "The United States Government and President were on this like white on rice ! ! ! "

Now you may know what LBJ meant when he said "I think we got our man ! ". He wasn't talking about Oswald.

You better believe it, case solved and case closed. Happy Holidays ! It is Christmas 2012 - the last one before the JFK 50th Anniversary.

50th Anniversary in Dallas, Black Op Radio #610   
 
Black Op Radio #610
Published on Dec 26, 2012
Pete Johnson from Occupy The Grassy Knoll - www.occupythegrassyknoll.org
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2i1treknLY> 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2i1treknLY

The great Poem by Walt Whitman read in our schools......

O Captain! My Captain!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_Captain!_My_Captain!

O Captain! My Captain!

O Captain! My Captain! our fearful trip is done;
The ship has weather'd every rack, the prize we sought is won;
The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
While follow eyes the steady keel, the vessel grim and daring:

But O heart! heart! heart!
O the bleeding drops of red,
Where on the deck my Captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead. 

O Captain! my Captain! rise up and hear the bells;
Rise up—for you the flag is flung—for you the bugle trills;
For you bouquets and ribbon'd wreaths—for you the shores a-crowding;
For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning;

O captain! dear father!
This arm beneath your head;
It is some dream that on the deck,
You've fallen cold and dead. 

My Captain does not answer, his lips are pale and still;
My father does not feel my arm, he has no pulse nor will;
The ship is anchor'd safe and sound, its voyage closed and done;
From fearful trip, the victor ship, comes in with object won;

Exult, O shores, and ring, O bells!
But I, with mournful tread,
Walk the deck my captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead.

HOW THE RFK ASSASSINATION IS EXTENSION OF THE JFK ASSASSINATION - AND RELIGIOUS EXTENSION OF ALL PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED (BIBLE STUDIES POSTED)

In observing all previously posted about the JFK asassination and religious Studies posted as reference and truth, we find this extends into the subsequent RFK assassination. "You know a tree by it's fruit" applies. This means the technique employed by he (head of 6th kingdom) who ordered the assassination of JFK as a somewhat 'counter intelligence' type of operation as planting of evidence and blame theme, and patsy cover story, etc. Here in the RFK assassination, Sirhan Sirhan is the new patsy and cover story. Naturally they understood any investigation, of course as there would be, would reveal Thane Eugene Cesar would be assumed the actual assassin - the "rent a cop" moving directly behind RFK at the time, and armed. Virtually all evidence did point directly at him as the actual assassin of RFK (head wound). SEE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

Thane Eugene Cesar was openly in interview as a racist by comments and despised RFK policy etc. and Democratic Party.
PLEASE VIEW YOU TUBE ---->
Title: RFK Assassination: Multiple Shooters
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llo0WMJ94eo>

And here we are again.... the patsy - set up as shooter is Sirhan Sirhan that was not the real assassin. He is reported preliminarily as a Jordanian and Palestinian and as well Iran was mentioned in others. Mid East ties in other words as "cover story" for "cause" and is out for the public in the similar furor of the JFK and Oswald events. The "cover story" goes worldwide to hush up the true assassin, plot, and cause - as happened with Lee Harvey Oswald.

So religiously as the same technique as the JFK assassination - the 6th King in power (Book Of revelation, Holy Bible) ordering the RFK assassination (and MLK) puts the blame finger (as a counter intelligence type maneuver used in JFK assassination) again pointing to the 7th King (American) as the one ordering the assassination in investigation most likely finding the apparent white rascist of those lines of theories and rumours flying around the JFK assassination as the ACTUAL assassin. The original theories and/or suspicions with JFK's murder where towards the Cuban involvements and American personnel and Communist hating old south Republicans etc. - those lines. Specifically then, Thane Eugene Cesar was a perfect candidate it appears to be found as assassin (but in "national security" type hidden investigation again) - only this time intentionally - as was never the mode or intention in the JFK assassination [to discover the actual real shooter(s) ] because the actual multiple assassins and conspiracy where being concealed by the Oswald cover story as the "lone assassin nut" - no conspiracy.... and of course the cover story there was along the lines Oswald was an American traitor with Communist loyalty in some fashion - but not forgetting that the 6th King (Red Communism, underground world head) was planting that the American 7th King planted him to put blame on the USSR and Red Communism as the 7th king hope to not get caught... "counter intelligence" technique employed in all things. 

(For the MLK tie in SEE the Dr. Pepper mentioned previously and explanation ! )

The presumption in America and world is hoped by the 6th King (Underground head of Red Communism - see Bible studoes posted) to be that the 7th King has taken power in America by the JFK, MLK, and RFK assassinations - all but eliminating the competition (Christian and humane leadership powers) through assassination and public fear in America, and worldwide by these assassinations and other murders such as JFK witnesses etc. etc. Now, all rumours and anything going public in some manner as leaks etc. along the lines there were multiple shooters is supposed to be nothing but more crazy Kennedy theories again and dismissed worldwide as America is hitting the roof in pulic hysteria and panic and wild rumour etc.

In short, if you are not getting it, the entire wedge driven into the American heart causing panic and rumour and public hysteria over these multiple assassinations again and again - as desired by the 6th king intentionally - is having America believe or suspect there is an "internal coup detat" going on - and the "7th king did it" scenario as the notable '"counter intelligence planting technique" blame game for the actual REAL American National Security investigation occurring - to baffle their minds in fear, uncertainty, and doubt to escape actual prosecution.


PLEASE VIEW YOU TUBE --->
Title: sirhan sirhan Are The comments correct was there a second shooter ?
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZpLxcplJuI>

About at 16:30 (mins/secs), his explanation of his sudden reversal in feelings and now contempt for RFK and explanation of his position after RFK supported the 50 jets aid to Israel - which Sirhan believed would be used against his people and homeland called Palestine for basically, assumed (by him), what would he seemed to term proable war atrocities, or simply slaughter of Palestinians. He claims, previously RFK was as a hero and world champion to him for his leadership for the "underdogs" - economic and otherwise - to be remedied in some fashion.

In any irony, he is prestating approxiamately the entire causes of modern day extinct Bin Laden of the extremist terrorism type activity - here what would be a political assassination of a world leader to be according to popularity and projected vote. Of course, there was the PLO in those days and that did commit acts of terrorism such as the Munich Massacre at the World Olympics.

What is very, very, very notable in the Holy Bible (Authorized King James Holy Bible - Christian Bible) is that Palestine has been extinct for thousands of years and there is no such thing. This has been posted with full detailed history and explanation in this Bible Study posted....

Study: Who are the Palestinians ?
http://churchphilaforums.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,31.0.html

In short, diligent search in the Scriptures reveal they are the modern day Phillistines actually.

Is this that verse Sirhan refers to pre-emptively to Bin Laden in the extremist vein of victory showing a Palestinian inclusion ? .....

Isaiah 11:14
King James Version (KJV)
14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west; .....

The betrayal Sirhan mentioned he felt of RFK ?

Or is this the actual part of the cover story - reading between the lines - that these (JFK, MLK, RFK) and who they represent as the American majority and all Christianity in America as now finally being defeated to fulfill a world dominion scenario by the 6th Red Communist underground king in that no one will have the guts to ever run for President or Congress to initiate retaliation and prosecution without total fear of "die trying" ? Heard of David and Goliath right ?

Don't forget the OTHER counter intelligence game he played as ALWAYS blaming the Mid East "false prophet" - the " lamb with two horns " (two princes) -leaving their calling card on the assassinations ...... all posted previously. MORE of the attempt to baffle REAL American Investigation to escape prosecution.

B I N G O !
You have just understood hopefully the entire 60's Revolution by the American Youth etc..... "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf" to coin a phrase. We were NOT intimidated and perceived an evil, evil, evil power that was to be met and succeeded. Granted, there simply was not enough knowledge, knowledge of God, to secure victory and fell short to another day.
You can do a micro sum up of this in two songs of the era with the Dylan / Hendrix song "All Along the Watch Tower" and the term "barefoot servants too (sultans)".

Song of Solomon 7
King James Version (KJV)
1 How beautiful are thy feet with shoes,...

And move to "Sultans of Swing" Dire Straits .

(This refers to the Ten Kingdoms and what that meant. Barefoot - "no kingdom yet" but "one hour with the beast".

Isaiah 14:2
King James Version (KJV)
2 And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of the Lord for servants and handmaids: and they shall take them captives, whose captives they were; and they shall rule over their oppressors.

Isaiah 10:20
King James Version (KJV)
20 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him [devil, beast666] that smote them; but shall stay upon the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, in truth.

===

RFK - Final Journey (movie footage)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4vJxi9Kis>

Robert Kennedy Funeral Train Pics
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSpJfVlfQrE>

Robert F Kennedy's emotional final journey to Washington from New York by Train.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mems0eRzgOk>

I was there in Philadelphia Suburbs with my father and others and was packed up and down the train stations all along the route, I think it was Folcroft Station (maybe Glenolden by name). I will never forget it and Hands Across America (Reagan times) reminded me of that. I remember vividly everyone watching and waiting and suddenly the train comes along. But it was just an engine and caboose and everyone did the gasp, and we were all mentioning they sent out a lead engine probably sweeping for bombs along the route because Ted was onboard. Finally it came. Could barely see the flag draped casket. We all saw Ted standing on the back platform of the car looking at everyone. I will never forget it and today there is now a you tube or two showing it. That night stopped America cold when Bobby was on the floor. Pure insanity.. how how how. why why why. no no no.

Sequester: Dallas County D. A. Henry Wade et al

ORIGINAL POST:
Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade sequester
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,236.0.html

UPDATE CONCERNING TRIAL AND LEGAL STANDING....

Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade sequester
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,236.0.html

In a simple brief lifetime review of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade (JFK, Oswald, Ruby) in the article below, it is VERY CLEAR about the reputation of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade - not the legacy wished - that aligns D.A. Wade in any realm of the legal instrument of "impingement" http://www.thefreedictionary.com/impinge (as with evidence) as to set aside ALL involvement with the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy, and this includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events.

ARTICLE REVIEW (READ)
NBC NEWS ARTICLE:
DALLAS — As district attorney of Dallas for an unprecedented 36 ye
19 convictions undone in Dallas - US news - Crime & courts | NBC ...
www.nbcnews.com/id/25917791/
After Dallas DA’s death, 19 convictions undone
Most cases involved black defendants; some praise preservation of DNA
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/25917791/

Henry Wade
(Dallas County District Attorney - JFK, Oswald, Ruby)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wade


However appropriately worded and invoked, should lay to the side as sequestered (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sequester) ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him, involved. This concludes that jurisdiction over the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events) CAN NOT be relied on or accepted and NOT jurisdiction of the investigation. This means ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him is in review for investigation.

It is plain and evident that in these areas historically resulted in actual Civil War to secure Due Process of Law under the United States Constitution as Law of the Land. In other words, ANY public and fair trial did not even exist until victory - and then necessarily adding so many laws to enforce Liberty and Justice for over 100 years. This is not even mentioning Jury. It is mentioning simple basic Bill of Rights Law.

And so district authority is removed in the cases, and in place the remedy by Law as to whether Federal necessary upon inquest. What applies.... "...which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..." .....

The Bill of Rights and Other Amendments - U.S. Constitution
http://usconstitution.com/bill-of-rights
(Bill of Rights)
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Ironically, this is as well a basis for Atty. Mark Lane who agreed with Mrs. Oswald to defend Lee Harvey Oswald before the Warren Commission, as is the Rights of ALL Americans as Due Process of Law. 

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Again, district authority is removed in the cases is apparent until.....

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 25
3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)

ORIGINAL LAW states....
"....until the Disability be removed...."

This is extended as inference to ALL positions of Government - Federal, State, Local, other - and certainly applies to ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him in the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events). In the least is saying a review is in order. In the least is saying to reopen the case in that jurisdiction requires these such events of impingement and sequestration. Much as US Courts of Appeals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals) sat to hear Appeals for the Supreme Court, whether valid to proceed, there must be a similar Judicial authority in place of the Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him involved AS WELL AS EXTENDS to the Presidential Commission as the Warren Report and its validity or even jurisdiction or to be itself sequestered as impingement itself to the case(s). 

Of course I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning NO intervention by ANY body of Law or Judicial has ANY legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not.....

Article III
Section 2.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.


And so apparently "politics, the science of spin city" has turned the Law as "the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" somehow now means they have the right by and with "such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make" - has turned the Law into being unlawfully interpreted as meaning these have the right to judge what appeal the Supreme Court will accept to hear, with their bullcrap excuses and reasons for the others they decide not to hear. This IS denial of Due Process. The Law, "...the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" is defining the role, authority, and power of the Supreme Court in the United States as being the appeal receiver from LOWER COURTS to rule on it, as these Justices are to be our best as understanding our Law. It is defining them NOT as having some despot power or all power in all court and Law of the Land and so on. It defines them as NOT having some tyrannical posistion, but is defining them rather as a last resort in America per Appeal in hearing a case that seems to be above understanding of posistion, or some unlafwfullness in fact or witness etc etc etc. - in hearing in lower courts. THIS the Founding Fathers made Law of the Land by and with Americans so that for any nefarious (dark) reason a lower court could not wrongfully and illegally put Americans to hurt with some political view and interpretation of the Law as convenient to serve their means against someone. ALL Americans have the Right Of Appeal in the United States. In less terms, there is NO attachment to the Right of Appeal in America - period.

I site the foundation by Imminent Domain (and as upheld by God) as to the interpretation of Law as precedent being the Declaration of Independence being cause and reason for the institution of the United States Constitution.... "transient causes"...

"IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance....."

Need I say more about Chief Justice William Howard Taft ?

THE UNLAWFUL CHANGE...
This is unconstitutional in my opinion and anyone American or sane....
"....The right of automatic appeal for most types of decisions of a court of appeals was ended by an Act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1925. This law was urged by Chief Justice William Howard Taft, and it also reorganized many other things in the federal court system. ...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals

Again, I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning NO intervention by ANY body of Law or Judicial has ANY legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not hear. That is denial of due process of the law - appellate jurisdiction as Law of the Land, period. As well this means NO one has any right to determine "validity" or 'grounds" for any appeal. THE APPEAL is heard by the higher court and NO ONE ELSE for ANY reason. Obviously the court being appealed against is in conflict of the law or as a "hostile witness" and etc etc etc. Under appellate jurisdiction, how could those (or any, for that matter) possibly be considered as "hearing grounds for appeal" - particularly after they had just made ruling in a case. As Judge in other words, they are being called inferior or wrong or dishonest in an appeal to a higher court. How can that give ruling in the same case then ? Is not that the evidence and defendant being "tried twice" - "twice put in jeopardy" which is ILLEGAL in the United States. THE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL LEGALLY IN AMERICA MEANS ANYONE WHO REQUESTS IT - PERIOD. If in the higher court it is determined this was other than realistic and genuine as superfluous (a joke) etc - then that party is to be charged with that. What lawyer in other words would go to jail and lose practice over some bad defendant trying to buy time with an appeal against a sentence etc, or pulling a prank for spite, or trying simply to remain in a less secure local prison to attempt escape while waiting for hearing ? 

Bottom Line ? Dallas - apparently you're out until such time as you are in !

========================= OCTOBER 2013=============

BELOW HERE I AM ADDING ANY STICKIES NOTES IN SUPPORT OF VARIOUS POINTS MADE OR MENTIONED.

ANY ADD ON DISCOVERIES.

CONCERNING POSSIBLE NATIONAL SECURITY AS OPPOSED TO COVER UP.....

From the Autopsy....
Lt. Colonel Pierre A. FINCK, MC, USA
Chief, Military Environmental Pathology Division &
Chief, Wound Ballistics Pathology Branch
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Washington, DC 20305

SUBJECT: Personal notes on the Assassination of President Kennedy.

TO: Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA
The Director
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Washington, DC 20305

IN FULL / SOURCE:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/finck1.htm

We find here the notes statement from Lt. Colonel Pierre A. FINCK, MC, USA the following....

"2. Before the "Warren Report" was published, in September 1964, I received Directives by telephone, from the White House, through your Office and through the Naval Medical School in Bethesda, not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report. "

Receives instructions/orders ("Directives") -- "not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report" from:
# the White House
# through your Office (Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA)
# and through the Naval Medical School in Bethesda

-----SO, with all the research about who dunnnit and who was involved in all, certainly researchers must include these persons as directly ordering "cover up" as the "Directives" ordering not to say anything but what is given to and then published in the Warren Report later. I have not yet seen that concerning Brig. Gen.. J.M. Blumberg, MC, USA and wondering why looking at this 'smoking gun'. Surely this means they knew in advance that what was going to be published in the Warren Report was going to be absolutely a "censored" version of the facts, or limited version - not all. So cover up? We are looking at it. 

NOTICE he says... "Before the "Warren Report" was published..... I received Directives.....not to discuss Subject autopsy beyond the contents of the Warren Report."
NOW plainly it can be seen that he (Finck) has knowledge of what ONLY is going to be given to the Warren Report that was to be published later, and they (the above issuing "Directives") knew that in advance of that as well. You might say simply the Military Officers in charge simply gave orders not to discuss and made them take an oath. That is NOT what Finck said.

As I said --- put on the thinking cap as being in the Gov and operating in National Security Mode. Surely they would not want the guilty to know what they knew. The release of the Warren Report certainly makes them appear in part or all as also involved in a cover up. Is not that what they would want to appear as involved in a major sting operation? The guilty of the conspiracy might or not be scratching their heads at this, the Warren Report (autopsy photos,drawings incomplete), saying to themselves, "Well gosh darn, they dun got the autopsy room in on it too. No chance of getting caught for anything. That be one dang blaster of a payroll." .... giving them a false confidence as they would be spied on for months and months while National Security Mode tried to track the entire conspiracy back to its origin with their compiling list of possible/proabale Conspirators within the U.S. .

As I concluded as my "solved" , I believe this document mentioned is the "smoking gun" among many that show, even prove, there was no cover up by criminal activity - but rather the United States Government was in national Security Mode measures for the obvious reasons that they knew there had been a "state sanctioned" type execution assassination occurred and was facilitated by traitors with in the Gov in key positions including the Secret Service, that evidence tampering indeed had occurred before reaching autopsy, and that the scope of the conspiracy within as well as extending internationally (those of the USSR) could not be immediately ascertained. It would take a major secret investigation that could not be easily put together as the "wall had ears". Slowly but surely, the beginning was with the Presidential Commission (Warren Report) as direct evidence gathering and investigation - the innocent had to wade through any found guilty and with extended investigation of any guilty found as who they were involved with and to what extent.

In the end I suppose the last sealed evidence should contain the actual list of the proven and suspected assassin conspirators. It is apparent the sources lead back to the USSR persons employing the American traitors and the Gov yielding prosecution due to the Cold War could have easily escalated to the hot war of nuclear exchange. This does not explain or dismiss them for not rounding up the alleged guilty per investigation of the Americans involved, and I do not believe you will find any Americans who would dismiss not arresting those of America internally who were by probable cause deemed guilty and per trial, and upon arrests bring the horrific charges horrifying America that could include a list of American Gov personnel such as the Secret Service and possible FBI and CIA agency involvement and Military officers. The most horrific is announcing the President's brain had been disposed of en route to Bethesda as part of their evidence tampering. Those involved in the selling of the Atomic Secrets to the enemy were publicly hanged after trial.
SEE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_spies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg


Conspiracy includes Affimation (Non Sworn Testimony / No Statement) as being guilty  - remaining silent and not coming forth if one knew about a conspiracy and those in it. In other words if three persons in a car go to rob a bank after discussing it, and the one says "I will wait in the car for you" and does not participate yet rides off with them to a place where the two robbers split the money and they all went their way and the third never says anything - then that person is guilty of conspiracy before and after the fact to rob the bank. The same, if there were others at the place where the robbers split up the money telling them, others, they just robbed the bank - and these others never came forward to the police to report it - these are guilty of the conspiracy after the fact as well.

They should have arrested all with probable cause of guilt and held them in a Military Trial since it was Gov members and the Commander In Chief. It seems quite possible they could have arranged this without any opposition from America when leaking some of the details of their involvement.

Discovery, Commission Members Deny Oswald Legal Representation - "Or, Another Smoking Gun that National Security Mode was/is Applied".

The Oswald Case: Mark Lane's Testimony To The Warren Commission
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbUV3iS1k8>

That you tube link above is the reading of transcript by Atty. Mark Lane to the Warren Commission. It is about one and a half hours. You should have a good understanding of American Constitutional Law to hear all and understand. You can listen along and understand.

I have listened to all. I have discovered just now towards the conclusion, a few things. I do not believe Mark knows he insulted the Commission Members - depending on who he was referring to as "Prosecution". However, this is as a petition at and to the Commission to dismiss the President of the American Bar Association appointed as Representative for Lee Harvey Oswald and appoint him (Atty. Mark Lane) as Representation, and of course was hired by Oswald's mother. 

Mark has made a most fascinating petition and request alive to the Commission, most outstandingly with the existential evidences concerning Oswald. His attack vector was that Prosecution choosing Jury and Representation of Defendant as inequality. That is almost laughable in the Supreme Court. I am sure as most American Attorneys he has served as Public Defender. In cases whereby a Public Defender was appointed to a Defendant, Prosecution does indeed choose - with Defense - the Jurors. BUT Mark was saying it is not equality or due process that Prosecution choose Representation as well.

I believe he is referring to the Commission itself as Prosecution. Now the Commission got its power from Congress which was appointing the Commission as "Prosecution". As such, the Commission DID NOT HAVE the power to Appoint Representation for Oswald, but appointed the President of the American Bar Association anyway. THAT is the inequality Mark may have been referring to, must have been. And again, Defendant survivors did indeed afford representation - Atty. Mark Lane. I will add if unsaid then, the DISCOVERY here in research is that the Commission Members DENIED Lee Harvey Oswald Due Process of Law to Legal Representation by THEIR appointment - and the Commission can be brought up on this and a NEW Commission established with lawful COMPLIANCE to the US Congress. In other words Congress and the President are acting as Ruling Judge, dismissing Dallas and Texas jurisdictions in the cases, and the Commission Members acted inappropriately.

Now this brings in the whole ball of wax, and note if Mark is referring to "Prosecution" as the entire Presidential Commission by and with Congress in National Security Mode of Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended (or as Martial law), then he indeed is petitioning "Prosecution" itself and none of this applies (the contrary), and Mark Lane invited them to read between the lines. (Yeah he's got 'em). Prosecution is authority given to the Commission by Congress in all matters. Its root is the Presidential Commission by LBJ (President Johnson). So original legal authority is even challenged, and see why.....

You can follow along at a blog post of mine at a blog domain I own http://christianeministry.com/  .....
ADDENDUM: Who Was Innocent – T.Martin, G. Zimmerman
Posted on July 22, 2013 by eminister   
http://christianeministry.com/2013/07/22/addendum-who-was-innocent-t-martin-g-zimmerman/

JUMP TO:
HOW MAY THE US CONGRESS TAKE THIS CASE IN REVIEW AND RETRIAL?
Article IV, Section 1:
“Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”

…This is too many times misconstrued and even intentionally as misinformation and interpretation – Full Faith and Credit shall be given…. is what and by whom? Full Faith and Credit is given by the Federal Government to each State as being trusted in as the honor system, or blind faith, by promise, etc they are and will remain in compliance of putting forth into Law a republican form of government of the United States Constitution ONLY dismissing nothing, not denying and not disparaging any rights of American Citizens as citizens and residents of that State that are guaranteed all Rights as United States Citizens.
It includes State to State by State examination of public acts, records, and judicial proceedings and to compare as to the same equal justice being necessary. Judicial Proceedings can prove a more true judgment arrived in one State to Judicial Proceedings in another to be compared to – of course not infringing upon the profession and talent and income of Attorneys etc, to say how a judgment was reached lawfully. However ONLY Congress by laws may prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof. ONLY Congress has the right and overview and is Law of the Land as to how Judicial Proceedings are proved. ONLY Congress may render opinion and fact as to the EFFECT of any Judicial Proceeding in the States.
ALL THE ABOVE WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OPINIONS BY ME SHOW THE BOTTTOM LINE THAT THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS MAY TAKE FULL POCESSION OF THIS CASE TO EXAMINE AND PROVE THE CASE AS LAWFUL AND INCLUDING BY RENDERING THE EFFECT OF THIS CASE AS TO WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN ANY FEDERAL LAWS VIOLATED OR STATE LAWS OR DISTRICT. THE US SUPREME COURT MUST REFLECT THIS – THE POWER OF THE US CONGRESS – IN ANY PROCESSION.
This then includes the Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI)…” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law….”
…. This is to say then that “…which district shall have been previously ascertained by law…” shows the Federal Authority and to have oversight of Proof and to Prove the District (where this case was tried) is and was “previously ascertained by law” and is part of that FULL FAITH AND CREDIT GIVEN by the Federal Goverment (that blind faith, honor system, etc) that Florida is indeed in compliance with a state republican form of goverment of the US Constitution and this IS NOT the “double jeopardy” violation, to say the case can not be tried again or reviewed. The District in the State (county, town, etc) or State itself has NO power to stop the US Congress from this. The US Congress may show the effect of a flawed Judicial Proceeding in a State and prove any “mistrial” etc and declare it a void judgment and case be retried. Which is to say perhaps this is the route as opposed to “take it all the way to the US Supreme Court” – always assumed as the only way to get justice in cases via lawful appeal etc. The case retried then is NOT in violation of the Fifth Amendment (“..nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…”) .

Now above is the good explanation of how the United States Congress could indeed take over the Martin/Zimmerman Case. HOWEVER, in the JFK Case - Congress must needs be declaring the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus which, that's right kids, declaring National Security invoked to REMOVE jurisdiction from Dallas and State of Texas.


PRESIDENTIAL POWER TO CREATE A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION....
Article II
Section 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
(Get it ? Atty. Mark Lane was talking 'over their heads' - the Commission Members - addressing "Prosecution" meaning LBJ.)

So more smoke of the gun.... the Commission Members were 'Commissioned Officers' of the President and in National Security Mode as Writ of Habeas Corpus suspended. LBJ did not need Congressional approval, but made them as "by and with Congress" and apparently negated a Military Tribunal Trial - which effectively was in place from November 29th until December 13th. It must be the internal conspirators were waiting to be lined up against the wall and have their brains blown out because effectively LBJ was the full power of the Law of the Land for those 15 days all by himself. That ain't no coward! He took the weight of any existing conspiracy assassins as prime target with full power. "Bring it on !"

READ:
Introduction to the Records of the Warren Commission
<http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/intro.html>
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,21.msg38.html#msg38

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Article One Section 9
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus can be invoked by a lawyer for the defendant which is basically "show me the money" or meaning 'having the body' of evidence - the Court must show the body of evidence and witnesses alleging charges. There is NO way out of that in American Courts unless the Writ of Habeas Corpus has lawfully been suspended meaning these do not have to be presented. This is a case of National Security (Martial Law declared) and more locally might be applied in various police and bureau investigations in such special circumstances BUT nevertheless with a Judge et al privately than the Open Court (Public Trial). A quickie example is some RICO Act 6 month investigation going on over drug trafficking etc etc etc. whereby in open court could compromise or endanger etc.

Now the Secret Service breaking the law in Dallas and Texas taking off with the President's body without legal autopsy by law done in Texas into Bethesda where it was illegally performed, and all the way to the new President declaring a Presidential Commission into the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy and everything between and after - isn't the invocation of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended on the flimsiest non-existent reasons?

Or as I always said, National Security being the Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended or Martial Law in Effect as the only POSSIBLE cause of action for them doing what they did to say or believe they were being honest and lawful, sure evaporated fast - within hours and days - for ..."when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it".

They can't hide behind they were not acting as Judge and Jury - just an inquest into all facts and evidence and witnesses testimony because it was NOT their jurisdiction to do so. This would be like Canada taking full control of the investigation into the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan and saying they just wanted to see who was doing what. And everyone in America would say WTF - GET OUT OF HERE! (what the f^^k). That's what they tried to say in Parkland Hospital. So like when they were done, what Dallas and Texas can resume their investigation? Oh please. With all the evidence they compiled and made public and the later Freedom Of Information Act and the rest of the JFK acts on evidence being made public - they have so screwed this case with every nut and genuine professional commercial researcher and all their opposing views and screwball distorted versions implanted in the American psyche with all the evidences presented in thousands of opposing opinions that there IS NO POSSIBLE WAY that ANY JURY could convict ANY of the guilty parties "beyond the shadow of a doubt". CONGRATULATIONS PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And yet the case remains in the auspices of National Security Mode with evidences that are under the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus - no, no one may have these certain evidences - they are locked away. Listen to the end of the Tube - the words by famous TV Anchorman Walter Chronkite... (it will start there)

lbj
http://youtu.be/xd1wuXrVPjo?t=2m29s

=================

AND ONE MORE SMOKING GUN THAT OUR GOVERNMENT INDEED WAS IN NATIONAL SECURITY MODE.....

WARNING ! THE ATTACHED PICTURE IS HORRIBLY BRUTALLY GRAPHIC AND THOSE AFFECTED SHOULD NOT VIEW.... IT IS A VERY GRAPHIC ARTIST RENDITION TYPE PHOTOGRAPH OF JFK ON THE AUTOPSY TABLE IN BETHESDA....

I believe that is an artist rendition and not actually a photograph if memory serves, although depicts what JFK looked like arriving on the autopsy table out of the zipped body bag after leaving Parkland with only "about one third of his brain blown out" (Parkland Doctors). Paul O'Conner was finally given Military permission to speak at the House Select Committee on Assassinations and was revealed at that time *only to date* that JFK arrived "with no brain, except less than a handful". Thus, if any real photograph it was certainly not released into record unless in National Security auspices of the WC etc. I have a degree (Data Processor) in computers of that era - the great big room filled computers and "hacking" the system then might be done by a type "tape worm" but would no doubt only retrieve text data - not graphics, pictures. So, if this was a real photograph then an insider with access had either stolen it or made a copy and put it back. This in fact is one more piece to the puzzle that upholds my research results summation that LBJ and the Govt by and with the Warren Commission were in National Security Mode and *not* involved in a criminal cover up. As the Public, we were to realize that our Government had just divulged this fact openly and by National Security permission about JFK and that his brain (what was left) had been disposed of illegally enroute from Dallas. Our Government for that one shining Camelot moment did reveal the truth to America when allowing Paul O'Conner to divulge this to the public at the hearing, which would become public. Of course the House Select Committee on Assassinations got about as much praise as the Warren Commission - wow at first, and realized it was as much BS and same off-handed Jersey hook questioning pattern without really consenting to evidence or witnesses all over again for a real trial. But as I said, it was not meant to be that National Security at the time was ready to divulge all and make arrests. During this time was all the PLO activity in the Mid East as home of the False Prophet from Bible references. He was not known yet or his powers, and did not rise until years later anyway (Bin Laden). Paul O'Conner is that *true* link to the Govt came clean to America and admitted a major conspiracy had occurred if you read between the lines. It was not clear why the investigation was still active this 15 years later and would not be until known in every Bible Study book thumping preaching fire and brimstone Minister worth his salt was teaching throughout the Nation to know what Armageddon was and is. IMO? (in my opinion). No, this is fact. If the Government were still involved in cover up as suspected, why would they allow Paul O'Conner to testify an openly admit to the world there was a conspiracy - in the least of after the fact, destrution of evidence? Did the Committee then bring charges? No. Shows *that* was not their intetntion *obviously*.

[BTW the very neat straight cut of the skull on the left side is the dead give away, pardon the pun, that this is not the real JFK. It appears as someone with a chainsaw walked up and cut the skull out. That is *not* what his skull looked like at all. But is somewhat, mostly, a fair gruesome rendition as an artist's depiction of horrible reality as a really close estimate. The brain matter on the table is another give away as it *is* testified to that the President "had less than a handful" of his brain left.]
PS EDIT.... Searched out and this was definately simply an artists's rendition.

Commission records - The 75-year rule
 

Commission records
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

In November 1964, two months after the publication of its 889-page report, the Commission published twenty-six volumes of supporting documents, including the testimony or depositions of 552 witnesses and more than 3,100 exhibits.[12]

All of the commission's records were then transferred on November 23 to the National Archives. The unpublished portion of those records was initially sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archives policy that applied to all federal investigations by the executive branch of government,[13] a period "intended to serve as protection for innocent persons who could otherwise be damaged because of their relationship with participants in the case.”[14]

The 75-year rule no longer exists, supplanted by the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and the JFK Records Act of 1992. By 1992, 98 percent of the Warren Commission records had been released to the public.[15] Six years later, at the conclusion of the Assassination Records Review Board's work, all Warren Commission records, except those records that contained tax return information, were available to the public with redactions.[16] The remaining Kennedy assassination related documents are scheduled to be released to the public by 2017, twenty-five years after the passage of the JFK Records Act.[17]

In 1992, the Assassination Records Review Board was created by the JFK Records Act to collect and preserve the documents relating to the assassination. It pointed out in its final report:

Doubts about the Warren Commission's findings were not restricted to ordinary Americans. Well before 1978, President Johnson, Robert Kennedy, and four of the seven members of the Warren Commission all articulated, if sometimes off the record, some level of skepticism about the Commission's basic findings.[18]

Introduction to the Records of the Warren Commission
http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/intro.html

"President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, commonly called the Warren Commission, by Executive Order (E.O. 11130) on November 29, 1963. Its purpose was to investigate the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, at Dallas, Texas. President Johnson directed the Commission to evaluate matters relating to the assassination and the subsequent killing of the alleged assassin, and to report its findings and conclusions to him. .....
 
On December 13, 1963, Congress passed Senate Joint Resolution 137 (Public Law 88-202) authorizing the Commission to subpoena witnesses and obtain evidence concerning any matter relating to the investigation. The resolution also gave the Commission the power to compel the testimony of witnesses by granting immunity from prosecution to witnesses testifying under compulsion. The Commission, however, did not grant immunity to any witness during the investigation. ....."


Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy Appendix 3
http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix3.html

Public Law 88-202
88th Congress, S. J. Res. 137
December 13, 1963

Joint Resolution

Authorizing the Commission established to report upon the assassination of President John F. Kennedy to compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of evidence.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) for the purposes of this joint resolution, the term "Commission" means the Commission appointed by the President by Executive Order 11130, dated November 29, 1963.

(b) The Commission, or any member of the Commission when so authorized by the Commission, shall have power to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any evidence that relates to any matter under investigation by the Commission. The Commission, or any member of the Commission or any agent or agency designated by the Commission for such purpose, may administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses, and receive evidence. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of such evidence may be required from any place within the United States at any designated place of hearing.

(c) In case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any person under subsection (b), any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon application by the Commission shall have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring such person to appear before the Commission, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.

(d) Process and papers of the commission, its members, agent, or agency, may be served either upon the witness in person or by registered mail or by telegraph or by leaving a copy thereof at the residence or principal office or place of business of the person required to be served. The verified return by the individual so serving the same, setting forth the manner of such service, shall be proof of the same, and the return post office receipt or telegraph receipt therefore when registered and mailed or telegraphed as aforesaid shall be proof of service of the same. Witnesses summoned before the commission, its members, agent, or agency, shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees ar are paid for like services in the courts of the United States.

(e) No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing books, records, correspondence, documents, or other evidence in obedience to a subpoena, on the ground that the testimony or evidence required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture; but no individual shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture (except demotion or removal from office) for or on account of any transaction, matter or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.


Page 474

Pub. Law 88-202

December 13, 1963


(f) All process of any court to which application may be make under this Act may be served in the judicial district therein the person required to be served resides or may be found.

Approved December 13, 1963.

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 109 (1963):

Dec. 9: Passed Senate.

Dec. 10: Considered and passed House.


Bibliographic note: Web version based on Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1964. 1 volume, 888 pages. The formatting of this Web version may differ from the original.


SO, NO, IN REALITY THIS WAS A MILITARY TRIBUNAL BY DEFINITION OF THE LAW - THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF NAMING ITS PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONED "OFFICERS" OF THIS MILITARY TRIAL AND CONGRESS ADDING THE EQUIVALENT OF A DECLARATION OF WAR. NO ONE HAS CHALLENGED THIS IN THE SUPREME COURT BUT RATHER DECIDED TO GET RICH FROM BOOK WRITING AND FAT AT THE EXPENSE OF AMERICANS TRYING TO FOLLOW THE IDEA OF A NEW TRIAL WHICH THEY HAVE NEVER ATTENDED OR PURSUED.

THE RULE OF THUMB IS THAT YOU CAN MAKE ALPHABET SOUP SAY ANYTHING YOU WANT IT TO. THEY DID. IT ALL COMES OUT IN THE WASH. MY FINAL CONCLUSION IS THEY SHOULD ALL WHO ARE GUILTY BE HELD FOR ESPIONAGE LIKE MODERN DAY SNOWDEN AND THOSE RELEASING ANY RECORDS WHATSOEVER BY HAND OR LEGISLATION. THEY HAVE CIRCUMVENTED NATIONAL ARCHIVES LAWS FOR PROFIT AND SPYING. IT IS CLEARLY THE LAW UPHELD AGAINST RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT VIOLATED. THEY EVEN PURSUE THE REDACTED FOR THIS. THE PUBLIC IS NOT INVITED TO A MILITARY TRIAL NOR MAY THEY MAKE RULING.

THE US CONSTITUTION, THE PRESIDENT "....shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States."

IT IS A MILITARY TRIBUNAL OF COMMISSIONED PRESIDENTIAL OFFICERS. YOU WILL NEVER KNOW WHAT WAS SEALED UNTIL AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT ANNOUNCES PUBLICLY THAT THE NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY ALLOWS OF FINAL FULL DISCLOSURE. THOSE WHO BROKE INTO RECORDS LIKE RATS WILL NEVER KNOW WHAT IS ACTUALLY AND STILL LOCKED AWAY FROM THEM ACCORDING TO THE LAWS APPLIED. FOR EVERY 100 DOCUMENTS RELEASED THERE IS NO DOUBT UP TO A 100 THAT WILL NOT BE WITHOUT ANYONE'S KNOWLEDGE. HOW CAN THE PUBLIC POSSIBLY ASCERTAIN WHAT IS WITHIN NATIONAL SECURITY?

I HAVE BEEN TO SOME JFK FACEBOOK GROUPS AND MADE SOME COMMENTS AND ATTEMPTED TO LEAD PEOPLE TO THIS HERE (MY POSTS) AND WHAT I KEEP SEEING IS THAT THIS IS SOME KIND OF DISEASE AND COMPULSIVE DISORDER TO BE A "JFK RESEARCHER" ANYMORE AND FOR SOME TIME NOW - MANY YEARS. ASIDE FROM LIVING THROUGH THIS FOR THE PAST 50 YEARS LIKE EVERYONE FROM MY GENERATION, READING SOME OF THE ORIGINAL BOOKS OR TWO IN THE 1960s , I HAVE NOT REVISITED THIS RESEARCH BUT TOWARDS THIS 50 YEAR ANNIVERSARY I DECIDED TO TAKE ONE LAST LOOK AND SEE WHAT FINALLY MAKES SENSE AND WHAT WAS FACT. THE LAST TIME I DISCUSSED THIS, LIKE MANY, WAS DURING THE VIET NAM WAR YEARS BUT OBVIOUSLY AS OUR NATION DID WHEN RFK WAS ASSASSINATED TOO - THE SECOND DARKEST DAY OF THIS.

NEWER GENERATION PEOPLE GET SUCKED INTO THIS DISEASE AS WELL. IT IS TIME THIS STOPS FOREVER AT THE 50TH UNTIL THE PRESIDENT COMES FORWARD WITH THE ALL CLEAR. OTHERWISE YOU LIVE IN SICKNESS AND DISORDER AND JUST "SPEAKING INTO THE AIR" - AS ALL THEY SAY IS ENTIRELY CONTRADICTED BY EACH OTHER. YOU ARE A NUT HOUSE THAT NEEDS BE CLOSED. YOU KNOW WHERE I WILL BE - AWAITING THE PRESIDENT AND I SUGGEST YOU DO AS WELL WITH RESPECT FOR YOURSELF AND THIS NATION.

I HAVE STATED HERE THE RELIGIOUS REASONS AS THE ONLY POSSIBLE CAUSE OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY BUT THERE IS A VAST NUMBER THAT ARE ACCUSING PRESIDENT LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON OF ASSASSINATING JFK. IT IS SICKNESS AND DISORDER. IT IS DISRESPECTFUL AND INANE. IT IS COMPLETELY WITHOUT PATRIOTISM AND PLAIN COMMON SENSE. THERE IS A SAYING "THE ASS KNOWS THE MASTER'S CRIB". THESE ARE NONE OF OURS.

AS I SAID. I HAVE LIVED THIS FOR THE PAST 50 YEARS AND HAVE BEEN IN EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SEEN ABOUT THE 1960-70s ERA - THE PROTESTS, MORATORIUMS, MARCHES, THE "MOVEMENT" , THE "REVOLUTION", WOODSTOCK, ETC ETC ETC. I AM AN ORIGINAL PERSON WITH THE YOUTH OF THE NATION AT THE TIME WITH ALL THE SAME BELIEFS. YOU CAN NOT AND WILL NOT CALL ME SOME WARREN COMMISSIONER BACKER OR A BUGLIOSI NUT SUPPORTER AND ET AL. - YOU CAN'T. I WAS AND AM THE EXACT OPPOSITE. BUT I HAVE GROWN UP AND OPENED MY EYES AND SEEN THE MANY. THE MANY PILOT FISH LIVING OFF THE SHARKS.

You dishonor your head... Proverbs 25
1 These are also proverbs of Solomon, which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied out.
2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
3 The heaven for height, and the earth for depth, and the heart of kings is unsearchable.

I COULD HAVE TURNED THIS INTO A BEST SELLING BOOK - BUT FROM THE BIBLE 'FREELY GIVEN, FREELY GIVE' PERTAINING THE PREACHING OF THE GOSPEL.
I HAVE INTRODUCED THE ONLY INSTANCE IN THE WORLD BY BOOK AUTHORS OF THE INTRIGUING WIRELESSLY FIRED ELECTRONIC FIRING PIN RIFLES IN TRIANGULATION OF A STATE SANCTIONED EXECUTION HIT. I HAVE INTRODUCED THE ONLY INSTANCE BY AUTHORS INTRODUCING THE RELIGIOUS MARTYRING OF JFK AND THEN MLK RFK - ALL BY THE SAME CONTRACT HEAD DIRECTLY FROM THE BIBLE AS THE INTRIGUING EVENT OF OUR TIMES THE END TIMES. DON'T TELL ME THAT IS NOT A UNIQUE ONE OF A KIND BEST SELLER! SOMEONE MIGHT P*I*S*S ON YOUR LEG AND TELL YOU IT'S RAINING. (You are not that much of an idiot to actually suggest a critique are you?! omg! - you are that diseased.)

ASK YOUR SELF AS A CITIZEN OF AMERICA LIVING THIS.... THESE HAVE COMMITTED THEMSELVES TO A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION TYPE RESEARCH AND WITH RESULTS HAVE THEY TOLD THEM TO YOU OR ASKED FOR 20 OR 120 DOLLARS TO SEE THEIR RESULTS? WHAT DO YOU CALL IT? ME TOO!
I AM TALKING ABOUT THE RESEARCHERS SELLING THEIR RESULTS AS BOOKS AND PAPERBACKS FOR PROFIT. WHAT, SHIRTS TOO? THESE SHOULD BE SEPERATED AS TAINTED IN SOME WAY AND BE CALLED "COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL RESEARCHERS" THAT DO NOT SHARE THEIR RESULTS FOR FREE. TAINTED AS THEY WILL BE INTICED TO WRITE WHAT SELLS.

OTHER SCUM HAVE CONTINUALLY ATTEMPTED TO SOIL OUR HONORABLE PRESIDENT, WORLD REVERED, AND RFK US ATTY.GEN. US SENATOR AND PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE - WITH THE SEXUAL MISCONDUCT TRASH OF THE IMAGINATIONS OF THEIR MINDS. JFK's MEDICAL HAS EVEN BEEN RELEASED SHOWING THE DEGREE OF PAIN HE WAS IN - AND AS I SAID I HAD THE SAME TYPE BACK BRACE PRESCRIBED FOR WELL OVER TWO YEARS FROM A FRACTURED VERTEBRAE AND SEVERE LUMBAR SPRAIN TRAUMATIC, IN PAIN THAT ACTUALLY ONLY MORPHINE WOULD VIRTUALLY STOP ENTIRELY. I CAN PERSONALLY TESTIFY SOMEONE IN THAT CONDITION HAS NO SEX LIFE WITHOUT POSSIBLE/PROBABLE HOSPITALIZATION. JFK SUFFERED HIS BACK INJURIES IN THE US NAVY SERVICE AS AN OFFICER AND HERO ON THE FAMOUS PT-109 IN THE MOST HONORABLE AND ADMIRABLE SERVICE OF HIS COUNTRY AND CREW. IT IS SHOWN MEDICALLY HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN THIS PLAYBOY THESE SCUM ALL ACCUSED HIM OF FOR YEARS AND DRAGGED BOBBY INTO. READ THE STUDY ABOUT MARILYN MONROE I HAVE POSTED AND YOU MAY HAVE MISSED - IT IS DIRECTLY ABOUT THIS AND "ANOTHER BEST SELLER" IN ITSELF BY YOURS TRULY....

JFK "Girlfriend" Assassinated, Marilyn Monroe
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,98.0.html

like nixon said, the French have a word for it - au revoir - we'll meet again.


================== HERE YOU ARE.....

Still think JFK was a Playboy Adulterer? Read this.... (Have added my own comments input)... http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,98.msg495.html#msg495

Proving the ill health President Kennedy suffered, take a good look at this. Playboy? They should be ashamed terribly and run and hide and never show their faces again! Filthy dreamers from the imaginations of their own filthy hearts....

Holy Bible, Book of Jude
Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. 

I personally had a similar back injury in the same exact place L5-S1 as a traumatic fracture of the vertebrae which later permanently damaged the disc at the same place from the fracture causing misalignment. 2 and half years in bed each time. To remove the disc, they will ONLY perform the operation if the patient would rather die or commit suicide because of the chronic (24/7) pain. You get a 50-50 chance of surviving the operations as the Gil method is performed which is four, count them, four spinal fusions are performed creating a cage around the damaged disc then removed. I also was prescribed and had to wear the same type back brace as JFK. As well there are extreme back muscle spasms in the lumbar (lower back). A simple stubbing the toe can send you into a whirlwind of pain and spasms.
 
JFK had two of these and was at that point of wishing death at the level of pain. Like I said before, no one in this condition has a sex life and yet the scum say all this trash about his constant affairs and prostitutes and on and on. That was physically impossible as seen in the release of JFK medical history....

John F. Kennedy – A Life of Back Pain & Hidden Illness
Posted on February 23, 2011 by Paul Hagen
http://www.vacupractor.com/famous-people/john-f-kennedy-back-pain/

This post is the first in a series about famous and/or note worthy people that suffer from Back Pain. In our ongoing effort to educate America about back pain and help eliminate it, this series was inspired by a story we spotted on Hub Pages you can read here if you like: Presidents Back Pain Cured

John F. Kennedy’s medical records may shed some light on questions of the president’s character. Reviews of his records in recent years revealed that the president suffered from severe back pain and other numerous ailments, taking as many as eight medications a day to manage them. Kennedy, his aides, and his family kept this information hidden from the public in an attempt to project an image as a strong and powerful figure, in much the same way Franklin D. Roosevelt concealed the severity of his paralysis in the 1930s and 40s.

Kennedy’s back pain and other ailments clearly did not stand in the way of his political ambitions. He used his father’s connections to enlist in the Navy and keep his medical condition concealed from military physicians. While serving on Navy boats in the southwest Pacific, he slept with a plywood board under his mattress for back pain relief. During his 1960 presidential campaign, he was followed everywhere by an aide who carried a bag of “medical support.” Kennedy’s medical records remained closed for years following his death, apparently because his family worried they would tarnish his reputation as an honest political figure.

Due to his many ailments, a man of Kennedy’s health would not be able to survive today’s political climate, writes presidential biographer and New York Times political correspondent Richard Reeves. Kennedy suffered from Addison’s disease, a condition in which the adrenal glands produce insufficient hormones and which required increasing amounts of hydrocortisone and testosterone. Sickly since he was a boy, Kennedy was also frequently ill and suffered from severe fatigue and low weight. He became so ill that he was read the last rites three times in his life. Lifelong abdominal discomfort and fatigue may have been due to celiac disease, which is often associated with Addison’s.

What Was The True Source of Kennedy’s Back Pain

Though his back pain was rumored to have been caused by football injuries and war wounds, according to Reeves, however, those stories were untrue. Some reports indicate that Kennedy suffered from a degenerative disease of the lumbar spine, which caused a difference in the length of his legs, requiring him to wear a back brace and use crutches intermittently. Navy records show evidence of osteoporosis. Reporter Robert Dallek writes that steroid treatments Kennedy received for his intestinal ails as a youth may have contributed to both his Addison’s disease and his back problems. In a December 2002 article in the Atlantic Monthly, Dallek writes that in the 1930s and 40s, physicians did not realize the long-term effects of corticosteroids – specifically the suppression of normal adrenal function and the inducement of osteoporosis in the lower back. X-rays from the early 50s show compression fractures in Kennedy’s lower spine.

Kennedy Underwent High Risk Back Pain Surgery

In 1954, while Senator of Massachusetts, Kennedy underwent back surgery, which posed extreme risks due to his Addison’s disease, as his hormone treatments suppressed his immune system. According to Reeves, no one with Addison’s disease had ever previously survived traumatic surgery. But Kennedy said his back pain was so severe, he would rather die than live with the pain. His x-rays revealed that his fifth lumbar vertebra had collapsed, and he had become more dependent on his crutches. He survived the surgery, but was hospitalized for nine months afterward due to a urinary-tract infection and a transfusion reaction.

A report in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1955 indicated he would have been incapacitated without the surgery, which consisted of a lumbo sacra fusion together with a sacroiliac fusion. Doctors hoped the fusions would strengthen his lower spine, but due to a possible infection, another operation had to be performed four months later to remove the metal plate that had been inserted into Kennedy’s spine.

The President Continues to Suffer from Back Pain & Other Ailments

The surgeries brought him no back pain relief. Throughout the 50s, Kennedy continued to suffer from his back pain and other ailments, including abdominal discomfort, high fevers, dehydration, high cholesterol, and difficulty sleeping. He could not bend forward or backward at all. Turning over in bed or sitting in a chair posed extreme difficulty. Kennedy continued to hide his condition from the public and denied reports of his Addison’s disease. During his presidency, he was under the regular care of an allergist, an endocrinologist, a gastroenterologist, an orthopedist, a urologist, and an internist/pharmacologist. He received back injections to make less reliant on his crutches, but his medical advisors feared they may be doing more harm than good and that he would eventually end up in a wheelchair. 

Regular exercise therapy with an orthopedic surgeon began to ease his back spasms and increase his mobility, but it is unknown how his health issues would have progressed had he lived longer. Kennedy was killed in 1963 by Lee Harvey Oswald. Some believe that his chronic back problems ultimately contributed to his death:  Kennedy was wearing his back brace when he was shot. The first bullet struck him in the neck, and his back brace held him upright and kept him in the path of Oswald’s second, fatal bullet to the head.

John F. Kennedy Deception or Exceptional Character?

Though some have criticized Kennedy for deceiving the public in order to advance his political career, Dallek notes that Kennedy refused to complain about his ailments and exhibited an extraordinary strength of will, enduring unspeakable pain and yet refusing to let his physical ailments interfere with his political duties.

References:

PBS.org: John F. Kennedy

“In J.F.K.  File, Hidden Illness, Pain and Pills;” The New York Times

The Health and Medical History of President John Kennedy; Dr. Zebra

“The Medical Ordeals of JFK;” The Atlantic Monthly, December 2002

I read somewhere said JFK was in a *plastic liner* instead of a medical official body bag? That significance was trying to lie that JFK arrived in the bronze expensive heavy casket from Parkland that a plastic liner was put inside because of the blood still oozing from the head wounds and THAT was the mistaken body bag. (Where's the zipper buddy? LOL)

Here again I have found Paul O'Conner given interview (JFK autopsy worker, military permission to testify) and clearly states JFK arrived in a *zipped* body bag..... pasted ...

 "Casket Switch - Arrived Body Bag Zipped, Not plastic liner
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,249.msg471.html#msg471
 Paul O'Conner was in Autopsy team at Bethesda and was given permission to speak by the Military who had all take an oath and sign document to not to speak about the autopsy. This permission was given at the second hearings years after the Warren Commission. He as well testified to the President "had no brain... less than a handful" - but left Parkland Hospital Dallas as Doctors testifying "about one third of his brain had been blown out". The two caskets are documented. The casket switch and alterations occurred in flight from Dallas.

 Here in this Video again Paul O'Conner giving interview explains JFK arrival to autopsy room and plainly states JFK was in a "body bag zipped" which he being in the military and autopsy worker is describing an actual body bag. Some one (s) tried to say JFK was in the "plastic liner" from Parkland. This is not true. Body bag is a medical and military term for the body bag as all America saw almost every night on television reports from the Viet Nam War - the many dead soldiers in zipped closed body bags. This video starts at 6Minutes/33seconds into the clip to this exact interview about the two caskets and zipped body bag..."

http://youtu.be/Fj0743iertU?t=6m33s

EDIT: And apparently the "plastic liner" or described as "plastic matress liner" ? was ALSO missing when received in Autopsy room.


==============


Here is an interesting homemade video. Shows the other drain storm down at the Triple Underpass. Author makes some observations. The footage is invaluable to those who did not can not make the trip to Dealey Plaza. Presumably, this drain system entry area was their in Nov 22 1963? There was the Trinity River area where possible suspect(s) were seen just after the assassination. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyu103QzX_s
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyu103QzX_s>

Here are a lot of good photographs and apparently the above video shows the drain system "hatch: was indeed there on Nov 22 1963... (I am familiar with the sewer drain assassin theory but I don't feel JFK was shot from there on Elm)... http://jfktruth.org/drain/index.htm

I of course have posted in my research the third shot to the head causing the rear blow out wound was fired from front and down towards the overpass. Seems these may show a possible escape route for that event. The direct evidence shows the third round via the rear blow out which happened an instant after the first two hit.

A FACT SHEET : On Security and Secret Service Inconsistencies in the JFK Assassination

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/palamara/factsheet_vmp.html

by Vince Palamara

[Vincent M. Palamara has done the most painstaking research and results on the Secret Service pertaining to their role in the JFK Assassination. Many call him "the expert".]


Summary : Recent interviews with many of the Secret Service agents that protected JFK, a number of whom where in Dallas on November 22, 1963 -- along with recently declassified documents -- contradict history's official verdict that President Kennedy was difficult to protect and was somehow indirectly responsible for his own death by foregoing security measures that would have aided in saving his life. The following "fact sheet" was prepared as a basic and general summarization of some of the more salient points in the author's research for the book "THE THIRD ALTERNATIVE ..."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Fact #1:
Contrary to recent testimony before Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr by current Secret Service Director Lewis Merletti and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Gary Grindler, President Kennedy did not instruct agents not to ride on the rear bumper of his car several days before Dallas. Former agents Gerald A. Behn (#1 man on JFK s detail), Floyd M. Boring (the #2 man), Arthur L.Godfrey (another top man, one of the three Shift Leaders on Kennedy's Texas trip), Rufus W. Youngblood (#2 man on LBJ s detail on 11/22/63, riding in the V.P.'s car), Samuel A. Kinney (the driver of the Secret Service follow-up car in Dallas), Dave Powers (loyal Kennedy aide who rode with Kinney), Cecil Stoughton (White House photographer in the Dallas motorcade), Donald J. Lawton (also on the Texas trip), Martin E. Underwood (Democratic National Committee advance man for JFK's trip to Houston), Robert I. Bouck (head of the Protective Research Section), Robert Lilley (a member of JFK's detail from election night until one month before Dallas), Maurice G. Martineau (the agent in charge of the Chicago office), Abraham W. Bolden (the first black member of the White House Detail), and John Norris (a member of the Uniformed Division), collectively and in no uncertain terms, told me that President Kennedy never ordered the agents off the rear of his car, was not difficult to protect, and , in fact, was very cooperative with the Secret Service. Jerry D. Kivett (who rode in the V.P. follow-up car in Dallas) and June Kellerman (widow of the #3 man on Kennedy's detail) also confirmed to me that Kennedy was not difficult to protect for the Secret Service. More than anything else, this debunks the "JFK as scapegoat" notion of history -- and the buck stops with the Secret Service.



Fact #2:
Contrary to all prior accounts, including those attributed to President Kennedy himself, former agent Samuel A. Kinney was adamant to me, on three occasions, that he was SOLELY responsible for the bubbletop's removal on that fateful day in Dallas.



Fact #3:
The Secret Service was knowledgeable about prior recent threats to President Kennedy but, not only was nothing done to relay this information to the agents in Dallas, at least 3 separate checks of the Protective Research Section for any threats or harmful subjects in Dallas yielded nothing, something two agents, Roy H. Kellerman (to the Warren Commission) and Abraham Bolden (to me), said was highly unusual, to say the least. DNC advance man Marty Underwood told me that he was getting all sorts of rumors, merely 18 hours before the assassination, that JFK was to be assassinated in Dallas, even conveying this information to President Kennedy himself, who told Underwood not to worry (indeed, JFK had told San Antonio Congressman Henry Gonzalez that the Secret Service had taken care of everything and, thus, there was no need for worry)! Agent Kinney told me that there was a scare four days before Dallas when Kennedy was in Florida, separate from the accurate assassination prediction of one Joseph Milteer (an ardent right-wing supporter), in Miami on November 9, 1963. Agent Bouck told me he was aware of this threat knowledge before Dallas (and documents confirm that the Secret Service did indeed have material regarding this in their files). Five years before the revelations of the four agents who spoke to Seymour Hersh, Bouck told me he also was aware of Kennedy's philandering, crucial compromising information for a top man in Kennedy's detail to have.



Fact #4:
Although Kennedy normally had much motorcycle "coverage" in his motorcades, including at least 3 to 6 motorcycles riding on each side of the car on all prior Texas stops, as well as many other foreign and domestic trips in 1963, the plans were altered by the Secret Service for Dallas, giving JFK a measly 4 non-flanking outriders: the reason being that, as with the allegations that JFK did not want the men on the car (debunked) or the bubbletop (debunked ), the president did not want a lot of motorcycles, especially ones right by his side, which effectively opened him up to crossfire and/ or eliminated more key professionally-trained eye and ear witnesses from the scene (and out of harm's way). My interviews with agents Sam Kinney and Arthur Godfrey dispelled the notion that JFK ever said that he did not want motorcycles by the car, as films, photos, and the prior Texas stops make quite clear in and of themselves.


Fact #5:
Although Secret Service Chief James J. Rowley adamantly denied to the Warren Commission that his agency was responsible for the printing of the motorcade route in Dallas, the author has traced the critical decision back from LBJ aide Bill Moyers to what Moyers described as "the agent in charge of the Dallas trip"!



Fact #6:
In a related matter, the motorcade route itself went against both common sense and Secret Service protocol by involving turns of 90 and 120 degrees, which slowed the limousine down to a dangerous speed by both the Texas School Book Depository (Oswald's alleged lair) and the infamous grassy knoll area --- DNC advance man Underwood and uniformed agent Norris were two men who strongly criticized the route in interviews with this author. Furthermore, the #1 agent in the president's detail, Jerry Behn, told me that the Dallas route was changed from some other (unknown) choice, as the House Select Committee on Assassinations asked him in Executive Session in still unpublished testimony in the late 1970s. Furthermore, agents Kinney and Winston G. Lawson confirmed for this author that there were indeed alternate routes (two, according to Kinney), and the author discovered much confusion in the newspapers and perhaps unwitting obfuscation in the strangely conflicting accounts of the route Kennedy was to take in Dallas.



Fact #7:
The press photographers who normally rode in a flatbed truck directly in front of JFK's limousine, as they had done countless times before, were relegated to a position "out of the picture" well behind the president's limousine. According to reporter Tom Dillard, this change occurred at "the last minute" at Love Field, where two Secret Service agents, Winston G. Lawson (who the author interviewed) and Roger Warner, were responsible for lining up the cars for the motorcade, including the use of numbers for the automobiles. In addition, JFK aides Godfrey McHugh and Ted Clifton -- one of whom usually rode in the front seat of the limousine taking notes between the two agents -- were also relegated to a position behind JFK and out of sight. McHugh said that this was unusual and that this was achieved through a first-time ever request by the president's aide Ken O'Donnell and the Secret Service. Furthermore, official White House photographer Cecil Stoughton, who normally rode in the Secret Service follow-up car taking films and photos, including even riding on the rear of Kennedy''s car from time to time, was also moved to a position far out of view ofthe presidential limousine (Stoughton rode in the back-up car from July 1963 until 11/21/63, the day before the assassination). Stoughton would not give the author a reason for this change in seating arrangements in Dallas. Finally, the White House and pool Press Busses, which also normally rode close to JFK, were positioned far to the rear and out of harm's way.



Fact #8:
Dallas Sheriff Bill Decker, who rode in the lead car in front of JFK's limousine in Dallas, ordered his men not to participate in the security of the motorcade, according to Dallas Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig.Surprisingly, as this author discovered, Decker had offered his "full support" to the agent in charge of the Dallas office, Forrest V. Sorrels (a fellow passenger in the lead car), a mere day before the assassination. In addition, the car that Decker, Sorrels, Lawson, and Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry were riding in was a CLOSED SEDAN, not a convertible, which was a most ineffective choice for monitoring windows and other security concerns.



Fact #9:
An important discovery by the author was found in the video from ABC television's Dallas/ Fort Worth affiliate WFAA depicting the start of the fateful motorcade at Love Field: agent Henry J. Rybka is shown being recalled by shift leader (and commander of the follow-up car detail) Emory P. Roberts. As the limo begins leaving the area, Rybka's dismay and confusion is made manifest by his unambiguous body language of throwing his arms up several times before, during, and after the follow-up car passes him by, despite agent Paul E. Landis making room for Rybka on the running board of the car. After the assassination, the author discovered three different reports, two of which were written by Roberts on 11/22/63, which mistakenly place Rybka IN the follow-up car! Emory Roberts would go on to make a mysterious radio broadcast (depicted in the famous Altgens's photo), separate from his calls before and after the shooting, which is unaccounted for in the record (the Secret Service's radio transmissions, if transcribed, have yet to surface) offered no assistance to the president himself --- not even a shout of alarm or an alert to his men; recalled agent John D. Ready, which was erroneously blamed on the speed and distance of the two cars (as borne out by the descriptions and changes---in Roberts and Ready's reports); and, amazingly, according to the driver of the follow-up car seated right beside
Roberts, Sam Kinney, the shift leader ordered the men not to move -- although Roberts was one of a select few who recognized the first shot as a rifle blast. As nine agents were involved in the infamous late-night drinking incident the night before the assassination, including four on the follow-up car, the actions and inactions of Roberts were crucial to JFK's security (even the late arrival of agent Clinton J. Hill, who was assigned to Jackie).



Fact #10:
Windows were not systematically watched in Dallas, since no order was given (as confirmed by Dallas policeman Perdue Lawrence), although it was agent Lawson's "usual instructions" to do so. Also in regard to Lawson's responsibilities, the Dealey Plaza triple underpass was NOT cleared of spectators (as Lawson himself testified that he was trying to wave them off shortly before the shooting began). In addition, ambulances (such as the one on standby for JFK that was called to Dealey Plaza five minutes before Kennedy arrived to pick up an alleged "epileptic seizure" victim) were called to this same area on false alarms in the days and weeks before November 22, as ambulance driver Aubrey Rike told me ( He even stated that the FBI believed there was something to this)!



Fact #11:
The president and the vice president were permitted in the same city in slow, open vehicles in close proximity to each other -- former agents Lawson and Bolden stressed how unusual this was. In Bolden's case, he stated that this was a security hazard, as common sense would seem to dictate (keeping in mind that the First Lady was ALSO in this motorcade). Further complicating and confounding matters, the driver of the presidential limousine car, Secret Service agent Bill Greer, slowed the limousine down during the shooting, looked back twice at the president, disobeyed his superior, Roy H. Kellerman, who told him to get out of line before the fatal shot was fired, and,at least part of the way, led the race to Parkland Hospital -- actions that agent Greer later denied to the Warren Commission -- despite the testimony of others, the films, and the photographs (this author is the first researcher to put ALL of these elements together).



Fact #12:
Surprisingly, several of these agents told the author that they believe there was indeed a conspiracy to murder President Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963---Sam Kinney, Abraham Bolden, Maurice Martineau, Marty Underwood, and John Norris are the men that believed this to be the case. In addition, June Kellerman, widow of the late Roy Kellerman, as well as their daughter, stated that both Roy and Bill Greer knew there was more to the assassination than what was officially pronounced. Finally, two key elements discovered by the author may be the "living answers" to the security concerns and planning for JFK's Texas trip: Lawson's forgotten partner, David B. Grant, who joined Lawson in Dallas four days beforehand -- and was working with him since November 13, 1963 -- and Floyd M. Boring, who, although back in Washington, was in charge of all of the advance work during the Kennedy years AND was in charge of planning the Texas trip from the Secret Service's viewpoint!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Used by permission of the author. [C} Vincent M. Palamara 1998



Updated December 1999

==========

HEAR AND SEE AS VINCE SHOWS IN HIS TUBE ALL THE LETTERS AND DOCS AND PLAYS THE RECORDINGS IN THE BACKGROUND - INTERVIEWING EVERYONE INVOLVED AND IT IS FOUND THE COMPLETE LIE THAT "KENNEDY ORDERED THE SECRET SERVICE OFF THE BACK OF THE CAR"....

STARTS AT AUDIO...
Vince Palamara takes on JFK Secret Service Agent Clint Hill + Part 2
http://youtu.be/Rf1StSdXqyg?t=7m59s

ADDDITIONALLY - HIS 4 Min COMPILATION OF WHAT NORMAL PARADE ROUTE SECURITY LOOKED LIKE - OBVIOUSLY CONSPICULOUSLY COMPLETELY ABSENT IN DALLAS...
Starts at the compilation...
 Vince Palamara takes on JFK Secret Service Agent Clint Hill + Part 3
http://youtu.be/t59Jb0pGAfM?t=10m43s

Those alive back then may clearly remember at least two incidents of premonitions or dreams or visions or prophecy about the assassination. Rev. Billy Graham had a premonition and tried but failed to warn President Kennedy not to go to Dallas. Jean Dixon is the other....

JEAN DIXON PREDICTED / FORESEEN THE JFK ASSASSINATION AND NAME "OSWALD" 
Anybody remember Jean Dixon?
Jean Dixon who became a household name, This is *very* interesting to read. I have a retrieved here a link showing the actual newspaper story...... See the actual vision so to speak she describes... chilling....
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1346&dat=19800427&id=j44sAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JPsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6306,4205796

....I am seeing one report quoted ..."In a side chapel is where Jean Dixon, the famous seer, had a vision in 1956 of a young, tall man standing in a White House doorway with "1960" over his head. She knew he was a Democrat and that he wouldn't live out his term. She told of this vision on a radio show that year."

....Just remembered the famous "Mac Arthur's Park" song that came out "melting in the rain". It may have been based on the Jean Dixon "vision" she discussed - seeing (something like) the White House and JFK face and 1960 and from top melting down all over all. Being a PA native, I have lived in California 10 years and been to MacArthur Park many times. It is like a really smaller Central Park just west of Central City. Very nice. .... (((PLAY MacArthur Park: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NE-5ICw-QqM> "I shall return".

You hate to speak out if this happened to you (seeing something so to speak) because you may get immediately tagged as an Area 51 Looney or nut job or etc etc etc. It is in the common Bible Studies that it is taught we test these things to see if true, and if even from the Lord. Some of these verses....

Deuteronomy 13:1
1 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

Jeremiah 23:28
28 The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the Lord.
29 Is not my word like as a fire? saith the Lord; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?
30 Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.
31 Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues, and say, He saith.
32 Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the Lord.
 
Joel 2:28 
28 And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:
29 And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.
31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come.
32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the Lord hath said, and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call. 

I John 4:1
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.
6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error. 

FACEBOOK JFK GROUP QUESTION....

Secret agent Clint Hill publicly stated (it is on youtube) that
right after the first shot, the agent in Vice-President's limo, who was sitting in the front seat, got up and over his seat and jumped on Johnson as he was trained to do.

Right after the first shot, both Secret Service agents in the front seat of JFK's limo turned around to see JFK in distress.
They had 5 secs to act before the shot to the head.

Secret Service agent William Greer, the driver, slowed down the limo to almost a stop. Why didn't he step on the gas and get the hell out of there as he was trained to do?

Why didn't Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman, sitting next to William, make an attempt to get up and jump over the President to shield him as Secret Service Agents are trained to do?

==

MY ANSWER......

Roy Kellerman's assignment was to jump on the President in this event. He choose to play with the radio for the "five seconds" he admitted. William Greer is one of the conspirators of the Secret Service involvement *obviously* instructed to slow the limo to 6-8 mph walking speed in the Grassy Knoll kill zone, as they are found guilty of disposing of the President's remaining brain aboard Air Force One. Of those in the follow car, those giving orders to stand down are the other found guilty of Conspiracy before the fact. ...... See Vince Palamara who has been dubbed the "expert" on the Secret Service of that time and day http://vincepalamara.blogspot.com/

.....Clint Hill on the surface appears as not involved, but the *only* Agent that day performing his duty. If we apply "extreme prejudice" and view, this can be seen as just part of the pretend concerned, as he was supposed to be on the rear boards of the Presidential Limo according to the security warnings that day. Clint Hill was supposed to be protecting the First Lady against cross fire gun play scenarios etc.

Was he really protecting Jackie? Hell no with the possibility of Badge Man firing with an exit wound hitting her and killing her from that specific angle and found as above 90-95 percent certainty a shot was fired from there or dummy round in the least (smoke).

Clint Hill may have been told "get up there" to protect their asses when Jackie was crawling hysterically out on the back of the limo after fatal shots. What would that have looked like if she fell off with all the dumb ass drunk agents laughing at her. Yes they would have got it for sure - so Clint Hill in attempting to save face runs to "her assistance'.

As well, the extreme prejudice view shows the "shrugging of shoulders, wtf" (what the freak) of the other agent(S) during direct evidence stand down orders well prior to this can be viewed again as the dog show of "concerned" but leaves "plausible deniability" to Command which the Warren Commission like the 911 Commission gave suggested guidelines to a better Secret Service preventative protection plan - accepting the Command excuses.

.... (simply upon receiving JFK in Bethesda with his entire brain missing, the Secret Service Detail should have been all arrested immediately. The Gov chose not to). Greer's excuse of hitting the brake pad by mistake instead of the gas is not acceptable in the least as a wrongful death charge by *gross* negligence. That applies to Greer as well. Roy Kellerman seemed to be ducking shots and brain matter anticipated while pretending acting in procedure to the events - "playing with the radio".

Others.... <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6OWcujJSCU>

EDIT: As you watch the YouTube link below this --- ALSO NOTICE NOT ONLY THE AGENT SAYING WTF SHRUGGING HIS SHOULDERS, BUT ALSO S.S. AGENT CLINT HILL (WHO RAN TO JACKIE KENNEDY AFTER SHOTS ON THE LIMO) REACTS TO THE SAME STAND DOWN ORDERS WITHOUT ANY PROTEST WHATSOEVER ! ! ! SO AGENT CLINT HILL CAN GO TO HELL, THE LIAR HE IS - AS SEEN SAYING AND IDENTIFYING THE ONE PROTESTING AGENT ABOUT THE STAND DOWN AS SAYING ACCORDING TO CLINT HILL - "OK, I AM GOING TO LUNCH NOW, HAVE A GOOD TRIP". BULL SHIDTT!

WATCH YOU TUBE:
Title: JFK Assassination Conspiracy.The Secret Service Stand Down Order. Was This Pre-Planned? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1FVZksUiZw
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1FVZksUiZw>

Now we go back to my observation - Clint Hill was simply putting on the dog show to cover their asses to pretend they were concerned with the President just being assassinated as running to the aid of Jackie Onassis, which unexpectedly placed herself in danger for the brief time she was attempting to retrieve her husbands brains blown out.

Jack Ruby Silenced Oswald is a Lie, Debunked

What my post here will do is completely debunk this classic contention virtually all JFK researchers have promoted all these years falsely, causing so many to err from truth. It as well shows that there is no such thing as President LBJ was in on it and set up the Commission to cover up the truth. Having Jack Ruby murder Lee Harvey Oswald is the LAST thing accused conspirators internally would have wanted. What they would have wanted was Oswald to stand trial and be found guilty and put to death like modern day Tim McVeigh in the Oklahoma Bombing Terrorist Act. CASE CLOSED ! Because once that happened, there was NO way to re-open the case, it is illegal in America to do so.

Review all the many YouTubes and testimony and reports of the Dallas P.D. and District Attorney Wade of Dallas and newspapers and television reports - all saying they "had their man", the "case is cinched", we are "certain beyond a doubt we have the right man" etc etc etc.

The only cover up neccessary is what did occur - the Secret Service commandeering the body of JFK from Parkland Hospital to perfrom the autopsy in Bethesda that gave them the opportunity to destroy damning evidence via removing the President's brain en route aboard Air Force One. They played their hand, revealed, as betting on switching caskets onboard (plain shipping casket) and radioing ahead to deliver it first to the rear at Bethesda and the actual expensize bronze casket JFK was placed in at Parkland was as a decoy dog show and photo opp - which later was delivered to the rear of Bethesda. They hoped this would allow for, and create, the neccessary confusion by all personnel at Bethesda that somewhere between the two caskets that officially the Govt. had special occassion to remove the brain for examination and evidence to pursue any conspiracy of more than one shooter - first before the official autopsy would ensue. That they presumably would believe without asking that any national seucrity measure was in place and being a military autopsy, no one questioning orders. As well, knowing the medical condition of JFK (doctors with medical bag daily giving President medical injections etc) they planned on the Kennedy Family itself (Jackie and Bobby) forbidding, or in the least requesting, certain procedures of a full autopsy where not performed, which they did. As well, all autopsy evidences would naturally go to the lock up of the Archives as they hoped sealed them from investigation and arrest - which also occurred.

NOW WE GO TO DALLAS...... (next)

Again, review all said that the case was all but closed and that Oswald was going to be convicted - period - and get the death penalty.

Let's review my post on Dallas D.A. Wade to learn of his reputation as a Prosecutor.....  WE CAN PLAINLY SEE THAT DALLAS D.A. HENRY WADE WAS A VERY HARD NOSE D.A. AND BASICALLY WENT FOR CONVICTIONS..... HE WOULD HAVE NAILED OSWALD TO THE CROSS....

 Sequester: Dallas County D. A. Henry Wade et al
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2013, 04:49:32 pm »
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,165.msg454.html#msg454

Sequester: Dallas County D. A. Henry Wade et al

ORIGINAL POST:
Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade sequester
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,236.0.html

UPDATE CONCERNING TRIAL AND LEGAL STANDING....

Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade sequester
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,236.0.html

In a simple brief lifetime review of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade (JFK, Oswald, Ruby) in the article below, it is VERY CLEAR about the reputation of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade - not the legacy wished - that aligns D.A. Wade in any realm of the legal instrument of "impingement" http://www.thefreedictionary.com/impinge (as with evidence) as to set aside ALL involvement with the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy, and this includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events.

ARTICLE REVIEW (READ)
NBC NEWS ARTICLE:
DALLAS — As district attorney of Dallas for an unprecedented 36 ye
19 convictions undone in Dallas - US news - Crime & courts | NBC ...
www.nbcnews.com/id/25917791/
After Dallas DA’s death, 19 convictions undone
Most cases involved black defendants; some praise preservation of DNA
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/25917791/

Henry Wade
(Dallas County District Attorney - JFK, Oswald, Ruby)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wade


However appropriately worded and invoked, should lay to the side as sequestered (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sequester) ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him, involved. This concludes that jurisdiction over the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events) CAN NOT be relied on or accepted and NOT jurisdiction of the investigation. This means ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him is in review for investigation.

It is plain and evident that in these areas historically resulted in actual Civil War to secure Due Process of Law under the United States Constitution as Law of the Land. In other words, ANY public and fair trial did not even exist until victory - and then necessarily adding so many laws to enforce Liberty and Justice for over 100 years. This is not even mentioning Jury. It is mentioning simple basic Bill of Rights Law.

And so district authority is removed in the cases, and in place the remedy by Law as to whether Federal necessary upon inquest. What applies.... "...which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..." .....

The Bill of Rights and Other Amendments - U.S. Constitution
http://usconstitution.com/bill-of-rights
(Bill of Rights)
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Ironically, this is as well a basis for Atty. Mark Lane who agreed with Mrs. Oswald to defend Lee Harvey Oswald before the Warren Commission, as is the Rights of ALL Americans as Due Process of Law.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Again, district authority is removed in the cases is apparent until.....

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 25
3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)

ORIGINAL LAW states....
"....until the Disability be removed...."

This is extended as inference to ALL positions of Government - Federal, State, Local, other - and certainly applies to ALL involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him in the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events). In the least is saying a review is in order. In the least is saying to reopen the case in that jurisdiction requires these such events of impingement and sequestration. Much as US Courts of Appeals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals) sat to hear Appeals for the Supreme Court, whether valid to proceed, there must be a similar Judicial authority in place of the Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him involved AS WELL AS EXTENDS to the Presidential Commission as the Warren Report and its validity or even jurisdiction or to be itself sequestered as impingement itself to the case(s).

Of course I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning NO intervention by ANY body of Law or Judicial has ANY legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not.....

Article III
Section 2.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.


And so apparently "politics, the science of spin city" has turned the Law as "the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" somehow now means they have the right by and with "such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make" - has turned the Law into being unlawfully interpreted as meaning these have the right to judge what appeal the Supreme Court will accept to hear, with their bullcrap excuses and reasons for the others they decide not to hear. This IS denial of Due Process. The Law, "...the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" is defining the role, authority, and power of the Supreme Court in the United States as being the appeal receiver from LOWER COURTS to rule on it, as these Justices are to be our best as understanding our Law. It is defining them NOT as having some despot power or all power in all court and Law of the Land and so on. It defines them as NOT having some tyrannical posistion, but is defining them rather as a last resort in America per Appeal in hearing a case that seems to be above understanding of posistion, or some unlafwfullness in fact or witness etc etc etc. - in hearing in lower courts. THIS the Founding Fathers made Law of the Land by and with Americans so that for any nefarious (dark) reason a lower court could not wrongfully and illegally put Americans to hurt with some political view and interpretation of the Law as convenient to serve their means against someone. ALL Americans have the Right Of Appeal in the United States. In less terms, there is NO attachment to the Right of Appeal in America - period.

I site the foundation by Imminent Domain (and as upheld by God) as to the interpretation of Law as precedent being the Declaration of Independence being cause and reason for the institution of the United States Constitution.... "transient causes"...

"IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance....."

Need I say more about Chief Justice William Howard Taft ?

THE UNLAWFUL CHANGE...
This is unconstitutional in my opinion and anyone American or sane....
"....The right of automatic appeal for most types of decisions of a court of appeals was ended by an Act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1925. This law was urged by Chief Justice William Howard Taft, and it also reorganized many other things in the federal court system. ...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals

Again, I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning NO intervention by ANY body of Law or Judicial has ANY legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not hear. That is denial of due process of the law - appellate jurisdiction as Law of the Land, period. As well this means NO one has any right to determine "validity" or 'grounds" for any appeal. THE APPEAL is heard by the higher court and NO ONE ELSE for ANY reason. Obviously the court being appealed against is in conflict of the law or as a "hostile witness" and etc etc etc. Under appellate jurisdiction, how could those (or any, for that matter) possibly be considered as "hearing grounds for appeal" - particularly after they had just made ruling in a case. As Judge in other words, they are being called inferior or wrong or dishonest in an appeal to a higher court. How can that give ruling in the same case then ? Is not that the evidence and defendant being "tried twice" - "twice put in jeopardy" which is ILLEGAL in the United States. THE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL LEGALLY IN AMERICA MEANS ANYONE WHO REQUESTS IT - PERIOD. If in the higher court it is determined this was other than realistic and genuine as superfluous (a joke) etc - then that party is to be charged with that. What lawyer in other words would go to jail and lose practice over some bad defendant trying to buy time with an appeal against a sentence etc, or pulling a prank for spite, or trying simply to remain in a less secure local prison to attempt escape while waiting for hearing ?

Bottom Line ? Dallas - apparently you're out until such time as you are in !

Okay to date we have posted here the plain information that Lee Harvey Oswald was ABSOLUTELY getting convicted and receiving the death penalty as punishment. Now - ISN'T THAT CASE CLOSED?

What in God's name would President Lyndon B. Johnson accused of being in on the assassination conspiracy and all the others want with a full blown Presidential Commission with Congressional Vote and Approval full of lawyers and staffers and evidence and interviews, Officer after Officer, witness after witness, Agency after Agency, on and on - everything naked to so many independent eyes conducting same and to finally GO FULLY PUBLIC UNDER THE SCRUTINY OF THE NATION AND WORLD for ? ? ?

The **** researchers all these years have kept yelling that in our faces and holding up as supposedly our national anthem to them and accusing them as part of the conspiracy and they hired Jack Ruby to shoot Lee Harvey Oswald as supposed to be CASE CLOSED?
WASN'T THAT CASE OPENED? ? ? ! !

The last thing the conspirators wanted was anybody around asking questions and rousing up interest and public reports in the news and radio/TV as is what happened by the Commission occurring. Are all the a*s*s*h*ole researchers also having us believe LBJ was that much of an a*s*s*h*ole? That stupid? Or do they want us to believe he was that paranoid that he just had to have all the evidence of the case locked up for ever just to make sure - after it was paraded past all those independent staffers that were NOT in on it? Could blow the whistle at any time as modern day Snowden?

THE MOST PERFECT CASE CLOSED POSSIBLE WAS OSWALD GOING TO TRIAL. THEY HAD THE MURDER WEAPON. THEY HAD THE FINGER PRINTS. THEY HAD THE BULLETS AND BALISTICS. THEY HAD THE WITNESSES. THEY HAD HIM CHARGED WITH KILLING THE POLICE OFFICER. THEY HAD HIM PULLING THE MURDER WEAPON TRYING TO SHOOT ANOTHER OFFICER WHEN HE WAS BEING ARRESTED. MARK LANE IS A COMPLETE A*S*S*H*OLE ANYMORE IS MY OPINION. HE WOULD HAVE NEVER GOT ANYWHERE AS DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR OSWALD AND DIDN'T. THE COMMISSION TURNED HIM DOWN. HE ACTUALLY ISN'T AS GOOD AS PEOPLE THINKS HE IS. HE SUCKS! DELIVERING FROM SOME PARALLEL UNIVERSE AS DEFENSE WITH HIS LITANY OF PLAIN BULL CRAP. THAT WOULD NOT HAVE WALKED IN DALLAS. THE ANSWERS TO HIM WHERE THEY HAD THE MURDER WEAPON -  THEY HAD THE FINGER PRINTS - THEY HAD THE BULLETS AND BALISTICS - THEY HAD THE WITNESSES - THEY HAD HIM CHARGED WITH KILLING THE POLICE OFFICER - THEY HAD HIM PULLING THE MURDER WEAPON TRYING TO SHOOT ANOTHER OFFICER WHEN HE WAS BEING ARRESTED. NO THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE FOUND OR REASON TO LOOK FOR IT. THEY HAD THEIR MAN. MARK LANE WOULD HAVE BEEN TARRED AND FEATHERED OUT OF DALLAS LIKE THE MOVIE "EASY RIDER".

-------------------

Q & A From the Facebook Group....

Q. What if the trial of Oswald brought up more questions than his death would?

MY ANSWERS....

Like what? that is the whole point if you studied all that Mark Lane proposed, all the out from left field questions of all this that and the other thing and persons involved, as he is arguably about best on the perfect defense as that studied on it. I believe with that create a doubt in the jury would have been laughed out of the court room like they did with Garrison.

They would have probably turned all things against him saying you just made our case for us defining his motives.

So many things would not walk and struck down such as introducing why Oswald so easily got back into the country and financed after being a defector, as example. The Judge would uphold prosecution as Defense is trying to reach conclusions for the jury. etc etc etc.

Crap like that would not have been allowed to be introduced - the defector crapola. etc etc and what CIA he knew or FBI and on and on....leading to a summation / struck down struck down struck down. I think the real thinking cap has to be on here is why I posted this. Oswald convicted was the *real* CASE CLOSED.

Leaves me to the question, what the hell did Ruby shoot him for? Weird. Strange. Mafia? Would have had him shanked (stabbed by improvised knife) in prison for a couple hundred or thousand, contract. Happens all the time. He would have never talked or made it to trial.

Jack Ruby seems to have been with the USSR "international" possibility the WC mentioned, by "blaming it on LBJ". An obvious doubt attempted to be spread to the American Public. The USSR propagandists fits this perfect. Be the enemy with in. Create doubt and confusion. Beat them from within. They were like that very heavily back in those days as part of that Cold War tactics. Make it real spooky and kill Dorothy Killgallen. whooooh Strike panic and fear in the hearts of the enemy.

The photos meant nothing in the case and would be struck down as well as reaching a conclusion or leading to summation. Like D.A. Wade said, he did not have to pove motive but only that Oswald did it and he said he was convinced beyond the shadow of a doubt. In other words all Defense trying to say they were smearing Oswald would have been a laugh since he was legally a traitor who had defected to the Soviet Union giving information to the enemy. Plus he was a confessed Marxist and defending Cuba which was an enemy of the state - Missle Crisis. Having studied we all know the evidence they had. Even some suggested the allleged rifle was rusty and could not shoot. Bull, they would have said becasue they fired a round to get and match balistics. The scope was crooked, they would have said defense must admit in hurried escape the rifle was thrown between boxes and knocked the scope out of alignment. and on and on. They had balistics matched. I have not seen that as challenged.

=========================

Ted R. WROTE: ) You are barely coherent and your logic absurd.....  classic disinformation.... "why I posted this" indeed. People fall for this crap?

MY COMMENTS....
Ted you blinded yourself and missed the whole post. You have the horse blinders on apparently and refuse to listen to anything but yourself then. I find *your* response "classic disinformation" and as a disingenuious professional agitator. That's because you said that only - I guess your famous one liner "classic disinformation". All you have to do now is prove it! You offer nothing but sway. Appear intelligent and sway people away is a classic by people who do not look at others looking right at them and what they are doing. They hope and pretend with their head up their ass they won't get caught like a typical addict on the run. Classic ostrich syndrone. Got symptoms? The "whole point of the post" is I am sick of the disinformation handed America for the past 50 years by bull**** profiteers. You want to side with that and hit on work like mine - it's your choice. It is a free world even with God. Anyone is allowed to chose to go straight to Hell. God can't stop them. It's a free choice you make. This is the "whole point to this post" as you outlined. Did you even read it and disagreeing make some criticisms of points - point out *exactly* what you are calling disinformation. Your one size fits all - "classic disinformation" - isn't fooling anyone here Ted or in all America or the world. They know who they are.

The exercise Ted is to open your mind. Isn't that the reason for people joining here?

Ted R. wrote... <<"why I posted this" indeed. People fall for this crap?>> Ted you are caught! Caught at your disinformation and BS with your classic one liners as "classic disinformation". Caught Ted because this is the FIRST time in America that this has ever been mentioned ! How can it be ""People fall for this crap?"" Ted when you and one other member are the only ones who have ever seen it? Ted your caught with disinformation you are peddling on my post! Again Ted you said ""People fall for this crap?"" when people have NOT even seen it yet! Ted now understands I have caught him as I accused him of spreading classic disinformation at an Internet?Internuts destination! Thank you, applause.

Classic disinformation Ted R. ? Now remember your hero researchers telling you those of the Military Industrial Complex and Southerners and left Republicans as anti-communist and Bay of Pigs people against ALL against JFK backing down war with the USSR around the world as a real wuss is why they killed him. Right? They still haven't told us why LBJ didn't invade Cuba as they killed Kennedy because he didn't and why they didn't kill LBJ because he didn't.... They still haven't told us when all those wanted war with the USSR how they SUDDENLY after killing JFK chickened out and went out the back door and shot themselves in the foot in Viet Nam getting only 25 cents on a dollar (500,000 Troops) as compared to full profit in world war which is the reasons researchers gave as their reasons for killing Kennedy. Remember? . gothcha! classic disinformation from them all Ted R. When you give expert testimony as a criminologist Ted let me know. Otherwise why continue to feed into the classic disinformation that poisons your mind that the American Government has warned against. I am a convert. I see the light. I am the first to admit I was a fool listening to them when I was young and niave. You can too Ted. See you.

I don't listen to their garbage anymore, I put it out!

He wasn't Jack Ruby - Ted - he was Jack Ruskie ted

----------------------

As I put forth in the study, try on looking at Jack Ruby as getting money from the USSR who paid for JFK's assassination to kill Oswald. They are the idiots that caused the Presidential Commission, "doing their homework" , researching our history as predicting this would be the move of LBJ.

All they need do now is pay for one insider to leak all the investigative information to them. List of witnesses. What do we find next. Expert actuaries done in England describing odd as something like 22 trillion to 7 odds that many witnesses in a murder investigation would die in that short of a time - dead witnesses.

That is one branch..... now look at Ruby planting the first seeds "I'm a big *s*h*id*t mafia man" and I, only, know what is going on here. *Suddenly* this is nothing to do with his love for Jackie anymore.

*Suddenly* he intoduces intrigue and the first notion Oswald is not who he appears to be. Oswald has been hired/framed (take your pick) by others way high up in America to kill JFK. RUBY ONLY is introducing the notion that those in America are guilty of the major conspiracy and assassination of JFK.

*Before* this, eveyone in America was fine with digesting that some communist Oswald **** Marxists for Cuba defector lone nut from lonely childhood in NYC shockingly, as first thought it may have been the loudmouth southerners who were protesting.

... WATCH Ruby planting the seeds as if he is the insider about America did it. Why would the USSR pick him for this ? Becasue of his mafia background as that is what they wanted - pointing the finger at America to take the heat off of them....(Now remember your researchers telling you those of the Military Industrial Complex and Southernors and Bay of Pigs against JFK backing down war with the USSR around the world as a real wuss is why they killed him - so obviously the USSR is afraid and paranoid then, right suckers? They still haven't told us why LBJ didn't invade Cuba as they killed Kennedy because he didn't.... gothcha! classic disinformation) ....

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we2eucWXqjg>

---------------

We now have Jack Ruby introducing (what they call today classic disinformation) in Part Two.... he beefs up the intrigue by introducing it is more than mafia going on - it is big big big.

Here we go with Ruby planting the seeds and so laughible as he says....

"The people had, that had so much to gain, (classic blame -Military Industrial Complex) and had such an alterior motive for PUTTING ME IN THE POSISTION I AM IN will never let the true facts come above board to the world." ...

Do you see this CRAP. SUDDENLY Ruby is no longer running his cover story that he shot Oswald because of his loving respect for First Lady Jackie Kennedy and did not want here to suffer a public trial.
NOW suddenly his wild story planting seeds in the minds of America and future axxhole researchers planting the seeds that insider America has conspired and killed JFK for profit in war BUT DO YOU HEAR WHAT HE SAID? LISTEN TO THIS SUDDEN TURN AROUND OUT OF NOWHERE PLANT OF DISINFORMATION......

QUOTE: "The people had, that had so much to gain, and had such an alterior motive for PUTTING ME IN THE POSISTION I AM IN ..."

...... SEE IT ? SUDDENLY this is *nothing* to do with Jackie Kennedy anymore. All of a SUDDEN there is some MAJOR conspiracy that put Jack in prison for shooting Oswald. "Alterior motive for putting me in the posistion I am in..." - not Jack putting HIMSELF in prison for shooting Oswald in broad daylight in a Police station - NOW it is suddenly "The people had, that had so much to gain, and had such an alterior motive..." are who put Jack in prison. And who now wonders why the warren Commission walked away laughing at Jack Ruby and his "classic disinformation" that is actually USSR propaganda intentionally. ... And ByTheWay, Ruby claims to the Warren Commission he will talk if they get him out of there about all these conspirators - and do you get it? If he was honestly going to testify and spill the beans - why the hell would he have silenced one of the witnesses, Oswald, by shooting him in broad daylight? Now again do you get it - the Warren Commission walked away LAUGHING at Jack Ruby....

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnpQBa1Euc>

------------------------------ 

 We now move to the Jack Ruby dropping his jewel - what he wanted from the beginning but needed to run his ramp up for it.... the classic disinformation of all time LBJ DID IT. That f8xkking absurd!

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsZ59X2_46M>

TED R. THAT IS CLASSIC DISINFORMATION MY FRIEND! or keep your had up your butt and take your soft target shots at people like me. Depends on your character as a person doesn't it? Don;t make personal attacks on people over the internet without expecting response. it is a golden rule in forums and these type group board settings. TED R..... CLASSIC DISINFORMATION.....

Candlelight Service at Lincoln Memorial in Honor of JFK, 12/22/1963, MP769
50 YEARS AGO....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO7pK_Mc5Z8

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO7pK_Mc5Z8>

Candlelight vigil at Lincoln Memorial and the lighting of the National Christmas Tree, December 22, 1963. This film is from the LBJ Library moving picture collection created by the White House Naval Photographic Unit, aka the Navy Films. Public domain.

(Skip in one minute.... TV test bars for one minute)

In this my Thesis (solved) you have read here that the first wound to JFK was by a high powered rifle entering below the neck on the President from behind. Some questions must have risen. I will here qualify Governor Connally's wounds as NOT from the same bullet.

Remember what was written here that the bullet entering from rear below the neck of JFK then passing through struck the vertebrae, nicking it shown in X-Rays, and then richocheted upward - exiting the front about the Adam's Apple. There was the fresh dent on the chrome dash of the Presidential Limo that was about the size of a bullet as this striking it. There was also the windshield debacle of actually a through and through bullet hole against it was "just cracked". The bullet exiting JFK's throat could have been either of these, or simply richocheted out of the car altogether.

And so the questions arise. Then I am then saying that the Governor was hit by another shot other than the one striking the President from behind below the neck. It is really difficult looking at the Zapruder Film to not say that both these men were simultaneously hit by the same bullet. They both appear reacting at the same instant. However, this does not rule out that two bullets were fired simultaneously at both men by two different assassins.

It has been shown here that the American Government DID "declassify" to the American Public and World in the House Select Committee Hearings that President Kennedy arrived into the Autopsy Room "with no brain". It is documented the President was in a different casket (then the one left from Dallas) brought into the room at Bethesda with both caskets in a paper trail and no one accessed the President at Bethesda. What was revealed to all via the testimony now allowed by Paul O'Conner (Military Autopsy worker), as he and the others were sworn to secrecy by the Military at the autopsy time - was that indeed the President was in that different casket and a body bag (which he was not placed in at Dallas) and was unzipped and O'Conner helped place the President onto the table and said there was "a gasp" as the President "had no brain" except "less than a handful" of serrated matter inside at the bottom of the blown open skull. Of course Parkland Doctors all testified that only about one third of the President's brain had been blown away, out. What was "declassified" was that the only persons with access and to do this (dispose of the President's brain) were those of the Secret Service and at the only time alone with the casket in Air Force One at the time of the swearing in of V.P. Johnson as the President now of the United States.

Since it was shown here that Oswald's gun could not possibly have been the murder weapon and according to all medical testimony, then also it is known that those of the Secret Service had planted fragments of bullets from Oswald's rifle - shot and collected elsewhere on a previous date. This includes in conspiracy the infamous "pristine bullet" planted on the gurney at Parkland Hospital.

And so also, we see the Secret Service were "sweeping" the Presidential Limo at Parkland and elsewhere - obviously then to gather and dispose of damning evidence of more than one assassin, being then by definition as part of the conspiracy. There was all the Parade Route oddities and lack of security, and the slowing down almost to a stop right precisely at the spot where the head wounds occurred which are also obviously conspiratorial.

To qualify Governor Connally's wounds in answering questions arisen in my thesis here, we go to the medical descriptions of the entry wound of the Governor. This is a several part examination of existing documented evidence and testimony.

Here is one source showing photos of the "recovered" bullets, fragments from the Presidential Limo and the 'pristine' (meaning almost with no damage) bullet from the gurney at Parkland....
http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/fragments/fragphotos.html
...and here....
http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Rifle_Bullets/index.html


And so with your research about the Gov. Connally wounds as I did, a good source is here....
http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm

....we find that the entrance wound of the Governor was described as much a puncture wound - meaning a straight on shot, the bullet entering with a slight eliptical shape as to be from a slight tangent or "tangential". The entry wound in the top rear of the President's head was a puncture wound - virtually round clean straight in. This alludes to the bullet hitting the Governor was from a slight angle. Those of course of the SBT (single bullet theory) camp will say that naturally, as the Governor said he was turning when he got hit.

This also means that a separate bullet could have been fired from a more severe angle than the supposed Oswald bullet hitting the President's head. That would cause the entry wound described in the Governor - slight tangential entry. Note that the entry wound to the rear of the President's head (top center, about size of a pencil hole) has been described as and looks like a puncture wound - straight in cleanly and NOT tangential - which of course means not from an angle such as from behind and to the right as the Book Depository Building, but rather straight on as from the DalTex Building.

There is more though, and importantly so. A lot of the bullets, cartridges, in these type weapons as Oswald's have a very pointed tip sharply. The ammunition for the Carcano Rifle (like Oswald's) is much more round in pronounced manner. This Carcano ammo, not even in the FBI test repository at time, having the rounded tip makes it much less able to yaw or tumble after leaving whatever it hit - here reported as JFK in the Warren Commission. It stays almost virtually straight to then hit a second target which became Governor Connally also reported by the warren Commission.

Most other bullets as this tend to hit sideways into the second victim, after tumbling or yaw from leaving the first. SEE....  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaw_(rotation)

Now in support of the Warren Commission, or rather not, it was actually not in there that the Carcano ammo could have indeed caused the slight tangential puncture entry wound of the Governor's back and as opposed to all other type ammo not as the Carcano rounded tip ammo - which is reportedly not known to yaw much or tumble after leaving a first victim. Ironically, the Warren Commission not doing their homework, lost a best chance to support their SBT (single bullet theory). This may have cinched their theory's credibility in the eyes of many more.

And so what we have here is that Governor Connally was hit from a slight angle - more so then the bullet that first entered the President's head (not tangential) in the top rear and from the rear. There is one research offering a shot was fired from the other end of the Book Depository Building and a lower floor I believe it was. That, as example, would be more of an angle obviously than straight on from the rear. 

In review of the Secret Service, or rather the FBI, bullet fragments they said were found about the rear seat area (Mrs. Connally) - this would coincide with the angle shot from the Book Depository (Oswald sniper nest) as fragments from the head shot entering the rear of the President's head and exiting as fragments and landed there. PROBLEM: The entry wound of the President's head towards the top and center (not the lower blow out wound of lower right side) was NOT tangential - but plainly seen as a traditional puncture wound fired straight on and NOT from an angle. Reconcile that! It would be from the Daltex Building if anywhere (straight on puncture wound), and not the Book Depository Building that would have caused then a somewhat tangential entry wound.

SCREENSHOT PICTURE.....
http://www.jfklancer.com/docs.maps/limoexam.gif


THE GREATEST mystery I find here as knowing a different shot hit the Governor, is the whole planted evidence scenario. Remember that I have written and reminded that the Oswald Evidence of the gun and three spent shells have been already planted to find to frame Oswald. It has to be that ALL evidence found means only three shots could have been fired - and from Oswald's rifle only. This includes the pristine bullet found on the gurney at Parkland. If anything else shows up - it shows a conspiracy and may even reveal the evidence tampering that did go on. Busted. Obviously the assassination conspiracy "hit" was revealed as Oswald only did it and with three bullets only - period. They put all their money on that as the outcome of investigation obviously by all the found planted evidence. Even with all their planning, we find, they were sloppy and did weird risky unexplained things as if somewhat deranged rather than cold blooded calculated murderers - even being in category of a "state sanctioned hit" as is said today.

The strangest thing is the "pristine bullet" found on the gurney at Parkland Hospital. If they knew they were shooting JFK first in the back (and was shown here why and reason of that wound - not a mistake or sloppy gunmanship) - they also knew they were shooting the Governor also with a separate bullet. With the straight on puncture wound of the back at the neck area of JFK - they must have assumed (and even practiced on victims or reproductions) the exiting bullet would have struck the Governor as well. This means the second shooter actually causing the wounds with a separate shot would have left two entry wounds in the Governor's back - one tangential from the actual side shot and the other presumed as a tumbler or yaw entry from passing through the first victim (JFK). Again note the Carcano ammo. The bullet hitting JFK in the back/neck area did nick the vertebrae (discovered in X-Ray) richocheting and exited the throat - but did not hit Connally. It richocheted upwards and out and explains the angles involved. I have posted this here and has not been found elsewhere, to my knowledge, by other researchers who seem to have missed the valuable info about the vertebrae injury of JFK being struck by the bullet.

So why plant the pristine bullet? We are talking here a shot at least 90 yards away having to basically hit a silver dollar with all accuracy (JFK's back/neck shot). It did hit but a little to the left which then entered and richocheted off the vertebrae and out. This is part of the weird stuff. Why take a shot like that with the obvious outcome being in many scenarios of violent reactions that would have called off the head shots ? Deranged people.

Now if you haven't gotten to the 'smokin gun' question here, it is this. How could those involved have possibly predicted the JFK back/neck shot would richochet off his vertebrae and angle upward even out of the car and not hit Connally? Why and how then did they plant the pristine bullet as if they knew this would occur and took the next shot hitting Gov. Connally as if it was the JFK back shot that hit Connally?

THEY set up the single bullet theory - NOT Arlon Spector. It was like a script handed to American Govt and Law investigating - Oswald, the rifle, the three spent shells, and the single bullet. Remember, I don't believe they had any type laser targeting then for rifles - BUT even so at 90 plus yards away pinpointing a vertebrae nick while the Limo was moving at speed during this sequence shots and after slowed down for the head shots is not possible except by luck in many, many shots and one hitting target - the vertebrae to cause richocheting.

Look at it.... single bullet Carcano ammo (doesn't yaw much), tangential wound to Connally. It's crazy like they were Satan himself which knew more than saved him. But we know that was impossible. As they say God's hand is in everything. Here they must have gone a bit crazy wondering what happened to the exiting bullet that struck JFK in the back/neck area. Remember that the evidence of Oswald rifle fragments are being planted in the Limo too. Simple. Visually sweep the Limo after, beginning at Parkland, and even with a Geiger counter. Everything found swooped up to be thrown out and then plant the Oswald rifle fragments. Then wash it down to be sure nothing else is found in some profound excuse of decency for the President. And so the reality. They were prepared to explain the TWO entry wounds into Governor Connally's back - and P.S. - how could they have possibly known the bullet hitting the Gov. would finally exit as a graze wound of the thigh (SBT) ?

Too bad for them - Governor Connally had turned sideways and then fell into his wife's lap before the head shot so that they could not say one entry wound into Connally's back was fragments from the JFK head shots - which was probably the planned outcome.

Again we go back to the Carcano rifle picked which raised the questions why Oswald did this. He could have easily purchased a rifle back then anywhere and not have it traced to him, but seemingly chose the order method that would and with the fake name. Did the conspirators do their homework and knew this about the Carcano ammunition that does not tumble or yaw much after hitting a first victim and into the second? Does this explain these obvious stick out like a sore thumb tactics in Oswald ordering the Carcano rifle? Fits. Fits for the SBT (single bullet theory) and we are back to square one - why and how did they set that up as it was? How could they know the outcome of the shots in advance as they did occur ? The only explanation is they expected two entry wounds into Governor Connally and ready to have evidence support that in their pre-arranged Oswald did it in three shots (evidence already planted).

All said and done, the Doctors said the found fragments/bullet on the floor of the Limo would be the expected evidence and NOT the pristine bullet for Governor Connally's wounds. As well, all tolled, the fragments found (planted) weighed far too much to be from the "pristine bullet" planted at Parkland.

TAKE A LOOK......
1963 SECRET SERVICE FILM (JFK ASSASSINATION RECONSTRUCTION)
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcqYcdIce6E>

You can see the angles here that do not match the JFK head wound from the rear that was as a puncture wound straight on (apparently from Daltex Bldg.) - no tangential entrance. Ironically, the slightly eliptical puncture entry tangential wound in Gov. Connally's back reveals the JFK rear head wound entry was NOT from the Book Depository. This is more gleaned from the medical evidence and not mentioned by other researchers I have seen. And so they "snitched" on themselves. Perhaps the first "amateur" state sanctioned hit in modern history. Again, there is no such thing as the perfect crime in America.

BELOW HERE I HAVE ATTACHED THREE PICTURES FROM THIS....

And so the bottom line here in qualifying Gov. John Connally's wounds is shown as the actual multiple assassin attack became flawed immediately after the first wounding of the President which was also the simultaneous wounding of the Governor by a different gunman and bullet. In other words, there were two different gunman who simultaneously fired - one at the President and one at the Governor. They had obviously been prepared to have these wounds explained and obviously involved the mysterious pristine bullet found on the gurney at parkland Hospital.

What went immediately wrong, was the bullet that hit the President in the lower neck area (upper back) striking through, richocheted off of the President's vertebrae and exited upward out his throat area around the Adam's apple. This is what forced the President's arms up in reaction, as seemingly clutching towards his throat as choking as seen on the Zapruder film and reported/testified by witnesses.

This unexpected injury to JFK in the shooting shows Gov. Connally was hit simultaneously by a second gunman. The one shot of the three the Warren Commission reports that "missed everything" may indeed be a shot intended as firing over the targets and missing everything - expressly as a missed shot that in turn was intended to be a cover story second shot that then fitted hitting the Governor causing back wounding. Witnesses easily sloughed off as hearing echoes, but the medical evidence was the crux of the matter.

If you look at the Zapruder film you notice it seems both men were hit simultaneously by that shot that struck the President in the lower neck/upper back area. BUT in viewing the aftermath of that strike, we see JFK throwing his arms up as seemingly choking and then after that the Governor has attempted turning around to see him. NOW this is about the time of the reported second shot according to the warren Commission that simply missed everything - and obviously it would have had to, because look at the men now to try and shoot the Governor. We have JFK's arms up and clutching towards his throat - his elbows and arms up high and now in the way of another shot to hit the Governor. As well, the Governor has turned and is also falling into his wife's lap backwards, sideways in the car. There is now NO clear shot from the buildings behind to hit Connally in the back. This proves the bullets that hit the President in the lower neck area and the Governor in the back were indeed fired simultaneously even though Governor Connally swears he was hit by the "second shot heard". All the reenactments and all the years they have never shown the shot with JFK's arms up and in the way of it with the Gov. turning and then falling - though they have shown the trees in the way of an Oswald first shot, showing when it was possible to fire. Let's see Gov. Connally's "second shot hit" him. If possible, then medically it would seem to have shown a more tangential entry wound as the target was moving sideways as opposed to the shooter shooting from a sideways position.

I hope this has served to qualify Governor John Connally's wounds that occurred and when - answering as well questions that may have arose about my "solved" thesis on the JFK Assassination and concerning the lower neck/upper back wounding of JFK which then did NOT continue on into the Governor.

CHECK OUT....

Bobby Kennedy: America's first assassination conspiracy theorist
May 13, 2007
BY DAVID TALBOT
http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=deceptions/assassinations/jfk/rfk-accused-cia-of-jfk-murder.txt

Debunk My Thesis? I don't think so!

Many persons like to attempt to "destroy" a researcher's work and resultant theory or belief and the facts showing or leading to that - and only as mischief. Other genuine persons may pose questions and show facts - and even researchers, and may possibly "debunk" or disprove a theory arrived at or belief. As anyone knows in this case, and with no official lawful judgment all these years combined with "locked away evidence", it has been a real pain to attempt to arrive at the belief of what happened - and via the zealous efforts of so many concerned - to even map the entire assassination from start to finish, even with a who's who list of the guilty involved.

I am going to go ahead here and post a bottom line "hey genius, if that's how it happened then what about this?".

As I posted I was really, really, really surprised suddenly through my own research to suddenly realize and reach the conclusion that our own American Government immediately, and ongoing, were involved in a complete National Security Mode that explained many of the puzzling things going on after the death of the President within the hour of the shots fired. I have posted support and documents for this and have given reasons for all they did as far as the Warren Commission Report and why. I have denounced those that pointed the finger at Vice President Lyndon Johnson saying/claiming he was "in on it" - and as disgraceful even.

Seeing through and dissatisfied with the Warren Report, ever since has been that quest to discover the whole truth for many Americans (most) and even many others from other nations. It was all a daze in the beginning, one question would unleash an avalanche. Simply and profoundly by the sealing up of the evidence, eyes seeing holes in the Warren Report just went on staring at the Government with the thoughts "somebody in there in a big conspiracy shot our President". The eyes and thoughts kind of glazed over like that for years - staring and glaring at the Government and the apparent Warren Commission 'cover up'. What was lost was the pursuit into USSR involvement, but turned and stayed on those in American Government.

All in all, through my "solved" thesis - I see two possibilities to "blow it to hell", and they combine as against the innocence of some of the National Security Mode going on particularly with the now President Johnson. This refers to all the accusations of the "President Johnson Executive Order 273" which is reported by many as the complete reversal of President Kennedy's position of the withdrawal of American Troops (Executive Order 263) as a "green light" to create a full blown "Viet Nam A Go-Go" money making machine for years, as long as it lasts. The other involves a mystery needed to be pursued as to one of the first Press Conferences from Parkland Hospital whereby one of the Doctors treating Governor Connally reported that a bullet was still lodged in his thigh that they will remove shortly, as his major wounds have been addressed first and that was secondary. The question goes - whatever happened to that bullet ? Hmmmm.....

So let's begin with the two Executive Orders concerning Viet Nam from JFK and then LBJ after the death of President Kennedy. The one idea reported is that LBJ signed this reversal of withdrawal to begin full scale operations and what a day after the JFK Funeral - "before he was even cold in the grave".

Now in comparing the JFK 263 and the LBJ 273 and the draft of that while JFK was alive - we see that the LBJ 273 is as very much simply using Kennedy's Draft and issuing now under his self as President as the "best way to honor President Kennedy" was to promote and pass into legislation all the things he was fighting for. WHAT THESE LYING BASTARDS DO NOT SAY IS THAT THE LBJ 273 STATES SPECIFICALLY....

QUOTE))) (LBJ 273) :
" 2. The objectives of the United States with respect to the withdrawal of U. S. military personnel remain as stated in the White House statement of October 2, 1963. "

AND WHAT WAS IN THE JFK 263 ?
QUOTE))) (JFK 263) :
"The President approved the military recommendations contained in Section I B (1 -3) of the report, but directed that no formal announcement be made of the implementation of plans to withdraw 1,000 U.S. military personnel by the end of 1963."

SO THAT ENTIRELY IN ONE STATEMENT BLOWS AWAY ALL THOSE THAT POINT THE FINGER AT LBJ SAYING HE WAS IN ON IT AND GAVE THEM THE GREEN LIGHT IN 273 TO ESCALATE A FULL BLOWN MILITARY WAR IN VIET NAM....B*U*L*L*S*H*I*D*T !

LBJ TAKING UP THE PRESIDENCY ADDRESSED THE BUSINESS LEFT ON THE PRESIDENT'S DESK AND 263 WAS ONE OF THEM. HE REINTRODUCED JFK'S WISHES AS 273. I NO LONGER HAVE THE RESPECT FOR OLIVER STONE AND HIS TRASH MOVIE - "JFK" - CONTINUING THE LIE. ....NEXT!

Now you compare those documents and see the truth. Visit the "Pentagon Papers" while you are at it. Get a good view and history of Viet Nam. See the "China Containment Policy" too. Viet Nam was simply the back door into World War Three with the USSR which JFK entered the front door at Moscow over the Cuban Missile Crisis. This was the whole reason of the Viet Nam protesters - the youth of America - who all wanted to take on Communism in Moscow, not Viet Nam which was nothing more than what Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara called it... "the real U.S. goal was "not to help friend, but to contain China.".... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers

....And this became the stalemate and loss. The United States Armed Forces held a 20 to 1 kill ratio, perhaps the greatest ever in the history of warfare. What they were up against was not just Northern Viet Nam troops, but the Viet Cong and Chinese troops being snuck into the fighting and surrounding nations involvement - Laos, Cambodia etc. The stance taken as the back door into World War Three by containing Communist Red China and her satellites (those of South east Asia) as the ground forces of USSR to invade against Allied Forces in full assault and invasion of the USSR (much as done in World War Two at D-Day) resulted in the final stalemate that it would end in some Nuclear Winter to win and the South Viet Nameese would have to agree their freedom from communist rule was simply not worth destroying the entire world over it and accept a saving face defeat with the USA.

Now understand that and what is being said ! Read a brief here from the President Kennedy State of the Union Address 1963 (his last).....

QUOTED:
"The Nassau agreement recognizes that the security of the West is indivisible, and so must be our defense. But it also recognizes that this is an alliance of proud and sovereign nations, and works best when we do not forget it. It recognizes further that the nuclear defense of the West is not a matter for the present nuclear powers alone--that France will be such a power in the future--and that ways must be found without increasing the hazards of nuclear diffusion, to increase the role of our other partners in planning, manning, and directing a truly multilateral nuclear force within an increasingly intimate NATO alliance. Finally, the Nassau agreement recognizes that nuclear defense is not enough, that the agreed NATO levels of conventional strength must be met, and that the alliance cannot afford to be in a position of having to answer every threat with nuclear weapons or nothing. "

SEE IT ? .... "...Finally, the Nassau agreement recognizes that nuclear defense is not enough, that the agreed NATO levels of conventional strength must be met, and that the alliance cannot afford to be in a position of having to answer every threat with nuclear weapons or nothing." http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=9138

"Nuclear weapons or nothing" is NOT any way to win what would become World War Three and invasion of the USSR and to end unlawful tributary communism forever from the face of the world. In other words many nuclear strikes could serve only to paralyze nations isolated as land masses separated by the seven seas. Short of ultimate planet destruction in a nuclear winter scenario, a nuclear war would not end any nation, or perhaps a few. Humanities would survive and rebuild and start war all over again as they were able. So as JFK instructed and reflected, any nuclear use must be accompanied by a sustained invasion force of levels high enough to accomplish victory. Simply this was estimated traditionally since World War Two as the United States must have a 2,000,000 man standing army. Of course this was called into action the year prior at the Cuban Missile Crisis when President Kennedy placed us at DEFCON 2.

Now do you see how the Viet Nam war was a mistake ? This was called shooting yourself in the foot in Viet Nam (a reference to a soldier shooting himself in the foot to get out of the war). The invasion force if you will was being decimated as ill planned resulting in over 500,000 casualties and over 55,000 dead. That is a staggering 25 percent of the 2 million man standing army face down in the mud wounded in Viet Nam. There is much that fingers should be pointed at President Nixon and NOT Johnson. At Nixon because he is the one that refused to win the war. He is the one that offered peace when there was none. He is the one who chickened out of war. He is the soldier that shot himself in the foot at Watergate. He was a coward! President Johnson was always considered as meaning well but was kind of country dumb and naive in the heart of hearts of the American Youth.

The United Nations Treaty and Charter constrained America to fight Communist overthrow anywhere in the world. This was also called in manner the Containment Policy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Containment ....What was President Johnson to do ? Ignore North Viet Nam ? Remove from South Korea ? Let Cuba have their missiles back ? Stay out of Southeast Asia ? Hide from Red Communism altogether like a good neighbor, to hell with their victims ? What happened is history. We can not apologize for leaders's lack of might, courage, and wisdom. Europe and the Americas would say we can not achieve our promises and blessings without the knowledge of and obeisance to God. If we do not understand God, then we can not follow His Teaching and instruction. The whole can of worms with this goes back to the League of Nations - the predecessor to the United Nations. This is man's wisdom - NOT God's. Both are ridiculously flawed by the inclusion of both the United states and the Soviet Union. Both the United States Constitution and the Communist Manifesto International forbid entering these - as is defined as Treason in both forms of government to do so. They're ridiculous and always have been. As great a leader as Jack Kennedy was, he still promoted this activity saying he was not against Containment. Why fight 50 separate wars in 50 separate countries that the Soviet Union or Red China or other autonomous communist nations would invade with Containment policy ? It is worst then absurd ! If you are against communism for all the right reasons, you go to war and defeat it - PERIOD. Eradicate it from the face of the world. You can't call it evil if it spreads but is okay if it does not. Do you see it ? The Communist Manifesto International expressly demands the conquering of all nations and anything short of that or opposing that shall be held for Treason. That constitutes Communism as Enemy of the United States and United States Constitution and charged with Treason. Now do you see it ? Neither country could ever go into the League of Nations or the United Nations together without it being Treason. It has been too nonsensical almost 100 years now. There is no apology for these leaders. And so if you want to talk about Viet Nam or any President involved then do it right. Be correct. Speak intelligently. Above all, don't be such the a*s*swhole saying "President Johnson had JFK assassinated".

We can not be expected to answer for those that talk the talk but don't walk the walk.

An example of leadership that is simply non-quality and fruitless shows we have not gotten one foot forward in 50 years in the following comparison of events from the Viet Nam Era to present day under President Obama with the Russians and Syria and Ukraine Crisis and Iraq invasion.....

READ:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_relating_to_the_Six-Day_War
"In a 1993 interview for the Johnson Presidential Library oral history archives, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara revealed that a carrier battle group, the U.S. 6th Fleet, on a training exercise near Gibraltar was re-positioned towards the eastern Mediterranean to be able to defend Israel. The administration "thought the situation was so tense in Israel that perhaps the Syrians, fearing Israel would attack them, or the Russians supporting the Syrians might wish to redress the balance of power and might attack Israel". The Soviets learned of this deployment, which they regarded as offensive in nature, and, in a hotline message from Soviet First Secretary Alexei Kosygin, threatened the United States with war.

The Soviet Union supported its Arab allies. In May 1967, the Soviets started a surge deployment of their naval forces into the East Mediterranean. Early in the crisis they began to shadow the US and British carriers with destroyers and intelligence collecting vessels. The Soviet naval squadron in the Mediterranean was sufficiently strong to act as a major restraint on the U.S. Navy. In a 1983 interview with the Boston Globe, McNamara said that "We damn near had war". He said Kosygin was angry that "we had turned around a carrier in the Mediterranean"."

LOOK FAMILIAR ? Same players today as then - Russia with the Arabs attempting control of Israel and the Free World. We have not advanced one foot militarily.

Next .... the mysterious disappearance of the "bullet in the thigh" of Governor Connally.....


Parkland Doctors on Connally's Leg Wound
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l428bg2JGY

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l428bg2JGY>

And so we see here real testimony/report by one of the treating Physicians at Parkland within those minutes to hour and so treating the wounds of Govenor Connally also hit. Now the doctor clearly is saying there is a bullet in the Govenor's left thigh, lodged, and will be removed now that the more pressing treament of wounds have been addressed. It is possible they somewhat probed the thigh wound and found a bullet. More likely I would assume they took X-Rays and saw the bullet. The Doctor did not say something like there is a fragment of a bullet lodged in the thigh. He said it was a full bullet. I had overlooked this to pursue and research what ever happened to this "bullet" reported as lodged in the Govenor's thigh. When I do that, I will add it below.

And so the point of the exercise here is someone saying they debunked my 'thesis' that the question asked must be how in the hello was National Security in the matter in place so fast within the first hour and second as in the know to then begin their National Security policy of hiding things for reasons posted across my thesis for those reasons they did? Reasons being for secret investigation into the conspiracy discovered. But that (the larger conspiracy) wasn't really discovered yet beyond initial reports of possibly more than one shot to the head of the President and possibly from different angles. The real discovery of the major conspiracy wasn't until the President's body arrived on the autopsy table at Bethesda and all saw "the President had no brain". Of course leaving Dallas, the Doctors said about one third was blown away - not the whole brain blown out. There was no autopsy surgical procedure performed which exactly involved cutting half the top of the skull off and so forth to then remove the brain for forensics of bullet paths and so on. The entire brain was missing "except for about less than a handful of mascerated brain at the bottom of the skull".

About then began the insanity for sure for those in charge to start investigating what had happened and where and by who. Soon after came the knowledge those of the Secret Service where the only ones able to do that - dispose of the President's brain - and aboard Air Force One and at the time of the swearing in of Vice president Johnson to the Presidency by law. It was the only time the President's body was alone, with them - Jackie being with the swearing in ceremony up front. As well, he arrived in a different casket at Bethesda at the autopsy room. It was shortly after these things and discoveries that what everyone has called a cover up (and myself before) was the time that National Security policy was going into effect, policy above the general as full heightened alert and so on at news of the shooting etc. The National Security policy I discovered involved the covering up of things and having those of the autopsy sworn by oath not to discuss anything and this by the Military - and then like things surrounding the autopsy results and beyond to the Presidential Commission etc. Reasons being were secret investigation.

So if the actual scope of the conspiracy wasn't even known yet, how the hello was the policy in place to then surpress anything to do with the bullet in the Govenor's thigh? Why would they know to start grabbing evidence to keep it from the public if they were not even aware yet of the scope and magnitude of the full conspiracy? Where did the bullet go? Things have been declassified. Huh guy. huh Guy? And then they go back to - bullcrap, President Johnson set the whole thing up and they were all in on it. That's the end of your bullcrap "theory". 

SEE....

F.B.I. Backs Plan to Remove Connally Bullet Fragments
By DAVID JOHNSTON,
Published: June 18, 1993
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/18/us/fbi-backs-plan-to-remove-connally-bullet-fragments.html

Well like I said, Debunk My Thesis? I don't think so!

--
SENDER: gerald309 --
Have A Safe Computing Day!
Webmaster: Malware Removal/Amateur Forensics
HOME http://bluecollarpc.us/
Alternate https://sites.google.com/site/pcsecurityhelper/
HELP http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BlueCollarPCSecurity/
Membership/Join List:
Subscribe: BlueCollarPCSecurity-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Free Malware Removal Help / A Community Website Since 2005

David Lifton about Paul O'Conner
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=7502
IN HIS OWN WORDS.... QUOTED:

"What made O’Connor important is what he told the House Select Committee, and is recorded in the HSCA Outside Contact Report of Purdy and Flanagan, in 1977, and it comes down to 3 basic facts concerning the JFK autopsy:

1. JFK’s body arrived in a shipping casket
2. Inside, it was in a body bag
3. The cranium was empty.

O’Connor is a direct witness to these events, which is surely what was being suppressed by the “order not to talk,” which he (and the others) were placed under verbally, and then in writing, on November 26, 1963, the day after JFK’s funeral. Moreover, it was the recision of the “order not to talk” which made it possible for him (and the other) Bethesda witnesses to be interviewed by the HSCA.

Those interviews were conducted in 1977/78, and the appropriate reports written. But then Blakey didn’t like what they said and it was all locked up — and not scheduled for release until 2029.

Two things changed that schedule for the much delayed release of this information:

(1) I learned of, located, and interviewed the witnesses in 1979; and incorporated their accounts into Best Evidence, which was submitted in manuscript form by April, 1980, and was in the book stores by January, 1981..

(2) The JFK Records Act—passed as a result of Oliver Stone’s 12/91 release of JFK—led to the original HSCA documents being released in 1993/94.

Of course, the public didn’t have to wait until 1993/94; they could (and did) read Best Evidence, published in January, 1981.

The substance of what O’Connor (and the others) had to say made its first public appearance in Best Evidence, which was number one on many best seller lists by April of 1981. Further, I arranged to film his account, in October, 1980, at his home in Gainesville, Florida,, and that was broadcast nationally on several shows in the Spring of 1981 (e.g. Tom Snyder) plus in many cities across the U.S. where I went on my book tour, always carrying with me a 3/4” video of O’Connor and the other key Bethesda witnesses.

Neither the way O’Connor’s account became public nor any of the 3 key points that O’Connor made that made his account historically significant is mentioned in the obituary. The obit about Paul O’Connor should be focused on what was important about him as a witness, and the information he had which pointed to fraud in the autopsy; and how those facts became known—not on who fraternized with whom, and in what year.

When then HSCA report was released in July, 1979, and I saw the statement about the body bag, I located O’Connor (and the others), interviewed him (and the others, all in the fall of 1979) and published their accounts. (This is described in Chapter 26 of B.E.)

O’Connor’s statements that the body arrived in a body bag, inside a shipping casket; and that the cranium was empty—all that is nowhere to be found in the obituary but is spelled out in the HSCA (Purdy/Flanagan) Outside Contact Report, and it would have remained locked up until 2029, were it not for the JFK Records Act, which made it available in 1993/94. It only became available in 1981—a full 13 years earlier---because of Best Evidence.

In short, I played the major role in locating and interviewing (at length, and on camera) Paul O'Connor--and seeing to it that he was exposed, repeatedly, to a national television audience. None of that is mentioned in
the obit. Instead, the obit limits my involvement to this single sentence: "Mr. O'Connor was interviewed by David Lifton for Best Evidence”—as if events that happened in 1979-1981 can be ignored. They cannot and should not.

Starting in the Spring of 1981, Paul O’Connor’s face was all over the tv, in national broadcasts (e.g. Tom Snyder show) and in major news shows in individual cities across the country, where I was sent on tour, always carrying 3/4” video tapes of his account. Another burst of publilcity occurred on the 20th anniversary (1983), another on the 25th (1988) and still more on the 30th (1993).

As Paul himself said to me back then, “Thanks for putting me on the map, buddy.”

Of course, I realize that the obit ought to be focused on Paul O’Connor, not me; but we are inextricably linked because my book and video were the means by which Paul O’Connor’s critical information became available to the world. The obit, as currently written, misses all that entirely. Instead of being written about the events of 1977-1981, when all this occurred, its as if its focused on the year 2000, or who O’Connor was fraternizing with in the late 1990s, or what he said to William Law 22 years after I first interviewed him and filmed him.

Why in the world is there this misplaced emphasis? The role of B.E. is not just diminished, it is ignored. Further, what O’Connor had to say that was important is also ignored.

The result: that O'Connor's account, and its 3 key features (the way the body arrived--shipping casket, body bag, etc.--and the empty cranium)--is omitted.

That’s like writing an obit of Thomas Edison and omitting the fact that he discovered the electric light bulb.

For your reference, I’m attaching a chronology of my involvement with O’Connor. Perhaps what you generate in the future can be a more accurate reflection of this record."

11*22*63 A Space Absurdity, Corrected   :P

Thanks to composer Linda Z at Facebook Group JFK ASSASSINATION RESEARCH BUREAU

SBT supporters posit one of the reasons JFK's head and body goes "back and to the left" from the head shot is "neuromuscular reaction". Since I have a medical background Steve Rxx asked me if I could support him on it. Frankly, I've never heard of it before except I connection to the assassination (turns out Belin and Ford on the WC came up with it as an explanation - apparently finding an expert or experts who were willing to testify it exists). I need proof, so I googled around and found this wonderful explanation from a Canadian neurologist, Dr Robert Zacharko, on alt.assassination.jfk in response to a inquiry to him about this theory. Brace yourself, Steve. "Neuromuscular reaction" is complete pseudoscience hogwash.

The Backward Head Snap in the Zapruder Film

MTGriffith

9/3/99

I asked Dr. Robert Zacharko, a neuroscientist at Carleton University in Canada,
about the theory that JFK's backward head snap was caused by a neuromuscular
reaction. This is really the only theory that Warren Commission supporters
have to offer as an explanation for the violent backward movement of President
Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film. I wrote to Dr. Zacharko as follows:
In frames 312-313 of the Zapruder film, we see Kennedy's head knocked
forward, but then, suddenly, beginning in frame 314, we see his head and
upper body jolted violently backward and to the left as the rightfrontal
area of his skull explodes. One theory says that this violent backward
motion was the result of a neuromuscular reaction. This reaction would
have had to occur in no more than 56 milliseconds. I have two questions
about this theory:

1. Some object to this theory on the basis that the reaction could not
have occurred so quickly. They point out that the fastest involuntary
reaction known to man is the eye blink, which takes about 40
milliseconds. They argue that this indicates that the backward head snap
would have taken longer to occur, since it involved much more mass. One
author phrases this objection as follows:

. . . it [the head] is suddenly driven forward between frames 312
and 313. Amazingly, in the very next frame, 314, it is already
moving backward, a movement it continues in succeeding frames until
the President's shoulders strike the seat cushion at Z321. . . .
The extremely small time factor combined with the relatively
large mass of the President's head would tend to rule out
such an explanation [i.e., the neuromuscular-reaction theory].
The fastest reflex reaction known to science--the startle
response--takes place over an interval of 40 to 200
milliseconds. Beginning with an eyeblink in 40 milliseconds,
the response wave moves the head forward in 83 milliseconds,
and then continues downward reaching the knees in 200 milliseconds.
The change in direction we observe [in the head snap] occurs in 56
milliseconds (1/18th/second), and involves not the negligible mass
of an eyelid but the considerable mass of a human head
moving forward with an acceleration of several g's.

What is your opinion on the speed of the alleged neuromuscular reaction?

2. One author has objected to the neuromuscular-reaction theory on the
following basis:

A "massive neuromuscular reaction," according to Messrs. Ford
and Belin, occurs when there is "massive damage inflicted to nerve
centers of the brain." The nerve centers of the brain are the
pons, the medulla, the cerebellum--all located in the rear of the
brain. According to the Warren Commission and the HSCA, the head
shot damaged the right cerebral hemisphere of Kennedy's
brain--not a nerve coordination center, not capable of causing
a "massive neuromuscular reaction."

The neuromuscular reaction that supposedly accounts for
the backward snap of Kennedy's head when struck by a
bullet from behind could happen only if a major coordinating
center of the brain is damaged. According to the x-rays and
autopsy photos that lone-gunman theorists champion as
evidence of a shot from behind, those areas of the brain
are intact.

What is your opinion of this objection to the neuromuscular-reaction
theory?

Dr. Zacharko responded as follows in an e-mail dated 8 February 1999:

If you ask any neuroscientist what a neuromuscular effect is they will
tell you that it refers to some interface of nerve and muscle for
example. In some cases a simple reflex response (e.g., knee jerk for
example). Can certain reflexes be influenced? Certainly. Do head
movements fall into such a category? No. The head movements that you are

referring to are following the laws of physics. With all due respect to
Belin and Ford I would ask what medical references or more precisely what
research references are being using to document arguments of
neuromuscular reactivity. Simply stated there are none. The pons and
medulla contain centres for respiration, cardiovascular regulation,
visceral reactivity and the like. The cerebellum is also present at this level.
Damage to these areas will interrupt respiration and heart rhythm
and affect motor coordination. Neural damage per se associated with
bullet entry will not cause exaggerated head movement of the type you see
in the Zapruder film. In fact there are no brain sites that will. This
neuromuscular reactivity argument is simply nonsense.[Note: One could
make the argument, ludicrous as it may sound, that Kennedy actually saw
the bullet approaching and jerked his head back reflexively to avoid
being hit.]

The second author does not appear to be any more informed than either
Belin or Ford. There is no such thing as a major coordinating centre.
Those arguments were largely discounted in the 1960's. The brain simply
does not act in such a fashion. It is a coordinated system. Actually
there is a system which is referred to as the extrapyramidal motor
system, which runs from the mesencephalon to the forebrain. It controls
voluntary movement. If this system was to discharge, you would effect
gross motor output. Such discharge would typically represent the invasion
of seizure like activity to motor areas. It would not be coordinated and
certainly not of the type evident in the Zapruder film.

The bottom line is that the head movements are reactions to the direction
of bullet entry. They are not the product of central nervous system
damage. It would almost seem that certain myths are maintained in the
absence of documented data. Information from half-sources of
documentation appear to blend with legitimate sources of information to
provide muddled scenarios.

Sincerely,

Dr Robert M. Zacharko
Life Sciences Research Building
Institute of Neuroscience
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

The neuromuscular-reaction theory is the principal hypothesis advanced by
lone-gunman theorists. It is untenable. Their other theory, the jet-effect
theory, is ludicrous. Even Larry Sturdivan told the HSCA that the force that
would have resulted from the right-frontal explosion would have been minimal
(and would have pushed the head leftward, not backward and to the left). In
short, lone-gunman theorists have no explanation for the marked backward head
snap.

Mike Griffith

********

Michael Griffith does a nice job on his webpage explaining how nothing could explain such a rapid motion - except the removal of frames in the Zapruder film
http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/6shots.htm
Reactions to Six Shots in the Zapruder Film
www.mtgriffith.com

The Warren Commission said only three shots were fired at President Kennedy. But there is compelling evidence in the Zapruder film alone that six shots were fired. We see reactions to shots in the following frames:
Unlike · · Unfollow Post · Share · about an hour ago

    You like this.
    Gerald Fxxx A *most* excellent contribution! Thank you. I used to say that reaction could not happen if the area nerve the pro-commission theorists said caused head movement could not have happened if it was blown to a billion pieces upon contact. I mean like if you hit with a stick, but this was an instantaneous explosion obviously seen on the Z-Film. Your contribution here has replaced my dumb-dumb words with intelligent speech! As far as a massive trial if America ever gets this case into a court room - as a Consitutional Lawyer would argue best - I believe using the argument "imperical data is then conversion as direct evidence" certainly applies here. The imperical data is the medical evidence well elaborated on here and in simple enough terms that is medical fact period, and *not* opinion. Science is fact. If argued, it is the fact argued and not a theory, but fact. So the fact established here in the parley is then imperical data for the case and means in a trial it is submitted as Direct Testimony as to the facts of the case and being - there was no nerve struck in the President's head by a weapon causing the head movement. It is compared to like a direct evidence as an authentic autopsy picture or X-Ray, or authentic bullet fragments etc as evidence presented as Direct Testimony and is the facts of the case. Opinions and theories by experts and so on are outside of the facts. From what I read, this is direct medical facts that are not argued but taught in all medical schools and practiced by their graduates. Great piece, than you!

A Final Lee Harvey Oswald Note

I must apologize I forgot about this point.

Once more and more came out to the Public about Lee Harvey Oswald, it lead to an obvious point of the trying to decide about him. There split the two views - one that he was "one of ours" (American good guy) who defected to USSR per his assignment as double agent, and two - was he actually a double agent bad guy working for the USSR. More simply, who's side was he on and working for - as it became apparent he was much more involved then being a simple "lone nut" that ran out on America and then vice versa from the USSR.

And so we go to Dallas on November 22, 1963 to the actual events immediately after the assassination up until Oswald himself was shot down in cold blood.

My thoughts are about if he was some American good guy spy working for the government as, one area, of spying on things going on between the United States and Cuba. I also turn to the many "testimonies" by Colonel F. Prouty about the U-2 Spy Plane events and how Oswald had a background in that in the military, and tying into his defection - that he did give up any information about that as part of defection, that it is required to "tell all" you know about the American Military as enemies of the USSR. With the information that came out, it was obvious in other words that Oswald was not a simple Private in the Army. The USSR was or became well aware of his Military service because he had a "loud" profile. He had a Top Secret position in the U-2 Spy Plane scenario. In those days of the Cold War - this was very loud and very spied upon and very sought out for defection from both sides - America and the USSR - trying to recruit traitors to learn military strengths secrets. It was simply routine and par for the course in those days. And so there is no doubt that the USSR was well aware of Oswald's military service background and that if he held back about the U-2 they would obviously have taken some action against him in a rejection in some manner instantly. And then was that the Soviet tactic played in sending him back to America - to make it appear to American Government that the Soviets were treating him well with employment and allowed the KGB niece's hand in marriage as to be "buttering him up" to finally tell all, and that he didn't and so he was returned to America?

But back to Dallas and as thoughts we go to he was an American good guy side again. This would make him an American "asset" as an FBI Informant or CIA or Military and so on. The key thought to focus on here is - was Oswald an American asset? And here we are just after 12:30 P.M. Dallas time Nov 22 1963. Within an hour and so and of all things an American Asset has just been arrested for killing a Police Officer and is going to be charged with assassinating the President of the United States who has just died. Now being an Asset, his whereabouts where known to them.

So picture it. Whether the FBI, CIA, etc they are hearing the news of the assassination and death and 2 plus 2 immediately goes to their Asset Oswald is employed right there at the assassination scene at Dealy Plaza, Dallas. Possibly they are thinking of others in other fashions. Obviously they would be now looking for any reports from their Assets about the assassination - anything they would know no matter how small or great.

So now get this - within those first hours their Asset is about to be charged with assassinating the President of the United States after already being charged with the murder of a Police Officer. Perhaps granting lightening reaction moves upon hearing the name Oswald, it would seem prudent then under all that is required by Law and responsibility and professionalism and expected common compliance that they would have rushed into Dallas Police Station and identify themselves and declare that they have arrested an Asset of the CIA or FBI or Military etc. The Dallas Police would have been assured it was proposterous that this Asset was involved in any manner whatsoever with the assassination of the President. At the worst, the Dallas Police and District Attorney may have argued there was far too much evidence Oswald shot an Officer and argued they were holding him on that, which again would have probably brought in their (FBI CIA etc) superiors who would have assured them the Asset Oswald in no way whatsoever was involved in shooting anyone and perhaps swear them to National Security and show them his record of service as an Asset to convince them and then order his release. The Local News would get stuck with word from the Dallas Police that in some manner the original suspect was indeed the wrong person and was released as having an airtight aliby etc.

BOTTOM LINE...... here is the point made, that if Oswald was a good-guy Asset of the American Government it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that he would have spent anymore than an hour in custody, as the Dallas Police would have been ordered by Federal Authority to release him immediately, identifying who he was and what he was doing working at the School Book Depository. Any further in time than the hour at most would have ended how it did into a complete on-scence Media Circus by the Free Press - and now that would have to be explained, and Asset compromised, that Asset Oswald was in some manner an undercover agent or informant working for the Government / Agency and was dismissed from charges and released. It is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the American Government / Agency would leave their Asset to the dogs (malicious prosecution) so that covert activities were not compromised by the Public exposure - even facing trial for the assassination of the President - at the expense of the Asset.

And what was further, it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the Oswald Rifle and any evidence found was not immediately being investigated as planted evidence and as Oswald said - making him a "patsy". The full investigation would have been just that - a now, full blown investigation into planted evidence as the murder weapon et al and by who and when and where of it all as being planted to frame their Asset. At that point, it would have been digestible by the Press and Public that an American Asset was set up for the crime and reveal that Oswald was indeed a double agent working for the American Government - a complete known and trusted Asset working under orders and admirably, and that now his undercover identity compromised and the attempted framing for the crimes left no other choice but to take Oswald into Protective Federal Custody and from public eyes and access.

If you indeed have been following my thesis here (and is in polished order in my ebook launched for publication available any minute now for download) and we go to the manner in which the true conspiracy was conducting themselves - we go to two more of their obvious plants then that fits into the entire scenario and as centerpiece as Oswald himself planted as false evidence as an apparent patsy to baffle investigation and was a kamikaze willing to die for it (foreknowledge of being shot in custody transfer). Not far fetched as Gary Powers himself (captured U-2 Pilot in USSR) had a suicide pill to take if caught. So they (real conspirators) persuade Oswald if he shot and killed the President, he would most likely get caught and have taken a suicide pill any way so why not make that work for us - plant you and evidence and then shoot you being transferred from the local Jail. Two more pieces of "plants" ......


Two more pieces of "plants" ......

As the "pristine bullet" was planted on the stretcher as well as the Oswald rifle etc., the Conpirators were as handing American Investigation their "cover story" for a full blown clandestine investigation ongoing. Here they plant Oswald and the rifle and the bullet and fragments and the pristine bullet ends up the "single bullet theory" that was handed to them - not Arlon Spector inventing that, it was that already by the planted evidence - one bullet did it. So as mocking American Investigation - they plant Oswald with giving them the ability to publicly state that Oswald was an American Asset and apparently being framed and has been taken into Federal Protection. Then they have Oswald where they want him - for full interrogation secretly and out of the sight and minds of the Public.

So get this - they also had Billy Nolan Lovelady planted (Oswald look alike outside on Depository steps at time of shooting) so that they are giving the Dallas Police their cover story as the Government / Agency comes in within the hour explaining Oswald and having him released - the Dallas Police then go public and say Oswald was a mistaken person apprehended and actually they were looking for Billy Nolan Lovelady (feasible, they are lookalikes) - and then they go public with that Lovelady had an airtight aliby as he was seen on the steps outfront during the shooting itself (Altgens photo, others).

Now get this.... then after clearing Oswald and Lovelady, the American Investigation is handed the next "plant of evidence" of the clown behind the Grassy Knoll fence that showed a Secret Service Badge at the time of the shooting to a Dallas Police Officer rushing to the scene who let him go. It is to dawn on the Dallas Police to now announce to Free Press that a full blown All Points Bulletin Manhunt is under way to find whoever identified themselves as Secret Service when there was none in service that day at that position, that the Secret Service themselves declare it was an imposter and is now wanted in the case. So these all are the plants handed American Investigation with the premise that if they had anything on the ball they would have ran the story that Oswald was indeed an Asset (as his background showed) and was taken into secret Protective Federal Custody being framed for the assassination (gun planted etc) and feasibly to the Public and Free Press if indeed they wanted to really interrogate Oswald in full privacy with chance to come clean with testifying Soviet involvement (conspirators) and clemency.

And so the real conspirators are there with their pre-judged opinion confirmed that in the crime of the century the Americans suck suck suck. They were handed Oswald on a silver platter for a real and secret National Security interrogation into his knowledge and participation in the conspiracy and completely missed "connecting the dots" because they live in complete naive delusions of grandeur of self worth and relevance and power in the world. 

Again - it is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the American Government would have allowed a good-guy Asset Oswald to be charged with the assassination of the American President and stay in Dallas Police Station jail cell going on 1, 2, 3 days and be gunned down in cold blood while in custody - abandoning him against duty and honor with his would-be noted Service to the United States of America as the Asset he performed - to leave him to stand trial and completely abandoning him altogether. It is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe that the Government / Agency would have come in at some later date and explain to some Judge those circumstances and have the trial aborted. They would have had Oswald released into their custody IMMEDIATELY OBVIOUSLY.

THIS HAS BEEN WRITTEN THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS AN INNOCENT PATSY UNINVOLVED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY - AS IS SHOWN HERE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE HE WAS AN AMERICAN GOOD-GUY UNDERCOVER SET UP AS A PATSY BY CONSPIRATORS AND THAT INDEED HE WAS AN AMERICAN TRAITOR WHO DEFECTED TO THE USSR AND GAVE INTELLIGENCE TO THE ENEMIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION. OSWALD WAS NOT INNOCENT AND UNINVOLVED. IN THAT VIEW RECEIVE RESEARCH RESULTS AS THERE ARE THOSE THAT KEEP SPREADING THE MISINFORMATION THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT AND UNINVOLVED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT J. F. KENNEDY.

LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS A TRAITOR - PERIOD !

HE WAS NONE OF OURS (AMERICA) OR THEY WOULD HAVE CLAIMED HIM AS ASSET AND HE NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATED.

--------------------

You might say here, back up, how could employee Lovelady be a plant if he was working there since 1961. Wouldn't he be a recent employee as Oswald if he was a part of that scenario? And you come to my gut feeling from a bird's eye view as taking an over all view of all the evidence and witnesses and general history of the assassination over and over again. Even with how many times each item is pinned as pin the tail to the donkey and makes sense over all, there is still that feeling something is missing - it is not a real truth looking at it, with all the best truth telling the event as even an 90 percent accuracy or better.... there is just that feeling that there was something much more sinister involved. There was no like claim to it like the modern day terrorists will give claim that they did such and such an atrocity and why. It is too obvious Oswald was not a lone nut assassin and that was that, no matter how hard the ostriches pray to that idol. Indeed it is that much of a conspiracy but then what came of that is the question. It doesn't seem visible in that immediate and ongoing future. What this leads to is my original feeling, perhaps an alternative theory, but actual impression altogether is that the USSR duped President Kennedy and America. The USSR appears to me as having planned the whole Cuban Missile Crisis as a farce a few years before it happened, as to be the whole "we surrender" scenario that played out after taking things to the brink of nuclear engagement probable....

So the duping, the set up, goes that the USSR at plot conception mushrooms to the fake set up of the Cuban Missile Crisis well orchestrated to seem real and surrender, and to then return on November 22 1963 in Dallas and literally blow Kennedy's brains out in broad daylight putting America and the World on notice as to who was in command of them with the message this is what any next American President will get if he tries to ever come against the USSR again with surrender or else ultimatums. And it plays out. Viet Nam and illegal surrounding nation's involvements including China go unpunished with no war Declaration. For macho bravado the Warren Commission gets called a cover up instead of a put it all away and let's run away and play ostrich in Viet Nam rather than prosecute the USSR and retaliate. It moves to assassinating MLK with the screw you Eisenhower and Kennedy and your Christian Civil Rights and right to assassinating Robert Kennedy with the don't even think about it - run for President and open the JFK Assassination Case for prosecution. From there to the invasion by the USSR into Czechoslovakia with the I dare you to do something about it. On and on up to sanctioning terrorism against the U.S. and Israel and promoting oil wars with O.P.E.C. - economic wars against the United States and a thousand events in between.

This is a good look at when the Cuban Missile Crisis was born - how deployed and escalating to the point of the crisis. Good history brief:
Cuban Missile Crisis
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1736.html

There is no way either, to simply believe the Cuban anti-communist crowd killed Kennedy when everyone knows it was the high ranking officer in command of the air support that disobeyed orders causing the fiasco they site over and over again. Neither does anybody really believe that rich businessmen assassinated Kennedy to get even richer over a drummed up lasting Viet Nam A Go-Go War. Nobody believes all the bullshidt handed out from bullshidt researchers about all the bullshidt scenarios of rich men of power did it. Bullshidt. Nobody believes the American mob did it either. None of those had the far reaching hands into what is always called the national cover up. None of any of those could orchestrate that much power and control. The whole LBJ was the power behind it all is as a child's tale made up, fantasy. None of all the tales of who did it - who financed it - hold water or make sense. Presidents in the world have not been killed for these flimsy reasons. No American President has ever been assassinated, or attempt, simply for financial gain. It was much bigger and much more sinister than a fistful of dollars. Recently watching the Oswald trial movie of 1977 I believe it was, there was one line that makes the sense. It went something like Oswald is the whole centerpiece and key to the assassination. You define Oswald and you define the conspiracy.

In defining Oswald to define the conspiracy - the one major part of all this is that Oswald predates the Kennedy Administration, and so does the Gary Powers U-2 Spyplane shoot down and capture. Oswald predates all this back to the Eisenhower Administation.

Lee Harvey Oswald as a Marine radar specialist in Japan and California, Oswald had access to extensive classified information regarding radars, flight patterns, and in particular the new US height-finding radar that would have been of exceptional interest to the KGB in regard to the U-2 spy flights. Oswald told US Embassy officials in Moscow that he intended to reveal sensitive information to the Soviets. In October 1959, after a two-year stint as a radar operator, Oswald became the first Marine to defect to the Soviet Union. Gary Powers, pilot of the U-2 flight downed in May, 1960, suggested that Oswald might have betrayed to the Soviets information that they used to shoot down the U-2. This seems very believable, and it would mean that Oswald had proved himself a loyal communist and one who had provided precious information to the USSR - so the KGB would have trusted him. Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in June 1962.

My pin the tail on the donkey was that, as reported and discussed by Colonel Fletcher Prouty that there was the stronger more powerful camera in the U-2 Spyplane that photographed the missile complex in Cuba confirming to the President their existence and status and used to expose them at the U. N. was the hah- hah America wins..... we caught you with your hand in the cookie jar and you thought all we had was the Gary Powers model camera (else why else would they have them out in the open like that if they knew they would be seen plainly). But the Kennedy assassination scenario here - its reasons - show a World conquest implication. American politics have been the posture as defending the peace and not any world conquest, even with the promoting of democracy worldwide. However the much more sinister act of this duping of America and then blow them away as the opposing super power seems to have accomplished that for some time as a world conquest act, and is actually what the Communist Manifesto International promotes - world conquest.


Mind boggling Oswald Doubles......
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/TwoLHOs.html

So Lovelady plant as early as 1961 in School Book Depository in Dallas ? The USSR new Oswald very well already, not far fetched at all considering the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred in the next year and assassination in the next.

This is finally what the eBook Table Of Contents looks like....

President John F. Kennedy 50th, Case Solved

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Chapter One
Sections:
1.1 Target Audience
1.2 Medical Evidence Basics
1.3 Triangulation Head Shots
1.4 Detractors Resolve

Chapter Two
Sections:
2.1 Autopsy Controlled
2.2 JFK Assassination Ordered by One Man
2.3 The Pink Elephant Gun
2.4 Satellite Jamming Defense
2.5 The Shooters
2.6 The Missing Brain
2.7 Zapruder Film Altered

Chapter Three
Sections:
3.1 Magic Bullets
3.2 Two More Magic Bullets
3.3 11-22-63 A Space Absurdity
3.4 Magic Wounds
3.5 Magic Rifles
3.6 Magic Parade Route
3.7 Magic Witness Deaths

Chapter Four
Sections:
4.1 Qualifying Governor Connally's Wounds
4.2 Dr. Pepper
4.3 Conspiracy Extends to MLK and RFK
4.4 Jean Dixon Prophecy
4.5 JFK Medical History
4.6 The Warren Remission

Chapter Five
Sections:
5.1 National Security Begins at Autopsy
5.2 National Security At Commission Hearings
5.3 National Security Partial Declassification
5.4 Judgment
5.5 Prologue
5.5.1 Prologue Continued
5.6 Epilogue

Chapter Six
Sections:
6.1 The 50 Year Law
6.2 Sample Ruling: Sequester D. A. Henry Wade
6.3 Sample Ruling: Terminology Assassin or Individual
6.4 Sample Ruling: Autopsy Dr. Earl Rose Medical Examiner
6.5 Sample Ruling: Legality of Warren Commission

Chapter Seven
Sections:
7.1 In The Final Analysis
7.2 Sources
7.3 About The Author

JFKCalc (Google spreadsheet of JFK witnesses and deaths and the calculations etc)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=1
SEE:
Reclaiming Science: the JFK Conspiracy: A mathematical analysis of unnatural deaths, witness testimony, altered evidence and media disinformation Paperback  – October 23, 2014
by Richard Charnin (Author)